• Skip to main content

Christopher L. Scott

  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Free Resources
  • Podcast

Christopher L. Scott

God, Do You Have This? (Habakkuk 1:12-2:1)

November 23, 2024 by Christopher L. Scott

The book of Habakkuk is a “theodicy” which is an “attempt to defend God’s omnipotence and goodness in the face of the problem of evil in the world.”[iii] The book of Habakkuk tells the story of a man asking God about the evil he sees occurring in his country and in the neighboring nations. It also reveals the struggles that Habakkuk has with what he sees and what he believes God should be doing.

            Many of us probably have the same questions that Habakkuk was asking. Questions such as, God do you know what’s going on? God when will you intervene? God why don’t you do something? God if you are good why do you allow evil, pain, and suffering?

            In this book we don’t get all of those answers at once. Just as each of the four gospels in the New Testament give us a portrait of Jesus from different sides and with a different emphasis, the book of Habakkuk answers our questions in a series of steps building upon each other. Each step gets us closer to understanding who God is and why He chooses to do what He does in the way He does.

            The first chapter of Habakkuk’s book focuses on Habakkuk’s problems. Habakkuk 1:1 serves as an introduction, and then we read about Habakkuk’s first question in Habakkuk 1:2-4 which we could summarize this way: How long will evil continue and when will you stop it? In these three verses he questions the inconsistency of God’s actions and God’s character.[iv]

            Next in Habakkuk 1:5-11 we read God’s first answer to Habakkuk which could be summarized in this way: I’m going to stop it, I know what’s going on, and you’ll be surprised how. God tells Habakkuk that He will use ungodly people (Babylon) and ungodly forces to purify His people who are acting ungodly.

            But God’s first answer raised a new problem for Habakkuk and that’s what we’ll examine together. Habakkuk’s second question of God in 1:12-2:1 questions the inconsistency of God’s character by asking why God would use the more serious sinners (Babylonians) punishing the less serious sinners (Judah).[v] Habakkuk is perplexed that the eternal holy God would send a nation more wicked than Judah to punish Judah, but Habakkuk waits for an answer. Let’s look at these three sections and an application for each together.

DECLARATION ABOUT GOD (1:12-13)

In Hebrew there are specific types of questions that expect a positive reply[vi] and Habakkuk’s question is one of those, “Are You not from everlasting, O LORD, my God, my Holy One? We will not die. You, O LORD, have appointed them to judge; and You, O Rock, have established them to correct. Your eyes are too pure to approve evil, and You can not look on wickedness with favor. Why do You look with favor on those who deal treacherously? Why are You silent when the wicked swallow up those more righteous than they?” (Habakkuk 1:12–13).[vii] While these appear as questions, they are actually declarations in the form of questions.[viii] These are rhetorical questions that expect the answer, “Yes of course.”[ix] With this perspective lets note a few key words from Habakkuk 1:12-13.

            The name of God deserves our attention. “LORD” is used two times in Habakkuk 1:12. It’s in all capital letters in our English translation which tells us it’s a translation of YHWH[x] or transliterated as Yahweh. Some believe it comes from the verb, “to be” in Hebrew.[xi] Yahweh was the covenant name of God (Exod 3:14). The use of this name for God by Habakkuk indicated God’s covenant faithfulness and would evoke confidence in the original hearers.

            The titles for God deserve our attention. Habakkuk calls God “Holy One” (v. 12b). This title describes how God transcends the affairs of people and nations. He will not allow sin to go unpunished. Habakkuk also calls God “Rock” (v. 12e).This title views God as a place where someone can go and be safe from danger. It pictures God as a place of safety and protection for His people. It evokes feelings of permanence and stability.

            The attributes of God deserve our attention. Habakkuk describes God as “everlasting” (v. 12a).This was a reminder of the Lord’s saving history in Israel. Next Habakkuk describes God’s “eyes” (13a). This is an “anthropomorphism” which is the attribution of human features to God. Here it describes God’s omnipotence in how He sees everything going on in the world. God sees evil, but he does not condone evil or tolerate evil.

            The activities of God deserve our attention. We read that God has “established them to correct” (v. 12e). God is going to use the Babylonians to punish, but they will not overstep God’s sovereign will. (This was the message of God to Habakkuk in 1:5-11.)

            Lastly, the attitude of Habakkuk deserves our attention. Habakkuk almost seems relieved to know God is active, but God had not responded the way Habakkuk wanted. This is important to note: Habakkuk does not question that God punish Judah, but Habakkuk does question how God will use an evil nation to punish Judah. Habakkuk 1:11-12 reminds us of an important reality in the Christian life which is this.

We have confidence in the eternal God.

            For Habakkuk things are not looking good, but Habakkuk still believes God is good. Thingshave been bad for 300 years in Israel and Judah, and they are not getting better. Yet Habakkuk still has confidence in the eternal God as seen in Habakkuk’s addresses to God as “Lord” “Holy One” “Rock” and “Everlasting.” Pastor John MacArthur writes, “Although the prophet could not fully comprehend the sovereign workings of his righteous God, he expressed his complete faith and trust.”[xii] While the devastation of divine judgement was terrible, Habakkuk drew hope and consolation from God’s holiness and faithfulness.

            Reading about God’s potential judgment requires a reflection on God’s promises to Israel. Scripture written before the book of Habakkuk said God would remain faithful to the Patriarchs based on the covenant with Abraham (Gen 17:2-8; 26:3-5; 28:13-15). Scripture also revealed that God would remain faithful to Israel as they were the descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (Exod 3:3-15; Deut 7:6; 14:1-2; 26:16-18). Furthermore, God would remain faithful to the house of David in how God told David that David would always have a descendant on the throne (2 Sam 7:12-29).[xiii]

            While there were promises given to Israel then, God also gives promises to believers living today. Promises that we will always be tied to God because of His love (Rom 8:38-39). Promises that we are adopted as sons and daughters (Gal 3:26-27). These promises give us confidence in the eternal God.

            Where I live in Washington we sometimes experience snow and icy conditions in parking lots. One important element of walking on ice is to look for parts of a parking lot or sidewalk that do not have ice. When walking you look for the solid parts and step there. You avoid the slippery spots and walk on the solid parts. In a similar way, we rest and focus on the elements of God we know for sure. We don’t know everything about God, but we stick with what we do know. Pastor J. Vernon McGee once said, “My friend, do not be disturbed if you are not thinking as God thinks. You are not God. Unfortunately many folk try to take His place.”[xiv] What a blessing it is to have the benefit of confidence looking back at these things. But Habakkuk does not have that benefit. So let’s continue as he shares his concerns with God.

DESCRIPTION OF THE BABYLONIANS (1:14-17)

Helplessness of Humanity (vv. 14-15)

Habakkuk tells us about the helplessness of humanity by using the analogy of fishing, “Why have You made men like the fish of the sea, like creeping things without a ruler over them?” (Habakkuk 1:1). This is an analogy because fish have no leader and they’re easy to catch. These fish represent human society to the Babylonians. In other words, Judah is as helpless as fish and they are going to be easy to catch without a leader.

            Habakkuk tells us about the catch of the sea for the Babylonians, “The Chaldeans bring all of them up with a hook, drag them away with their net, and gather them together in their fishing net. Therefore they rejoice and are glad” (Habakkuk 1:15).  This is what the Babylonians do. The “Chaldeans” were a tribe within the Assyrian Empire that rose up and overtook the Assyrian Empire. Nabopolassar rose up into power in 625 BC and Nebuchadnezzar inherited the powerful kingdom in 605 BC. The Chaldeans were the original tribe name of the nation known as the Babylonians.

            The Babylonians had a tradition of driving a hook through the lower lip of their captives, stringing them together, and then walking them together in a single-file line as their captives.[xv] Brutality was seen when they captured king Zedekiah, killed his sons in front of him, then they gouged out his eyes (2 Kings 25:7).

Haughtiness of Babylonians (vv. 16-17)

The haughtiness of the Babylonians is seen in how they believe in themselves, “Therefore they offer a sacrifice to their net and burn incense to their fishing net; because through these things their catch is large, and their food is plentiful” (Habakkuk 1:16).  The Babylonians attributed their success to their own military might, worshipped what brought them success, loved their livelihood, enjoyed their luxury, and they lived by the plunder of the people that they conquered. Those helpless fish they gathered up indiscriminately and caught in their net were their life.

            The haughtiness of the Babylonians is also seen in how they battle anyone they want, “Will they therefore empty their net And continually slay nations without sparing?” (Habakkuk 1:17). They fill the net, empty it, then fill it again. As we read about the arrogance and self reliance of the Babylonians it reminds us as Christians about an important principle we follow.

We have confidence that we achieve nothing without god

The pride of the Babylonians we read here matches what we read earlier in this chapter, “Then they will sweep through like the wind and pass on. But they will be held guilty, they whose strength is their god” (Habakkuk 1:11). The Babylonians believed everything they achieved was because of their might. Their strength was their god. They believed that what they achieved was because of their effort. As a result there was no acknowledgement of a god in heaven that was allowing them to do what they were doing. And that’s why God will eventually bring them down.

            That same attitude can creep into our lives as believers if we’re not careful. If we’re not careful we might start to depend on our connections, creativity, experience, education, family, or innovativeness. We as Christians must remind ourselves that God is provider and sustainer of everything that we achieve and have. Everything we have is God’s blessing to us.

            All of our success is God’s provision for us. A parent might hear from a teacher that her kids are doing excellent in school. Give God the credit! Someone working in food service might receive grateful compliments from the people she is serving food. Praise God for the honor of doing the work! A mechanic on a car might receive good reviews online for his work. Let the glory go to God!

            I started working at the church I now serve in July of 2021 during COVID when a lot of people were not attending church in person. Within two years of me pastoring that church attendance had doubled in size. For me I had no other choice than to attribute the growth to God’s timing of when He had me start and with the fact that people were now attending church again in person.

            It’s important to praise God when things go well because it’s our human nature to attribute our success to our work instead of to God. The Swiss reformer John Calvin once wrote it was “necessary that God should empty us by his special grace, that we may not be filled with this satanic pride, which is innate, and which cannot by any means be shaken off by us, until the Lord regenerates us by his Spirit.”[xvi] Thus we remind ourselves that we have confidence we achieve nothing without God.

            In this section of Habakkuk’s response to God we are seeing Habakkuk’s experience. We have read about Habakkuk’s declaration that taught us we have confidence in the eternal God. We have read about Habakkak’s description that taught us we achieve nothing without God. Last, we see Habakkuk waiting for a reply.

DETERMINATION TO WAIT (2:1)

Cities in the seventh century often were built with stone towers on top of the city walls so a watchman could easily see approaching visitors. That’s the imagery that Habakkuk employs here[xvii] when he says, “I will stand on my guard post and station myself on the rampart; and I will keep watch to see what He will speak to me, and how I may reply when I am reproved” (Habakkuk 2:1). While the verse designations in our Bible were not originally placed there by the writers, I’d like to point out three characteristics of Habakkuk 2:1.

            The first is that he’s standing (v. 1a). It’s easy when experiencing struggles to get discouraged and sink down into confusion and hopelessness. Instead Habakkuk stands up, has his head high, his eyes are open, and he’s looking out. The second is he’s watching (v. 1b). Habakkuk compares himself to a watchman that keeps his eyes open for approaching messengers or danger. The third is he’s waiting (v. 1c). Habakkuk braces himself for a rebuke, “when I am reproved.” Habakkuk waits patiently for divine revelation.

            Old Testament scholar O. Palmer Robertson writes that Habakkuk “will not attempt to reconcile in his own mind the apparent contradiction between the election of Israel by God as the object of his special love and the devastation of Israel at the hands of the rapacious Chaldeans as ordered by the Lord himself. He will not resort to the sources of human wisdom. Instead, he will watch for an answer that can come from the Lord.”[xviii]

            Habakkuk expects to get a reply. Sometimes only God can answer. The last lesson we learn from this passage is this.

We have confidence that God will reply.

When God replies He might correct us or comfort us, but we should have confidence that He will reply to us. And we need a place to go to wait for His reply just as Habakkuk did.

            As this relates to us, we need a place to get above the mess we are in and get away from the distractions we face. It might be some quiet time in the morning with coffee and a Bible and a journal. It might be late at night after everyone is sleeping when you can quietly pray. Maybe you sneak away in the middle of the day and go sit in your car on your lunchbreak while at work.

            When we encounter tough times we usually respond in two ways. Sometimes we leave God. When we leave God we withdraw from Sunday worship, stop attending a weekly Bible study, quit giving, or discontinue serving. Sometimes we lean into God. When we lean into God we rigorously study His Word more, seek counsel from Godly friends or family, and spend more time in fellowship with church people.

            I want to encourage you to lean into God. He knows what you’re going through, He knows what you’re feeling, and He knows what to do. You can be confident that He will reply. These types of situations require a certain level of human responsibility. If God speaks, we must be ready to listen. And when we lean into God it shows Him that we are ready to listen and that we are ready for His correction or His comfort.

            Reading Habakkuk’s reply in these verses gives us confidence in the eternal God, confidence that we achieve nothing without God, and confidence God will reply.

CONCLUSION

I hope that reading through the book of Habakkuk causes us to admire the man Habakkuk. We find Habakkuk here waiting for God’s reply. He wants to honor God, to see God’s people change their lifestyle, and he wants to make Judah a place holy and honorable before God. Yet he has to wait for God’s reply.

            This is tough because we don’t like to wait. We’re taught waiting is bad. We’ve been trained that waiting is an enemy. We have ATMs that give us instant cash, same day deliveries from Amazon, meals made in minutes, as well as have movies, books, and music that appear instantly on our TVs, tablets, and phones when we want them. Author Jen Wilkin states, “But being able to wait is distinctly Christian. In fact, it’s a mark of Christian maturity.”[xix] We as Christians can wait and be confident.

            Sometimes the answers come immediately, but most of the time God reveals those answers much later—sometimes, months or years pass—then we finally get an answer from God for why He’s done what He did in our lives, for why He caused us to endure what we went through, and for why He allowed people to do or say certain things. While we wait we can have confidence in the eternal God, we can have confidence that we achieve nothing without God, and we can have confidence that God will reply.


[i] Originally prepared and delivered at Lakeview Missionary Church on April 30, 2023, third in a series “Reverent Wrestlings” from Habakkuk.

[ii] Christopher L. Scott serves as senior pastor at Lakeview Missionary Church in Moses Lake, WA.

[iii] Page Brooks and D. A. Neal, “Theodicy,” ed. John D. Barry et al., The Lexham Bible Dictionary (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2016).

[iv] Christopher L. Scott, “Wondering and Waiting: Habakkuk 1:1-4” in Word & Deed, vol XXVI Number 2 May 2024, 93-101.

[v] Habakkuk has good reason to be puzzled. In 722 BC the Assyrian army arrived in Israel in the north and wiped out Israel. As a result the nation had been removed from the ancient near eastern landscape. Habakkuk naturally wondered if that might be the same fate of Judah? These questions Habakkuk asks likely are in 607 BC.

[vi] Habakkuk 1:12 begins with the interrogative particle, halo.

[vii] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[viii] J. Ronald Blue explains, “In Hebrew, the form of the question-O LORD, are You not from everlasting?-requires an affirmative reply. It is as much a declaration as an interrogation” (J. Ronald Blue, “Habakkuk,” in The Bible Knowledge Commentary: An Exposition of the Scriptures, ed. J. F. Walvoord and R. B. Zuck, vol. 1 [Wheaton, IL: Victor Books, 1985], 1511).

[ix] The NET Bible (Biblical Studies Press, 2005).

[x] According to one lexicon it occurs 6,823 times in the Old Testament (Brown, Francis, Samuel Rolles Driver, and Charles Augustus Briggs. Enhanced Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew and English Lexicon. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1977).

[xi] Other forms based on the Hebrew are “God” from Elohim and “Lord” from Adonai.

[xii] MacArthur Study Bible (Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 1996), 1289.

[xiii] Richard Patterson, Habakkuk, Cornerstone Biblical Commentary, vol. 10 (Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House, 2008), 412.

[xiv] J Vernon McGee, Nahum and Habakkuk, Thru the Bible Commentary Series, vol. 30 (Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 1991), 80.

[xv] Numerous commentaries cite this. O. Palmer Robertson, The Books of Nahum, Habakkuk, and Zephaniah. The New International Commentary on the Old Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1990), 163 and Thomas Constable, Notes on Habakkuk, 2023 edition, p. 23. Accessed May 27, 2024, https://planobiblechapel.org/tcon/notes/pdf/habakkuk.pdf. Both Constable and Robertson cite the W. Rudolph, Micha-Nahum-Habakuk-Zephanja (sic), KAT 13/3, second edition (Gütersloh: Gerd Mohn, 1975), 211. Also see the “Stele of victory from Susa” which depicts enemies caught in a net from 2371-2316 BC (Cultural Backgrounds Study Bible, [Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2019], 1551).

[xvi] John Calvin and John Owen. Commentaries on the Twelve Minor Prophets (Bellingham, WA: Logos Bible Software, 2010), 52.

[xvii] Other prophets used a similar image of a watchtower to explain their attitude of expectation (Isa 21:8; Jer 6:17; Ezek 3:17; 33:2, 33)

[xviii] Robertson, Habakkuk, 165.

[xix] Jen Wilkin, “Waiting on the Word,” Christianity Today, April 2022, p. 30.

Filed Under: Habakkuk, Sermons

God’s Got This (Habakkuk 1:5-11)

November 23, 2024 by Christopher L. Scott

We’ve all heard news that was too good to be true. Statements on the radio or YouTube tell us: “You’ll never have to pay an energy bill again after you put solar panels on your house,” or “Drinking a glass of water before bed will cause you to lose 30lbs in a month,” and my personal favorite, “This kind of chocolate is healthy and good for you.”

            While those statements are too good to be true, the people living in Judah in 606 BC were about to receive news that was too bad to be true. When they heard it they might have said, Could you repeat that? or I heard what you said, but it was so odd, I must have misunderstood you.

            Habakkuk 1:1-4 recorded Habakkuk’s complaints and cry out to God. Habakkuk pleaded with God to do something about the evil, wickedness, and violence that Habakkuk saw occurring in the nation of Judah. In Habakkuk 1:5-11 we read God’s response to Habakkuk.

GOD’S INTENTION OF DISCIPLINE    

            Habakkuk 1:5 serves as an introduction to this oracle of judgement. “Look among the nations! Observe! Be astonished! Wonder! Because I am doing something in your days— You would not believe if you were told.”[i] God breaks the silence Habakkuk endured as Habakkuk shared, “How long O Lord, will I call for help, and You will not hear?” (v. 2). That question is answered now. God has been doing something. When the text says “Look” and “Observe” and “Be Astonished!” and “Wonder!” those are all plural imperatives[ii] in the Hebrew text that emphasize two things. First, there is an urgency of what is commanded that they look and take note. Second, as plurals these words are addressed to the nation of Judah, not only to the prophet Habakkuk.

            Habakkuk is learning God has not been idle while Habakkuk asked his question. Habakkuk is learning God’s silence does not equal indifference, that God is already working on specific plans, and that God’s answers are not what Habakkuk wanted. Habakkuk had thought God would turn the people from wickedness to righteousness. He thought God would turn the people to the temple and away from pagan gods. He thought God would turn the king to God and way from idolatry.

God is sovereign in how He deals with all people.

            God surprises them in what He does and what God does reminds them about God’s sovereignty. The late Warren Wiersbe explained, “God gave Habakkuk a revelation, not an explanation, for what we always need in times of doubt is a new view of God. The Lord doesn’t owe us any explanations, but He does graciously reveal Himself and His work to those who seek Him.”[iii] This new view is that God is sovereign.

            Theologian John Fienberg defines sovereignty this way, “God’s power of absolute self-determination … God’s choices are determined only by his own nature and purposes…. God’s sovereign will is also free, for nobody forces him to do anything, and whatever he does is in accord with his own purposes and wishes.”[iv]

            We know God is sovereign from different areas. We know God is sovereign from Scripture. Psalm 103:19 tells us, “The LORD has established His throne in the heavens, And His sovereignty rules over all.” And 1 Chronicles 29:11 reveals, “Yours, O LORD, is the greatness and the power and the glory and the victory and the majesty, indeed everything that is in the heavens and the earth; Yours is the dominion, O LORD, and You exalt Yourself as head over all.” We also know God is sovereign from His names in Scripture, “God Most High” (Genesis 14:18–20), “God Almighty” (Genesis 17:1), “Master & Lord, Jesus Christ” (Jude 4). And we know God is sovereign from world history, “you O king, are the king of kings, to whom the God of heaven has given the kingdom, the power, the strength and the glory; and wherever the sons of men dwell, or the beasts of the field, or the birds of the sky, He has given them into your hand and has caused you to rule over them all” (Daniel 2:37–38).

            Scripture makes it clear that God is sovereign in how He deals with all people. Bible teacher Kenneth Barker comments on Habakkuk 1:5,

The Lord’s answer indicates his sovereignty. He is not bound by the listener’s whims or by their standards of “fairness.” He responds according to his sovereign will. He is the Lord of history who works in history to accomplish his purpose. Habakkuk’s questions reflect the questions of many people. Especially when we deal with personal affronts, difficulties, and disappointment, we desire to know where God is and what he is doing. Habakkuk reminds us that God is at work even if it appears He is not. He is the Lord of the universe who works to accomplish his purposes in his world and in our lives.[v]

            So Habakkuk learns God is sovereign in what God does, next Habakkuk learns God is sovereign in who God chooses.

GOD’S INSTRUMENT OF DISCIPLINE[vi]

            Habakkuk 1:5 is an introduction to the oracle of judgement and Habakkuk 1:6-11 is the explanation.

The Destruction by the Babylonians

            “For behold, I am raising up the Chaldeans” (Habakkuk 1:6a). The Hebrew word, kasdim, is translated as “Chaldeans”[vii] in the NASB but this group of people is better known by another name: Babylonians (see NIV and NLT). The Babylonians were a tribe within the Assyrian Empire that rose up and overtook the Assyrian Empire. Nabopolassar rose up into power in 625 BC and Nebuchadnezzar inherited the powerful kingdom in 605 BC.[viii]

            This was surprising for two reasons. One, that a small group within the nation of Assyria could rise up and overtake Assyria. Two, that God would allow a foreign wicked evil nation to punish the nation of Judah.

            In the book of Habakkuk we see God using ungodly people and ungodly forces to punish and purify His people in Judah who were acting ungodly.

The Description of the Babylonians

            Their size is described, “That fierce and impetuous people who march throughout the earth to seize dwelling places which are not theirs” (Habakkuk 1:6).The word “That” begins a list of twenty different features of the Babylonians.

            Their status is described, “They are dreaded and feared; their justice and authority originate with themselves” (Habakkuk 1:7). They do whatever they wanted. There was no judge but themselves, and no law but themselves.

            Their speed is described, “Their horses are swifter than leopards and keener than wolves in the evening. Their horsemen come galloping, their horsemen come from afar; they fly like an eagle swooping down to devour” (Habakkuk 1:8). We want to take Scripture in a simple straightforward literal way except in some cases when that seems impossible. For example, “horses are swifter than leopards” is hyperbole (an exaggeration that’s used to say more than is literally meant.)[ix] Babylon was 600 miles east of Judah. The essence here is that distance will not make a difference.

            Their success is described, “All of them come for violence. Their horde of faces moves forward. They collect captives like sand” (Habakkuk 1:9). Whatever they look at they take for themselves.

            Their scoffing is described, “They mock at kings and rulers are a laughing matter to them. They laugh at every fortress and heap up rubble to capture it” (Habakkuk 1:10). An example of the Babylonians’ brutality was seen when they captured king Zedekiah, killed his sons in front of him, then they gouged out his eyes (2 Kings 25:7). The phrase, “heap up rubble to capture it” refers to piling up dirt to a wall so they could capture it. Nothing could stop the Babylonians. The lesson is this: everyone should fear the nation that has no fear.

God is just in how He deals with Israel in a specific way.

            God had a unique relationship with Israel. He made a promise with Abraham marking out one family and one nation (see Genesis 11:10-Exodus 18:27).[x] God also gave the Mosaic Law which was 613 laws for a life of obedience following God (see Exodus 19:1-Acts 1:26).[xi] The people were responsible to keep the law (James 2:10) but they failed (Romans 10:1-3).             

            The goal of the promise with Abraham and the Law with Israel was to make Israel a kingdom of priests as described in Exodus 19:6 when God said to Israel, “and you shall be to Me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation.”[xii] Before Moses died he gave two promises to Israel. The first promise was for blessings on the nation of Israel if they followed God’s laws faithfully (Deuteronomy 28:1-14). The second promise was of curses that would come upon Israel if they disobeyed God and His word (Deuteronomy 28:15-68).[xiii]

            I say all of this because we—as Americans—shouldn’t insert ourselves into these prophecies in Habakkuk because God hasn’t made a promise with America like He did Israel.

            Israel’s prophets warned them that God would allow Gentiles to overrun Judah because of their disobedience to God (Deuteronomy 28:49-50; 1 Kings 11:14, 23; Jeremiah 4; 5:14-17; 6:22-30; Amos 6:14), but the people did not believe this would happen (Jeremiah 5:12; 6:14; 7:1-34; 8:11; Lamentations 4:12; Amos 6). Therefore God allowed Gentile nations to conquer them. God was doing to Israel what He told Israel He would do if they refused to return to Him. God was dealing with them because God had warned them.

            While we’ve seen God reveal to Habakkuk who this nation is (Babylon) and what they are like (powerful and wicked). Next God reveals what Babylon will do.

GOD’S IMPLEMENTATION OF DISCIPLINE

            While Habakkuk 1:5 was the introduction and Habakkuk 1:6-10 was the explanation, now we see Habakkuk 1:11 is the climax: “Then they [Babylonians] will sweep through like the wind and pass on. But they will be held guilty, they whose strength is their god.”

            We see that the Babylonians will reign and nothing will stop them. (Only God is going to be able to stop them). As one Bible teacher has said, “God may seem to be strangely silent and inactive in threatening circumstances. He sometimes gives unexpected answers to our prayers. And He sometimes uses unlikely instruments to correct His people.”[xiv] That unlikely instrument is the nation of Babylon.

            But we also see that the Babylonians source of their reign will be temporary. The phrase, “whose strength is their god” indicates that their strength will be their demise. Their might will cause their downfall.

God is gracious in how he deals with us in a different way.

            Let’s look at Acts 13:39-41 to see how God interacts with us differently now than He did with Israel then:

And through Him [Jesus] everyone who believes is freed from all things, from which you could not be freed through the Law of Moses. Therefore take heed, so that the thing spoken of in the Prophets may not come upon you: “Behold, you scoffers, and marvel, and perish; for I am accomplishing a work in your days, a work which you will never believe, though someone should describe it to you.”

            Let me explain the significance of these three verses. There are different ways to outline the book of Acts. There’s a geography outline focusing on what occurs in Jerusalem (chapters 1-7), Judea (chapter 8), and Samaria (chapters 9-28). There’s also a ministry outline profiling the ministry of Peter (chapters 1-12) and Paul (chapters 13-28). The outline I want to emphasize is the Gospel outline in which the Gospel is directed toward the Jews (chapters 1-10) and then to the Gentiles (chapters 11-28). God makes it clear in the book of Acts that God is no longer using one nation—Israel—to display glory. No longer is Israel the mediator. Now all people have access to God through one man: Jesus Christ.

            There are some important meanings for us to understand. We are part of that offer to the Gentiles. When Christ died on the Cross He fulfilled the Law (Acts 13:39). The end of that Law is why we don’t sacrifice a lamb at the end of our church services, why we worship on Sunday(the day of the resurrection) not Saturday(the day of the Sabbath), and why we don’t practice the feasts of the Old Testament. We are living in the time of grace. We interact with God because of the grace offered to us. We are not interacting with God based on the Law that was given to Israel. We don’t have the same obligations as Israel under the Law because we are Gentiles living in the age of grace.

            There are some implications for us because of that grace. If you forgot to pray this morning or didn’t read your Bible yesterday you don’t have to worry about God sending lightening to strike you and correct you. God is not going to give you all red lights on your way to work on Monday to punish you for forgetting to put your tithe check in the offering plate on Sunday. We don’t worship a fickle god that has petty disagreements with us. We worship a God that gave His Son to die for us and His desire is that we place our faith in His son and obediently follow Him.

CONCLUSION

            Christ coming displayed God’s grace of salvation. Under grace the responsibility of man is to accept the gift of righteousness offered freely through Jesus Christ to all people (Romans 5:15-18). There are two important elements of the time of grace. One is that we get blessed through grace. Another is that grace is offered to all. God no longer is dealing with one people—Israel—now He is interacting with all mankind (as seen from Acts 2:1 through Revelation 19:21).[xv]

            And that’s the news that is too good to be true. That God loved the world so much that He gave His Son—through the nation of Israel—to offer salvation to all the world. That faith in His Son gives eternal life. That’s news that is good and true.


[i] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[ii] An imperative in Hebrew is “urgent or demanding immediate, specific action on the part of the addressee” (Bruce Waltke and M O’Connor, An Introduction to Biblical Hebrew Syntax [Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 1990], 571).

[iii] Warren Wiersbe, Be Amazed (Colorado Springs, CO: David C. Cook, 2012, 2nd edition), 136-137.

