• Skip to main content

Christopher L. Scott

  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Free Resources
  • Podcast

Christopher L. Scott

20. Always Ready (1 Pet 3:15b)

June 3, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

Kasey’s first foray into sports has been into the world of pickleball. She describes herself as a “novice pickleball enthusiast” that’s part of a gracious and welcoming pickleball community in Dallas. In this pickleball community Kasey has been surprised by the opportunities to talk about Jesus Christ and share her faith.

            One woman named Cathy commented to Kasey that Kasey’s husband is a sweet man. Cathy asked if Kasey’s husband was always that way. Kasey proceeded to describe how her husband’s kindness stemmed from his love for Jesus and Jesus’s example of sacrificial love.

            Kasey also had a unique conversation with Paul, a man she built a friendship with over many pickleball games. Paul asked Kasey about a romantic relationship he was exploring, and he was curious about how faith connects with real life. Kasey shared that following Christ means laying down all of life to follow Jesus (even if it’s difficult).[1]

            Kasey’s pickleball foray illustrates the instruction that Peter gives his readers, “always being ready to make a defense to everyone who asks you to give an account for the hope that is in you, yet with gentleness and reverence” (1 Pet 3:15, NASB).[2]

            Notice the timing Peter tells us about, “always being ready.” Peter says that we shouldn’t need a piece of paper to describe our hope in Jesus. Peter says we shouldn’t need to Google our answers. Instead, we know the truth in our heart, and we should be able to share it when prompted. In the ancient city of Athens each citizen was expected to have an ability to discuss the current state affairs of the city.[3] In the same way, we should be able to engage in a discussion of our faith in Christ.

            Notice also the task that Peter tells us about, “to make a defense to everyone who asks you to give an account for the hope that is in you.” The Greek word for “defense” used here is the Greek noun, apologia, and comes from the Greek verb, apologeomai, which means “to answer back” or to make “a defense (but not an excuse).” The word literally means to be “ready for an answer.”[4] Our word for “apologetics,” which means an explanation about what we believe, comes from those words.

            But what do we defend? In this context, it appears to be our future hope despite present suffering. The curious person might not specifically ask about our hope, but because our hope is the source of everything we do—since Christ is consecrated in our hearts—our answers naturally stem from our hope. This was shown in Kasey’s story that I shared earlier.

            Notice the tools that Peter wants us to use, “yet with gentleness and reverence.” The late Bible teacher RC Sproul once wisely stated, “When we engage in debates and arguments, we sometimes allow ourselves to be overcome with the heat of the moment and generate more heat than light.”[5] The Christian is supposed to always be a gentleman or gentlewoman, even when opposed or criticized by unbelievers. This is important for us to remember because we might be gruff instead of gentle, or rude instead of reverent. It takes conscious effort to be gentle and respectful in how we answer others.[6]

            Peter teaches us that to evangelize others, we must adequately articulate the hope of our faith. I know this can be scary, but let me give you a little encouragement.

            Being able to adequately articulate the hope of your faith is easier than you might think .Jesus Christ told us that the Holy Spirit will help us with what needs to be said in situations. “For the Holy Spirit will teach you in that very hour what you ought to say” (Luke 12:12). Describing our faith is easier than you think because a basic understanding of the Bible and theology helps us to do this. If we have a basic understanding of the Bible being sixty-six books, that Jesus was fully God (Col 1) while also fully man (Phil 2), that the return of Jesus is future yet undated, and that we can use the Romans Road to show how someone is saved, then we have a great amount of information we can share with others.

            Being able to adequately articulate the hope of your faith is also more important than you might think. Seventy-five years ago most people knew about the gospel because it was cultural to go to church on Sundays, they heard Billy Graham share the gospel at an event, they watched the gospel shared in the Charlie Brown Christmas, or they attended a Vacation Bible School put on by a local church. Those things are not as prevalent in our culture now, and as a result it’s even more important that we share our faith with others.

            Training to adequately articulate the hope of your faith is more accessible than you might think. We have the ability, as twenty-first century Americans, to not just own a Bible, but we have an education provided to us so that we can read it. We have been taught methods for correctly interpreting the Bible such as the inductive Bible study method. We have the freedom to meet with others for a discipleship study. We can even take free online classes provided by Christian seminaries. It’s never been easier in America to deepen our understanding of our faith and learn how to share our faith.