[iv] John Feinberg, No One Like Him (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2006), 294.

[v] Kenneth L. Barker, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, vol. 20. The New American Commentary (Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers, 1999), 302.

[vi] Outline for this section is slightly adapted from J. Ron Blue, “Habakkuk” in Bible Knowledge Commentary: Old Testament, edited by John Walvoord and Roy Zuck (Colorado Springs, CO: David C. Cook, 1985), 1510.

[vii] In Hebrew, כַּשְׂדִּים

[viii] B. T. Arnold, “Babylon” (pp. 53-60) edited by Mark J. Boda and Gordon J. McConville, Dictionary of the Old Testament: Prophets (Downers Grove, IL; Inter-Varsity Press, 2012), 59.

[ix] Thomas Constable, Notes on Habakkuk, 2023 edition, p. 19, footnote 3, accessed November 23, 2023, https://planobiblechapel.org/tcon/notes/pdf/habakkuk.pdf.

[x] Charles Ryrie, Dispensationalism (Chicago, IL: Moody, 2007), 61-63.

[xi] Ibid., 63-64.

[xii] “Their role thenceforth would be to mediate or intercede as priests between the holy God and the wayward nations of the world, with the end in view not only of declaring his salvation but also of providing the human channel in and through whom this salvation would be effected.” (Eugene H. Merrill, Kingdom of Priests, 2nd ed. [Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2008], 98.

[xiii] There are four times as many curses as there are blessings, either to follow Ancient Near East (ANE) treaties or to foreshadow the future failure of Israel to keep the covenant.

[xiv] Constable, Notes on Habakkuk, p. 21.

[xv] Ryrie, Dispensationalism, 64.

Filed Under: Habakkuk, Sermons

Wondering and Waiting (Habakkuk 1:1-4)

November 23, 2024 by Christopher L. Scott

Most of us have been mesmerized by the pictures we’ve seen of our earth taken from space. Those pictures from space reveal the beautiful oceans, the various continents, the perfectly round shape of the earth, as well as the clouds and weather we can see developing on earth. It looks like the most beautiful place in the galaxy. The earth from those pictures looks peaceful, clean, and calm. Those pictures of our world are nothing but majestic.

            Yet, while the earth looks so beautiful when you are tens of thousands of miles away, those of us that live on earth don’t see the same beauty. When we live on earth we live in the midst of a different world. When we live on earth we see dust blown up by the wind, violence among animals, pollution from creation, injustice by humans, sadness in our communities, and we see suffering.

            In the midst of this we often ask God: Do you know what’s going on? When will you intervene? Why don’t you do something? If you are good why do you allow pain, suffering, and evil?

            The Old Testament book of Habakkuk was written 2600 years ago, yet it deals with a modern problem and common questions we all experience. The book of Habakkuk answers our questions because Habakkuk was asking the same questions then that we ask now. Thankfully, we don’t just read about Habakkuk’s questions, we read about God’s answers.

HABAKKUK’S CALL

“The oracle which Habakkuk the prophet saw.” (Habakkuk 1:1, NASB)[i]

The Prophet

His name, “Habakkuk” (חֲבַקּ֖וּק) only shows up two times in the Bible (Hab 1:1; 3:1). But the book of Habakkuk is quoted several times in the New Testament. Habakkuk 2:4 is quoted by Paul (Rom 1:17; Gal 3:11) as well as by the author of Hebrews (Heb 10:38) and Habakkuk 1:5 is quoted by Paul in a sermon that Luke records in Acts 13:41.

            While nothing in Scripture describes Habakkuk, we can make some conclusions about him from what we read. Habakkuk likely was an officially ordained prophet who was part of the temple liturgical singing. He appears well educated, deeply sensitive, and based on his literary style he was as much of a poet as a prophet.[ii] He also was probably a composer of music or led worship in the table based on the musical notations of Hab 3:19. Habakkuk likely recorded this book in 606-604 BC, under king Jehoiakim (Jer 22:15-17; 2 Kings 23:34-24:5). This means he lived in the final dark days of the southern nation of Judah.

The Oracle

The word, “oracle” (מַשָּׂא) (NLT, “message”, NIV, “prophecy” or literally “burden”) is “a pronouncement or message from God to people.”[iii] In the Old Testament there are three types of oracles:Judgement, blessing, and salvation.[iv] The book of Habakkuk is an oracle of judgement against the evil of the nation of Judah, its kings, its people, and its rulers.

            While most prophets in the Old Testament brought God’s messages to the people, Habakkuk is different. Habakkuk brings the people’s questions to God. And that starts here in verses two and three.

HABAKKUK’S CRY

“How long, O Lord, will I call for help, And You will not hear? I cry out to You, ‘Violence!’ Yet You do not save. Why do You make me see iniquity, And cause me to look on wickedness? Yes, destruction and violence are before me; Strife exists and contention arises.” (Habakkuk 1:2–3)

How Long?

Habakkuk is perplexed by the common wickedness he sees. He wonders why God doesn’t do something about it. Based on these two verses it’s clear he has been asking these questions for a while,[v] but he’s not getting a response. And because he hasn’t received a response he wonders what was going on. Habakkuk is frustrated and exasperated.

            Habakkuk has probably been trying to fix the situation. He probably had given sermons, taught classes, held seminars, conducted counseling, sang songs, wrote “letters to the editor,” and possibly conducted PR campaigns to try to get the people to return back to God from their wicked ways.  

Why?

In verses two and three we see Habakkuk pile up the synonyms as he describes what was going on among the people in Judah: “violence” (vv. 2, 3), “iniquity” (v. 3), “wickedness” (v. 3), “destruction” (v. 3), “strife” (v. 3), “contention” (v. 3). Charles Ryrie describes that “the strife and contention was between the Jewish people themselves, not with their enemies.”[vi] Habakkuk’s issues were with his neighbors in the city of Jerusalem, his fellow priests, and political rulers under whom he served. Because of this God is going to send a foreign nation to punish them.

            We are hearing about the hurting heart of Habakkuk. He has not received an answer from God, he sees wickedness continue in his nation, he feels like God is distant, and he probably feels alone.

 Questions of God should occur in the context of trust of God.

Throughout Scripture there are many biblical examples of people asking God questions but not getting answers. David (Pss 13:1-4; 22:1, 11, 19-20), Asaph (Pss 74:1-2, 10-11), and the Sons of Korah (Pss 88) are just a few of the examples from the Psalms.

            When we read about Habakkuk and see other examples of people asking God questions but not receiving answers it reminds us that our questions should focus on God’s work, not God’s character. We question what God does, not who God is. We can question God’s actions, but we should never question His deity. Additionally, our questions should be directed toward God. We should talk to God, not about God to others. We should complain to God, not about God to others. It’s okay to ask questions such as: “God, are you doing your job?” “God, if feels like you don’t care?” “God, I wonder if you are paying attention?” “God, are you taking a day off?

            I believe we can say these things and still be respectful for who God is even if we question what He does. However, this is a fine-line. A child asking a parent, “Why do you want me to eat all my vegetables?” is very different than the child asking, “Why do I need to do what you say?”

            We can trust God because of His character. We know God is omniscient (all-knowing), omnipotent (all-powerful), and holy (just and perfect). Yet, the more we know Him, the more we trust Him. It is important that we must not believe that God’s silence is a sign of His indifference or inactivity (see Dan 10:12-14 for proof). In the midst of our struggles, sufferings, and problems we need to recognize the long-range plans that God has and that God is putting together even though those long-range plans never make sense at the beginning.

            We must remember that God can see the whole picture but that we cannot. We’ve seen Habakkuk’s cry and his questions he asks from a place of trust and next we see Habakkuk’s heart and concern.

HABAKKUK’S CONCERN

“Therefore the law is ignored And justice is never upheld. For the wicked surround the righteous; Therefore justice comes out perverted.” (Habakkuk 1:4)

The Law

The “law” here is the Hebrew word, torah, (תּוֹרָה) which was the authoritative teaching of God’s Old Testament that revealed God’s will and was supposed to direct the life of God’s people in righteousness. “When used in the singular without clear definition, as here, torah signifies God’s covenantal code established with Israel, given through Moses and set forth particularly in the book of Deuteronomy (e.g., Dt 1:5; 4:8; 17:18-19; 31:9; 33:4; Jos 8:31-32)”[vii]

            But the law was ineffective.The law, apparently is “ignored.” (NIV translates it as “paralyzed”). In other words, the Law has had no effect on the people. It has literally been “numbed” in the lives of the people in Judah. The people are not respecting the Law or giving authority to it. The Law in the life of the people of Judah was like cold numb hands that try to tie a fishing knot. The Law had been considered pointless.

The Situation

Sin was ruling in the land. The rulers were not administering justice to those that needed it. Corruption and lawlessness were part of the situation they were living under. But how bad was it? Habakkuk lived under King Jehoiakim of Judah. Jehoiakim ruled in Judah 609-605 BC under Egypt’s oversight and 605-601 under Babylon’s oversight. During his rule Jehoiakim killed innocent people who opposed him, refused to pay poor laborers (2 Kings 23:35-37; Jer 22:13-19), he killed Uriah the prophet for prophesying that Jerusalem would fall (Jer 26:20-23), and he burned the prophet Jeremiah’s hand-written prophecy (Jer 36). Furthermore, prophets and priests were known to commit adultery and abuse their authority under his rulership (Jer 23:1-2, 9-11).[viii]

Questions of evil and suffering should acknowledge we live in a fallen world.

One of the modern myths we need to extinguish as Christians is that if we become Christians all our problems will go away. When we become Christians our basic spiritual problem of being separated from God because of sin is fixed, but there’s still the problem that we live in a fallen world. We live in a world that does not follow God’s laws and that is ruled under Satan’s program (John 12:31; 2 Cor 4:3-4). This means life won’t always go as planned for us as Christians. This means we need to acknowledge that the world in which we live in is sinful, and that sinful world pollutes our lives.

            When things don’t go the way we think they should we need to remind ourselves that there is injustice in this world. We need to remind ourselves that the sin of the Old Testament still effects us today. In the book of Genesis Adam and Eve committed the original sin (Gen 3), then Cain kills Abel (Gen 4), then God sends the Flood to wipe out the earth because of sin (Gen 6), then God disseminates the people because they were prideful wanting to build a tower to the heavens (Gen 11), then God wipes out Sodom and Gomorrah because of the sin there (Gen 18). That’s a lot of sin for only half of one book of the Bible! And if that’s not bad enough for you, read the book of Judges, 2 Kings, or Jeremiah.

            Consider Habakkuk who was probably a priest in the temple, he likely taught the Law, possibly led singing (Hab 3:19), and he likely enjoyed a good and safe life in Jerusalem. But as we will learn from Habakkuk 1:5-11, God is going to send the nation of Babylon to punish Judah for their sins. Habakkuk is going to endure the Babylonians coming simply because of the fallen world, not because of what he did or didn’t do. Nothing Habakkuk has done has caused God’s punishment to come on Judah, yet Habakkuk still has to endure it.

            Pain, evil, and suffering are the fault of the world we live in, not God. God gave us the freedom to make choices and a byproduct of that freedom is that sometimes the choices that others make hurt us. Sometimes our choices hurt us, but those are easier to wrestle with because we know who to blame: us. But when other people’s decisions effect us negatively, those are the hard situations to endure.

            When I lived in Texas I knew a guy who raised his daughter to love God and follow God. She graduated college and married a man that wanted to be a pastor. She supported him as he went to seminary and served in his first pastor position. But after he had been a pastor a few years he felt like he should be in the Air Force instead of being a pastor. Again she supported him and his decision to leave Christian ministry to join the Air Force and pursue his dream to be a pilot. Soon she found herself alone with their three kids while her husband was flying around the world in the Air Force with his female copilot. It wasn’t too much longer till the man announced he felt he wasn’t supposed to be married to his wife, instead he believed he was supposed to marry his female copilot. The woman I knew found herself divorced, alone, and caring for her three children while the ex-husband was flying around the world with his new wife.

            May I say something clearly and directly? Nothing that woman did caused her to have to experience the hurt and pain and shame that she has had to endure. She did everything right. She chose a spouse that loved God, she supported him through Seminary to be a pastor, she supported him as a pastor, she supported his dream to be a pilot in the Air Force, yet she ended up middle aged and divorced with three kids by herself.

            When we have questions about suffering like this we need to acknowledge that we live in a fallen world. Sometimes we experience pain and suffering that was not caused by anything that we did. But it’s important we remember that our viewpoint is limited, much like the view of the earth was 100 years ago.

CONCLUSION

For more than a thousand years we knew the earth was round, but we could not prove that the earth was round. We knew it intellectually, but we could not prove it physically. That was until 1931 when Captain Albert Stevens, an officer in the U.S. Army Air Corps, took his airplane to 21,000 feet above the earth and took a picture of the Andes Mountains in front of him which are 22,838 feet above the earth. If the earth was flat the Andes Mountains should have been level or slightly above the horizon of his picture which he took 287 miles away. But the Andes mountains were well below the horizon of his picture, thus serving as the first physical evidence that the earth was round.[ix] For years we knew intellectually that the earth was round, but we couldn’t prove it or see it physically.             And that’s sometimes how it works for us when we as Christians are in pain and suffering. We know that God is good. We know God loves us. We know God has a plan. But it’s hard to endure because we can’t see His plan. We can’t see the whole picture that God is painting. But we can trust that in the future after we’ve endured pain and suffering, that God will show us the full picture and we will understand his perspective.


 

[i] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

 

[ii] J. Ron Blue, “Habakkuk” in The Bible Knowledge Commentary: Old Testament, edited by John Walvoord and Roy Zuck (Colorado Springs, CO: David C. Cook, 1985), 1508.

 

[iii] Leland Ryken, Symbols and Reality (Wooster, OH: Weaver Book Company, 2016), 31.

 

[iv] Ryken, Symbols and Reality, 32-43.

 

[v] The phrase, עַד־אָ֧נָה indicates that the wicked conduct has continued for a long time without God stopping it (Carl Friedrich Keil, The Twelve Minor Prophets, vol. 2 [Grand Rapids, MI: Wm B. Eerdmans, 1949], 56).

 

[vi] Ryrie Study Bible (Chicago, IL: Moody Publishers, 2012) ,1117.

 

[vii] Carl E. Armerding, “Habakkuk,” in The Expositor’s Bible Commentary: Daniel–Malachi (Revised Edition), edited by Tremper Longman III and David E. Garland, vol. 8 (. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2008), 611..

 

[viii] Adapted from J.K. Bruckner, “Habakkuk, Book of” in Dictionary of the Old Testament: Prophets, edited by Mark Boda and J. Gordon McConville (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2012), 294-301, specifically p. 296.

 

[ix] “90 Years of Our Changing Views of Earth,” NASA. https://www.nasa.gov/feature/90-years-of-our-changing-views-of-earth Accessed May 30, 2023.

Filed Under: Habakkuk, Sermons

Historical Evidence for the Death and Resurrection of Jesus Christ

November 17, 2024 by Christopher L. Scott

The Bible makes it clear that Christ died on cross (Matt 27:32-61; Mark 15:33-47; Luke 23:44-56; John 19:28-42) and three days later Jesus came back to life and left the tomb in which he was buried (Matt 28:1-7; Mark 16:1-8; Luke 24:1-12; John 20:1-10; Acts 1:4-8; 9:1-9; 1 Cor 15:6-8).

I love the Bible and trust it as a reliable and credible witness to events that occurred in the first century. Yet, the Bible is not the only witness to the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. Based on my research there are five different categories of sources that contain at least thirteen different independent references to the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.

ANCIENT HISTORIANS

The first category comes from ancient historians. Tacitus was a first century Roman historian and politician who wrote about a Christian that suffered under Pontius Pilate (the man who sentenced Christ to death).[1] Josephus was a Roman-Jewish historian and military leader. He lived AD 37-97 and said that Jesus died and appeared “alive” again to his disciples.[2] Thallus was a historian who wrote a three-volume history of events in the Mediterranean region. He wrote about the physical events of Jesus’s death just as they were recorded in Luke 23:44-45. Scholars say Thallus wrote in AD 52 while Luke did not write his Gospel until AD 65.[3]

JEWISH SOURCES

A second category Jewish sources. The Talmud was a textbook for Jewish Rabbis on laws and theology that’s dated from AD 70-200. It directly references the crucifixion of Jesus Christ.[4] The Toledoth Jesu is a fifth century alternative history of Jesus that states that Jesus was in a tomb but was resurrected and not at the tomb when people came to see him days after his death.[5]

GENTILE SOURCES

A third category is Gentile sources. Lucian was a Syrian satirist, speaker, and writer that used sarcasm and tongue-in-cheek style. He lived AD 125-180 and said that Jesus was the founder of Christianity and was “crucified” for it.[6] Mara Bar-Seraphone was a Syrian (late first century) who wrote a letter to his son describing how the Jews “executed” Jesus.[7]

GNOSTIC SOURCES

A fourth category is “gnostic” sources which talk about Jesus directly but are much less credible than books that are in the Bible. The Gospel of Truth (second century) referenced Jesus as a historical person who had a “death for many . . . nailed to a tree.”[8] The Treatise on the Resurrection (late second century) says that Jesus died and came back to life. The Gospel of Thomas (second century) records Jesus’s death. The Gospel of Peter describes how Mary and other women went to the tomb of Jesus but he was not there.

LOST SOURCES

The fifth category is “lost” sources which we do not have copies of, but portions of these writings are quoted in writings that we do have. The Acts of Pontius Pilate says that in Jesus’s crucifixion he was pierced in his hands and feet. Phlegon (born in AD 80) wrote that Jesus was alive, died, and arose to life after his death.[9]

By no means is this an exhaustive list (just a simple one compiled by a church pastor). There are other “evidences” that Jesus lived, died, and came back to life. I encourage you to do your own search and investigate the claims of Scripture for yourself.


[1] Tacitus, Annals, 15.44.

[2] Josephus, Antinquities 18:3.

[3] Extant Writings, 18 in the Ante-Nicene Fathers. Julius Africanus in 221 quotes the words fof Thallus.

[4] Talmud, Sanhedrin 43a in the Babylonian Talmud.

[5] I have not been able to find the citation of this directly.

[6] Lucian, Death of Pelegrine, 11-13.

[7] British Museum, Syrian MS, add. 14, 658; cited in Habermas, 200.

[8] Gospel of Truth, probably written by Valentinus. See 30:27-33; 31:4-6; 20:11-14, 25-34.

[9] cited by Origen, 4:455; cf. Habermas, 210; Anderson, 19. Origen 14, Julius Africanus, 18.

Filed Under: Bible Study Resources

An Outline of 1 Thessalonians

November 9, 2024 by Christopher L. Scott

I. PRAISE (1-3)

A. Existing Church (1)

1. Greetings (vv. 1-2)

2. Gratitude (vv. 3-10)

For Their Labor (vv. 3-5)

For Their Acceptance of the Gospel (vv. 6-7)

For Their Proclamation of the Gospel (v. 8)

For Their Living out the Gospel (vv. 9-10)

B. Excellent Church (2)

1. Word Work (vv. 1-8)

Preaching Is Not Pointless (v. 1)                   

Preaching In Persecution (v. 2)

Preaching In Pure Motives (vv. 3-4)             

Preaching with Practical Words (vv. 5-6)

Preaching in Tenderness and Compassion (vv. 7-8)

2. Deed Work (vv. 9-16)

Independence in Finances/Word/Provision (v. 9)

Instigation in Personal Conduct (vv. 10-12)

Imitation in Corporate Gathering (vv. 13-16)

3. Absent Work (vv. 17-20)

Desire (v. 17)            

Prevention (v. 18)                  

Goal (v. 19)                

Motivation (v. 20)

C. Enduring Church (3)

1. Timothy’s Sending (vv. 1-5)

Who Was Sent (vv. 1-2)                                

Why He Was Sent (v. 3)

What He Was Sent to Say (v. 4)                    

How Paul Wanted It to End (v. 5)

2. Timothy’s Reporting (vv. 6-8)

What He Was Told (v. 6)                  

What It Did (v. 7)                  

How It Affects Them (v. 8)

3. Timothy’s Positive News (vv. 9-13)

Caused Paul to Rejoice (vv. 9-10)                             

Caused Paul to Exhort (vv. 11-13)

II. PUSH (4-5)

A.  Expectant Church (4)

1. Living in Purity (vv. 1-8)

Generally (vv. 1-2)                            

Specifically (vv. 3-7)                         

Generally (v. 8)

2. Living in Love (vv. 9-12)

Keep Getting Along w/Each Other Well (vv. 9-10)              

Keep Loving Outsiders Well Too (vv. 11-12)

3. Living in Hope (vv.13-18)

B.  Exempt Church (5)

1. Ready for the Return of the Lord (vv. 1-11)

The Suddenness of the Rapture (vv. 1-3)                  

The Sons of the Rapture (vv. 4-5)

The Soberness Needed (vv. 6-8)                               

The Salvation of the Rapture (vv. 9-11)

2. Requests Before the Return of the Lord (vv. 12-22)

Support and Encourage Those Workers Among You (vv. 12-13)

Minister Differently to the Different People Among You (vv. 14-15)

Act Correctly Yourselves (vv. 16-22)

3. Requests by the Author (vv. 23-28)

For Preservation (v. 23)         

For Faithfulness (v. 24)         

For Prayer (v. 25)

For Greetings (v. 26)             

For Reading (v. 27)                

For Grace (v. 28)

Filed Under: Outlines of Books of the Bible

How Giving Can Touch Others

November 6, 2024 by Christopher L. Scott

Alice Clemmons was a widow with six children in 1950. She worked as a nursery school teacher in the day and as a janitor in the evening while also attending church on Wednesday nights and Sunday mornings. One week a couple named Paul and Audrey Reed came to her church’s Wednesday night service raising support to become missionaries to China. Even though Alice was extremely poor she pledged one dollar a month to Paul and Audrey as they were trying to raise enough support to be sent out as missionaries.[1] It did not appear to be a large gift, but Alice would later learn about the significant impact her pledge would make.

            Like the Macedonians that Paul describes in 2 Corinthians 8:1-5, Alice gave even though she did not have much money. Second Corinthians 8:1-9 is a great section to study when we want to learn about giving in the New Testament. In this passage Paul writes about the Macedonian example of giving (vv. 1-5), he gives his own exhortation of giving (vv. 6-8), and explains Jesus’ example of giving (v. 9).

            So what do we know about the response of the Corinthians? Did they give? Did they ignore Paul’s warnings? Did they give to someone else instead of the collection for poor Christians in Jerusalem that had begun (1 Cor 16:1-4)?

            Five months after Paul writes 2 Corinthians he wrote to the Christians in Rome. We now call this the book of Romans. Paul wrote that letter while visiting the believers in Corinth in his third and final visit to the city.[2]

Paul writes to the believers in Rome, “For Macedonia and Achaia have been pleased to make a contribution for the poor among the saints in Jerusalem. Yes, they were pleased to do so, and they are indebted to them. For if the Gentiles have shared in their spiritual things, they are indebted to minister to them also in material things” (Romans 15:26–27).[3] The word “Achaia”[4] describes the southern region of Greece in which the city of Corinth was located. Based on Romans 15:26-27 the Corinthian believers heeded Paul’s exhortation. They followed through. They gave because of the grace they received.

            In 1980 Paul and Audrey Reed returned to Alice’s town on furlough. It had been thirty years since they were there raising support to become missionaries to China. Alice was sick, so they visited her in her home. In that visit Paul and Audrey told Alice they had trouble raising money back in 1950. They were discouraged and wondered if it was God’s will that they should be missionaries to China. But what they told Alice was important. Paul and Audrey told Alice that the one dollar a month pledge was what encouraged them to keep raising funds to go to China![5]             If Alice had not pledged that one dollar a month, Paul and Audrey might have decided not to be missionaries to China. This is an important story because it shows the sizable impact we can make even if we don’t have much money. We never know how God is going to reach others through our giving even if we think it is small.


[1] As told by Dr. Thomas Constable, “Acts & Pauline Epistles,” unpublished class notes for BE106 (Dallas Theological Seminary, Online Course Unit 7, video 10).

[2] 2 Cor 12:14; 13:1-2; cf. Acts 20:2-3; Rom 16:23; 1 Cor 1:14.

[3] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[4] Greece was conquered by the Romans in 168 BC, and later in 27 BC the Romans divided Greece up into two provinces called “Macedonia” in the north and “Achaia” in the south.

[5] As told by Dr. Thomas Constable, “Acts & Pauline Epistles,” unpublished class notes for BE106 (Dallas Theological Seminary, Online Course Unit 7, video 10).

Filed Under: Giving

Why We Give God Everything

November 6, 2024 by Christopher L. Scott

San Francisco has a restaurant exclusively for man’s best friend. At “Dogue” (meant to rhyme with “vogue”) you can take your dog for a seventy-five dollar multi-course dinner. This gourmet experience includes chicken-skin waffles, filet mignon steak, and quail eggs. On one Saturday Dogue hosted three birthday parties for dogs. One attendee, Gledy Espinoza, came with her miniature dachshund, Mason, and remarked, “We’re foodies. I guess he is too, now.”[1] The owner, Rahmi Massarweh, says everything at Dogue is human-made and some of the food specialties for dogs takes as many as two days to prepare.[2]

            Dogue is an example of the extreme wealth we enjoy as Americans and how we not only pamper ourselves, but our pets too. But how does our extreme wealth as Americans effect our giving[3] to the local church? The apostle Paul’s teaching on giving in 2 Corinthians 8-9 is too often neglected when churches and Christian communities discuss giving. In 2 Corinthians 8 Paul begins his instructions on giving with the example of the Macedonian church giving (vv. 1-5), then gives an exhortation of giving for the Corinthians (vv. 6-8), and concludes with the example of the Messiah’s giving (v. 9). Paul writes. “For you know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, that though He was rich, yet for your sake He became poor, so that you through His poverty might become rich” (2 Corinthians 8:9).[4] Let’s slow down and notice a few elements from this verse.

            First, let’s notice the theology contained in this verse.Paul’s theology starts with Jesus who became sin and He died in our place so that we might have life. Paul wrote earlier in this letter that God “made Him [Jesus] who knew no sin to be sin on our behalf, so that we might become the righteousness of God in Him” (2 Corinthians 5:21). Jesus gave up everything to help us.

            Second, let’s notice the words contained in this verse. The word “grace” is used four times in nine verses as Paul teaches about giving (vv. 1, 6, 7, 9). Paul defines the nature of Christ’s grace. When we read, “though He was rich” it describes Christ’s glory in heavenly existence. When we read He “became poor” it describes His lowliness and destitution when He lived on earth. Jesus Christ exchanged His royal status as an eternal resident of heaven for a slave’s status as a temporary resident on earth. What Christ did had a purpose. The phrase, “for your sake” is in the emphatic position in Greek text and could be translated as “all for your sake . . . you, yes you.”[5] When we read that Christ was “rich” it describes His spiritual richness; not economic wealth. Then later when we read, “He became poor, so that you through His poverty might become rich” it describes the Corinthians richness of salvation secured by Christ both now and in the future.[6]

            Third, let’s notice the method contained in this verse. Paul wants the Corinthians to do the right thing, but he wants them to do it because they were taking initiative. He wants them to give because of love, not obligation. He wants them to give because of their caring, not coercion.

            What we learn about giving from 2 Corinthians 8:9 is that God’s gift of salvation requires we give Him everything. We find no greater example of sacrificial giving than Jesus Christ. The requirement that we give Him everything is something we should do on our own initiative, not because we are coerced or forced to do so. I agree with Pastor Charles Swindoll who says “all giving should come from a context of grace, not guilt; from love, not compulsion.”[7] Just as Paul wanted the Corinthians to give because of their own desire, God wants us to give because it’s what we want to do.

            When we are prompted to give to God, I think it’s healthy to remember that Americans are extremely rich. We might not take our dog to a seventy-five dollar dinner, but we have other proofs of our wealth. Most of us have a car for each adult in our household, extra bedrooms in our house that no one sleeps in, electronics that we don’t use, animals we call “pets” because they don’t provide us milk to drink or food to eat, and garages full of stuff we don’t use or want. It is from this abundance that we gladly give to God just as Christ gave Himself for us.


[1] Associated Press, “At San Francisco restaurant, pups chow on filet mignon,” Columbia-Basin Herald, October 27, 2022, https://apnews.com/article/san-francisco-restaurants-dogs-a6c1ba368023209a1bb5afd027b76742.

[2] Ibid.

[3] According to Grey Matter Research and Infinity Concepts, 26 percent of American evangelicals do not give any money to church. The same study reveals that 42 percent of American evangelicals who do give to church give only 1 percent or 2 percent of their income (“The Tithing Tenth,” Christianity Today, January-February 2022, p. 22).

[4] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[5] Murray Harris, The Second Epistle to the Corinthians, New International Greek Testament Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2013), 578.

[6] The giving here is not supposed to be so great that they become poor while the Jerusalem believers become rich. Second Corinthians 8:13-15 clarify that this is not a call to give everything away so that they can’t provide for themselves.

[7] Charles R. Swindoll, 1 & 2 Corinthians, Swindoll’s Living Insights New Testament Commentary, vol. 7 (Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale, 2017), 410.

Filed Under: Giving

Several Free but Often Forgotten Marketing Tools for Churches

October 25, 2024 by Christopher L. Scott

Pastors and church staff are busy and overworked. In the midst of worship services, staff meetings, and hospital visits, it can be easy to forget about some of the free marketing tools available to churches. So here is a list of a few free marketing tools that you can use for your church. You might have heard of these before—maybe you have used them in the past—but have forgotten amidst a busy schedule that you endure like I do.

            1. Write for the opinion section of your local newspaper. Most newspaper editors are always looking for fresh material to put on their pages. They usually have a certain amount of words they have to print every print cycle, and contributions from members of their community are great material for them to publish. Search your local newspaper for the opinion section and there usually will be an e-mail address for how you can write a letter to the editor. Follow their word count and write about politics, a topic important to your community, or a relevant news item as it relates to your church or Christian faith. Make sure you keep a kind and positive tone in your writing and most editors are glad to publish it for their readers to enjoy. Normally, editors are required to list your name and affiliation with the community (which is your church).

            2. Post your events and ministries on Facebook. In the past four years we learned to live stream our worship services on Facebook and to podcast our sermons to Facebook. But among those different ministries, it’s easy to forget that we should simply post our events to Facebook. Are you giving away backpacks to kids in your community? Then post it to Facebook. Are you teaching a membership class? Post it to Facebook. Are you collecting coats for the homeless? Post it on Facebook. Post simple updates and reminders. Perhaps a good way to do this is to copy and paste the announcements from your bulletin onto Facebook each week.

            3. Purchase an A-frame sign and put it out front of your church during the week. For a hundred dollars you can purchase a basic a-frame sign, have an insert made for it, and put that in front of your church on the street every day for people to see when they drive by. Are you doing a harvest party for kids? Put that on the a-frame sign. Are you doing a special service for Christmas Eve? Put that on the sign too. While it might cost a hundred dollars for the sign and insert, you can reuse those year after year if you’re careful about what information is placed on the insert.

            4. Keep your website updated. I am surprised how many churches spend hundreds of dollars a year to have a website, yet they failed to keep the information on it updated. If people see that old outdated information on your website they might wonder if your church closed. So make sure you’re keeping the most updated information on your website. A website is still the first place people will likely go to learn about your church before visiting.

            5. Contribute basic devotionals or articles for local magazines in your region. Most cities or counties have regional magazines that are published once or twice a year, and they’re always looking for content for their magazine. Consider writing some encouraging devotionals and send them to the editor for consideration. This would be great exposure for you as a pastor or for your church. Most magazines will include a byline with your name and say which church you represent.

            I know these might not be new ideas for you, but they are some free marketing for your church. I hope you can evaluate these and maybe consider one or two as a free way to promote your church in your city.

Filed Under: Church Pastor and Leader Advice

How Churches Should Ask for Money

October 25, 2024 by Christopher L. Scott

Do you ever see a church asking people for money and think, I could have done that better. Do you wish you were able to help a church make better, more professional, and perhaps less cheesy appeals for money? I think we see an example of what asking for money should look like in 2 Corinthians 8-9. Paul starts this two-chapter section using the Macedonian[1] churches as an example of giving.[2] In this section of 2 Corinthians Paul says the grace of God enabled the churches of Macedonia to give (2 Cor 8:1-2) and even though they were extremely poor they still gave (2 Cor 8:3-5). In light of the surprising generosity of the Macedonian churches (located in the Roman province in north Greece), Paul then turns to the Corinthians (located in the Roman province of Achaia in the south of Greece) to give them instructions on giving (2 Cor 8:6-8). In these three verses we see Paul’s exhortation of giving which is perhaps inserted because a collection to help others had begun but was not complete.

            Paul writes about the beginning of the giving, “So we urged Titus that as he had previously made a beginning, so he would also complete in you this gracious work as well” (2 Corinthians 8:6).[3] The word “so” there tells us the result of 2 Corinthians 8:1-5. Specifically, it was the unexpected and enthusiastic giving of the Macedonian church that led Paul to ask Titus to visit Corinth and ask for their help too! When we read, “that as he had previously made a beginning” it reminds the Corinthians that they had began a collection to help, but they had not finished that collection. At one of the three visits Titus made to them Titus had begun this collection.[4]

            Next Paul writes about the resumption of the giving, “But just as you abound in everything, in faith and utterance and knowledge and in all earnestness and in the love we inspired in you, see that you abound in this gracious work also” (2 Corinthians 8:7). The word “But” is transitional. It introduces an exhortation with emphasis like “now then.” Notice five things the Corinthians have abundantly: “faith,” “utterance,” “knowledge,” “earnestness,” “love.” Based on these five things Paul provides the reasoning for giving: the Corinthians had experienced God’s grace (just like the Macedonians) and they should dispense God’s grace in the form of giving (just like the Macedonians). The Corinthians had made a pledge for giving (1 Cor 16:1-2), so Paul held them to that pledge.

            Next Paul writes about the motivation of giving, “I am not speaking this as a command, but as proving through the earnestness of others the sincerity of your love also” (2 Corinthians 8:8).Paul did not bark orders at them. He didn’t command. He didn’t shame. He offered opportunity not obligation. When I served as a pastor in Exeter, California there was a pastor I heard about that would visit church members who were not at church on Sunday and he would leave an empty tithe envelope on their door so they could mail in their tithe to his church. That’s motivation for giving but in the wrong way: coercion. Here when Paul says, “but as proving through the earnestness of others,” Paul was using the Macedonians giving as a benchmark or measuring rod that the Corinthians can use as a way to show Paul, the believers in Jerusalem, and all believers everywhere how genuine their love is. Giving was not a contest among rivals; but an imitation among equals.

            What we learn from Paul’s instructions to the Corinthians about giving is that generosity is required of all believers everywhere. The Corinthians were giving to people they had never met. When we give to a church we give to people and help people that we’ve never met and will never meet. When we give to a local church we help people such as online listeners, missionaries in other countries, and benevolence help given to people locally that need it. All of us are enabled through the grace of Christ to show that grace by giving to others. And when we do that we are unselfishly helping others that we might never meet just like the Corinthians.


[1] Macedonia was a Roman province north of the city of Corinth that included the churches Paul had been to in Philippi (Acts 16:2-4), Thessalonica (Acts 17:1-9), and Berea (Acts 17:10-15). Greece was conquered by the Romans in 168 BC, and later in 27 BC the Romans divided Greece up into two provinces called “Macedonia” in the north and “Achaia” in the south. The cities of Thessalonica, Philippi, Berea, Apollonia, Amphipolis, and Neapolis were all cities in Macedonia. Paul preached the Gospel and had begun churches in Macedonia during his second missionary journey (Acts 15:36-18:22). Those churches in Macedonia had contributed to Paul’s support on several occasions (Phil 4:10, 15-20).

[2] When Paul was in the city of Thessalonica one Macedonian church gave to him on at least one occasion (Phil 1:5; 4:15-16). Paul stayed in Corinth for eighteen months and while there Silas and Timothy brought Paul a gift from the Macedonians (Acts 18:5; 2 Cor 11:9) that sustained Paul and allowed him not to have to receive gifts from the Corinthians. While in Corinth Paul was collecting money to help the poor Jewish believers in Jerusalem (2 Cor 8:1-4; Rom 15:26).

[3] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[4] Titus had experience collecting and distributing money (Acts 11:29-30; Gal 2:1).

Filed Under: Giving

Giving Even When We Think We Don’t Have Much

October 25, 2024 by Christopher L. Scott

It might surprise you to learn that while Americans are some of the richest people in the world, Christian Americans are unlikely to give to their church. According to Grey Matter Research and Infinity Concepts, 26 percent of American evangelicals do not give any money to church.[1] The same study reveals that 42 percent of American evangelicals who do give to church give only 1 percent or 2 percent of their income.[2] While we are among the richest people in the world, we give very little of that money to a local church to support godly ministries.

            In one of Paul’s letters to the Corinthians[3] he praises one group of churches that did not have much money, yet they gave a lot. The Roman province of Macedonia was an area that Paul visited on his second missionary journey. While on that second missionary journey one of the churches provided substantial financial support to Paul (Phil 4:15-20). When Paul was writing instructions to the Corinthian church about giving, he declares the Macedonian churches a great example of giving based on their circumstances (2 Corinthians 8:1-2). Paul essentially says that even though they were extremely poor, they gave to Paul. Next Paul moves on to describe the Macedonians’ contribution (2 Cor 8:3-5).

            Paul writes that the Macedonian church gave more than necessary, “For I testify that according to their ability, and beyond their ability” (2 Corinthians 8:3a). The word “for” is the Greek word hoti which is a causal word that introduces evidence in 2 Corinthians 8:3-5 for the Macedonian churches’ generosity described in 2 Corinthians 8:1-2.

            Paul then says the Macedonian church gave without anyone asking them, “they gave of their own accord” (2 Corinthians 8:3b). The word “accord” is the Greek word authairetos which is used two times in the New Testament (here and 8:14). This word “pertains to being self-chosen.”[4] It describes a voluntary free-will decision to commit to an action. In other words, the Macedonians gave spontaneously without prompting and without pressure from others.

            Paul continues and declares that the Macedonian churches gave and wanted to continue giving, “begging us with much urging for the favor of participation in the support of the saints” (2 Corinthians 8:4).Apparently the Macedonian churches asked to participate because they wanted to give. They saw giving not as an obligation but a privilege in spite of their poorness (2 Cor 8:2). Have you ever heard someone beg for an opportunity to give? That’s what the Macedonian churches did!

            Paul reveals that the Macedonian churches gave more money than expected and they gave more than just financial aid, “and this, not as we had expected, but they first gave themselves to the Lord and to us by the will of God” (2 Corinthians 8:5). Perhaps the Macedonians provided financial aid to Paul but also personally helped him with giving gifts or belongings that he might have needed. They were whole-heartedly dedicated to Paul and the spread of the gospel.

            As we read about the Macedonian example of giving we learn that giving is something we do even when we don’t have much. Paul is using an argument style that was common in Jewish life as well as Greco-Roman life that we now call “from the lesser to the greater.”[5] His message to the church in Corinth was that if the poor destitute churches of Macedonia can give so much from so little, how much more should the Corinthians give from their position of wealth! This is an encouragement for us to give to others no matter how much or how little we have.


[1] “The Tithing Tenth,” Christianity Today, January-February 2022, p. 22.

[2] Ibid.

[3] The apostle Paul wrote four letters to the believers in Corinth. We don’t have the first letter Paul wrote to the Corinthians (1 Cor 5:9). The second is 1 Corinthians which was written from Ephesus (1 Cor 16:8). The third was a “sharp letter” Paul wrote and was carried by Titus (2 Cor 7:8-12), but we don’t have it. 2 Corinthians is technically Paul’s fourth letter that was written seven months after 1 Corinthians.

[4] William Arndt, Frederick W. Danker, Walter Bauer, and F. Wilbur Gingrich, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000), 150.

[5] In Hebrew it was called qal wahomer. In Latin it was called a minore ad maius.

Filed Under: Giving

How Grace Is Sufficient for Giving

October 25, 2024 by Christopher L. Scott

When we hear sermons on giving we often feel the preacher making us feel guilty for not giving to church like we should. As a pastor I must admit that I have probably been guilty of making people feel guilty about their lack of giving to the church. But the Apostle Paul took a different approach when addressing the topic of giving in one of his letters[1] to the Corinthians.

            When Paul begins his two-chapter section on giving in 2 Corinthians he praises a group of people in Macedonia that have been a good example of giving. He praises the Macedonians because they have been giving in spite of their circumstances and poverty.

            Paul says the grace of God was seen in their lives, “Now, brethren, we wish to make known to you the grace of God which has been given in the churches of Macedonia” (2 Corinthians 8:1). Macedonia was a Roman province north of the city of Corinth that included the churches Paul had been to in Philippi (Acts 16:2-4), Thessalonica (Acts 17:1-9), and Berea (Acts 17:10-15). Greece was conquered by the Romans in 168 BC, and later in 27 BC the Romans divided Greece up into two provinces called “Macedonia” in the north and “Achaia” in the south. The cities of Thessalonica, Philippi, Berea, Apollonia, Amphipolis, and Neapolis were all cities in Macedonia. Paul preached the Gospel and had begun churches in Macedonia during his second missionary journey (Acts 15:36-18:22). Those churches in Macedonia had contributed to Paul when he was in Thessalonica at least once (Phil 4:10, 15-20).

            After telling the Corinthians that grace was seen in the lives of the Macedonians, Paul then explains how the grace of God was seen in their lives, “that in a great ordeal of affliction their abundance of joy and their deep poverty overflowed in the wealth of their liberality” (2 Corinthians 8:2). In the first century people did not follow a god, but focused on accumulating gods. This is called syncretism and it was common in the Roman Empire because as the Romans conquered more people they acquired more gods. As a community the people gave things to appease those gods or to patronize those gods. If they needed a good crop of grain, they offered something to the grain goddess (“Demeter” was her Greek name and “Ceres” was her Roman name).[2] If a family wanted another child, they would give something to the fertility goddess (“Aphrodite” was her Greek name and “Venus” was her Roman name).[3] This was a community experience in the Roman Empire in which people would do things publicly and corporately to appease and patronize the gods.[4] We could call the first century a “Religious Stew” because of all the different gods, festivals, and cults that existed everywhere.

            But Jesus arrived teaching there was one God, one faith, and one way to heaven: Him (John 14:6). As a result, followers of Jesus Christ were forced to make a hard decision: do I become a Christian and follow Jesus only or do I maintain my place as a participating citizen patronizing the gods of the Roman Empire? When a Christian started following Jesus he or she neglected all the other gods. This caused problems because the Christian abandoned the community obligation to appease those gods and to bring favor from those gods. New Testament scholar Darrell Bock notes, “The idea of a privatized decision for Jesus was almost impossible in the first century.”[5] Because of this Christians were seen as having drawn away from society and were often persecuted because they failed to appease and patronize the many gods of their culture.

            It is within this context that Paul writes that the Macedonians are “in a great deal of affliction” (v. 2a). You could translate that phrase in a literal way like this, “in much testing of troubles.”[6] It is within this context of affliction and persecution that Paul writes that the Macedonians are in “deep poverty” (v. 2b). Lots of people lived in poverty in the first century, so to go into “deep” poverty was extreme. And when Paul writes that their giving “overflowed in the wealth of their liberality” (v. 2c) he’s describing the nature of their generosity: opened hearted and opened handed.

            As we read about the Macedonian example of giving we learn that grace is sufficient for giving.       No matter where we are in life our faith in God provides us the ability to give, and that giving is something we do because of the grace He has shown us. God’s love for us is shown in His grace, and we show that same love by giving to others. We show God’s love for others when we give to others liberally even when we have little, just like the Macedonians did.


[1] The apostle Paul wrote four letters to the believers in Corinth. We don’t have the first letter Paul wrote to the Corinthians (1 Cor 5:9). The second is 1 Corinthians which was written from Ephesus (1 Cor 16:8). The third was a “sharp letter” Paul wrote and was carried by Titus (2 Cor 7:8-12), but we don’t have it. 2 Corinthians is technically Paul’s fourth letter that was written seven months after 1 Corinthians.

[2] Everett Ferguson, Backgrounds of Early Christianity, 3rd ed. (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2003), 154.

[3] Ibid.

[4] See Ferguson’s section on “Civic Cults” (pp. 182-199) in Backgrounds of Early Christianity for how pervasive, institutionalized, and dependent the city and community were on appeasing gods.

[5] Darrell Bock, “New Testament Introduction, ” unpublished class notes for NT 113 (Dallas Theological Seminary, Online Course, 2024).

[6] In America we don’t understand what it means to have “affliction” because of our faith. In America I’ve heard some Christians say that the Charlie Brown “Christmas” show being taken off ABC was “persecution.”

Filed Under: Giving

How Church People Are Smart with Money

October 25, 2024 by Christopher L. Scott

In her book, The Dumb Things People Do with Money, author Jill Schlesinger lists thirteen things that normal everyday Americans do with their money. Jill lists dumb things such as “You Take On Too Much College Debt” (#4), “You Fail to Protect Your Identity” (#7), “You Don’t Have a Will” (#12), and the most enticing “You Try to ‘Time’ the Market” (#13).[1]

Let’s be honest: managing money is hard. Most of us were not taught by our parents how to manage money. Sometimes schools teach money management but we often are not interested to learn at that time. As adults we often have to figure it out on our own.        

Our culture tells us that when it comes to money you never have enough of it, when you get it spend as much of it as you have, if you want more stuff than you have money then borrow so you can get it (TVs, vacations, phones, fancy vehicles), and if you can’t afford the education go into debt knowing you’ll get an awesome job to pay for it.

But Scripture, from time to time, tells Christians how to manage money. The apostle Paul devoted two entire chapters to the topic of money in one of his letters to the believers in Corinth. While money is hard to manage for ourselves, it’s often just as hard to know if we should give it to others, how we should give, or what that should even look like.

The book of 2 Corinthians was Paul’s fourth letter sent to the believers in the city of Corinth[2] and is Paul’s most personal and intimate letter. Paul started the church in Corinth on his second missionary journey and stayed there for eighteen months preaching and establishing the church (see Acts 18:1-17).

            The city of Corinth was a port city and had a booming economy because it had ocean on both sides of the city.[3] Approximately 300,000-600,000 people lived there. Previously the Corinthians had made a pledge to give and help the poor Christians in Jerusalem (1 Cor 16:1-2). With that context in mind carefully read what Paul wrote to the Corinthians about giving.

“Now, brethren, we wish to make known to you the grace of God which has been given in the churches of Macedonia, that in a great ordeal of affliction their abundance of joy and their deep poverty overflowed in the wealth of their liberality. For I testify that according to their ability, and beyond their ability, they gave of their own accord, begging us with much urging for the favor of participation in the support of the saints, and this, not as we had expected, but they first gave themselves to the Lord and to us by the will of God. So we urged Titus that as he had previously made a beginning, so he would also complete in you this gracious work as well. But just as you abound in everything, in faith and utterance and knowledge and in all earnestness and in the love we inspired in you, see that you abound in this gracious work also. I am not speaking this as a command, but as proving through the earnestness of others the sincerity of your love also. For you know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, that though He was rich, yet for your sake He became poor, so that you through His poverty might become rich.” (2 Corinthians 8:1–9).

            From this I think we can summarize that giving to God’s people is done abundantly even when in poverty because of the grace we have received. Let’s note that grace is sufficient for giving (vv. 1-2), giving is something we do even when we don’t have much (vv. 3-5), generosity is required of all believers everywhere (vv. 6-8), and God’s gift of salvation requires we give Him everything (v. 9).  

            While the Corinthian church was far from perfect, they were encouraged to get their giving right. We too are far from perfect as Christians, so let’s pray we can do giving to God’s church right.


[1] Jill Schlesinger, The Dumb Things People Do with Money (New York, NY: Ballantine Books, 2019).

[2] We don’t have the first letter Paul wrote to the Corinthians (1 Cor 5:9). The second is 1 Corinthians which was written from Ephesus (1 Cor 16:8). The third was a “sharp letter” Paul wrote and was carried by Titus (2 Cor 7:8-12), but we don’t have it. 2 Corinthians is technically Paul’s fourth letter that was written seven months after 1 Corinthians.

[3] It had the Adriatic Sea known as the “Gulf of Corinth” to the northwest of the city and the Aegean Sea known as the “Saronic Gulf” to the southeast of the city. Ships wanting to avoid the long difficult journey south across the dangerous tip of Greece placed their boats on logs and dragged their ships three and a half miles across the land in which Corinth was located.

Filed Under: Giving

Five Views on Genesis 1

June 7, 2024 by Christopher L. Scott

YOUNG EARTH CREATIONSIM

Young earth creationism believes the earth was created in six literal twenty-four-hour days with the appearance of age. In other words, God created the universe and our world about 6,000-10,000 years ago. (Views vary depending on potential gaps in genealogies in Genesis 5 and Genesis 10-11.) Most young earth creationists believe God created a “mature” earth with the appearance of age. Because the earth was created “good” and “perfect” there was harmony and not “survival of the fittest” before the fall of Genesis 3.

Strengths

  • The Hebrew word yom is literal when used with cardinal and ordinal numbers.
  • The phrases “evening” and “morning” make no sense unless there are literal days being described.
  • Exodus 20:8-11 teaches Israel to work six days and rest on the seventh day following God’s example. This implies literal days.
  • There was no death before the Fall in Genesis 3, therefore time and creation operated very differently.
  • Noah’s Flood radically changed the earth, therefore time and aging of the earth was very different than now.
  • Statements of Jesus, the Apostles, and Isaiah indicated that Adam and Eve were created at the beginning of creation, not billions of years after (Psalm 19:1; 97:6; Job 12:7-10; Mark 10:6; 13:19; Luke 11:50-51; Rom 1:20)
  • Historical theology supports this interpretation with 1,800 years of Christian history and 1,400 years of Jewish history
  • If we believe in God performing miracles and acting supernaturally, then creating everything we see in seven days is certainly within His potential.
  • When the Bible describes the creation of the earth by God it is always as a past action not something that was in progress.
  • Hebrew syntax supports a plain-literal interpretation of six days of creation over twenty-four hour periods. Genesis 1-2 does not follow the pattern if Hebrew poetry or allegory.
  • If Moses wanted to indicate creation took place over millions or billions of years there are other Hebrew words he would have used.
  • God uses words of time to describe time in ways we can understand it (Pss 90:4; 2 Peter 3:8).

Weaknesses

  • Young earth creationism does not match what most agnostic and atheistic scientists believe in physical science, life science, experimental science, or historical science teaches.

Other Names

  • Immediate Creation
  • Recent Creation
  • Gap Theory

Further Reading

  • Ken Ham, “Young Earth Creationism” in Four Views on Creation, Evolution, and Intelligent Design (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2017), 19-31.
  • Henry Morris and John Whitcomb, The Genesis Flood (Presbyterian and Reformed, 1961)
  • Henry Morris, Biblical Creationism (Baker, 1993)
  • AC Custance, Without Form and Void (Doorway Papers, 1970)
  • Henry Morris and John D. Morris, Science, Scripture, and the Young Earth (Institute for Creation Research, 1989)
  • John C. Witcomb, Jr., The Early Earth (rev. ed., Baker, 1986)
  • John C. Witcomb, Jr., The World that Perished (Baker, 1988)
  • Ken Ham, The Answers Book (rev. ed., Master Books, 2000)

Popular Supporters

  • David Jeremiah
  • John MacArthur
  • J. Vernon McGee
  • John Calvin
  • Martin Luther

OLD EARTH CREATIONISM

According to Old Earth Creationism life appeared gradually over billions of years and that God miraculously intervened to create earth’s first life. In this view the six days of Genesis 1 are actually six long eras.  Adam and Eve were created 12,000-135,000 years ago during the last ice age. Old Earth Creationism views all humans as descendants of two historical persons, and distinct from Neanderthals and Homo erectus. A key part of Old Earth Creationism is the utilization of what they call “constructive integration” which sees Scripture and science as compliments to each other and not in conflict. They see nature as providing observable, measurable, and verifiable information about God’s supernatural handiwork as each successive act prepares for the next. When “mass speciation” events appear in science it is because of divine intervention. Specifically, God introduces diverse species appropriate for Earth’s changing conditions. Old Earth Creationism believes God’s message and meaning is conveyed by biblical authors through figurative language. According to this view, the universe began in a transcendent event, it unfolds for the benefit of humanity, and is sustained continuously according to nature’s laws. Thus the laws of physics have stayed the same (by that they mean the Fall and Flood did not change science as we see it). Old Earth Creationism does not believe in a literal worldwide Flood and diminishes the effects of the Fall on the environment that supports life.

Strengths

  • Believes there are twenty major passages and hundreds of additional verses that provide commentary on the natural realm, which they believe is a scientifically testable model.
  • The events that occur on the sixth-day appear to need to take longer than a day (Gen 2:9, 19, 21-22, 23; cf. Gen 29:34-35; 30:20; 46:30; Judg 15:3).
  • Place a strong emphasis on Genesis 1-11; Job 37-39; Psalm 104; Proverbs 8
  • Seventh-day continuation is not a “day” (Heb 4:4-11), therefore it appears to continue and not “end” like others.
  • Time according to God is different than time according to us (Pss 90:4; 2 Peter 3:8).
  • God’s eternality compared ours is unmeasurable (Pss 90:2-6; Prov 8:22-31; Ecc 1:3-11; Micah 6:2).
  • Statements about the earth’s age seem to imply it is very old (Hab 3:6; 2 Peter 3:5).
  • There is an exception to the Hebrew word for day, yom, as “24hr” period of time when it is used with an ordinal number (Hosea 6:2).
  • The Sabbath gets implemented as “years” in the Law (Exod 20:10-11; Lev 25:4).
  • The “evening” and “morning” statements don’t make sense until the sun was created (Gen 1:5, 8, 13; cf. 14-19)

Weaknesses

  • Utilizes poetic passages—allegedly about creation—in Job 38-39, Psalm 104, and Proverbs 8 to reinterpret the historical narrative of Genesis 1-2.
  • If God can create supernaturally and miraculously, then it is possible He can create everything not just in six days but instantaneously.
  • The Bible does not describe creation as a process.
  • The Bible describes the Flood narrative of Genesis 6-8 as worldwide, not local.
  • Psalm 90:4 and 2 Peter 3:8 describe time according to our perspective and not God’s perspective.
  • Death did not begin until Adam’s sin and humankind’s fall (Genesis 3; Romans 5:12-21)
  • A forced reconciliation and realignment of what science teaches with what is in the Bible. This leads to criticism from both Young Earth Creationists and Theistic Creationists.
  • Requires a new reading and new interpretation of Genesis 1 (that did not exist until the 1800s) based on the claims of science.
  • Requires a reinterpretation of Genesis 1 as scientific beliefs change over time (Darwinism, Neo-Darwinism, genetics, big bang, astronomy, etc.)
  • Sometimes it appears they are saying more than what the text is saying (Job 37-39; Psalm 104, Prov 8). Specifically, the passages they claim describe “mass speciation” events and “mass extinction” events do not appear to be describing those events (Psalm 104:29-30)
  • Most DNA and genetic theory do not believe that humanity descended from one man and one woman (but that “number” is declining).
  • Places too much emphasis on general revelation and diminishes the significance of special revelation.
  • According to science birds (created on day five of Genesis 1) appeared hundreds of millions of years after land animals (created on day six of Genesis 1)
  • According to science seed and fruit bearing plants (created on day three of Genesis 1) appeared hundreds of millions of years after sea creatures (created on day five of Genesis 1).
  • The Hebrew word yom is literal when used with cardinal and ordinal numbers.

Other Names

  • Progressive Creationism

Further Reading

  • Hugh Ross, “Old Earth (Progressive) Creationism” Four Views on Creation, Evolution, and Intelligent Design (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2017), 71-100.
  • Alan Hayward, Creation and Evolution (Bethany House, 1985)
  • Hugh Ross, A Matter of Days (NavPress, 2004)
  • B. Ramm, The Christian View of Science and Scripture (Eerdmans, 1964)
  • Fazale Rana and Hugh Ross, Origins of Life, Biblical and Evolutionary Models Face Off, 2nd ed. (RTB Press, 2014)

Popular Supporters

  • Ray Stedman

EVOLUTIONARY CREATION

Evolutionary creation holds two beliefs: evolution is real and the Bible is true. In the evolutionary process God chose at times to act supernaturally and evolution is the mechanism that God used to achieve His purposes over billions of years. In Evolutionary Creation all species arose through gradual change and are related by a tree of common ancestry. Our human ancestors were a group of several thousand humans that evolved from apes. In this view the first humans lived 150,000-200,000 years ago. The evolutionary process results in natural selection, microevolution, and macroevolution. Evolutionary Creationists state that the Gospel is the central message of Scripture and that Scripture is authoritative not inerrant. This view rejects a literal interpretation of all aspects of creation described in Scripture. Evolutionary Creationism does not see science as a tool for ascribing truth or reliability of Scripture. It states that the Bible does not make scientific predictions, believes geological evidence does not support a worldwide flood, and believes the basic laws of physics did not change with the Flood or Fall (since those were not literal events).

Strengths

  • Human “genome” is similar to chimpanzees and also has extra pointless “junk” in our genome as other animals have too.
  • States that the Bible does not intend to use scientific language.
  • Believes science and the natural laws that it discovers are a testimony to God’s care of all matter and mechanisms.
  • Has support from geological evidence. Annual layers of ice from glaciers have been counted back over 100,000 years in Greenland and over 700,000 years in Antarctica. Annual layers of sedimentary rock formed at the bottom of lakes and shallow seas show millions of years of deposits. Radiometric dating is possible for some atoms that are radioactive and decay over time.  For example, a rock formation in Greenland has been dated to 3.6 billion years old. Rocks returned from the moon have been dated to 4.5 billion years old.
  • Has support from astronomical evidence because light takes time to travel. The light we see from Andromeda galaxy (the closest galaxy) takes 2.5 million years to reach us.
  • States that Genesis focuses on who and why of creation; not on how and when.