            Let’s return back to Kasey’s story and Peter’s letter. It’s important to recognize Peter tells us to always be ready to defend our faith. I hope Kasey’s story can encourage us to build friendships and make connections with people. This is why we must understand what we believe, know why we believe it; and be able to articulate it to others biblically, humbly, and reasonably. In this way I hope we can be ready to talk about Jesus and share our faith when prompted, just like Kasey.


[1] Kasey Olander, “Pickleball Evangelism” in DTS Magazine, spring 2025, 26–31.

[2] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[3] A. T. Robertson, Word Pictures in the New Testament (Nashville, TN: Broadman Press, 1933), “1 Peter 3:15.”

[4] Paul used this word in this way in Acts 22:1; Phil 1:7, 16. A. T. Robertson, Word Pictures in the New Testament (Nashville, TN: Broadman Press, 1933), “1 Peter 3:15.”

[5] R. C. Sproul, 1 Peter (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2011), 124.

[6] As we share our faith we don’t degrade others; but can and should defend ourselves. We could all benefit from Paul’s advice to Timothy, “The Lord’s bond-servant must not be quarrelsome, but be kind to all, able to teach, patient when wronged, with gentleness correcting those who are in opposition, if perhaps God may grant them repentance leading to the knowledge of the truth” (2 Tim 2:24–25).

Filed Under: Portraits of an Authentic Disciple

19. Step One in Evangelism (1 Pet 3:15a)

May 26, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

Jack Martens was a band teacher of teens in San Francisco. For thirty-three years he braved the challenges of less-than-ideal teaching conditions at Ben Franklin Middle School to live out his faith. More than half of Mr. Martens’s students were from broken homes, on welfare, and from families where English was not the first language.

            It was in those circumstances that this bearded band teacher shepherded his students through the less-than-green pastures of life. “I love these kids,” he said. “And they love me. In me they can see my love for Jesus Christ.”

            Although Mr. Martens always kept a Bible and other Christian symbols on his desk, it was his interaction with the kids that was his primary witness. He ate lunch with his kids to help them talk through their problems. He stayed after school to help them with difficult fingerings on their instruments. Through the mechanics of music he was able to show his students they were capable of something beautiful.[1]

            That story about Mr. Martens reminds us about our need to be witnesses for Christ wherever we work, live, or play. The apostle Peter tells his readers to intentionally evangelize others even when in the midst of suffering (1 Pet 3:15–16). Peter reminds his readers that to share their faith, they first must have a dedication of Jesus in their hearts. Peter[2] writes, “But sanctify Christ as Lord in your hearts” (1 Pet 3:15a, NASB).[3] This is contrary to the fear of others Peter has just mentioned in 1 Peter 3:14. Peter is saying that we don’t let fear live in our hearts because we have placed Christ in our hearts. Peter exhorts his readers to make an inner commitment to Christ. I like how the NIV translates this phrase, “revere Christ as Lord.”

            To “sanctify” Christ means we turn everything over to him, we live only to please him, and we seek to glorify him. It means we set Jesus in a unique place as Lord and Master over our lives.

            To set Christ apart “in your hearts” means to separate from the world. The Greek word for heart, kardiais, “refers to the mind as the core of one’s feelings, thoughts, and volition; it is the basic self.”[4] Instead of having the world’s passions and desires in our hearts, we should have Christ in our hearts, and as a result we want what he wants. Peter makes it clear that before we begin witnessing about our faith (1 Pet 3:15b–16) we have to get our heart right (1 Pet 3:15a).

            Peter teaches us that to evangelize others we must fully consecrate Jesus in our hearts. When we say Jesus is Lord it’s not as if we’ve accepted him as our Savior, and then we need to take the next step to elevate him to Lord of our lives. Instead, when we make Christ Savior and accept him for who he is and what he did, we are in effect making him Lord. This is because of who Jesus is. Jesus is God (John 1:1, 14; Col 1:16-17). Jesus is sovereign (Matt 12:8 and John 5:17). Jesus is Savior (John 1:14, Heb 4:15; Phil 2:7-8). Jesus is Lord (Acts 2:21; Rom 10:9).[5]

            But what does this look like for a practical application? This is how we set Christ as Lord of our lives. We do what he wants us to do, we desire what he longs for, we avoid what he cautions us against. Another way to practically consecrate Jesus as Lord in our hearts is to ask some questions. Would Jesus do that action? Would Jesus watch that movie? Would Jesus say those words? Would Jesus treat that person that way? It is in these ways that Jesus governs us and guides us.