Weaknesses

  • While the main focus of Genesis is who God is, there is still a strong focus of how and when it happened. Specifically, there are statements about the order of creation and time it took to make that creation.
  • Primary focus is on the Book of Nature and not Book of Scripture.
  • Refuses the possibility of supernatural interference.
  • Evolutionary Creation is contrary to the clear teaching of Genesis 3:20; Acts 17:26; Romans 5:12-19; and 1 Corinthians 15:20-22 that specifically state all humans descended from one man and one woman, and that our sin nature was inherited from Adam.
  • The Bible does not describe creation as in progress.
  • Rejects historical doctrine of Christianity that Adam and Eve were literal historical persons.
  • Utilizes less clear general revelation to reinterpret special revelation.
  • Many scientists—both secular and Christian—question the validity of evolution.
  • Adam and Eve were not sole progenitors, thus three possibilities are suggested by Evolutionary Creation. One, Adam and Eve were “ancient representatives” of humanity that God entered into relationship with 200,000 years ago in Africa. Two, Adam and Eve were “recent representatives” living 6,000 years ago in the Ancient Near East. Three, Adam and Eve are viewed not as historical persons but instead as symbolic stories in the genre of the Ancient Near East.
  • Evolutionary Creation diminishes the doctrine of humans being made in the image of God, original sin, falsely teaches death before the Fall of Genesis 3, allows for natural evil before the fall of Genesis 3, and allows for a “randomness” of creation.
  • Must reinterpret the significance of the Fall of Genesis 3, the Flood of Genesis 6-9, and significance of sin in Romans 5:12-21.
  • Animals (specifically fossils) appear long before humans in geological records. Why would there be billions of years of death (fossils) before the Fall of humans and entry of sin and death into the world in Genesis 3.

Other Names

  • Theistic Evolution

Further Reading

  • Deborah Haarsma, “Evolutionary Creation” in Four Views on Creation, Evolution, and Intelligent Design (Zondervan, 2017), pp. 124-153.
  • Dennis Alexander, Creation or Evolution: Do We Have to Choose (Monarch, 2008)
  • Francis Collins, The Language of God (Free Press, 2006)
  • Howard Van Till, Portraits of Creation: Biblical and Scientific Perspectives of the World’s Formation (Eerdmans, 1990)
  • Howard Van Till, The Fourth Day, (Eerdmans, 1986)

Popular Supporters

  • Deitrich Bonhoeffer

INTELLIGENT DESIGN

Intelligent design advocates that a scientific understanding of what we see requires an intelligent “being” as creator. In other words, there was a guiding influence over evolutionary force, not a process of random selection. This is a new faith-based alternative to evolution, however there is no specific designation to the intelligence except for a “creator” or “god.” This view is an “age-neutral theory” to the earth and universe. It does not take a position on how to interpret the book of Genesis or the age of the earth. Intelligent Design proponents believe there are tell-tale features in digital code in DNA, miniature circuits and machines in cells, as well as constants of physics which all point to an intelligent cause. In summary, the creative action of a conscious and intelligent being is an adequate cause for the origin of the things we see.

Strengths

  • DNA shows appearance of design because of the specific way that nucleotide bases are arranged in DNA. They are arranged in an exact way that allows them to properly function.
  • Genetic information shows a creator making important changes over time. In other words, there are necessary changes in genetic information that are too complex to be random. An example is “function proteins” being developed that are required for life, yet impossible to have been the result of random development.
  • Chemical evolutionary theory and the origin of information shows a creative influence. A living cell is too complex to just appear and it must have had a designer. RNA molecules are arranged in such a complex and complimentary way that they could not have found themselves in their current form without a designer.
  • Closely follows the discoveries and interpretations of science, but attributes what it sees to a designer, not randomness.
  • There are few evidence-based objections.
  • Arguments are consistent with what Scripture teaches in Romans 1:20, Acts 14:15-17, Psalm 19:2, Job 12:7-10.

Weaknesses

  • Proudly declares the theory is not based on the Bible, but is instead based on scientific discoveries related to intelligent causes. In other words, Intelligent Design is not derived from a religious text, but an inference from science.
  • Intelligent Design proponents might have a variety of interpretations of Genesis 1, or they may have none at all.
  • Must reinterpret the significance of the Fall of Genesis 3, the Flood of Genesis 6-9, and significance of sin in Romans 5:12-21.
  • Is not specific about the date of the earth or creation.
  • Some suggest it is “religion masquerading as science.”
  • Is too vague in its belief about a “creator” or “god”
  • The Bible is completely left out of all arguments.
  • Only focuses on origin of creation and does not address the process of creation.
  • No Intelligent Design leaders have given serious consideration or explanation of what God said about creation in Genesis 1-2, the Flood in Genesis 6-9, or the age of the earth.

Further Reading

  • Stephen Meyer, “Intelligent Design” in Four Views on Creation, Evolution, and Intelligent Design (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2017), 177-208.
  • Michele Behe, Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution (Free Press, 1996)
  • Michele Behe, The Edge of Evolution: The Search for the Limits of Darwinism (Free Press, 2008)
  • Charles Thaxton et al., The Mystery of Life’s Origin: Reassessing Current Theories (The Philosophical Library, 1984)
  • Phillip Johnson, Darwin on Trial (InterVarsity, 1991)
  • Stephen Meyer, Signature in the Cell: DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design (Harper One, 2009)
  • Stephen Meyer, Darwin’s Doubt: The Explosive Origin of Animal Life and the Case for Intelligent Design (Harper One, 2013)

Popular Supporters

ANCIENT NEAR EASTERN CREATION MYTH

While Genesis 1 is likely literal the structure of Genesis 1 is more theological and artistic than literal. In other words, Moses shaped the theology and history as recorded in Genesis 1 based on the genre of literature that was circulating at the time he wrote the Pentateuch. Some scholars say that the Genesis 1 creation account is a literary “polemic” which was meant to refute Ancient Near Eastern (ANE) creation mythologies of Egypt, Babylon, Sumeria, and Canaan. However, debates within this view are about if Moses took ANE creation myths and attributed them to the God of Israel, or was Moses’ creation story in Genesis 1 the original creation story that other ANE cultures intentionally took and changed to their own culture.

Strengths

  • There are similarities in the source of creation. In both ANE creation myths and in Genesis land emerges from the waters. In Israel God made humans in His image and formed the man from the dust of the ground. In Babylon humans were made from the “clay,” but that clay was mixed with “the blood of Kingu or two Lamga gods (craftsman gods).”    
  • There are some similarities in the sequence of creation. Many of the creation events in ANE myths follow the basic structure of the Israelite creation account. The Enuma Elish (Babylonian) begins with a divine spirit existing external to matter, the matter was full of darkness, and light came from the gods. Next was creation of firmament, dry land, luminaries, man, then the gods rest and celebrate. God’s rest on the seventh day of creation relates to Egypt’s Memphite Theology where Ptah rested when creating was done and all gods were settled.
  • There are some similarities in the substance of creation. The Egyptian creation myths describe “primordial waters”, which would eventually be formed into the earth. Darkness is common in the Enuma Elish and Egyptian creation myths. In the Egyptian “Hermopolis” light came from Atum (the sun-god) before formal creation of the sun. The Sumerians said that the heavens were separated from the earth by the air-god Enil. The Babylonian Enuma Elish made heaven from the upper part of the slain Tiamat. The Egyptian myth tells of Shu, the air god, pushing up Nut (sky goddess) from Geg (earth god) which eventually separated the earth from the sky.

Weaknesses

  • The myths often varied depending on which city they were told in and which god belonged there. For example, Egypt had four creation myths.
  • There are differences in the source of creation. Almost all ANE creation myths involve a myriad of gods while Israel had one God. In the Israelite creation account there is no combat, struggle, or force, while there was a constant struggle and combat in the ANE creation myths.
  • There are differences in the substance of creation. Unlike the ANE creation myths, the Israelite creation account did not deify nor worship the created matter. In this way, Genesis 1 rejects the Egyptian method of deifying the sky, ground, and air. For example, the sun was the god Re, the sky was Nut, the ground was Geb, dry air was Shu, moist humidity was Tefnut, the primordial sea was Nun. The ANE myths had humans being made to serve the gods while in the Israelite creation account God entrusted humans to reign and govern his creation.
  • Another difference is the fact that the Israelite creation account describes the beginning of the human race with a single couple, Adam and Eve. There are no ancient texts that describe human origins with a single couple as the beginning of the entire human race.

Other Names

  • Archetypal Creation View (of Adam)
  • Protohistory
  • Historico-Literary Genre
  • Genesis as Mythopoeic
  • Historico-artistic Creation
  • Genesis as Polemic

Further Reading

  • Walton, John Walton, “A Historical Adam: Archetypal Creation View” in Four Views on the Historical Adam (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2013), 89-118.
  • Gordon Wenham, “Genesis 1-11 as Protohistory” in Genesis: History, Fiction, or Neither (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2015)73-97.
  • Miller, Johnny and John Soden. In the Beginning . . . We Misunderstood: Interpreting Genesis 1 in Its Original Context (Grand Rapids, Kregel, 2012)
  • Stephanie Dalley, Myths from Mesopotamia: Creation, the Flood, Gilgamesh, and Others (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991)
  • John Walton, Ancient Israelites Literature in It’s Cultural Context (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1989)

Popular Supporters

  • Bruce Waltke
  • Peter Enns
  • Gordon Johnston

Filed Under: Bible Study Resources

Giving God’s Money to God’s Work

May 1, 2024 by Christopher L. Scott

Let’s be honest: managing money is hard. Most of us were not taught by our parents how to manage money. Often we end up adults having to figure it out on our own.    

            When it comes to money our culture tells us you never have enough of it, when you get it to spend as much of it as you have, and if you want more stuff than you have money then borrow so you can get it (TVs, vacations, phones, fancy vehicles).

            But Scripture tells us (as Christians) how to manage money. Jesus mentioned money regularly and the apostle Paul devoted two entire chapters of 2 Corinthians about money.

            2 Corinthians was Paul’s fourth letter sent to the believers in the city of Corinth.[1] It also was Paul’s most personal and intimate letter.   TheCorinthian believers had made a pledge of giving in 1 Corinthians 16:1-2 to help the poor Christians in Jerusalem. Paul begins chapters eight and nine of 2 Corinthians with the example of another church’s giving.

THE MACEDONIAN EXAMPLE OF GIVING

            Their circumstances are described first, “Now, brethren, we wish to make known to you the grace of God which has been given in the churches of Macedonia, that in a great ordeal of affliction their abundance of joy and their deep poverty overflowed in the wealth of their liberality” (2 Corinthians 8:1–2).[2]

            Their contribution is described next, “For I testify that according to their ability, and beyond their ability, they gave of their own accord, begging us with much urging for the favor of participation in the support of the saints, and this, not as we had expected, but they first gave themselves to the Lord and to us by the will of God” (2 Corinthians 8:3–5). There are few important giving principles we should note from these verses.

            First, they gave more than necessary (v. 3a). These people were generous.  

            Second, they gave without anyone asking them (v. 3b). That word “accord” is the Greek Word is αὐθαίρετος and is used two times in the New Testament (here and in 8:14). This word “pertains to being self-chosen.”[3] It describes a voluntary free will decision to commit to an action. In other words, the Macedonians gave without prompting, without pressure, and without guilt trips.

            Third, they gave and wanted to continue giving (v. 4). Apparently, they asked to participate and wanted to give. In fact, they saw it as an honor to give. In spite of their poorness they saw giving as a privilege. Have you ever heard someone beg for an opportunity to give? That’s what the Macedonian churches did!

            Fourth, they gave more money than expected and more than just financial aid (vv. 4-5). According to verses four and five they gave both their possessions and their personal help.

            Reading about the Macedonians’ example of giving teaches us that giving is something we do even when we don’t have much. Paul is using an argument style that was common in Jewish and Greco-Roman life that we now call “from the lesser to the greater.”[4] The message was this: if the poor destitute churches of Macedonia can give so much from their so little, how much more should you give from your position of wealth!

            This encourages us to give no matter how much we have. And in light of the surprising generosity of the Macedonian churches, Paul now turns to the Corinthians.

THE APOSTLE’S EXHORTATION OF GIVING

Paul reveals the beginning of the giving, “So we urged Titus that as he had previously made a beginning, so he would also complete in you this gracious work as well” (2 Corinthians 8:6). The “so” tells us the results. It was the unexpected and enthusiastic involvement of the Macedonians that led Paul to ask Titus to visit Corinth and ask for their help too!

            Paul reveals the resumption of the giving, “But just as you abound in everything, in faith and utterance and knowledge and in all earnestness and in the love we inspired in you, see that you abound in this gracious work also” (2 Corinthians 8:7).

            Notice five things they have abundantly: “faith” “utterance” “knowledge” “earnestness” and “love”. Based on these five things Paul launches into the reason for giving. The Corinthians had experienced God’s grace (just like the Macedonians) and they should dispense God’s grace in the form of giving (just like the Macedonians). The Corinthians had made a pledge for giving (1 Cor 16:1-2), so Paul held them to that pledge.

            Paul reveals the motivation for giving,“I am not speaking this as a command, but as proving through the earnestness of others the sincerity of your love also” (2 Corinthians 8:8). Paul did not bark orders at them. He didn’t command. He didn’t shame. He offers opportunity not obligation.

            The Macedonians’ giving is a benchmark that the Corinthians can use as a way to show Paul, the believers in Jerusalem, and all believers everywhere how genuine their love is. This was not a contest among rivals; but an imitation among equals.

            Reading about the apostle’s exhortation of giving teaches us that generosity is required of all believers everywhere. The Corinthians were giving to people they had never met. When we give to church we give to people and help people that we have never met and will never meet such as online listeners, missionary ministry, or benevolence help to strangers of the church.

THE MESSIAH’S EXAMPLE OF GIVING

Paul concludes the beginning section this way, “For you know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, that though He was rich, yet for your sake He became poor, so that you through His poverty might become rich” (2 Corinthians 8:9). The word “For” at the beginning of this verse describes why the Corinthians should excel in the grace of giving. Because of what Jesus did we respond and worship. Paul’s theology starts with the one who gave up everything to help someone else. He died in our place so that we might have life (2 Cor 5:21).

            Notice that everything which comes after “grace of our Lord Jesus Christ” defines the nature of Christ’s grace. What is Christ’s grace? “that though He was rich, yet for your sake He became poor, so that you through His poverty might become rich.” Here “rich” describes His glory in heavenly existence. “poor” describes His lowliness and destitution when He lived on earth. Jesus Christ decided to exchange His royal status as an eternal resident of heaven for a slave’s status as a temporary resident on earth.

            There’s a focus of what He’s doing. It’s “for your sake.” That phrase is in the emphatic position in Greek and could be translated as “all for your sake . . . you, yes you.”[5] The “rich” that He promises here is a spiritual richness; not economic wealth. It describes the Corinthians richness of salvation secured by Christ both now and in the future. The giving here is not supposed to be so great that they become poor while the Jerusalem believers become rich.[6]

            The Macedonians gave when they were extremely poor, the Messiah gave when He was incredibly rich. These Corinthians are somewhere in between and should give sacrificially.

            Paul wants the Corinthians to do the right thing, but he wants them to do it because they were taking initiative to do it. He wants them to give in love, not obligation. He wants them to give because of their caring not coercion. 

            Reading about the Messiah’s example of giving teaches us that God’s gift of salvation requires we give Him everything.And that requirement that we give Him everything is something we should do on our own initiative, not because we are coerced or forced to do so. Just as Paul wanted the Corinthians because of their own desire, God wants us to give because it’s what we want to do. Not coercion. Not competition.

CONCLUSION

So what do we know about the response of the Corinthians? Did they give? Did they ignore Paul’s warnings? Did they give somewhere or to someone else besides Paul?

            Five months after Paul wrote 2 Corinthians he wrote to the Christians in Rome while visiting the believers in Corinth. (Paul said his plan was to travel to Corinth in 2 Corinthians 12:14 and 13:1-2 which is verified in Acts 20:2-3 and Romans 16:23.) In Paul’s third and final visit to Corinth he wrote to the believers in Rome, “For Macedonia and Achaia have been pleased to make a contribution for the poor among the saints in Jerusalem. Yes, they were pleased to do so, and they are indebted to them. For if the Gentiles have shared in their spiritual things, they are indebted to minister to them also in material things” (Romans 15:26–27). The term “Achaia” describes the region in which Corinth was located! This means the Corinthian believers heeded Paul’s exhortation! They gave because of the grace they received.

            I pray and hope that we can exhort our people to give and that they will be faithful to give just as the Corinthians were.


[1] The first letter we don’t have (1 Cor 5:9). The second letter was 1 Corinthians and was written from Ephesus (1 Cor 16:8). The third letter was a “sharp letter” Paul wrote and was carried by Titus (2 Cor 7:8-12). The fourth letter was 2 Corinthians and was written seven months after 1 Corinthians.

[2] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[3] William Arndt, Frederick W. Danker, Walter Bauer, and F. Wilbur Gingrich. A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000), 150.

[4] In Hebrew it’s known asqal wahomer and in Latin it’s known as a minore ad maius.

[5] Murray Harris, The Second Epistle to the Corinthians, New International Greek Testament Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2013), 578.

[6] Verses 13-15 clarify that this is not a call to give everything away so that they can’t provide for themselves.

Filed Under: Church Pastor and Leader Advice

Timing of Events Related to the Book of Ezra

April 26, 2024 by Christopher L. Scott

  • 539 Cyrus of Persia takes Babylon (Dan 5:30-31)
  • 538 Cyrus of Persia issues decree for Jews to return to Judah (Ezra 1:1-4)
  • 537 Jews leave Babylon and arrive in Judah (Ezra 1:5-2:70)
  • 536 Sacrifices made on altar (Ezra 3:1-6)
  • 535 Temple foundation rebuilt (Ezra 3:7-13)
  • 535 Temple rebuilding stops due to enemies of Judah (Ezra 4:1-5)
  • 520 Temple rebuilding begins due to Haggai and Zechariah (Ezra 4:24-5:2)
  • 515 Temple rebuilding complete (Ezra 6:14-15)
  • 485 Letter of accusation written at beginning of Xerxes reign (Ezra 4:6)
  • 485-465 Book of Esther takes place under Xerxes (between Ezra 6 and Ezra 7)
  • 464 Letter of accusation written under Artaxerxes (Ezra 4:7-16)
  • 458 Ezra returns to Judah (Ezra 7-10)
  • 444 Nehemiah returns to Judah (Nehemiah)

Filed Under: The Book of Ezra

An Outline of the Book of Ezra

April 26, 2024 by Christopher L. Scott

I. THE TEMPLE REBUILT UNDER ZERUBBABEL (1-6)

A. The Goal Described (1)

1. The Decree of Cyrus (vv. 1-4)

2. The Decision of the Jews (vv. 5-11)

B. The Goal Pursued (2-3)

1. The Faithful Returners (2:1-70)

2. The Faithful Builders (3:1-13)

They Begin (vv. 1-6) > altar is built

They Continue (vv. 7-13) > temple foundation is built

C. The Goal Paused (4)

1. Opposition Begins (vv. 1-5) [vv. 1-5, 24]

2. Opposition Grows (vv. 6-24) [vv. 6-23]

The Group of Opposers (vv. 6-10)

The Content of the Opposers to the King (vv. 11-16)

The Response of the King to the Opposers (vv. 17-22)

The Result of the King’s Response (vv. 23-24)

D.  The Goal Restarted (5-6)

1. By Fresh People (5:1-5)

2. With Fresh Opposition (5:6-17)

Those Composing the Letter (vv. 6-7a)

The Content of the Letter (vv. 7b-17)

3. Yet with Fresh Encouragement (6:1-22)

The Search by the King (vv. 1-2a)

The Findings of the King (vv. 2b-5)

The Result from the King (vv. 6-12)

The Accomplishment of the People (vv. 13-22)

-Goal Is Complete (vv. 13-15)

-God Is Celebrated (vv. 16-22)

~Dedication of the Temple (vv. 16-18)

~Celebration of Passover (vv. 19-22)

II.  THE COMMUNITY REFORMED UNDER EZRA (7-10)[1]

A.  Ezra’s Testimony (7)

1. The Selection of Ezra (vv. 1-10)[2]

His Family (vv. 1-5)

His Focus (vv. 6-7)

His Fervency (vv. 8-10)

2. The Support for Ezra (vv. 11-26)

Introduction (vv. 11-12)

Permission (vv. 13-20)

Commission (vv. 21-24)

Deputation ( vv. 25-26)

3. The Statement of Ezra (vv. 27-28)

B.  Ezra’s Travels (8)

1. Those Traveling with Ezra (vv. 1-14)

2. Those Helping Ezra (vv. 15-20)

3. Those Reforming with Ezra (vv. 21-30)

4. More Travels and Arrival in Jerusalem (vv. 31-36)

C.  Ezra’s Troubles (9)

1. The Problem with Mixed Marriages (vv. 1-4)

2. The Profession of the Dilemma (vv. 5-15)

D.  Ezra’s Task (10)

1. A Proposal by the People (vv. 1-4)

2. A Plan by Ezra (vv. 5-8)

3. A Production Together (vv. 9-44)

The Setting (v. 9)

The Speech (vv. 10-11)

The Response of the People (vv. 12-14)

The Response of the Leaders (v. 15)

The Actions of the People (vv. 16-17)

The Findings (vv. 18-44)


[1] Commission of Ezra (7), Coming of Ezra (8), Confession of Ezra (9), Cleansing of People (10)

[2] His Pedigree > Back to Aaron (vv. 1-5), His Proficiency > Skill (v. 6a), His Pilgrimage > Timing (vv. 7-9), His Passion > Heart (v. 10)

Filed Under: The Book of Ezra

Gospel First and Politics Second

April 19, 2024 by Christopher L. Scott

While attending Seminary I lived in the Dallas area and worked at a golf course as a caddie. One day when talking with some of the caddies the name of a prominent pastor in Dallas was mentioned in our conversation (which usually revolved around sports and movies, not politics). One of the caddies spoke up and said, “I have zero interest in what that pastor has to say.” It was a presidential election year and political dissension was at a climax. That pastor had publicly announced in his sermons who should be the next president of the United States. And that pastor’s stance was polarizing. His sermons were broadcast via many radio stations and on TV and he was well known as the “voice of Christians” for the Dallas area.

            However, this pastor’s political stance had blocked the gospel from being received by my caddie friend. My caddie friend was an atheist and clarified that he was not going to listen to anything that pastor said. Because the pastor was a bad person? Because the pastor had misused money given to him and his church? Because the pastor had been unfaithful to his wife? No, because of the pastor’s political stance on who should be the next president, my caddie friend didn’t want to hear anything that pastor said.

            The gospel should be the primary message we share with others. Furthermore, the gospel should be what we build our church’s reputation on. The apostle Paul wrote, “For it is with your heart that you believe and are justified, and it is with your mouth that you profess your faith and are saved” (Romans 10:10, NIV).[1] When doing that “anyone who believes in him will never be put to shame. . . everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved” (Romans 10:11, 13). That is the primary task of church leaders and every Christian. We are supposed to know God and make Him known. Paul raises these questions as he expands his thoughts on the Gospel, “How, then, can they call on the one they have not believed in? And how can they believe in the one of whom they have not heard? And how can they hear without someone preaching to them?” (Romans 10:14). The gospel is supposed to be primary so people can be saved and not go to hell. If another message becomes primary, then unbelievers cannot “call on” God, “believe in him,” or “hear.” If the gospel is not the primary message, then people won’t come to a saving faith in Jesus. This is why our church’s reputation should be based on the gospel.

            The book of Acts gives us a picture of how the gospel was the primary message proclaimed by each of the disciples in every city they went. Here are some examples.

            Philip “traveled about, preaching the gospel in all the towns” (Acts 8:40). After traveling, Peter and John “returned to Jerusalem, preaching the gospel in many Samaritan villages” (Acts 8:25). Paul and Barnabas went to Lystra and Derbe and “continued to preach the gospel” (Acts 14:7, 21). At the Jerusalem Council, Peter told the people gathered there that “God made a choice among you that the Gentiles might hear from my lips the message of the gospel and believe” (Acts 15:7). Then later, Luke—the author of Acts—wrote that “We got ready at once to leave for Macedonia, concluding that God had called us to preach the gospel to them” (Acts 16:10).  

            The gospel was the message of these men traveling to new places. It wasn’t about tax reform, who to vote for, or how to maintain the politics in their region or country. (They didn’t even address slavery as many people today thought they should have.) The focus was on presenting the gospel so people could hear about God and believe in Him.

            If things inhibit people from hearing the gospel, then those inhibitors must be removed. The gospel must be primary, and anything that prevents it from having its rightful place must be removed.

            I am afraid my caddie friend might not hear the gospel. The political focus of one pastor pushed him further away from a potentially inquiring faith in Jesus Christ. Hopefully in the future, a strong Christian can befriend him and help him draw close to God. But for now, the gospel is not something he’s interested in hearing, at least from that Dallas pastor. I learned that day—and I hope you have learned too—that our church’s reputation should be based on the gospel and nothing else.


[1] Unless otherwise noted, all translations are from the New International Version, 2011 revision.

Filed Under: Church Pastor and Leader Advice

A Fresh Start for an Old Friend

April 19, 2024 by Christopher L. Scott

The words “I’m sorry” are always hard to say, but perhaps words harder to say are “I forgive you.” Whether we are five years old or fifty years old, it’s always hard to say “I forgive you” especially when that same person has hurt us, cost us money, or wasted our time.

In this article we’re looking at a forgiveness story. A slave has ran away from his master, he became a Christian, then was sent back to his master, saying “I’m sorry” and hoping the slave owner says “I forgive you.”

The letter we know as “Philemon” was written to a man named Philemon who was a wealthy member of the Colossian church which met in his house (Philemon 2). Paul calls Philemon a “beloved brother” and “fellow worker” (Philemon 1).Philemon was likely a prominent member of the church of Colossae (Philemon 1, 2; cf. Col 4:2) and likely had been saved under Paul’s ministry several years earlier in Ephesus (Philemon 19).

APPLAUSE

Paul begins his letter commending Philemon this way, “because I hear of your love and of the faith which you have toward the Lord Jesus and toward all the saints” (Philemon 5).

            The effects of Philemon’s faith in Jesus and love for all the saints is explained in the following verses, “and I pray that the fellowship of your faith may become effective through the knowledge of every good thing which is in you for Christ’s sake. For I have come to have much joy and comfort in your love, because the hearts of the saints have been refreshed through you, brother.” (Philemon 6–7) The “fellowship” (v. 6) here means much more than just enjoying someone else’s company. It refers to the mutual sharing of all of life because of the mutual bond and faith they have in Christ. The word “effective” (v. 6) here describes Paul’s desire for Philemon’s actions to send a powerful message to others about forgiveness.

You might have noticed that Paul gives Philemon a reputation to live up too. I don’t think he’s buttering him up or trying to manipulate him. But I do believe he’s reminding Philemon of the godly character that Philemon has.

APPEAL

In the middle of this letter Paul makes his request based on two situations.

The Earthly Problem

Paul’s request involves a person named “Onesimus.” Paul writes, “I appeal to you for my child Onesimus, whom I have begotten in my imprisonment” (Philemon 10). Onesimus was a common name for slaves that meant, “useful.”

            Onesimus was not a believer when he ran away from Philemon, but Onesimus apparently had met Paul while Paul was in house arrest in Rome and Onesimus became a Christian. The trip from Colossae to Rome would have been a 1,000 mile trip by land and water. Many slaves would flee to Rome when they ran away from their masters because the city of Rome had 1,000,000 people living there and was an easy place to get lost among all the people.[1] The problem was that Onesimus had broken the Roman law (running away) and Onesimus had probably also defrauded his master (stealing).

            Paul knew this had to be dealt with so he sent Onesimus back to Philemon. Onesimus was traveling to Colossae with Tychicus, who was returning to Colossae with the letter to the Colossians (Colossians 4:7-9). But, there had been a change in Onesimus, “who formerly was useless to you, but now is useful both to you and to me.” (Philemon 11). Onesimus is described by Paul as a “child”[2] in the faith to Paul (v. 10) and a “brother” (v. 16).

            Paul does a play on words here in Greek that comes through in English as well. Onesimus in Greek means “useful.” In the past Onesimus “was useless.” In other words, Useful was useless. It’s like calling a woman Grace who always holds grudges or a man Earnest that never tells truth. In the past Onesimus had forsaken his name, but Paul says Onesimus “now is useful.”Useful was formerly useless, but now Useful is useful.   Onesimus had been worthless until God got a hold of him and radically transformed him by God’s grace.

            This is what Paul wants Philemon to consider. “I have sent him [Onesimus] back to you in person, that is, sending my very heart, whom I wished to keep with me, so that on your behalf he might minister to me in my imprisonment for the gospel; but without your consent I did not want to do anything, so that your goodness would not be, in effect, by compulsion but of your own free will” (Philemon 12–14).Paul wants Onesimus for ministry, but only wants to do it if Philemon allows.

            From Paul we learn that we value relationships more than requests. In this context Paul values his relationship with Philemon more than his request of Philemon. Effectually, “This is a request that I have, but I don’t want my request to effect our friendship.” As Christians we need to value our relationships more than requests.

The Heavenly Provision

Paul writes, “For perhaps he was for this reason separated from you for a while, that you would have him back forever, no longer as a slave, but more than a slave, a beloved brother, especially to me, but how much more to you, both in the flesh and in the Lord” (Philemon 15–16).

            Here we see God’s plan. The word “Perhaps” indicates Paul believes God has had a part in all of this. Paul knows wrong occurred as Onesimus was a runaway slave, now God is using it for good. As one commentator stated on this passage, “God’s sovereign grace works in all human affairs.”[3] Paul suggests there has been a deeper significance and purpose of Onesimus’s running away.

            The great reformer John Calvin wrote, “If we are angry on account of offences committed by men, our minds ought to be soothed, when we perceive that those things which were done through malice have been turned to a different end by the purpose of God.”[4] I think that’s what Paul’s telling Philemon, Your experience was bad, but maybe God is using it for good.

            From Paul we learn that we value heavenly providence more than luck. Someone asked one of the members of our church if she believed in luck as a Christian woman. What a great question! As Christians we don’t necessarily believe in earthly luck, but we do believe in divine providence.

            With God there are no accidents and I think we can say there is no luck. Imagine the conversation occurring between Paul and Onesimus the first time they met in Rome:

Onesimus: “I’m from Colossae.”

Paul: “Wow, I’ve never been there, but when I was in Ephesus I met a guy from Colossae. Perhaps you know him.”

Onesimus: “Maybe I do. What’s the guy’s name?”

Paul: “His name is Philemon. Do you know him?”

Onesimus: “Yes, I do, in fact.”

Paul: “How do you know him?”

Onesimus: “I used to be his slave.”

Paul: “Wow, you must have earned your freedom or he let you go?”

Onesimus: “No, I am here because I ran away from him and I am here hiding from him.”

Paul: “Well, let me ask if you know someone else I’ve met. He’s not from Colossae. He’s from Judea, and his name is Jesus. . .”

            In one of my favorite books pastor Warren Wiersbe writes, “If you are yielded to Christ, your life is not a series of accidents; it is a series of appointments.”[5] God is in everything we do. When we run, He allows us to run because He knows where He wants us to end up. I believe that’s Paul’s message to Philemon here: Philemon, what are the odds that your runaway slave ends up in the house that I’m in, and that I got to share the Gospel w/him and that I am able to send him back to you. Philemon, God is in this. Because of this we need to allow the unique way that God orchestrates things to influence what He might want us to do.

ACCOUNT

But what about the cost of this? Philemon might be wondering: I have been hurt, shamed, and been stolen from. Paul addresses that next.

Here we read about Paul’s offer. “But if he [Onesimus] has wronged you [Philemon] in any way or owes you anything, charge that to my account;” (Philemon 18).When Onesimus left, he likely stole money or goods (or both) in order to travel 1,000 miles to Rome. Philemon had a right to be upset his slave left, especially if Onesimus stole from Philemon.

            Paul proposes a solution, “charge that to my account”(v. 18).He essentially says, “charge that to me” or “I will stand in his place” or “Put what he owes on my account.”

            Paul then signs his pledge, “I, Paul, am writing this with my own hand, I will repay it (not to mention to you that you owe to me even your own self as well)” (Philemon 19). It takes more than love to solve a problem and here Paul says he’ll help pay it with money.

            It was common in the first century to have an “amanuensis” who would write a letter while someone dictated it to someone else. Yet here Paul wants to emphasize his promise so he grabs the pen and writes himself.

            Paul then describes his hope “Yes, brother, let me benefit from you in the Lord; refresh my heart in Christ. Having confidence in your obedience, I write to you, since I know that you will do even more than what I say” (Philemon 20–21). Paul wants to have Onesimus welcomed back gracefully, to have Onesimus minister to others in a significant way, and to have Onesimus be forgiven.

            From this we learn from Paul that we value reconciliation more than money. Money almost always complicates situations. Money creates conflict in families, churches, business, schools, and many other areas of life. Yet Paul values reconciliation between these two people more than money. And that’s an important lesson for us to apply as well. We need to value reconciliation with others more than the money that might have caused problems.

So what happened as a result of this letter sent in AD 63? In AD 110 we possibly learn about what happened.

CONCLUSION[6]

In AD 110 Ignatius of Antioch—previous Christian bishop of Antioch and personal associate of the apostle John—was a prisoner being taken to Rome. He was transported by ten Roman soldiers to be fed to the lions because he refused to renounce his faith in Jesus Christ as Savior and Lord and God and King. Ignatius and the Roman soldiers stopped in Smyrna for a short period of rest which gave Ignatius an opportunity to have visitors. Three prominent Christian leaders came to visit Ignatius from three different cities. These three men were Polybius who was the bishop of Tralles, Damas who was the bishop of Magnesia, and a guy named Onesimus who was the bishop of Ephesus.  

We don’t know from Scripture what the result was from this letter that Paul sent to Philemon, but a period of time later, just 100 miles away from Philemon’s home in Colossae a man named Onesimus shows up as bishop in the nearby church in Ephesus.  Many scholars believe this Onesimus is the same man Paul wrote about in his letter to Philemon. Apparently Onesimus was forgiven by his slave owner, became a prominent spiritual leader in Ephesus, and with this we conclude that an old friend gave Onesimus a fresh start.


[1] M. Reasoner, “Rome and Roman Christianity” (pp. 850-855) in Dictionary of Paul and His Letters (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 1993),p. 851.

[2] περὶ τοῦ ἐμοῦ τέκνου / “for my child” is a term of endearment which Paul has used elsewhere to refer to Timothy (1 Tim 1:2; 2 Tim 1:2) and to refer to Titus (Tit 1:4). AT Robertson says this is a “tender and affectionate” reference to Onesimus (A.T. Robertson, Word Pictures in the New Testament [Nashville, TN: Broadman Press, 1933]).

[3] Larson, Knute Larson, I & II Thessalonians, I & II Timothy, Titus, Philemon, vol. 9, Holman New Testament Commentary (Nashville, TN: Broadman & Holman Publishers, 2000) p. 407.

[4] John Calvin, Commentaries on the Epistles to Timothy, Titus, and Philemon (Bellingham, WA: Logos Bible Software, 2010) p. 356.

[5] Warren Wiersbe, The Bumps Are What You Climb On (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 2016),48.

[6] This conclusion is adapted from Charles Swindoll, Swindoll’s Living Insights: Philippians, Colossians, Philemon, vol. 9 (Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale, 2017), pp. 199, 202.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Confronting a Lost Leader

April 19, 2024 by Christopher L. Scott

Conflict is a part of every ministry. It’s common to think certain sizes of churches or specific denominations might have more or less conflict. The reality is not whether or not you have conflict in ministry, what is important is how you navigate the conflict in your ministry.

            Paul, Barnabas, and Titus left their brief meeting with Peter, James, and the other leaders in Jerusalem (Acts 15:30) and returned 300 miles north to Antioch. In Galatians 2:11-21 Peter comes to Antioch, sins publicly in front of others, so Paul reproves Peter.

            In this article I would like to show you the context of what’s occurring (Galatians 2:12-13), highlight parts of the correction Paul gives to Peter (Galatians 2:14b-21), then look at the way that Paul confronts Peter (Galatians 2:11, 14a) and see what we can learn about how to handle conflict in our churches and ministries.

CONTEXT

The problem is described in Galatians 2:12, “For prior to the coming of certain men from James, he [Peter] used to eat with the Gentiles; but when they came, he began to withdraw and hold himself aloof, fearing the party of the circumcision.”[1] Peter had been enjoying meals with Gentile believers, but when James and other prominent Jewish leaders arrived from Jerusalem, Peter withdrew himself from the Gentiles and only ate with the Jews.

            Why was this a problem? We learn about that in Galatians 2:13, “The rest of the Jews joined him [Peter] in hypocrisy, with the result that even Barnabas was carried away by their hypocrisy.” Peter was not just sinning by showing favor to race, but Peter was also leading others into sin.

CORRECTION

Now that we have the context, let’s look at the correction that Paul gives to Peter. Paul gives a speech that states all Christians are equal in Christ for two reasons.

            First, we are saved through faith, not through works, “nevertheless knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the Law but through faith in Christ Jesus, even we have believed in Christ Jesus, so that we may be justified by faith in Christ and not by the works of the Law; since by the works of the Law no flesh will be justified” (Galatians 2:16). Second, we are saved through Christ, not through the Law. “I have been crucified with Christ; and it is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me; and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself up for me” (Galatians 2:20).

            These three statements show there was no biblical reason to treat someone different because of race (like Peter was doing). Paul makes it clear in his letter to the Galatians that Peter has sinned.

CONFRONTATION

I want to share with you four tips to follow whenyou need to confront others and correct behavior based on how Paul handled the situation described in Galatians 2:11, 14a.

1. Get the Facts

Notice Paul says, “But when I saw that they were not straightforward about the truth of the gospel” (Galatians 2:14a). Paul saw with his own eyes what occurred and he knew from first-hand experience.

            When confronting someone we need to get the facts straight and make sure we have the right information. In this case, Paul saw it. (Paul probably also knew about Peter’s tendency to say one thing in passion, but that Peter didn’t always follow through on what he said in practice.)

            In our lives we might not always see something that is done wrong, but we often hear about it. So the first step is to verify. And you verify in an informal and non-threatening way. Don’t approach someone saying, “I heard that. . . .” Instead what you say is, “I wanted to talk to you because someone told me something, and what they said doesn’t sound like you. So I wanted to share with you what I heard and see what you have to say. . .”

2. Know the Truth

To confront someone you have to know what Godly behavior should look like. How should that person have acted? What would the appropriate thing to say have been?

            The proper behavior in this context is described as “the truth of the gospel” (Galatians 2:14) which is the same phrase used in Galatians 2:5 when Paul said he didn’t yield to those False Brethren who snuck into his meeting with Peter about the need for Titus to be circumcised. The doctrine Paul has laid out in Galatians 2:14-21 states that we all are sinners, we have been saved through faith, and we have been saved because of Christ. Thus, there is no reason to act differently around people of different races.

3. Act Quickly

When Paul “saw that they weren’t straightforward about the truth of the gospel” (Galatians 2:14a) it says “I [Paul] said to Cephas [Peter] in the presence of all” (Galatians 2:14b). Paul acted quickly. He didn’t wait. He didn’t procrastinate. There’s no gap between the sin and correction. He knew that the behavior he saw did not match the Bible’s teaching on that situation.

            However, there are two times you don’t want to act quickly. Don’t act when emotional (whether angry or sad). You’ve got to be levelheaded. You must be cool, calm, and collected, because the other person isn’t always going to be. So you have to be centered and at peace. Be Confident and firm, but loving and gracious. Don’t act without prayer. Pray before, during, and after the confrontation. Pray and look up Scripture. Pray and ask God for help.

4. Talk Directly

The most important principle for handling conflict and confrontation is this one: Do it face-to-face. Don’t text, don’t email, don’t call, don’t fax. Again, don’t text about conflict! Remember, don’t text when in conflict! As a pastor I have counseled many people engaged in conflict with family members through harsh exchanges of text messages. I can honestly say that when we replace a face with a screen in conflict, the results are bad.

            Here it says that Paul, “opposed him [Peter] to his face” (Galatians 2:11). This was a direct confrontation. Paul did not talk about Peter behind his back. He didn’t put it on Facebook. He didn’t send him a text. Paul approached Peter and talked to him directly. 

CONCLUSION

Don’t you wish we knew what Peter’s response was? We don’t know what he did. But most commentaries on this passage state that he likely admitted he was wrong and brought the two groups together (based on the book of Acts and what he wrote in 1 & 2 Peter later). I pray and hope that you too can get past conflict just like Peter and Paul, by using Paul’s example as a model for your ministry.


[1] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

25 Tips for Facilitating a Small Group

April 19, 2024 by Christopher L. Scott

Start a Bible study . . . they said. It will be easy . . . they said. Anyone can do it . . . they said. Well, facilitating a small group discussion as part of a Bible study is not as easy as one thinks. For four years I served as a small groups pastor at a church and it was always a challenge to help our small group facilitators—new and veterans—to feel equipped to lead a small group discussion. In this article I will give you twenty-five tips that will help you become a better small group facilitator.

PREPARE WELL

Don’t just show up and wing it. Pray, read the passage several times, and write out your answers to the questions. A great small group discussion doesn’t just happen. It takes preparation and hard work. Write out your notes by hand or type them up if that’s easier for you to read. But have them printed out so you don’t have to be using your phone or tablet in the meeting.

READ THE QUESTIONS ALOUD BEFORE THE MEETING

Just because you can read a word and know what it means doesn’t mean you can properly pronounce it verbally during the small group. Be sure to read the questions aloud before the group meets.

TURN YOUR PHONE OFF

Your focus needs to be on your group and guiding their discussion, so turn the phone off so you can concentrate. Furthermore, encourage others to turn theirs off too.

UTILIZE AN ASSISTANT OR COFACILITATOR

Try to find someone willing to be your “backup” to facilitate the group if you can’t be there. This assistant can also help you to facilitate healthy conversations in the group. Sometimes people make statements or ask questions and it can be hard to discern what exactly they are saying or asking. A good assistant will be assertive to step in and say, “I think what you are asking is actually _____” or “I think what she is trying to say is ____.”

ALWAYS HAVE A BIBLE WITHIN REACH

Your small group discussions should always interact with the Bible. Be sure to have a paper Bible (not digital on a phone or iPad) within reach while you facilitate your small group.

KEEP A GOOD STUDY BIBLE NEARBY

When you come to a difficult passage or someone has a question that you can’t answer, pull out a study Bible. The NIV Study Bible and NASB Study Bible are great resources to use (both have the same study notes). I use the Ryrie Study Bible (NASB), but the ESV Study Bible and MacArthur Study Bible are great too.

AFFIRM WHAT PEOPLE SAY

Let people know what they say makes sense and is a good contribution by thanking them for sharing. Statements like, “I like how you phrased that” or “Thank you for sharing” go a long way to encourage people to share their thoughts and answer the questions you ask the group.

TALK LESS THAN 25 PERCENT OF THE TIME

Your job is to facilitate a discussion, not to preach or teach. Make sure that you talk less than 25 percent of the time in your group. Your goal is to get other people to discuss the passage of Scripture or topic.

READ THE NOTES IN THE BACK OF YOUR DISCUSSION GUIDE

Most Bible study guides will have some “leader notes” in the back of the guide to help the facilitator know what to expect during the discussion each week and how to prepare for the discussion. Be sure to read those notes during your preparation time for your small group.

WATCH THE LEADER COACHING VIDEOS

If your group is using a DVD study, often there are some coaching videos on the DVDs (or available online). In your preparation time for your small group be sure to watch those videos because they will help you be ready to facilitate a discussion.

ASK FOR ADVICE FROM YOUR CHURCH OR PASTOR

Your church staff should be equipping you and encouraging you. Don’t be afraid to ask for help when you need it.

PUT THE CHAIRS AND COUCHES IN A CIRCLE

Nothing says “let’s talk” like a bunch of people in a circle looking at each other. A circle fosters a discussion environment. If your group watches a DVD as part of your study, you will want to start out with your group chairs facing the TV. Then after the DVD is finished, have a few people move their chairs so that you can all sit in a circle facing each other.

ENCOURAGE THE GROUP TO WORK THROUGH THE LESSON BEFORE COMING TO MEETING

Your group will have a better discussion if they take time to work through the lesson before coming to their group meeting. Encourage them to read the passage a few times, answer the questions in the study guide, and bring their own questions to the group.

DELEGATE YOUR BUSY WEEKS OR SEASONS

If you know that you are going to be busy for a particular week or season, ask your assistant or someone else in your group if he or she might like to facilitate the discussion for you. This is one of the reasons you must always have an assistant in your group!

SILENCE IS OKAY

In a new group or at the beginning of your meeting there probably will be some silence. Sometimes it just takes a couple of people to start talking and then the rest of the group will start to contribute. If there is silence, that’s okay.

DON’T ANSWER YOUR OWN QUESTIONS

If you read a question and no one answers, then read the question again. If still no one answers, then ask if the question makes sense or is confusing. If needed, slightly alter the question so people understand it, or just skip the question. But as the facilitator, do not answer your own questions unless someone else has already shared any answer. If you as the facilitator ask a question, then jump in and answer it before others talk, it discourages the group for sharing their thoughts. You only want to share your answer to a question after others have already had a chance to share.

BEGIN AND END ON TIME

Success in a small group requires consistent start and end times. Make a plan for your group and keep the discussion going. There might be times that your group needs to deviate from the curriculum to focus on a need someone has. If that’s the case then put the material aside and focus on the person. But be sure that the group ends on time.

REVIEW A COVENANT OR AGREEMENT YEARLY

Most churches have a small group “covenant” or “commitment” or “agreement” form. This agreement guides the group and helps ensure a healthy atmosphere for discussion and spiritual growth. Be sure to review it yearly and give it to the new people that join your group. Doing this will prevent problems and headaches for you in the future.

ENSURE EVERYONE UNDERSTANDS THE PURPOSE OF THE GROUP FROM DAY ONE

Each small group has a slightly different flavor, but the purpose should always be the same: learn God’s Word, connect new people to church, enjoy fellowship with each other, and serve others. So make sure that everyone understands that this is why your group exists.

INVOLVE EVERYONE

Everyone should participate in your discussion. When people attend church on Sunday they passively sit and listen to a sermon. When they attend your small group during the week they need to actively participate in a discussion.

APPLICATION IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN COMPLETION

Take your time working through the curriculum for your group. If you need two or three weeks to cover one lesson that’s okay as long as people are staying on topic and are applying the material to their lives.

SOAK YOUR GROUP MEMBERS AND CURRICULUM IN PRAYER

Pray for the members of your group everyday. And pray that the curriculum you will be using will speak to your group, and help them transform their lives so that they look more like Christ.

HOLD THE SNACKS

Nothing is more distracting (and irritating) than someone getting up to grab a snack, dropping some of the floor, munching, and talking with a mouthful during the small group discussion time. If your group has snacks try to limit those snacks to only before the group begins or after the discussion has ended.

DIVIDE AND CONQUER

When it is time for your group to discuss more personal and sensitive issues, divide up your group. You will need to divide if you have ten or more people in your group. Pair up the men with men and women with women, or young folks together, or just pair people based on where they are sitting.

VISIT OTHER GROUPS TO SEE HOW OTHER FACILITATORS FACILITE

Different facilitators have different styles and methods of facilitating their groups. Visit a couple other groups to see what you can learn from others and how you can improve the way you facilitate your group.

REMIND THE GROUP THAT IT IS OKAY TO DISAGREE

Sometimes Christians think they have to agree with everyone in their small group. Part of the growth that people experience in a small group is enjoying fellowship with people that believe and act differently than they do. Learning to love those people and get along with them is a sign of spiritual maturity. From time to time, remind your group that it is okay to disagree.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Essential Tools for Weekly Sermon Preparation

April 19, 2024 by Christopher L. Scott

When I was an associate pastor I preached every four months. The benefit of only preaching every four months was that I had four months of material to use for that sermon. I had four months of principles to share, stories to tell, fresh ideas to bring to our congregation, and four months to study a passage or topic for the message.

            But now that I serve as a senior pastor the experience is different. Instead of four months of preparation I get about four days! (I work on my sermons Monday through Thursday and I try to take Fridays and Saturdays off to spend with my family.) In my experience as a senior pastor that preaches fifty sermons a year I’ve come to rely on some great tools to help me in my weekly sermon preparation, and I believe they can help you too.

A STUDY BIBLE

The best resource you need to have if you preach each week is a good study Bible. The study Bible I’ve used for years is the NASB Ryrie Study Bible. I prefer this study Bible because of the succinct doctrinal summaries, outlines of each book of the Bible, as well as the brief footnotes on each page of Scripture. In my opinion, the ESV Study Bible is the most comprehensive and best resource if you are looking for a study Bible. But I prefer my Ryrie Study Bible because I was privileged to have lunch with Charles Ryrie in 2015 and his notes reflect the theology of the Seminary I attended.

            There are two primary benefits you will find from utilizing a study Bible as you prepare to preach each week. First, it provides a solid foundation to begin your study. In a study Bible you won’t get bogged down with exegesis or textual criticism. Instead, it will orient you to the issues of the text that are important for an everyday layperson, not a scholar or a pastor. Years ago I was trying to describe how we arrive at the dates we often list for Old Testament events such as the fall of Jerusalem (586 BC) or return from exile (536 BC). I couldn’t find a clear answer when I looked through several of my commentaries and Bible dictionaries. But I found the best description of Old Testament dating from the NLT Study Bible. It described “Regnal Year” dating and “Ascension Year” dating in a simple way that no one else had covered.  A second benefit of a study Bible is that whether you find yourself at home, out for coffee, or on an airplane, if you have a study Bible and a pad of paper you can make the most of your time no matter where you find yourself.

A BIBLE DICTIONARY

The second essential tool you need for weekly sermon preparation is a good Bible dictionary. There are lots of these available from different Christian publishers. I use Unger’s Bible Dictionary. A good Bible dictionary will provide you an article on subjects in the Bible that will help you a little dig deeper than a study Bible. For example, this week I was preparing a message on Zacharias from Luke 1. I was curious for extra material about Zacharias in Scripture. I learned that there are 29 different men in the Bible named Zachariah (the Hebrew name) and that my NASB translation refers to him as “Zacharias” following the Greek form of the Hebrew name. This provided me with good expositional material for my sermon.

A THOROUGH EXEGETICAL COMMENTARY

Just as a Study Bible can help you make a lot of progress in your study toward a prepared sermon, an good exegetical commentary can get you almost to the end of your preparation. When I preached through Galatians I used the Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament (Baker, 2013)by Douglas Moo, when I preached through Malachi I used Malachi Then and Now: An Expository Commentary Based on Detailed Exegetical Analysis (Lexham Press, 2016) by Allen Ross, when I preached advent sermons in Luke I used the Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament (Baker, 1994) by Darrel Bock. An exegetical commentary will cover textual criticism notes that are relevant to your passage, incorporate relevant Hebrew or Greek grammar, help you discern your exegetical idea and homiletical idea for the message, and point out any significant doctrines relevant to the passage. Exegetical commentaries can be very technical, so if you have not attended Seminary I do not recommend an exegetical commentary.

A MONTHLY CHRISTIAN PERIODICAL

When you preach to the same people each week they expect you to stay updated on the state of Christianity both locally and internationally. You need to be in touch not just with your people you are speaking to, but with Christians and issues around the world. Because of this, you need to regularly read a Christian periodical. I have my church purchase me a subscription to Christianity Today. It provides relevant news articles related to the Christian church in America and also summarizes some of the significant things occurring in the Christian church around the world. You’d be surprised how many great sermon illustrations or current statistics I utilize in my sermons from simply reading one Christian periodical a month. For you, perhaps your Christian periodical might be your denominational magazine (Light and Life for Free Methodists, Christian Standard for restoration movement churches, Lutheran Witness, Presbyterians Today, etc.)

A SYSTEMATIC THEOLOGY

I hope that teaching Christian doctrine is a regular part of your weekly sermons. A book that covers systematic theology will help you dig deep when needed. Whether you are Calvinist or Wesleyan, get a resource that will help you expand on the theological topics that are briefly touched on in a passage, but require a more in depth examination. As Jesus closes the upper room discourse (John 13-17) Jesus prays to God the Father about his disciples, “I do not ask on behalf of these alone, but for those also who believe in Me through their word; that they may all be one; even as You, Father, are in Me and I in You, that they also may be in Us, so that the world may believe that You sent Me” (John 17:29-21, NASB). These verses describe the perichoresis of the Father and the Son and how that relationship between the Trinity should be a model for the people of the church too. A good systematic theology book will help you succinctly teach that vital (and complex) doctrine to your church.

A THESAURUS

When you preach to the same people each week you must bring fresh words and phrases to them. If you are not careful you will find yourself falling back into your same “go to” words, phrases, or quotes. A thesaurus will expand your vocabulary and help you find just the right word when needed. When I was preaching about how Jesus told his disciples to “go into the world” in John 17, I wanted a more vivid word to describe our “going into the world” and “being sent out.” A quick look at my thesaurus led me to the synonym “infiltrate” which was a great word that was clear and direct.

There are two thesaurus you should consider. I primarily use Merriam-Wester’s Thesaurus, but I keep a copy of Roget’s International Thesaurus at home. Each works differently. With Merriam-Webster you go to it with a word and it gives you different words to consider. With Roget’s you go to it with an idea and it gives you words to consider.

WHAT’S NOT ON MY LIST

As we wrap up our time together in this article you might be saying, “But what about. . . ?” Here are a few things I intentionally left off the list and why.

            Sermon Illustration Books. Preacher, you have lived a life full of experiences and you don’t need a book of illustrations. Furthermore, your people don’t want to hear you tell them the same story they’ve heard from their previous two pastors as well as Chuck Swindoll on the radio. Find your own illustrations. Get fresh material for your people. Don’t rely on others that have been retelling the same stories for a century.

            Logos, Accordance, or Other Bible Software. While these can be helpful, they get expensive quickly. You will pay more for those books to have them digitally than you would if you bought them in print. (If you don’t believe me, then check out Daniel Wallace’s Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics for sale on Amazon compared to Logos.) If you need to parse a Hebrew or Greek word, or want to quickly reference BDAG, then Bible software like Logos might be helpful. Otherwise invest your hard earned money in a print library.

            Someone Else’s Sermon Outline or Manuscript. Preacher, I pray you don’t copy a sermon from Rick Warren, use an outline from Warren Wiersbe, or preach from a manuscript from David Jeremiah. God has placed you in a church with His people and you should dig into God’s Word, allow His Spirit to speak to you, and bring a message that is relevant to your people.

            I preach fifty times a year at our church. While it is difficult and puts a lot of pressure on me, I know God has placed me where He wants me. These are essential tools I keep on my desk at all times to help me feed our church each week. I pray you will find them helpful too.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Basics of Discipleship

April 19, 2024 by Christopher L. Scott

On my first day of high school I was six feet tall. When I went to my physical education class the teacher, Mr. Koepp, approached me and introduced himself as the freshman basketball coach. He asked if I had ever played basketball and told me to try out for the team.

            Mr. Koepp took attendance, explained the course expectations, then let us play basketball until the class was over. I grabbed a basketball and played with the other kids, but I was absolutely terrible. While I was taller than everyone else, I lacked many basic skills required for the game.

            Mr. Koepp never asked me about playing basketball again. He had a picture of what he wanted in a basketball player. A boy that was tall was only one piece of the picture. He also wanted someone who could dribble, shoot, and play defense.

            In the Great Commission, Jesus commands us to make disciples. The New Testament then paints a picture of what a disciple of Jesus Christ looks like. And as pastors we must, like Mr. Koepp, know what he picture looks like. Jesus and His apostles describe four qualities of a true disciple.

THEY EMBRACE GOD’S WORD

The book of Acts reveals the earliest events of the church. The first Christians “devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching” (Acts 2:42, ESV). Several years later, while the church in Corinth had many problems, Paul praised them for studying what he gave them. “I commend you because you remember me in everything and maintain the traditions even as I delivered them to you” (1 Cor. 11:2, ESV).

            Embracing God’s word means applying what a disciple learns to his or her life. Peter gave us an example of applying what he learned. In 2 Peter he acknowledges Paul’s letters (2 Peter 3:15–17) and how we are supposed to “grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ” (2 Peter 3:18, ESV). Peter and others had been reading Paul’s letters, interpreting their meanings, and applying them to their lives.

THEY EMBODY GOD’S KINGDOM

In addition to embracing God’s word, disciples embody God’s kingdom on earth. The dictionary defines embody as “to make concrete and perceptible” or to “give a tangible or visible form to an idea or quality.” Christ’s disciples are tangible expressions of Christ on earth.

            Paul tells us that “we are citizens of Heaven” (Philippians 3:20, NLT) and we “must live as citizens of Heaven, conducting yourselves in a manner worthy of the Good News about Christ” (Philippians 1:27, NLT). We are supposed to look different than the rest of the world.

            There are many ways we should look different. We don’t participate in the evil things that unbelievers do (1 Thessalonians 4:3–7). We should be attractive based on our deeds, not our looks (1 Timothy 2:9–15). We don’t allow our bodies to be used for lustful sin (Romans 6:13).

THEY ENCOURAGE ONE ANOTHER

A best-selling self-help book of the 1980s started with three words: “Life is difficult.” But the Christian life is even more difficult, so it requires us to encourage one another.

            You can’t encourage fellow believers if you are absent from them. We are told to participate in community together in Hebrews 10:24–25, “Let us consider how to stir up one another to love and good works, not neglecting to meet together, as is the habit of some, but encouraging one another” (ESV). By meeting together we are able to “encourage one another and build one another up” (1 Thessalonians 5:11, ESV). And that only happens when we see one another in fellowship.

            We also need to be there for people who need someone. Widows (Acts 6:1–7; 1 Timothy 5:3), orphans (James 1:27), and the poor (Galatians 2:10; Romans 12:13) all need us. Christians sometimes resist the fact that we need other people involved in our lives. We want to be independent. But in the life of a disciple, dependence on others is essential.

THEY EVANGELIZE OTHERS

            The New Testament says some people have the “gift” of evangelism and this tempts us to leave it for others gifted in that area. But every disciple is called to evangelize others.

A disciple of Jesus Christ shares the gospel regularly. Peter tells us to always be “prepared to make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you” (1 Peter 3:15, ESV).

While we might not travel thousands of miles to preach the gospel like Paul or write a letter to many people while exiled on an island like John, we must be ready to share the gospel in every situation.

            This “picture” of a disciple is what I discerned from study the New Testament. I encourage you to pray and study the New Testament to discern what the picture looks like for you and your church.

            With that I said, I have not always been a good disciple. For a period of my life I engaged in deep study of Scripture while not encouraging others who needed it. At another time I was so focused on being a good Christian that I neglected to tell others about Jesus. But the New Testament paints a complete picture of what it means to be a disciple of Jesus. Like Mr. Koepp, my PE teacher, our Lord wants people playing for His team who are well-rounded. Disciples should pursue all of these qualities: embracing His word, embodying His kingdom, encouraging one another, and evangelizing others. I pray you and me can pastor churches that develop God’s “picture” of a disciple.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

How to Interact with the Three Unchurched Groups in Our Current Culture

April 19, 2024 by Christopher L. Scott

We all have people in our lives that don’t know Christ. And these people often—even if they don’t admit it—have questions about God and life.

            I’m sure some of the people in your life have asked some of these questions:

  • Does God exist?
  • How do you know he is real?
  • Why is there suffering and evil in the world if God is in control?
  • If God created the world why do so many people believe in evolution?

You probably have heard those questions from time to time. Maybe privately while you were having coffee or a meal with that person. Or maybe they took the opportunity to lob those questions to you in front of a captive audience to try to embarrass you.

            And these questions are important because we want these people to know God and Jesus Christ. We want them to love God and follow him like we do. When we get to heaven these are the people that we hope are there when we get there and that we spend eternity with in heaven. And that’s why for us as believers, we need to be ready and prepared to talk with them and discuss their questions.

            In the book of John there’s a passage I like to call “Q & A Time with John the Baptist.” In this passage John the Baptist has two groups approach him and ask him questions, and we get to see the variety of answers he gives them. And as we go through this passage together I think you will notice that there are similarities between what John the Baptist was doing and what we do to engage the unchurched in our culture today.

THE QUESTIONS PEOPLE ASK

John’s Context

            There were priests and Levites that ask, “John, who are you?” These “priests” and “Levites” from Jerusalem were the guards at the temple that served as temple police. They also provided music for the temple services. They ask, “John, who are you?”  

This is the testimony of John, when the Jews sent to him priests and Levites from Jerusalem to ask him, “Who are you?” And he confessed and did not deny, but confessed, “I am not the Christ.” They asked him, “What then? Are you Elijah?” And he said, “I am not.” “Are you the Prophet?” And he answered, “No.” Then they said to him, “Who are you, so that we may give an answer to those who sent us? What do you say about yourself?” He said, “I am A VOICE OF ONE CRYING IN THE WILDERNESS, ‘MAKE STRAIGHT THE WAY OF THE LORD,’ as Isaiah the prophet said.” (John 1:19-23)

            There were also Pharisees that ask, “John, what are you doing?”The Pharisees were a group of religious leaders that lived during Jesus’s time who took a strong study of the Law and made additional interpretations of it. They essentially ask, “John, what are you doing?

Now they had been sent from the Pharisees. They asked him, and said to him, “Why then are you baptizing, if you are not the Christ, nor Elijah, nor the Prophet?” John answered them saying, “I baptize in water, but among you stands One whom you do not know. It is He who comes after me, the thong of whose sandal I am not worthy to untie.” These things took place in Bethany beyond the Jordan, where John was baptizing. (John 1:24–28)

Our Context

You and I have more in common with John the Baptist than you think. While John was pointing to Christ and he had groups of people approach him asking questions, we too have groups of people coming to us asking questions about us and our God.

            First, there are atheists that say There is nothing!” An atheist is someone that believes there is no god. He or she says, “There is nothing and I know there is nothing.” They often say “I only need science and reason, I don’t need a God or higher power. There’s no such thing as coincidence or Karma.” While their war cry is “There is nothing” the questions they often ask us are not usually questions, but are declarations: “How can you prove God exists?” “Faith is for weak people, why are you weak and need faith?” Why would you submit to a god?” Atheists often are on a mission to disprove religion and Christianity.

            Second, there are agnostics that ask, “Is there something?”             An agnostic is someone that believes there might be something. He or she says, “There is something but I don’t know what it is and I don’t think there is a way to know what it is.” For the agnostic there’s no way of knowing if there is a God or who he is.

            Third, there are apathetics that ponder, “Do I care?” These people don’t want to talk about God. They don’t really have questions except, “Why does God matter?” They don’t really care. These are some of the hardest people to talk to because you don’t have much to work with. You can’t get any traction. I remember once giving a gospel of John booklet to a friend who I regularly played golf with. I told him I thought he might like to read it and learn about Christianity. A month later I asked him if he had read it and he simply said, “no.” Then didn’t say anything else.

THE ANSWERS WE GIVE

So with a thorough examination of the people asking questions in John’s context and what three groups of people we often interact with in our context, let’s look at how we should answer people’s questions that we interact with.

Our Answers Should Be Correct

This is important because the church is becoming less and less biblically literate. We must encourage our church people to read their Bible every day, join a Bible study during the week, listen to podcasts of sermons or radio broadcasts of Bible teaching, and read good Christian books.

            If an atheist, agnostic, or apathetic person comes to us we should know enough about the Bible and God to be able to talk to them and have a conversation with them. And when Atheists, agnostics, or apathetics come to us, they want an experienced Christian that knows his or her Bible.

Our Answers Should Be Appropriate

If someone loses a child she needs love and encouragement, not a theological lesson about the age of accountability. If someone’s spouse has asked for a divorce he doesn’t need to hear a verse from Proverbs that says you reap what you sow. He needs to hear a verse about God’s longsuffering unconditional lovingkindness to his people.

            Our answers need to be short and direct (not long). They need to be reflective of what the Bible says (not just based on our personal experiences). They need to be simple (not filled with Christian jargon or words they don’t understand). Our answers should be appropriate to the person and his or her needs.

Our Answers Should Be Gentle

We need to be conversational, not confrontational. We need to be humble, not prideful. Because it is possible to win the argument but lose the person. If we are prideful, arrogant, rude, interrupt someone, and yell, but we “win” the argument we can actually lose the person.

            When they ask questions we can’t answer, instead trying to make something up, we should be able to graciously say, “That’s a good question, I’m not sure what the answer is.”

            Part of the way we give gentle answers is to describe ourselves as Christians that have faith seeking understanding. In other words, we don’t reason our way into a belief about God. But instead, it is through our faith in Christ that we learn and grow and seek a deeper understanding of God. 

CONCLUSION

People are asking questions. And we have answers that we can share with them. And when we share those answers we are like John the Baptist. We are not Elijah, we are not a prophet, and we definitely are not the Messiah. But we are a voice like John the Baptist that shares how we believe in Jesus Christ and that we know him. And as God’s voice we share with people answers to their questions that are correct, appropriate, and gentle. 

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Three Ways to Graciously Welcome Guests Before Even Talking to Them

April 1, 2024 by Christopher L. Scott

Everyone wants to be part of a friendly church. But what if there was a way you could be a welcoming church before anyone ever talks to your guests that visit your church? Here are three ways to graciously welcome guests before anyone ever talks to them.

PRINT A BULLETIN FOR THEM

 I’m a millennial but call me old fashioned for saying you should print a bulletin. Things are much easier to read on paper rather than a phone. And the bulletin printed on paper is larger than a phone as well.

            To graciously welcome your guests be sure to print a bulletin for them. Make sure the text is large enough that it can easily be read (at least 12-point font) and use a basic straightforward legible font (Times New Roman, Arial, etc.).

            List your church’s contact information, what people can expect when they visit your church, as well as your church’s mission statement and core values. This is your first chance to welcome people to your church and tell them about your church. Don’t miss this opportunity!

            At our church we print our bulletin on an 8.5×11 sheet of paper and fold it in half. The front cover of the bulletin changes each week based on the season of year of special occasion of the Sunday (Easter, Veteran’s Day, Lent, etc.). A half-sized sermon outline is printed and inserted into our bulletin each week too.           

MAINTAIN YOUR CHURCH BUILDING

Just as a bulletin helps the visitor navigate the church service, a well-maintained facility helps the visitor navigate the church building. Are the rooms well lit so that people can see where they are walking? Is the auditorium where the service is held bright enough that people can find a place to sit both before and when the service begins?

            To graciously welcome your visitors make sure the church building is clean. Is there trash in the parking lot or in the grass of the church? Did you check to make sure no neighborhood dogs have pooped in your grass in front of the church? Are the carpets cleaned? Do the bathrooms smell clean? (As a former janitor I learned that bathrooms shouldn’t just look clean, but they should smell clean too.)

            And one more thing. No one likes to ask for directions. So make sure your restrooms, nursery, kids program, and other vital areas are clearly labeled so people don’t have to ask where they are. Use big print in block letters (no fancy cursive or pretty letters) so people can easily read them from a distance.

DIRECT THEM THROUGH THE SERVICE

If you notice a few new people at church don’t be afraid to describe the order of service at the beginning of the service. As you move through the different elements of the service you might also tell them what is occurring and what will happen next. Say things like, “Welcome, Lakeview Missionary Church, at this point in our worship service we are going to ________.” Or, “Now that we have worshipped God together with music, at this point in our service we are going to ______________.” Or, “I’d like to invite Carolyn to come to the stage and read Scripture for us as we normally do before the sermon.”

            Simple ques like those give your guests signs of where the service is going and helps them know what to expect next. You can also direct people through the church service by printing the order of service in your bulletin if you prefer. That’s a little more work each week, but is helpful for guests to know what to expect as they experience your worship service.

I hope you can see that being a friendly church that welcomes visitors involves more than just talking with people. If you are intentional you can kindly welcome guests with your bulletins, church facility, and direction through the church service.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Three Simple Ways to Maintain an Online Ministry

April 1, 2024 by Christopher L. Scott

As church leaders we often we say we want to reach people with the gospel where they are, but then we tell them they can meet God at 11am on Sundays. Instead, we need to take God to them.

            A consistent online ministry is one way to “take God to people on a weekly basis. But amongst board meetings, community ministerial groups, denominational conferences, sermon preparation, and hospital visits, how do you find time to maintain an online ministry presence? As a solo pastor with no paid support staff, I have three ways that I have created and maintained an online ministry.

WEEKLY EMAIL UPDATE

Never underestimate the power of your written words to feed and nourish people’s souls. Why? Because when people read what you have written they often are inviting you into their most private moments. They read while in bed before going to sleep, they read when they are alone at lunch with a little free time, they might read your words during their devotion times in the morning.

            When people show up to church on a Sunday they have their best on display. They are dressed nicely, they have a smile on, and they want to look good for others. A wall naturally goes up when people attend church in person.

            But when people read your words at home, in their pajamas, with no makeup on, after a fight with a spouse, or a failed attempt at being a good parent, people have a guard that is down. They are willing to accept what you are saying and allow it to speak to them in a way that does not occur at an in person church service.

                        In our church I send a weekly email update to our church with an encouraging article written by me (usually 400-600 words), a list of our announcements from church on Sunday, and a list of the prayer requests.

            You might ask, “How in the world do I find time to write?” Here’s the thing. You already do a lot of writing. If you preach each Sunday you are writing every week. Almost all the articles I send to my church each week first appeared as parts of my sermon. One year after I preach a sermon I pull out my manuscript and I look for a part of that sermon that I can put into an article. I look for a good story, a significant quote, or a joke, then I tie that to the Scripture and place it in the article. Because most of my articles are taken from my sermon manuscript, most of the work is already done for me.

            I am often surprised not just that people read my articles, but also that they remember what I have written. But a weekly update with an article is one of three tools for an online ministry.

PODCAST

I hope you have someone posting your sermons as a podcast. With one upload to a podcast distributor (we use Anchor.fm) your podcast gets syndicated to as many as seven different platforms. Right now our church podcast is distributed to Amazon Music, Apple Podcasts, Castbox, Google Podcasts, Pocket Casts, Spotify, and Stitcher.

            While people might go to your website to listen to your sermon, they are more likely to listen if it is automatically distributed to one of these services. And if you preach on a topic that someone happens to search in those different platforms (“How do we know Jesus was God?” or “Steps to Peace with God”) they might find your sermon and listen.

            An additional benefit of podcast is that people can listen while doing other things. While driving in the car, cleaning the house, or even working at their desk. A podcast allows them to listen to your sermon online when they might not have time to sit and read an article or watch a video.

YOUTUBE

For more than a decade YouTube has been the second largest search engine in the world. Second, of course, to Google.

            While it is helpful to read an article, or listen to a podcast, video has a powerful visual element that helps you connect with your audience. When they can see your smile, hand gestures, and movements around a pulpit, it helps them connect with you and better understand your message.

            Our church posts a video of the sermon each week on our YouTube channel. Sometimes we have half as many people watch the sermon on YouTube as people that sit in the pew!

            One cool thing about YouTube is the way it’s algorithms work. When someone watches your video, then when you post a new video next week, the YouTube algorithms likely will suggest your new video for the person to watch.

            Taking advantage of the search engine reach of YouTube along with the increased capacity to convey information in visual form is something you can’t miss. And it’s simple to do. An iPhone on a tripod with a wireless microphone receiver works just fine for us.

YOUR TURN

To maintain an online ministry you need to give people something to read (an emailed article), something to listen to (podcast), and something to watch (YouTube). If a solo pastor such as myself can start and maintain these three items, I’m confident you can too!

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Two Often Forgotten Essentials for Mission Statements

April 1, 2024 by Christopher L. Scott

Judah was strong, mighty, and blessed by God. But the people began to wander from God and sin. They worshipped false gods, sacrificed their children to those gods, married pagan Gentiles, and participated in prostitution. As a result God allowed king Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon to conquer the city of Jerusalem in 586 BC. The temple, gates of the city, and walls were burnt down. The nation known as God’s chosen people (Exod 19:3-6), the one he had led, guided, and been with for centuries had been conquered and taken away from God’s city, country, and promised land.

Fast forward 140 years and we meet Nehemiah. While the temple had been rebuilt by Zerubbabel, the city walls were still burnt to the ground and the gates were still destroyed. So Nehemiah gets permission from the king of Persia to travel to Jerusalem to rebuild the walls and gates of the city. He arrives in Jerusalem with the materials he needs.

Nehemiah surveys the city for three days then he decides to share his mission with the people of Jerusalem (Neh 2:1). Nehemiah had not told anyone about his plans for the city. Not even the priests, nobles, or officials of the city knew why he was there (Neh 2:12-16).

Nehemiah says to them: “You see the bad situation we are in, that Jerusalem is desolate and its gates burned by fire. Come, let us rebuild the wall of Jerusalem so that we will no longer be a reproach. . . Let us arise and build” (Neh 2:17-18, NASB).[1]

And as you may know, they did rebuild the gates and walls of the city in only 52 days (Neh 6:15).

THREE OBSERVATIONS OF NEHEMIAH’S PROCESS

1. He took initiative.

Nehemiah was heartbroken when he heard how poor the situation was in Jerusalem (Neh 1:1-4). So he took initiative to fix the problem. He asked the king if he could go to Jerusalem. He asked the king for the materials he needed to rebuild the walls and gates. He asked the king to provide protection for the travel. He went to the city. He showed the people living there what was possible. He told them how God had been so gracious to him in the presence of the king. Then he led them in rebuilding the wall.

2. He said “let’s.”

Nehemiah knew he could not rebuild the wall alone. He was going to rebuild the wall with the people. He knew that city transformation had to be done together. He invited them to join him saying “let us rebuild the wall of Jerusalem so that we will no longer be a reproach. . . Let us arise and build” (Neh 2:17-18, emphasis mine). Nehemiah would work alongside them the entire time with his time and with his money. This was a cooperative effort.

3. He prayed.

Nehemiah was fervent in prayer for his mission. He prayed when hearing the news about the desperate situation in Jerusalem (Neh 1:3-4), when sharing his desire with the King of Persia (Neh 2:4), during the work in Jerusalem (Neh 4:9), and when the work was done (Neh 9:5-38).

TWO ESSENTIALS FOR YOUR MISSION

There are lots of great resources that can help you create a mission statement for your church or ministry. The Effective Church Group has two digital resources that can help you: “Developing your Church’s Mission”[2] and “Discovering Your Church’s Mission.”[3] While these are two great comprehensive resources, there are two essentials you need to have part of your mission that most people forget to include.

1. You Need to Make Your Mission Statement Short.

Nehemiah’s inspiring mission statement was short: “let us rebuild the wall of Jerusalem so that we will no longer be a reproach” (Neh 3:17b). You too, need to keep your mission statement short so that the people you lead can memorize it and apply it. If you ask someone what your mission statement is and if can’t remember it, then it’s probably too long.

Here’s a great example of a short and memorable mission statement: “Our MISSION: Reaching Seekers and Building Believers.”[4]

2. You Need to Make Your Mission Statement Exciting

Show how you want to change lives and transform others in Jesus’s name. Nehemiah shared a mission that grabbed the excitement the people had for their city. And he worded it in a way that they believed they could do it

Because the people were motivated to end the disgrace they found themselves in, this mission was exciting for them. The people wanted the city back to the way it had been in years past.

YOUR TURN

I hope you can take some time to reflect on your mission statement that you have now. Is it something that excites your people? Is it short enough that they can memorize it and share it with others? Do you remember what the mission statement is for your church or ministry?


[1] Unless otherwise noted all Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[2] https://effectivechurch.net/store/developing-your-churchs-mission/

[3] https://effectivechurch.net/store/discovering-your-churchs-mission/

[4] Moses Lake Presbyterian: A Community Basin Church, https://www.moseslakepres.org/ Accessed February 22, 2022

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Four Leadership Lessons from Abraham Lincoln

April 1, 2024 by Christopher L. Scott

Many people say Abraham Lincoln was the greatest leader the United States of America has ever had. There are four distinct leadership lessons Abraham Lincoln shows that can be directly applied to my own work in Christian ministry and leadership. The first of the four is about the necessity of reading the Bible and using it as a guide.

Keep a Bible Nearby and Read It Often

One of the three books which Mr. Lincoln often read and memorized sections of during his youth was the Bible.[1]

Later on as Lincoln became President many people witnessed that he always kept a Bible on his desk and read it often.[2] In fact, as the Civil War began and caused increased stress and tribulations he often read it more and focused on specific stories that would encourage him and help with the situations he was in. 3 In Lincoln’s Philadelphia Speech at Independence Hall in 1861 he showed what a solid biblical foundation does for a leader when he needs to stand up on an issue. Lincoln made a speech about how the “weights [of slavery] should be lifted from the shoulders of all men, and that all should have an equal chance.”[3] In the speech Lincoln also explained that the only way there would be bloodshed and war was if it was forced upon the government. Then Lincoln boldly declared his commitment, “I have said nothing but what I am willing to live by, and, in the pleasure of Almighty God, die by.”[4] One of the important things for Christian leaders is to have conviction for what they are doing that is founded in biblical principles.

Additionally, a careful reading of Lincoln’s speeches reveals that he used Bible based scripture imagery and literal quoting on a regular basis when appropriate such as “let us judge not, that we be not judged” and “the Almighty has His own purposes. Woe unto the world because of offenses; for it must needs be that offenses come, but woe to that man by whom the offense cometh.”[5]

As a Christian leader I too must read the Bible often and memorize chunks of it. To lead people in an authentic way I must know what God’s word says and use it to guide others that way. Knowing God’s verses and stories allows me to pull those out when I need them as I interact with people who are going through difficult circumstances and or I myself am going through difficult circumstances. And perhaps the greatest way to be a well formed Christian leader is allowing God’s word to marinate in my life in a way that molds and forms me into a great leader.

As a pastor I bring my Bible to the church with me each day and then take it home with me in the evenings. The Bible sits on my desk while I work throughout the day, I take it on my pastor care visits, and when I sleep at night I keep it on my nightstand near me.

As Lincoln was witnessed to always keep a Bible on his desk and to read it often, it is a leadership example that if it helped to end slavery and gave him the strength to stand up against it, then I too should do the same. Perhaps some of Lincoln’s relationship to the Bible helped him develop another leadership quality worth noting which will be discussed next: his ability to stand firm.

Stand Firm

Lincoln stood firm on many issues while president against opposition from others both within his own Presidential Cabinet and outsiders too.[6]

No greater quote can illustrate his ability to stand firm on an issue than this quote he made in 1939: “Broken by it, I, too may be; bow to it I never will. The probability that we may fall in the struggle ought not deter us from the support of a cause we believe to be just; it shall not deter me.”[7] Historians disagree about whether Lincoln’s quote is about banking or slavery. Early historians (including the pastor who read this quote at his funeral) believe Lincoln was talking about slavery, while historians as of late claim Lincoln was speaking on the topic of banking. A careful study of Lincoln will reveal that as a member of the Whig Party early in his political career (which was at the time he made this speech) meant he was in strong favor of a US bank and it is well known his stance on slavery. Whichever topic he was discussing does not matter because his steadfast commitment to both issues was the same. The only difference was the strength of opinion and belief of the American people when sought to change each issue as he rose in his political career.

Another example of Lincoln standing firm came in the context of Mr. Lincoln standing up for his wife, Mary Lincoln, when others accused her of inviting unworthy guests to the White House. Mr. Lincoln calmly responded to the criticizer that he and his wife will invite whom they please to have as company in their home and that they do not need any outside help in selecting their guests to entertain.[8]

One more great example of Lincoln standing firm was when he talked about the necessity of all men being equal when he commented, “there is no need of bloodshed and war. . . . there will be no bloodshed unless it be forced upon the government. The government will not use force unless force is used against it.”[9] But, Lincoln makes it very clear that he is the one in charge and that there will be use of force if the Confederate States decide to start a war and have a war. There are many more instances where Lincoln stood firm on issues. The most common issue which Lincoln stood firm on for many years was the topic of slavery. Lincoln believed that if it was not abolished, it should at least not be allowed to spread.

In my life there are instances where I need to stand firm, and this probably is an area where I need to have more confidence. When instances come up and situations arise that I have a strong feeling on, I need to take a position and stand firm on what I believe in. But this is sometimes difficult because I am at times scared to anger others. Learning about this quality Lincoln had helps me to realize that some topics are so important that it is okay to anger others when it leads to standing firm for what is right.

Self-Led Growth

Lincoln was a self-grower: meaning he worked hard to grow personally and professionally so that he could read, write, speak well, and lead.

In this way, he pushed himself to do what was needed to be done and he grew along the way.

The level of Lincoln’s accomplishment is amazing when considering his limited formal schooling. Several sources show that Lincoln probably only had as much as a year of formal schooling. One biographer comments on his ability to learn and grow: “He developed a confidence that he could dig into books for what he wanted, and would so repeatedly in the years ahead. And that confidence in his powers of understanding what was written on the page seems to have encouraged a broader self-confidence, in his judgment and his critical powers-let us call it a moral self-confidence.”[10]

Later when the Civil War started Lincoln himself admitted he knew nothing about military strategy, tactics, or how to win a war. Concurrent with his past history of digging into books to find the answer he needed, Lincoln began studying war tactics, maps of the South, and actively working with his military generals to the point that he was a well versed military man by the end of the Civil War.

In the context of Christian Ministry and Leadership I too must have self-led growth. Eighteen months of education in Christian Ministry and Leadership is not going to teach me all the things I must know to effectively serve and lead others. To be as great of a leader as Lincoln was, I will need to practice self-led growth by regularly reading books, attending conferences, and spending time with others who will stretch me to grow and develop.

As we will see next, Lincoln’s self-led growth will be the most important aspect that allows him to actively lead.

Actively Lead

Perhaps one of the Lincoln’s greatest assets was during the Civil War when Lincoln actively led.

Early in his presidency he said he never wanted to dabble in the military, but when the Confederates (in the South) decided they wanted to start a war in order to separate themselves from the Union (in the North), Lincoln had to lead the war.[11] He had to allow his military officers to lead but he also monitored them, which is how he was able to know when to fire them and when to promote them. Because Lincoln had to actively lead both in and out of the Civil War he was quoted saying, “As commander-in-chief of the army and navy, in time of war, I suppose I have a right to take any measure which may best subdue the enemy.”[12] And that is what Lincoln did during the military. He made trips to visit his troops, he regularly communicated with his military generals, he nervously anticipated war reports as they came in over the telegraph machine, and he fired and promoted generals based on their performance and willingness to carry out his orders. Lincoln’s habit of actively leading helped him know when he had a military general who needed to be fired and when he needed to promote someone else. Because he was actively engaged in the war studying strategy and reviewing reports on a daily basis he was better equipped to lead his nation. He so closely monitored what was going on, he knew what results to expect in the war.

The greatest description of how Lincoln actively led while President and during the Civil War is described in “Lincoln’s Personal Motives and Capacities for Reconciliation:”[13]

  • Self-control and Forgiveness: His emotional balance in difficult situations was attributable to “acute self-awareness and an enormous capacity to dispel anxiety in constructive ways.”[14]
  • Empathy and Cognitive Complexity: His ability to show empathy helped his political efforts and ability to forgive others.[15]
  • Optimism About Others’ Potential to Change: His own ability for intellectual growth helped him be optimistic for positive change in others.[16]
  • Intellectual Formation and Reconciliation Policy: His habit of reading history and biography reinforced his tendency for precedent.[17]

With these qualities, Lincoln was successful in actively leading. His self-control and forgiveness was necessary during difficult times working with military generals who would not follow orders. His empathy and cognitive complexity helped him to create a proper so called “punishment” for the Confederates (South) after the Civil War ended because he said they would not necessarily be punished, but the result of the Union (North) ending the war over the Confederates would be that they would no longer be able to have slavery.

Lincoln’s optimism for others to change is probably best shown in his original plan that showed the war ending in 90 days. One of the saddest parts of Lincoln’s assassination only one week after the end of the Civil War was that many of his reformation and reconstruction ideas and policies were not implemented. In his mind he already had many great ideas to put our nation back together after the Civil War which were not carried out to their fullest capacities. Actively leading is something I do well. I am good at casting vision and actively plotting us to get there and making progress along the way. Due to the demand to be highly organized and administratively savvy at my current job, it has helped me to develop this quality of learning to actively lead (some would call this “project management”) which I am grateful to have learned about.

Conclusion

When studying the life of a great man and leader such as Abraham Lincoln, there are many things that can be learned about leadership.

These four aspects of keeping a Bible nearby and reading it often, standing firm, self-led growth, and actively leading are great principles that can and should be applied to the life of a Christian leader such as myself.


[1] Ronald D. Rietveld, “Was Abraham Lincoln a Christian?” Bibliotheca Sacra (January 1960): 59. 

[2] David Grubin, Abraham and Mary Lincoln: A House Divided, DVD (American Experience and PBS, 2005). 

[3] Abraham Lincoln, “Philadelphia Speech” (speech, Independence Hall, 1861). 

[4] Ibid.

[5] Ibid.

[6] The concept of Lincoln developing a Presidential Cabinet of men who often strongly opposed him on many issues is a topic so amazing that Doris Kearns Goodwin wrote a book about this topic titled, Team of Rivals: The Practical Genius of Abraham Lincoln (Simon & Schuster, 2005). In the book she specifically describes how Lincoln mastered the art of leading other men so well that he was able to assemble a Presidential Cabinet of men who mostly opposed many of his beliefs, but how in the end Lincoln was able to masterfully employ them to help keep the Union together and end slavery.

[7] William Lee Miller, Lincoln’s Virtues: An Ethical Biography (New York, NY: Vintage Books, 2002), 144.

[8] Grubin, Abraham and Mary Lincoln.

[9] Abraham Lincoln, “Philadelphia Speech” (speech, Independence Hall, 1861).

[10] Miller, Lincoln’s Virtues: An Ethical Biography, 53.

[11] Grubin, Abraham and Mary Lincoln.

[12] Thomas E. Schneider, “Lincoln and Leadership,” Perspectives on Political Science (Spring 2007), 71.

[13] Daniel Lieberfeld, “Lincoln, Mandela, and Qualities of Reconciliation-oriented Leadership,” Peace and Conflict 15 (2009): 34-44.

[14] Goodwin, Team of Rivals, 607.

[15] Lieberfeld, “Lincoln, Mandela, and Qualities of Reconciliation-oriented Leadership,” Peace and Conflict 15 (2009): 38.

[16] Ibid., 40-41.

[17] Ibid., 42.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Character Is Our Marketing

April 1, 2024 by Christopher L. Scott

The poor character of church leaders is killing our churches.  While in seminary I worked as a caddie at a private golf club for three years. That job provided lots of time to talk with my coworkers. Time after time they shared stories of disappointment and disgust about the church and Christians.

            They talked about TV pastors getting rich from the pennies of poor elderly women. They talked about local pastors caught having affairs with women in the church. They talked about so-called internet pastors who fancied themselves as “apologists” that could disprove evolution when the pastor had no training or knowledge of basic science.

            The poor character of the church leaders they knew about repulsed them from ever wanting to visit a church or become a Christian. We can talk about marketing tactics all we want, but until we fix the character issues within our church, no marketing efforts will work. Thankfully, the Bible gives us plenty of examples of how to be Christian leaders of good character. Some are examples to follow. Some are examples to avoid. Let’s look at one of those from the Old Testament.

Character in Genesis
Judah was outraged when he heard Tamar, the widow of his deceased son, had become pregnant because of prostitution. He demanded, “Bring her out, and let her be burned!” (Gen. 38:24, NLT).[1] What a shame to their family name! What an embarrassment for her! But this story exposes Judah’s poor character and his poor decisions, not Tamar’s.

            Judah’s firstborn son was Er who married Tamar, but Er died. So Judah had his second-born son, Onan, marry Tamar, as was customary to continue the family name and keep their land secure. But Onan died too (Gen. 38:3-10). Judah’s only living son was too young to marry Tamar, so Judah told Tamar to go live with her parents and remain a widow until his youngest son, Shelah, could marry Tamar. Although “Judah didn’t really intend to do this because he was afraid Shelah would also die, like his two brothers” (Gen. 38:11).

            When Shelah was old enough to marry, Tamar realized no arrangements had been made for them to wed (Gen. 38:14). So Tamar devised a plan. She put on a veil to disguise herself, sat beside the road, and waited for Judah. Judah thought that Tamar was a prostitute and told her he would pay her with a goat from his flock if she had sex with him (Gen. 38:14-17).

            Tamar was smart. She asked Judah to leave his identification seal, cord, and his walking stick as a guarantee that he would bring the goat (Gen. 38:18). After their night together when Judah sent the goat to the woman he thought was a prostitute, she was gone (Gen. 38:20). 

            Three months later Judah heard that Tamar had “acted like a prostitute” and had become pregnant. In response Judah demanded, “Bring her out, and let her be burned!” (Gen. 38:24). But before anyone could kill Tamar she sent the seal, cord, and walking stick to Judah saying, “The man who owns these things made me pregnant. Look closely. Whose seal and cord and walking stick are these?” (Gen. 38:25).

            Judah recognized his items and admitted, “She is more righteous than I am, because I didn’t arrange for her to marry my son Shelah” (Gen. 38:26[1] ). Judah’s poor character caused him A Godly character[2]  would have eliminated a lot of pain, shame, and heartache for Judah[3] .

Judah’s Failure

There were three significant failures of Judah’s character. First, Judah never intended to do what he said he would do. His two older sons had died. He told his daughter-in-law, Tamar, that when his youngest son was old enough for marriage, he would allow them to get married. However, the text in parenthesis provides an insight into what Judah was truly thinking, “But Judah didn’t really intend to do this because he was afraid Shelah would also die, like his two brothers” (Gen. 38:11b).

            Second, Judah didn’t maintain sexual purity. He had gone to the city of Timnah to supervise the shearing of his sheep (Gen. 38:12). While on that business trip he must have had time to spare and decided to pay for sex (Gen. 38:15-16). Without knowing it he paid for sex from his daughter-in-law!

            Third, In addition to deceit, Judah did not follow Israel’s customs to protect property ownership and family lineage. When a married man died his brother was supposed to marry the widow and have children through her (Deut. 25:5-10). Judah was scared to do this because he thought his youngest son would die like his other two sons had died..

Defining Character

In a postmodern culture sometimes we are confused about what “character” is. Lets define it. The Dictionary of Bible Themes defines character, “The moral and mental features that define a person, whether good or evil. The term also means moral strength, which Scripture regards as something to be highly valued.”[2] The Concise Oxford English Dictionary defines character as “the mental and moral qualities distinctive to an individual.”[3]

            As you can see from those two definitions, character is the reputation someone has based on her actions. As Christians we want to cultivate a righteous[4]  character. Righteous character is good and ethical character that shows our love for people, as well as our love for God. One way we cultivate this type of character is by doing what we say we will do.—one that shows our love for people—as well as our love for God.[5]  We cultivate that good ethical character by doing what we say we will do. Judah failed to do this .[6] 

A Contrast in Character: Joseph

Joseph was the half-brother of Judah. As a teenager he didn’t always exhibit the best judgment. In one situation he gave a bad report to his father about his brothers pasturing a flock (Gen. 37:2). He told his brothers about a dream in which they bowed down before him (Gen. 37:5-8). (This meant Joseph would reign over his brothers.) And he also told his brothers and father about another dream he had in which the sun, moon, and stars were all bowing down before him (Gen. 37:9-11). One person told me Joseph in his younger years was “a little bit haughty,” and I agree.

            But as Joseph grew older his character got better. His brothers, in their hate for Joseph, sold him to some Ishmaelite travelers, who eventually sold him as a slave to Potiphar in Egypt.

            Joseph grew into a smart and handsome man. Joseph “succeeded in everything he did” while serving Potiphar (Gen. 39:2). Everything that Joseph did prospered (Gen. 39:3). Joseph soon found favor in Potiphar’s mind (Gen. 39:4) and he put Joseph in charge of everything that Potiphar owned. Joseph was so competent that Potiphar only decided what he was going to eat because Joseph took care of everything else (Gen. 39:6).

            When Potiphar’s wife expressed her desire to have sex with Joseph (Gen. 39:7) he refused and tried to avoid her (Gen. 39:8-10). When Potiphar’s wife was alone with Joseph she grabbed him and demanded he have sex with her. But Joseph ran away from her (Gen. 39:12)! Potiphar’s wife lied and said that Joseph had tried to rape her, so Joseph was placed in jail (Gen. 39:13-20).

            While in jail soon Joseph proved himself a faithful servant and good manager in jail, just as he had been under Potiphar. Soon the chief jailer put Joseph in charge of all the prisoners (Gen. 39:21-23). Later Joseph was released from jail and given responsibility by the Pharaoh of Egypt.

            In Pharaoh’s service, Pharaoh put Joseph in charge of his court and all the people of Egypt took orders from him (Gen. 41:40). Joseph gathered food during the seven years of good crops in Egypt (Gen. 41:47-49). And when the crops stopped producing food and the people were hungry, they all came to Joseph because he had stored the extra food from the seven good years of harvests. When famine came, people from all over the earth came to Joseph and he sold food to them (Gen. 41:56-57).

            During the severe famine Joseph’s brothers, which had sold him into slavery 13 years earlier, came to him asking him for food. Joseph told them to bring their families to live in Egypt so that Joseph could provide for them (Gen. 49:9-11). Which he did until his father died. DECISIONS THAT CAUSED JUDAH SHAME

Judah never intended to do what he said he would do. His two older sons had died. He told his daughter-in-law, Tamar, that when his youngest son was old enough for marriage, he would allow them to get married. However, the text in parenthesis provides an insight into what Judah was truly thinking, “But Judah didn’t really intend to do this because he was afraid Shelah would also die, like his two brothers” (Gen. 38:11b).

            Judah didn’t maintain sexual purity. He had gone to the city of Timnah to supervise the shearing of his sheep (Gen. 38:12). While on that business trip he must have had time to spare and decided to pay for sex (Gen. 38:15-16). Without knowing it he paid for sex from his daughter-in-law!

            In addition to deceit, Judah did not follow Israel’s customs to protect property ownership and family lineage. When a married man died his brother was supposed to marry the widow and have children through her (Deut. 25:5-10). Judah was scared to do this because he thought his youngest son would die like his other two sons had died.

DECISIONS THAT DEVELOP A BETTER CHARACTER

We need to do what we say we will do. Judah could have avoided a lot of embarrassment and shame if he would have simply done what he told Tamar he was going to do. Or if he would have been honest and told her he had no intention of marrying Shelah to her, she could have found another person to marry (see Ruth 4 for an example). But he did not. He said one thing knowing he intended to do something different. For us to be people of good character, we need to do what we say we will do.

            We need to maintain sexual purity for a godly character. Sexual purity (especially among men) is an area most of us need to guard. In their book, Every Man’s Battle: Winning the War on Sexual Temptation One Victory at a Time, the authors say, “Sexual sins are the termites in the walls and foundations of today’s marriages.” Sexual sin might be found in novels, movies, magazines, our thoughts, or how our eyes wander to places they shouldn’t. Sexual sin is difficult for everyone: men, women, marrieds, singles, young, and elderly. We must clasp Scripture to help us fight sexual sin and maintain a godly character.[7]  We can memorize these verses to help us with sexual sin in our lives: Job 31:1; 1 Cor. 6:18-20; and 1 Thess. 4:3-7.[8] 

            We need to follow God’s commands for our character[9] . As Christians in a non-Christian world people should look at us and see that something is different. Paul told the believers in Philippi that even though they lived in the city of Philippi (which was part of the Roman Empire) they were “citizens of heaven” (Phil. 1:27; 3:20). Regardless of where we physically find ourselves, living as citizens of heaven should make us look different. Pastor and author Chuck Swindoll writes, “Professors, as well as pastors, corporate leaders, and those who engage in sales, need character.[10] [CS11] ” People should see a difference in us when they look at our lives and our character.[12] 

DECISIONS DETERMINE OUR CHARACTER

Character counts. It effects our lives in more ways than we realize.[13]  If we want to develop our character we should keep Warren Wiersbe’s words close at heart, “Life is built on character, but character is built on decisions. The decisions you make, small and great, do to your life what the sculptors chisel does to the block of marble.” A good character can save us from pain, embarrassment, heartache, and shame. We saw this in Judah’s story above. Good character is built on daily decisions[14] .

Cultivating Good Character for Christian Leaders

How can we cultivate a good character for our lives?

            First, we need to do what we say we will do. Judah said one thing but planned to do something different. Judah could have avoided a lot of embarrassment and shame if he would have simply done what he told Tamar he was going to do. Or if he would have been honest and told her he had no intention of marrying Shelah to her, she could have found another person to marry (see Ruth 4 for an example). But he did not. He said one thing knowing he intended to do something different. But Joseph said he would help his brothers and he did help them multiple times (even when he didn’t have to, and when know one would blame him for not helping them). For us to be people of good character, we need to do what we say we will do.

            Second, we need to stay away from sin. Sin can be blatant gossip about others, uncontrollable anger, drunkenness, or envy of others. Judah sought sex with a prostitute while traveling. Joseph fled the sexual advances of his boss’ wife. There are several things we can do to stay away from sin. The place to start is to not put ourselves in front of temptations. If we struggle with eating a healthy diet we shouldn’t go to the grocery store while hungry. Or a better idea is to only shop at a health food store. Doing everything possible to remove temptations is the best way to start. Another way we can stay away from sin is to pick specific verses of Scripture to memorize that will help us stay away from sin. When we feel tempted we should quote that verse in memory to help us combat the temptation. Another way we can stay away from sin is to surround ourselves with healthy people that are good influences in our lives.

            Third, we need to look different. Judah was “one of the guys.” He had a business and enjoyed the luxuries of travels. Joseph stood out among everyone he was around. Potiphar, the jail warden, and Pharaoh all recognized that something was different about Joseph. As Christians in a non-Christian world people should look at us and see that something is different. Paul told the believers in Philippi that even though they lived in the city of Philippi (which was part of the Roman Empire) they were “citizens of heaven” (Phil. 1:27; 3:20). To live as a citizen of heaven while on earth means we should pray unceasingly, participate in a faith community, and provide for our family and church. Regardless of where we physically find ourselves, living as citizens of heaven should make us look different.

            Character counts for church leaders. It effects our lives in more ways than we realize.[15]  We saw this in Judah’s story above. Hopefully we can cultivate a good character and be like Joseph.


[1] Holy Bible, New Living Translation, copyright © 1996, 2004, 2015 by Tyndale House Foundation. Used by permission of Tyndale House Publishers. All rights reserved.

[2] Martin H. Manser, Dictionary of Bible Themes: The Accessible and Comprehensive Tool for Topical Studies, (London: Martin Manser, 2009).

[3] Catherine Soanes and Angus Stevenson, eds., Concise Oxford English Dictionary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).


You did a wonderful job retelling the story in a concise and easy to follow way, well done!

What is “godly” character?

It might be nice to contrast Judah with someone else in the Bible who had good character (even if it wasn’t consistent). Maybe Abraham agreeing to sacrifice Isaac and following through up until the last minute when God told him to stop. What did this obedience produce in him? And how does growing our good character and obedience to God relate? You can add something like this further down in the article where you’re talking about decisions that develop better character.

Christian jargon – please expand in laymens terms, or in a fresh way?

Great!

Excellent!

There may be other things too. Like surrounding ourselves with healthy people that are good influences, not putting ourselves in front of temptations (perhaps Judah could have brought a friend/servant along to keep him accountable or not have such idle time on his hands, or avoided the main entrance where all the prostitutes hang out.

Your first and third points under this section are more general, and this one is very specific. Consider generalizing this section to be how we need to not be sinning to create godly character. You can still keep the content about Judah’s specific sexual sin, but can round out the section to cover more than just that, so it resonate with more readers.

What are these commands?

I’m not sure this quite flows. Why only professors, leaders, and sales people? Shouldn’t everyone? And “character” is not what we need, but specifically “good character”. 🙂

 [CS11]I deleted it. 😊

Totally agree!

I wonder if there is a way to make this more practical for our readers. How are they to develop character?

I’m not sure the “daily decisions” angle is that clear. It seems like earlier you argue that building good character is all about follow-through and doing what you say you will do. This isn’t usually a daily act that begins and ends in 24-hrs, but something that may resurface days, weeks, or months later. When Romans 5:4 says “We also glory in our sufferings, because we know that suffering produces perseverance;  perseverance, character; and character, hope.” So is good character built on perseverance? And how does this relate to your description of following-through and it’s link to perseverance?

I wonder if there is a way to make this more practical for our readers. How are they to develop character?

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Six Benefits of a Unified Budget

April 1, 2024 by Christopher L. Scott

“Our church is not for sale to the highest bidder” my senior pastor once told me. We were talking about budgeting methods and why our church used a unified budget.

He then told me a story about how he was serving in another church which had a choir. Someone in the church desperately wanted the choir to wear formal choir robes. However, my senior pastor wanted a comfortable and contemporary feel to the church and didn’t want to spend several thousand dollars on choir robes. He also wanted the choir to be able to sit with their family after the music worship time had ended (something a robe prevented), because they would have to change clothes.

When he told the woman who wanted the choir to wear robes that the church did not have money in the budget for that item she purchased the choir robes on her own initiative. She donated them to the church, then expected the church to give her a tax deduction for her “donation.”

My senior pastor, with a smile, then told me about how the Presbyterian Church a few miles away received a bunch of new choir robes. And his church choir continued to wear normal clothes. To that he told me, “We have a unified budget and our church is not for sale to the highest bidder.”

Having a culture of designated giving creates many problems for church leaders. An occasional missional fund or building campaign fund is okay. But I’ve heard of some churches having as many as 27 different designated fund accounts.[1]

Thom Reiner lists five reasons designated funds can be dangerous.

  1. They circumvent the will and plan of the church.
  2. They create division among the church members and leaders.
  3. They create an environment where advocates of a particular ministry solicit designated funds.
  4. They often come with stipulations which cannot always be followed.
  5. They often hurt the budget giving of the church.[2]

In my past role as an associate pastor and now a senior pastor I believe there are six benefits for a church using a unified budget to fund ministries and priorities through the church’s regular giving.

1. It encourages people to tithe.

Any pastor knows that it is difficult to talk about giving. When you allow designated funds to be a part of your church or you allow lots of fundraisers to occur to support ministries, it discourages people to tithe to the church. Instead people learn to give to whatever they want to support within the church.

But when you promote a unified budget that means you fund ministries from people’s tithes, which encourages people to tithe. People that regularly give to the church get to see what their support makes happen and that’s encouraging to them.

2. It encourages people to trust the church and leadership.

Our culture resists following leaders. People don’t want to be told what to do and they definitely don’t want to allow other people to determine how their money is spent.

Discouraging designated giving in a church and using a unified budget helps people practice Hebrews 13:17, “Obey your leaders and submit to them, for they keep watch over your souls as those who will give an account. Let them do this with joy and not with grief, for this would be unprofitable for you.”[3]

Leading a church that has a unified budget gives them a chance to practice this verse.

3. It keeps everyone moving in the same direction.

Designated funds create a church where everyone decides what the priorities of the church should be. Paul battled this and addressed it in one of his letters written to the believers in Corinth, “Now I mean this, that each one of you is saying, ‘I am of Paul,’ and ‘I of Apollos,’ and ‘I of Cephas,’ and ‘I of Christ’” (1 Cor 1:12).

In our churches today we could have people insisting they be in a “camp” and donate their money there. Examples could be: I’m with the group that believes in having Sunday School. I’m in the group that believes in having small groups. I’m in the group that believes in having discipleship groups.

How about we say, “I’m in the group that loves this church and trusts our leaders to know the best path for us to take. I’ll faithfully tithe each week and follow the direction my leaders believe our church should take.”

4. It prevents the loudest ministry leaders from getting the most support.

In an environment where people raise their own support through fundraising or designated giving, the most outgoing, charismatic, and loudest ministry leaders will get the most support. That’s a problem because they might lead a ministry that is least important to the church leadership. Or even worse, sometimes the loudest person is the most spiritually immature.

A unified budget puts the focus on ministries that the church leaders believe are important and aligns with the mission of the church.

5. It is less work over the year.

A unified budget requires less work from the church staff throughout the year.

There are less announcements to give at church because of less fundraising events. The weekly giving is easier to reconcile and process because there are no (or very few) designated donations. The church facilities are used less because you don’t have to use them for fundraising. The church members do not have to work at fundraising to support their ministries and can instead focus on doing ministry.

With a unified budget the church board works hard to plan a budget that aligns with the church’s mission and priorities. Then the church staff and volunteers simply execute that mission with the money allocated to them.

6. It is easier to write in pencil.

Everyone knows that budgets must be written in pencil. Change happens and requires us to revisit the budget we worked so hard on to prepare for the year. When the church activities are on one unified budget, it is easier to make adjustments because everything is in one place. A unified budget provides a snapshot of everything, therefore it is easier to adjust.

Unify the Budget and Unify the Church

I have heard of a few churches that use designated giving effectively. But most often, a unified budget is the simplest and most effective budgeting method for churches. Is your church for sale to the highest bidder?


[1] Robert Dial Jr., “Transitioning to a Unified Budget – A Story,” September 14, 2016, https://www.robertddial.com/transitioning-to-a-unified-budget-a-story/#comment-2750. Accessed June 17, 2021.

[2] Thom Rainer, “Five Dangers of Church Designated Funds,” Church Answers, February 19, 2018, https://churchanswers.com/blog/five-dangers-church-designated-funds/. Accessed June 17, 2021.

[3] Unless otherwise noted all Scripture taken from the NEW AMERICAN STANDARD BIBLE, © Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Two Ways To Keep Volunteers Serving at Your Church

April 1, 2024 by Christopher L. Scott

My wife was excited to begin volunteering at a local homeless gospel mission near our home. With a bachelor’s degree in Human Development and a master’s degree in Social Work she was eager to use some of her skills to counsel, encourage, and support clients of the gospel mission. However, after my wife had explained her professional experience and ideal area for volunteering to the volunteer coordinator, she was placed in the waiting room of the gospel mission where she was supposed to “hang out” with clients and talk to them. Every time she showed up she was expected to randomly walk up to clients who were waiting to receive services and talk to them.

Do you think my wife volunteered for a long time? Of course not! She left two weeks after she realized this gospel mission was not using her skills or experience in a way to help clients.

Most of the time people are willing to jump in and help a good cause even if the work is something that is uninteresting to them. However, if you want to have volunteers stay and serve for a long period of time you have to put them in areas they are passionate and skilled.

Passions: What Volunteers Want to Do

You can find volunteers passion either by the ministries in which the volunteers serve or the task which the volunteers do.

My guess is that your church has many ministries that potential volunteers are passionate about.

For example, as an associate pastor I oversaw many ministry areas. I was in charge of small group ministries, greeters, communion servers, men’s ministry, money count after Sunday services, facility maintenance, women’s ministries, and janitorial services for our buildings. There were plenty of areas for service based on someone’s area of passion.

In addition to individual ministries which volunteers might be passionate about, you also can find tasks that volunteers are passionate about. For example, some volunteers might be introverted and love to work quietly at a desk. For these people they are happy to work folding bulletins, organizing the church food pantry, collating teaching materials,  organizing clothes for a clothing ministry, etc. Other volunteers might be extroverted and only want to do ministry that has interaction with people. These volunteers want to answer the phone, serve as greeters on Sundays, make care visits to the hospital, and follow up with prayer requests by telephone. In this manner you can match volunteers with tasks they are passionate about.

Research shows that volunteers who serve in roles that match their passion for serving derive more satisfaction and enjoyment from their service. They also are more likely to continue serving.[1]

Skills: What Volunteers Are Good at Doing

In addition to placing volunteers where they are passionate, you also need to discover what they are good at.

There are two ways to discover this. One is the use of formal assessments. There are assessments available such as Maximizing Your Effectiveness by Aubrey Malphurs, Now, Discover Your Strengths, by Marcus Buckingham and Donald Clifton, and Strengths Finder 2.0 by Tom Rath.

Sometimes assessments can be a barrier to getting volunteers involved in ministry.  Several articles in nonprofit management and leadership journals reveal nonprofit organizations have more success by limiting the assessments of their volunteers in the initial offer to volunteer.

For example, parks and recreation organizations along with forestry and wildlife organizations have found that their volunteers are most successful when they simply allow the volunteers to go out and work instead of stopping the volunteers to complete assessments, do trainings, etc.

Don’t let assessments get in the way of your volunteers doing work. Sometimes you don’t need to assess the strengths and passion of your volunteers. Sometimes you just need volunteers to do a task which the volunteers already know how to do.

A second way to assess volunteer strengths is to talk about it. In addition to formal assessments to discover what volunteers are passionate about and good at, you can also talk with volunteers to discover what they are good at.

Help volunteers identify where they might excel. When volunteers come to you they might not know what volunteer job they want to do. Furthermore, the volunteers might not even know what they are good at. Your job as the leader of volunteers is to help those volunteers discover what they are good at.

If possible, finds ways to match volunteers skills with their passions.

Don’t Go Too Far

Like most things in life, too much of a good thing can be bad. This idea of matching volunteers’ passions and skills can cause problems if it is too strict.

Someone has to take out the trash. Someone has to type numbers into an excel spreadsheet. Someone has to unclog the toilet during services on Sundays. Someone has to fold flyers and letters for the mail.

You will not be able to match the passions and skills of every volunteer perfectly. But, your job as the leader of volunteers is to do your best to discover the passions and strengths of your volunteers and to place volunteers in the positions that best matches those passions and strengths.


[1] See Clary, E. Gil, Mark Snyder, Robert Ridge, John Copeland, Arthur Stukas, Julie Haugen, and Peter Miene. “Understanding and Assessing the Motivations of Volunteers: A Functional Approach.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74, no. 6 (1998): 1516-1530.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Seven Basic (but often neglected) Steps for Effectively Communicating with Volunteers

April 1, 2024 by Christopher L. Scott

Alan came to our office each week to volunteer. I usually brought the work to him at his desk and provided instructions when he arrived. But I was busy and had already left work on his desk for him to start doing when he arrived.

            I did not know a coworker left some donor forms on Alan’s desk. She had spent an entire day carefully sorting the names and information of donor forms into a special order so that the forms could be processed into the computer. When Alan arrived and saw a stack of 200 pieces of paper on his desk (donor forms), he did what he was always instructed to do with paper placed on his desk: separate the pieces of paper that had printing on one side from the pieces of paper that had printing on both sides.

            An hour later I walked over to Alan’s desk to check on him and I noticed that he was sorting out donor forms. Alan had undone a day of work that one of our staff had done. Ouch! All of this headache could have been avoided if I had taken time to walk over to Alan’s desk and provide him clear instructions when he arrived.

            In this article I share with you seven simple steps you can follow to provide clear instructions when leading volunteers at your church.

#1. Prepare for the Volunteer

To communicate clearly with volunteers there is specific information you need to know before the volunteer arrives at your church to help.

Know what needs to be done.

What should be done first? How many things need to get done? If the volunteer finishes early, what do you want her to do next?

Know how it needs to be done.

Is there a specific process that the volunteer needs to follow? What does she do first? What does she do last? Does it matter how the task is done? Where do you want the work placed when completed? Are there any necessary safety procedures she needs to follow?

Know when it needs to be done

Provide a deadline.People like a challenge and want to accomplish something (especially when volunteering their time). Tell the volunteer when you expect the work completed.

Know who can and cannot do the work

Knowing who can and cannot do the work that you have for volunteers is difficult.

            For example, Alan (not his real name) would come to our office twice a week to help with work. He had an intellectual disability that limited the work he could do. Alan was capable of doing most of the work I needed him to do, but there were some times when he was not able to do the work. I found that I could do a “test run” with Alan. If there was a new project I was going to give to him that I wasn’t sure if he could complete, I would provide him a small sample of the work to see how it turned out.

#2. Describe What Must Be Done

Share with the volunteers what needs to be done, how it needs to be performed, and when it needs to be finished. You are conveying all of the information from step one. Tell the volunteer this information several times. You might tell her at the beginning when she arrives, as you do the work to show her, and while she does the work while you watch.

#3. Explain What Why It Must Be Done

Tell the volunteers this:

Reasons this is important.

Why does this project matter? What difference will it make? What does it provide to people in need? How did it help to serve people the last time volunteers did this work?

What will happen once it is done.

When the volunteers complete the project what happens next? Where does the finished project go? How does that finished project help your church?

What will happen if it is not completed.

This is perhaps the strongest motivator for volunteers. Share with them what will happen if the work doesn’t get done. Who will not be served? What services will not occur as a result of this volunteer work not getting done?

Connect this work to the big picture and vision of your church.

How does this small task play a role in the big picture of the entire organization? Show volunteers why this apparently menial task is vitally important to your ministry.

#4. Do a Sample.

It is not enough to simply tell volunteers how to do the work; you must show them how to do it. Here’s a simple process I have followed when instructing volunteers about how to do a task. First, go through each step slowly. Second, explain what I’m doing and why I’m doing it. Third, if the volunteer doesn’t understand, I slow down even more.

            5 Senses of LearningResearch shows that we five senses of learning: taste (1 percent of learning is received this way), touch (1.5 percent), smell (3.5 percent), hearing (11 percent), sight (83 percent).[1] Because we learn primarily by sight you must show volunteers what to do.

            It is better to spend extra time up front ensuring the volunteer knows how to do the work than to spend time coming back to redo the work.

#5. Watch a Sample

You are not simply watching. You are instructing, coaching, and encouraging.

            Watch more than just one. Almost anyone can get something right the first time. Watch the volunteer do the task a couple of times to ensure that the volunteer is doing the work correctly and that she doesn’t have any questions.

            Let the other volunteers who will be doing the same work watch as well. One of the best ways to instruct in a group setting is to use someone as an example, a peer that the volunteers can follow and emulate.

            Let the volunteer know that you are watching to make sure you explained everything and that you did not forget something. This is important. Most people will feel nervous to know that you are watching them. Let the volunteers know that you want to make sure that you did everything correctly.

#6. Provide Feedback

Praise the volunteer for good work done.

Find something! Anything!You might have to look hard, but find something positive to say to the volunteer. Even if the volunteer is doing the work wrong but she has a smile on her face, you can compliment her on her good attitude.

            Provide praise quickly. The legendary coach of the UCLA basketball team, John Wooden said, “One of the greatest motivating tools we have is a pat on the back. It doesn’t have to be a physical pat – it could be a smile, a nod. Everyone likes to be complimented in one way or another.”[2] Share praise and encouragement as soon as the task is done.

Accept responsibility if something was done wrong.

You are responsible for the success of your volunteers. If something went wrong it was your fault. You need to convey this when communicating with volunteers. Don’t say “You misunderstood me.” Say “I am sorry. I did not explain correctly.”

#7. Answer Questions

Some volunteers require extra communication. Yes, they will regularly interrupt your busy work day to ask simple questions or talk through a problem for which they already have a solution.

            But remember that they are here to help you. Give them a little extra time for guidance and they will give that time back to you by taking care of tasks you don’t have to do.


[1] Donald Regeir, “Audiovisual Support for Your Teaching” in The Christian Educator’s Handbook on Teaching, edited by Kenneth Gangel and Howard Hendricks (Victor Books, 1988), 196.

[2] John Wooden, “The Quintessential Coach,” Toastmaster, Oct 2010, p. 23

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Four Keys that Unlock an Effective Staff During a Crisis

April 1, 2024 by Christopher L. Scott

I’ve been through some unique experiences in ministry. In the first church I was part of, our founding pastor of seven years announced he was resigning to become a missionary to Germany. The church had no official membership and was not ready for the founding pastor to leave. The next church I served at was recovering from a horrific death. Just before I arrived the senior pastor had been murdered inside his office at the church. At my current church, the founding pastor of nine years abruptly left one year earlier than planned. (One day I received a text message saying he was moving up the timeline that had been in place for almost two years).

Those experiences have taught me how to navigate crisis, change, and uncertainty within a church. In their book, Ministering to the Mourning, Warren and David Wiersbe write, “It’s a fundamental law of life that a crisis will bring out either the very best in people or the very worst, depending on their character.”[1] When a crisis happens, you can’t change the staff you have at your church. You’ve got who you’ve got. But, there are four things you can do to help the staff and volunteers thrive through the crisis. I call these four keys that unlock an effective staff as you navigate crisis. Let’s look at the first key, which focuses on the staff’s family.

Family Care Must Come First

Staff members cannot focus on ministry if they are concerned about their family. And by family, it’s not just a spouse and kids that need to be the first priority. It can be parents, grandparents, or grandchildren that staff worry about above the needs of the church. 

Family is a gift

In Psalms, we read that “Children are a heritage from the LORD, offspring a reward from him” (Pss 127:3).[2] There is a natural protective desire we all have. We see that protective desire in Noah’s life who “in holy fear built an ark to save his family” (Hebrews 11:7). We know that children (and family) are a heritage that God has given us.

You might object, “Now is a crisis time. We need our staff and volunteers now more than ever! Especially our elders/pastors. We need them to focus on the church!” Yes, during a crisis, you need your staff and volunteers more than you ever have in the past. But, if those deeply needed staff are worried about their family, they can never focus on the ministry of the church.

Family needs trump church needs

Give staff time off to check on their families. This might be an afternoon to do a few things for their family. Or a day or two to check on parents in a nearby state.

Perhaps the staff member can still work, but those normal hours need to be from home. Or, because of kids, the staff member needs to work early in the morning, late at night, or midday while the kids are napping. Perhaps finances are an issue. Get the staff member a gift card to Wal-Mart or a grocery store so he or she can get the basic family items that are needed. Small gestures like that make a big difference.

Family is more important for good staff

Why such an emphasis on caring for family? When you selected your pastors/elders for ministry in your church, you selected them with the qualifications of 1 Timothy 3:4-5, “He must manage his own family well and see that his children obey him, and he must do so in a manner worthy of full respect. (If anyone does not know how to manage his own family, how can he take care of God’s church?)”[3]

If you selected a pastor (or any other staff) correctly, then he will take care of his family before taking care of the church. So, let him care for his family. Once he knows his family is safe, then he can care for the church and staff. And that starts with the mission of the church.

Focus on Your Mission, Not Your Methods

Crisis is when you blow the dust off your church’s mission statement. Remember when you spent days at a retreat with your staff to craft that mission? If not you, then someone before you dripped sweat and tears on that mission statement to create it. Crisis is when you need that mission most because you must focus on what is most important for the church.

What is a mission statement?

Mission statements are “declarations of action”[4] They describe what you are supposed to be doing and should be the marching orders for your church.

What’s the mission of the church?

Bill Tenny-Brittian reminds churches in his consulting that their mission statement is to “make disciples of Jesus Christ.”[5] You already know the mission of the church, but here’s a reminder.

Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age. (Matthew 28:19-20)[6]

Those two verses are the essence of every church’s mission.

Why focus on mission?

Why all this focus on mission of the church and ministry philosophy? “It’s a crisis” you say, “We need to do something!” In Aubrey Malphurs’s book, Advanced Strategic Planning, he outlines nine ways a mission affects the church. A mission:

  • dictates the ministry’s direction
  • defines the ministry’s function
  • focuses the ministry’s future
  • provides guidelines for decision making
  • inspires ministry unity
  • shapes the strategy
  • enhances ministry effectiveness
  • ensures an enduring organization
  • facilitates evaluation[7]

As you can see, your mission affects every aspect of your staff and your ministry. With a crisis pulling everyone in different directions, focusing on a mission statement brings everyone back together.

How to implement the mission

The hot topic among churches now is how to do virtual church. Whether by choice or by force, all churches have faced the issue. YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, Vimeo, etc. are among the many options.

With those options come dissension about which one is the best method. During a crisis, don’t worry about methods, focus on mission. If you think Facebook Live is better than YouTube, then go with it. If your pastor doesn’t want to use Instagram and has never heard of it, then don’t push the method, focus on the technology he will use and use it to accomplish your mission.

During a crisis, anything that helps you deliver your mission is your friend, not your foe. Your mission brings people together and having a close-knit staff/volunteers is the third key you need during a crisis.

Fasten Yourselves Together

During chaotic times you must stick close together. As a staff, this is the time to come together, not distance apart. The most difficult part of the COVID-19 crisis is that it forces everyone to isolate. We cannot meet in the same room, shake hands, pat each other on the back for a job well done, or hug in loving fellowship. If you are not careful, that forced distance can easily creep into relationships.

The Bible’s team

Remember that you are on the same team. God wants us to be unified, but God knows we naturally drift apart through conflict. That’s why he gave so many reminders for us to stick together.

God tells us to have unity.  

  • I appeal to you, brothers and sisters, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that all of you agree with one another in what you say and that there be no divisions among you, but that you be perfectly united in mind and thought. (1 Cor 1:10)
  • Let us therefore make every effort to do what leads to peace and to mutual edification. (Rom 14:19)
  • How good and pleasant it is when God’s people live together in unity! (Pss 133:1)

God tells us we have the same Spirit:

  • Make every effort to keep the unity of the Spirit through the bond of peace. (Eph 4:3)
  • Whatever happens, conduct yourselves in a manner worthy of the gospel of Christ. Then, whether I come and see you or only hear about you in my absence, I will know that you stand firm in the one Spirit, striving together as one for the faith of the gospel. (Phil 1:27)

God tells us we are supposed to have one mind together:

  • Then make my joy complete by being like-minded, having the same love, being one in spirit and of one mind. (Phil 2:2)
  • Finally, all of you, be like-minded, be sympathetic, love one another, be compassionate and humble. (1 Peter 3:8)

As Christians, we should be unified because we have the same Spirit and are supposed to have one mind. During a crisis, we must remember that we are on the same team.

Stay close with virtual video meetings

Knowing we need to fasten ourselves as the Christian community is more difficult than doing it. Here are practical tips that can help you.

Require video conferencing together — emphasis on the “video” part. There’s a special dynamic that occurs when you can see each other’s faces and interact. Extensive email and text messages over time cause strife in relationships. It’s easier to be rude in a text message or email because you don’t have to say what you are thinking to a person’s face. It’s also easy for people to misinterpret what is said or to read into what is said when that wasn’t meant.

I had to call my senior pastor once to clarify what was said and meant. The senior pastor, youth pastor, and I were on text messages. The senior pastor misinterpreted what the youth pastor and I were saying and responded, “Well, since you guys have a no-growth mindset, I’m going to go start a different church somewhere else.” Whoa! Hold on boss! Neither of us had indicated we had a no-growth mindset. He was misinterpreting what we were saying about how many services to add to our Easter weekend. All of that because of two text messages.

There is something special about being together that you can’t substitute. The author of Hebrews tells us, “And let us consider how we may spur one another on toward love and good deeds, not giving up meeting together, as some are in the habit of doing, but encouraging one another—and all the more as you see the Day approaching” (Hebrews 10:24-25). Get together even if each person is at home.

Keep your meetings professional even when everyone meets from an informal location such as their home. Remind people to dress professionally, style hair, put on makeup, brush teeth, etc. Lovingly inform them it’s still a professional meeting. (One person told me of a recent video call among a boss and his employees in which one woman was making her bed, another was putting on makeup, and another wore her bathrobe.)

During times of crisis, you need to meet, even if it has to be a virtual video meeting. Use Zoom, Google Hangout, Facetime, or any other app (remember, it’s not the method it is the mission). Don’t hesitate to pay for an app or software that will help you all meet. If you were meeting at your church, there would have been money spent on lights, for a table to sit at, chairs to sit in, custodial workers to clean the room, snacks, drinks, and climate control to keep the room at a comfortable temperature. With those normal expenses to meet together in a room, it’s not a big deal to spend $25 a month on a virtual video conferencing software. It’ll be worth it.

Virtual video conferences won’t prevent conflict among your staff and volunteers. You’ll need another key to unlock that area.

Forgive and Give Grace

Do you remember doing group projects in school? The teacher would put four or five students together in a group, and you all had to work together on a project and received a group grade. There was always one person that didn’t show up for group meetings or do the work you gave him, but he still received the same grade as everyone else.

Doing ministry in a crisis is like that group project. There will be staff that don’t show up to your virtual meetings and aren’t committed to the mission, but they are part of your staff and seen as part of the church.

In normal, everyday ministry, staff must give grace and forgiveness to each other. Times of crisis require your grace muscles to be exercised like never before.

Bible Verses required for doing ministry

There are two verses I have read repeatedly that have helped me give grace to other staff members. They helped me forgive past failures of staff and the hurtful things they have said or done.

  • Be completely humble and gentle; be patient, bearing with one another in love. (Ephesians 4:2)
  • Be kind and compassionate to one another, forgiving each other, just as in Christ God forgave you. (Ephesians 4:32)

For several years I wrote those two verses on the pages of my staff meeting journal. When faced with a struggle I had with another staff member, I would glance down and read those verses quietly to myself. Sometimes I would highlight them when I needed to apply them. And after highlighting them sometimes, I would underline them with a pen, further trying to get myself to apply them.

Grace

One of my favorite passages that explains grace was written by Paul to Titus,

But when the kindness and love of God our Savior appeared, he saved us, not because of righteous things we had done, but because of his mercy. He saved us through the washing of rebirth and renewal by the Holy Spirit, whom he poured out on us generously through Jesus Christ our Savior, so that, having been justified by his grace, we might become heirs having the hope of eternal life. (Titus 3:4-7)

Paul tells Titus that people are saved not because of any righteous things they have done. Instead, they are saved because of God’s grace.

It is easy to slip into the mindset of “we’re doing ministry, and if you want to work here, you need to do a good job.” While there might be certain expectations that staff must uphold, remember that if our salvation is not based on the things we have done, perhaps our participation on a church staff shouldn’t be either.

I appreciate Warren Wiersbe’s description of grace, “God in His mercy doesn’t give us what we do deserve but in His grace gives us what we don’t deserve”[8] In a crisis you have to give the people you work with what they don’t deserve: grace. They might have wronged you or fumbled a project, but grace is needed during a crisis. 

Forgiveness

Forgiveness isn’t easy, but it’s necessary. Church staff need to learn to forgive each other. And during a crisis, the need for forgiveness increases because everyone is under more pressure and is more stressed. Mistakes get amplified, words can carry more meaning, and we can take things personally that we normally wouldn’t let affect us. In his book, The Making of a Disciple, Keith Phillips writes, “Forgiving others is a hallmark of the Christian faith.”[9] As the hallmark of our faith, church staff need to model and practice forgiveness for others. We are professional forgivers!

Grace is risky

“But Christopher, you don’t know who I work with!” Here’s the important thing about grace: you give it when it’s not deserved. In Seminary, I was taught that grace is “God’s unmerited favor.” Catch that important word in the middle—unmerited—it’s not something that another person deserves. And because of that, Max Lucado says that “grace is risky.”[10] People might abuse grace, but that’s okay because it is still something you give regardless if someone deserves it or not. If you’ve done ministry for any length of time, you learn that grace is required.

Doing Church in Crisis

I’ve been in a few churches navigating crisis and conflict. The churches survived and thrived because we knew that a crisis required change. These four keys unlock an effective staff in crisis: family must be a priority, focus on mission, not methods, fasten the staff together, also forgive and give grace. Those four keys will unlock your church from the damage that a crisis can cause and open the door to strengthen your staff, volunteers, and church during these difficult times.


[1] Warren and David Wiersbe, Ministering to the Mourning (Chicago, IL: Moody Publishers, 2006), 145.

[2] All Bible translations are the NIV (2011) with italics added by author.

[3] We also see the other end of this qualification later in Paul’s letter to Timothy, “Anyone who does not provide for their relatives, and especially for their own household, has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever” (1 Timothy 5:8).

[4] Gary Collins, Christian Coaching, 2nd ed.(Colorado Springs, CO: NavPress, 2009), 173.

[5] Bill Tenny-Brittian, “Why Most Church Mission Statements Aren’t Effective” on The Effective Church Group. https://effectivechurch.com/why-most-church-mission-statements-arent-effective/ Accessed April 9, 20202

[6] Also see Mark 16:15; Luke 24:45-49; and Acts 1:8.

[7] Aubrey Malphurs, Advanced Strategic Planning, 3rd ed. (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 2013), 106-109.

[8] Warren Wiersbe, The Delights and Disciplines of Bible Study (Colorado Springs, CO: David C. Cook, 2018), 191.

[9] Keith Phillips, The Making of a Disciple (Old Tappan, NJ: Revell, 1981),  63.

[10] Max Lucado, In the Grip of Grace (Dallas, TX: Word Publishing, 1996), 81.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Setting the Record Straight on Old Testament Dates

March 13, 2024 by Christopher L. Scott

How and Why We Have Confidence about Some Old Testament Dates

One of the most difficult subjects of Old Testament studies is biblical chronologies.[1] The authors of Old Testament books wrote to tell the history of Israel from a theological point of view, not necessarily a chronological focus. Therefore, when we try to determine Old Testament dates we need to look at both biblical and non-biblical information, note areas of correlation, and then try to fit that information into a cohesive system.

Firm Dates Known with Certainty in the Old Testament

There are some Old Testament events that can be identified with accuracy. Assyrian and Babylonia chronologies can be correlated with the reign of an Israelite or Judean king and accurate Bible dates can be determined within 10 years between 1,000 BC to 900 BC. After 900 BC the margin for error shrinks to less than a year.[2] This is possible because of the careful records kept by the kings of Assyria, precise records kept by Babylon, as well as a datable astronomical event.

Unfortunately, this type of information is rare and mostly limited to after 1,000 BC. Dates of Abraham’s journey to Canaan (Genesis 12-22) and the Exodus from Egypt (Exodus 12-18) are less certain. David Howard, who is an Old Testament professor at Bethel Theological Seminary, has said “the Bible does not have exact synchronic references in these earlier periods, and thus we see wider margins for error in dating such events as the exodus.”[3] Therefore, the farther you reach back into Old Testament history the larger the margin of error is. Conversely, more recent Old Testament historical events possess more confidence in their dates such as the ascension of David, Solomon’s rule, the final fall of Jerusalem, the edict of Cyrus, return of Nehemiah, etc.

One of the dates scholars can have confidence in is the ascension of David to the throne in 1010 BC (2 Sam. 1:1-2; 2:1-4).[4] Another date Bible scholars can be sure of is the date of Solomon’s rule (970-931 BC). Kenneth Kitchen, who served as professor of Egyptology at the University of Liverpool in England, has used Assyrian and Egyptian lists as well as historical records to assign an accurate date to Solomon’s rule that is within one year of accuracy.[5]

Another date we hold with confidence is the destruction of the Jerusalem temple in 586 BC. We arrive at this date by starting with the death of King Josiah in 609 BC. Josiah’s death is described in 2 Kings 23:28-30 (as well as 2 Chronicles 35:20-25). A historian from Greece named Herodotus traveled the world and wrote a history of Egypt and Babylon. In his book, Histories, published in 430 BC he records this battle between King Josiah of Judah and Necho of Egypt.[6] The date of this battle is 609 BC.

The date of the battle of Carchemish also helps us firmly establish the destruction of the temple in Jerusalem in 586 BC. Jeremiah 46:1-12 depicts the battle of Carchemish where Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon destroyed the Assyrian and Egyptian forces (the same Egyptian forces that killed Josiah). This battle is recorded in what is called “The Nebuchadnezzar Chronicle” which is housed in the British Museum. The date of the battle of Carchemish is 605 BC.

Next we move on to King Jehoaichin who’s reign ended in Judah in 597 BC. A series of “Babylonian Chronicles” (currently located in the Pergamum Museum in Berlin Germany) were found in the royal archive room of King Nebuchadnezzar near the Ishtar Gate in Babylon. These tablets—dating 595 to 570 BC—record oil and grain given to King Jehoaichin and his sons while they were in captivity in Babylon.

Because of these contemporary records that correlate with biblical events, we hold with confidence that the temple in Jerusalem was destroyed in 586 BC. The death of Josiah in 609 BC, the battle of Carchemish in 605 BC, and the end of the reign of Jehoaichin in 597 BC[7] allow us to establish 586 BC as the destruction of the temple in Jerusalem because Zedekiah reigned for 11 years (2 Kings 24:18) until King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon conquered Jerusalem and burnt the temple (2 Kings 25).

I hope you can see we don’t have to be wishy washy with some Old Testament dates. Because of biblical records that correlate to contemporary historical events, we can be certain of many Old Testament events after 1,000 BC. A few important ones it’s good to fix our minds on are the division of Israel into a kingdom in the north and south in 931 BC, the fall of Israel in the north to Assyria in 722 BC, the destruction of the temple and city of Jerusalem in Judah by the Babylonians in 586 BC, and King Cyrus of Persia’s conquering of Babylon in 539 BC which initiated a decree and return of Jews to the land of Judah.

Sources Used to Establish Biblical Chronologies

As we seek to establish a set of Old Testament dates it’s important to evaluate the sources we use to establish those dates.

Biblical Sources

Two sources are explicitly stated in the Old Testament that record events and establish Old Testament chronologies. These two sources are “the Book of the Chronicles of the Kings of Judah” (1 Kings 14:29) and “the Book of the Chronicles of the Kings of Israel” (1 Kings 14:19). In addition to these two sources in the books of Chronicles and Kings there are many other sources used to establish a biblical chronology. The author of 1 and 2 Chronicles used thirty-two different sources when writing those two books.[8] His sources can be summarized into three categories of official annals, genealogical records, and prophetic recordings. (“The Book of the Chronicles of the Kings of Judah” and “the Book of the Chronicles of the Kings of Israel” are annals—official court records—kept by the schools of the prophets.)[9] These are the main sources we use to establish reliable Old Testament dates.

Extra-Biblical Sources[10]

Extra biblical materials have not endured the same levels of preservation nor continuous interpretation as the Bible has. Thus we probably should not place a heavy weight on their use. Yet, there are still strong synchronisms that exist between the Babylonia and Assyrian records and the Bible that help us establish reliable dates for Old Testament events.[11]

The nation of Israel was located between Assyria (later Babylonia in the Northeast) and Egypt (in the Southwest). These nations record numerous wars, sieges, and conquering campaigns that they experienced. Because these nations kept detailed records for what they did and when they did them, that information can be reconciled with information in the Old Testament to establish accurate dates for Bible events.[12] These various extra biblical records are records of military campaigns, inscriptions related to a specific victory or dedication, annals which list the major accomplishments of a ruler, and pieces of pottery with inscriptions on them.[13] It is important to remember that these pieces of extra-biblical information supplement the account of the Bible, they do not replace the inspired inerrant text. 

Among some of the most abundant extra-biblical information that helps to establish biblical chronologies are the limmu lists of the nation of Assyria. These are summaries of where and what specific kings did. Historians have provided dates for when they believe these Assyrians kings ruled on the limmu list. Thus, we can use the limmu lists and correlate them with the Assyrian kings that are mentioned in the Bible. (Out of the twenty-two foreign rulers mentioned in 1 and 2 Kings and in 1 and 2 Chronicles, twenty of those kings are attested in ancient near eastern literature.)[14] These lists were records of significant events that occurred each year under that specific king. These lists provide valid information that can be corroborated with the Old Testament and give us confidence when reconstructing the chronology of history that corresponds to biblical history.

I hope your confidence in the dates we set for when Old Testament events happened is strengthened as we look at this information. While we now have a basic understanding of the sources, it’s important to understand the different ways that different countries utilized those sources.

Significant Dating Factors Used to Establish Biblical Chronologies

When establishing a chronology of events in the Old Testament it is important to recognize that neither Judah nor Israel from (931-586 BC) recognized each other’s dating system. (1 Kings 12:16-20 describes how the nation of Israel split into two kingdoms under King Rehoboam in 931 BC.) Each nation wrote its own history using its own dating system. This is one—of many difficulties—that arise when attempting to establish Old Testament chronologies.

Regnal-Year Dating and Co-Regencies

Both Israel and Judah utilized different forms of what is called Regnal-Year Dating. This is a dating system by reference to the years of a king’s reign.[15] Even though both Israel and Judah used regnal-year dating, they utilized this system in different ways. Thankfully the Assyrian and Babylonia kings appear in the Old Testament text (particularly 2 Kings and in Chronicles) which makes it possible to assimilate the regnal dating of the Old Testament with regnal dating of the Assyrian and Babylonian time.[16]

Accession-Year Dating Used by Judah as well as Babylon

Accession-Year Dating is a form of Regnal-Year Dating in which a nation (particularly Babylon and Assyria) counted the year that a new king took his throne as belonging only to the previous king. This meant that the year that a king took the throne was not counted as part of his reign. Therefore his “first year” was actually the second year of reigning as king.

Another way to explain the accession-year system is that it “distinguished a king’s accession year (the incomplete calendar year in which he began to reign) and reckoned by the number of New Year days a king lived in his reign.”[17] This leads to a separate “accession-year” which is excluded from the account of a king’s reign and is rather credited to the previous king whose reign just ended.[18] Accession-year dating was under David and Solomon and continued in Judah after the split of Israel in 931 BC.[19]

Non-Accession-Year Dating Used by Israel and Egypt

Egypt and the Northern Kingdom of Israel recorded what is called Non-Accession-Year Dating. In “Egypt (and elsewhere) the new king reckoned the partial year as his Year 1, disregarding his predecessor. This is the non-accession-year system, or ante-dating. And that’s what the kings of Israel used.”[20] This means that one year would often be counted twice: once for the previous king and once for the new king.[21] Israel in the north used non-accession-year dating starting in 931 BC possibly because it wanted to distinguish itself from Judah in the south (from which it had rebelled) or it might have been used because Jeroboam I (son of Nebat) had spent time in Egypt to escape from King Solomon and learned about that system while there (1 Kings 12:2).[22] Further explanation for the non-accession year system is that “the remainder of a previous king’s last year is counted as the first year of his successor, and then subsequent years are calculated from Nisan to Nisan in Israel, or Tishri to Tishri is Judah.”[23]

Co-Regencies

Another factor that makes creating a biblical chronology difficult is co-regencies. For example, the nation of Judah sometimes made their sons “co-regents” as a way to provide on the job training and to ensure a smooth transition of kingship power.[24] In the nation of Judah we see  Jehoshaphat, Jerhoram, Uzziah, Jotham, Ahaz, Hezekiah, and Manasseh all began as co-regent kings with their father.[25] Because of co-regencies in both Judah and Babylon (Belshazzar, a king in Babylon also was a co-regent with his father, Nabonidus), another layer of complexity is added to the dating of events.

Co-regencies in Scripture are an issue because “sometimes the number given is from the time a ruler became coregent; sometimes it is from the time he became king. Similarly the total years ruled may or may not include co-regency years and unless this is written into the translation it is not possible to make sense of the figures.”[26] This further adds to confusion, not necessarily errors in the biblical text. “When events are dated during the life of a king or coregent . . . it is a fact—which may not be significant—that these are dated according to his kingship. There are no instances of such events dated from the time of the king’s son became coregent.”[27] Even though this information might appear insignificant, it makes establishing a historical chronology difficult.

Factors That Make “Year” Chronologies Difficult

Another factor that makes chronologies of the Old Testament difficult is that the “calendar year” was different than what is used today. Furthermore, the calendar years used by neighboring nations were different than each other. “This ambiguity in dates [which we see today] existed even in ancient times because neighboring kingdoms used different systems. Years in the kingdoms of Israel and Judah began in different seasons; a year in one kingdom, therefore, straddled two years in the other.”[28] No wonder counting years accurately is so complex!

The nation of Israel used a calendar system that went from the month of Nisan to Adar in the Hebrew calendar (approximately April to March).[29] This calendar was also used by the nation of Babylon.[30] The nation of Judah used a calendar system that went from the month of Tishri to Elul in the Hebrew calendar (approximately September to August).[31] This calendar system started under the reigns of David and Solomon and continued after the split of Israel in 931 BC.[32]

Further complicating this is that the calendar systems of Israel, Judah, Babylonia, Assyria, and Egypt used do not correlate to the modern January to December yearly calendar currently practiced in the modern world. Even if these nations all kept exact dates, it is difficult for modern scholars to work backward more than 3,000 years, reconcile the modern calendar system to ancient nation calendaring systems, and reconcile different calendar systems with each other independent of the modern calendaring system.

CONCLUDING THOUGHTS

While there are many factors involved in the process of setting dates of Old Testament events, I hope what you’ve read gives you a greater appreciation for the work that goes into determining the dates that specific Old Testament events happened. And I hope that you have learned to accept some flexibility if some of these dates differ slightly in different study resources.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Boda, Mark and J. Gordon McConville, Editors. Dictionary of the Old Testament Prophets. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 2012.

Comfort, Philip W., and Walter A. Elwell, eds. Tyndale Bible Dictionary: A comprehensive guide to the people, places, and important words of the Bible. Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House Publishers, 2001.

Drinkard, Joel F., Jr., and E. Ray Clendenen. “Chronology of the Biblical Period.” Edited by Chad Brand, Charles Draper, Archie England, Steve Bond, E. Ray Clendenen, and Trent C. Butler. Holman Illustrated Bible Dictionary. Nashville, TN: Holman Bible Publishers, 2003.

Gerhald Larsson, “Chronology as a Structural Element in the Old Testament,” Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament, vol. 14, no. 2, (2000): 207-219.

Howard, David. An Introduction to the Old Testament Historical Books. Chicago, IL: Moody Publishers, 1993.

Kenneth Kitchen, “How Do We Know When Solomon Ruled,” Biblical Archeology Review, September/October 2001, 32-37, 58.

McFall, Leslie. “A Translation Guide to the Chronological Data in Kings and Chronicles.” Bibleotheca Sacra (Jan-March 1991): 3-45.

Merrill, Eugene. Kingdom of Priests: A History of Old Testament Israel, 2 Edition. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2008.

Rusten, E. Michael and Sharon. The Compete Book of When and Where in the Bible. Wheaton, IL: Tyndale, 2005.

“The Chronology of Israel’s Monarchy.” In New Living Translation Study Bible. Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale, 2007.Walvoord, John F., and Roy B. Zuck, Dallas Theological Seminary. The Bible Knowledge Commentary: An Exposition of the Scriptures. Vol. 1. Wheaton, IL: Victor Books, 1985.

Young, Rodger. “When Was Samaria Captured? The Need for Precision in Biblical Chronologies,” Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society¸ vol. 47, no. 4 (December 2004): 577-595.


[1] Leslie McFall, “A Translation Guide to the Chronological Data in Kings and Chronicles,” Bibliotheca Sacra (Jan-March 1991): 42.

[2] David Howard, An Introduction to the Old Testament Historical Books (Chicago, IL: Moody Publishers, 1993), 168-169.

[3] Ibid., 169.

[4] Ibid., 167.

[5] Kenneth Kitchen, “How Do We Know When Solomon Ruled,” Biblical Archeology Review, (September/October 2001), 34.

[6] Herodotus also records many details of the Persian Empire that can be correlated with details recorded in the Bible in 2 Kings, 2 Chronicles, Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther, and Jeremiah

[7] Philip W. Comfort and Walter A. Elwell, eds., Tyndale Bible Dictionary, 277.

[8] David Howard, Introduction to the Old Testament, 272.

[9] Rodger Young, “When Was Samaria Captured? The Need for Precision in Biblical Chronologies”, Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society¸ vol. 47, no. 4 (December 2004): 586.

[10] I firmly believe in the inspiration, inerrancy, sufficiency, and authority of Scripture, thus it is difficult to place a high emphasis on extra-biblical materials

[11] David Howard, Introduction to the Old Testament, 168.

[12] Kenneth Kitchen, “How Do We Know When Solomon Ruled,” 32-33.

[13] Philip W. Comfort and Walter A. Elwell, eds., Tyndale Bible Dictionary, 272.

[14] Gordon Johnston, “OT in the Public Square: Part Four—Historicity of the Divided Monarch Period” (slide 169) in OT 103 Elements of Hebrew, Dallas Theological Seminary, 2015 .

[15] “The Chronology of Israel’s Monarchy,” in New Living Translation Study Bible, (Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale, 2007), 562.

[16] Ibid.

[17] “Leslie McFall, “A Translation Guide,” 7.

[18] Kenneth Kitchen, “How Do We Know When Solomon Ruled,” 34.

[19] “Chronology of Israel’s Monarchy,” in NLT Study Bible, 563 quoted from Edward R. Thiele, “The Mysterious Number of the Hebrew Kings,” 3rd ed. (Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel, 1983), 47-51.

[20] Kenneth Kitchen, “How Do We Know When Solomon Ruled,” 34.

[21] “Chronology of Israel’s Monarchy,” in NLT Study Bible, 563.

[22] Ibid.

[23] Leslie McFall, “A Translation Guide,” 7.

[24] “Chronology of Israel’s Monarchy,” in NLT Study Bible, 564.

[25] Ibid.

[26] Leslie McFall, “A Translation Guide,” 7. Emphasis added.

[27] Ibid., 41.

[28] Kenneth Kitchen, “How Do We Know When Solomon Ruled,” 35.

[29] “Leslie McFall, “A Translation Guide,” 7 and Kenneth Kitchen, “How Do We Know When Solomon Ruled,” 35.

[30] “Chronology of Israel’s Monarchy,” in NLT Study Bible, 563.

[31] “Leslie McFall, “A Translation Guide,”7 and Kenneth Kitchen, “How Do We Know When Solomon Ruled,” 35.

[32] “Chronology of Israel’s Monarchy,” in NLT Study Bible, 563.

Filed Under: Bible Study Resources

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3

Copyright © 2025 · Christopher L. Scott · 810 S. Evergreen Dr., Moses Lake, WA 98837