            Most of us have had the experience of driving “self-assist” cars. The self-assist car gives you help when you’re veering off the road, when you get distracted, or if an obstacle suddenly appears ahead of you. A self-assist car does what either you cannot do or what you’ve failed to do. You are driving the vehicle, you are conscious, but you allow the car to help you.

            I think that’s what witnessing to others looks like when we dedicate our hearts and lives to Jesus. We actively try to witness and share our faith with others. But when we have Jesus dedicated in our hearts he steps in to help us when we cannot do or say what we need to do or say.

            It’s in that way that we can dedicate Jesus in our hearts as the first step to sharing our faith just like Mr. Martens did for many years.

—

Christopher L. Scott is a pastor and author of the book, Walking Straight When Life Goes Sideways: Essential Christian Truths for Enduring Life’s Trials (Wipf and Stock). He provides hundreds of free articles, videos, and Bible study resources at his website ChristopherLynnScott.com.


[1] This story is told by Greg Asimakoupoulos and recorded by Craig Brian Larson and Phyllis Ten Elshof in their book, 1001 Illustrations That Connect (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 2008), 273–274.

[2] Here Peter is quoting a portion from Isaiah 8:13. The original quotation was an instruction for Isaiah’s readers to dedicate their lives to Yahweh, but Peter applies the text here to Christ. Yahweh was the personal name of God used by Israel in the Old Testament. It was also the name frequently used to show God’s covenant and promise made uniquely to Israel. It was a distinct name for God which was different than the names of other gods in their culture. “The name, Yahweh, comes from the Hebrew verb YHWH which is “the verb ‘to be’, meaning ‘he is (alive, present, active)’ or ‘he brings into being’” (J. A. Motyer, “Name,” in New Bible Dictionary, ed. D. R. W. Wood et al. [Leicester, England; Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1996], 801. New Testament scholar Thomas Schreiner writes, “The move from Yahweh to Christ is common in the New Testament, reflecting the conviction that Jesus the Messiah deserves the same honor as Yahweh” (Thomas R. Schreiner, 1, 2 Peter, Jude, vol. 37, The New American Commentary [Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers, 2003], 173).

[3] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[4] Grant R. Osborne, 1–2 Peter, Cornerstone Biblical Commentary, vol. 18 (Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale, 2011), 222.

[5] Adapted from John MacArthur, The Gospel According to Jesus (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2008), 226-233.

Filed Under: Portraits of an Authentic Disciple

18. Courage for the Conversation (1 Pet 3:15-16)

May 18, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

Sharing our faith with others can be one of the most exciting things we do, yet also one of the most frightening things we do. As we share the Gospel with others we have to be prepared for the ways people might respond. They might accept what we say and become a believer. They might think about our message but not accept it. They might reject what we offer and reject us in the process.

Sharing our faith is difficult. I don’t know about you, but it seems harder for me than people often describe. One pastor I used to work for would say, “If you invite five people to church, then one will likely come.” That ratio has not been valid for me. In my experience it seems like one person comes for every fifty invitations I give to people.

I used to go to lunch with a friend named Andrew who seemed to talk about Jesus with everyone we saw when we were at lunch. He was always able to talk about God with the waitress, busboys, or the people sitting at the tables near us. (Yes, I mean “always”!) For me, I often struggle to talk about my faith with strangers and struggle to know how to bring up the topic.

I share those two examples because we want to share our faith, and we all know we should share our faith. Today we are looking at 1 Peter 3:15-16 as part of our series of articles I’ve titled: “Portraits of an Authentic Disciple: First Century Direction for Twenty-First Century Disciples.” Thus far we’ve learned that disciples of Jesus Christ embrace God’s word (2 Tim 3:16–17), embody God’s kingdom (Phil 3:17–21), and encourage one another (Heb 10:23–25). Today we learn from 1 Peter 3:15-16 that an authentic disciple of Jesus evangelizes others.

The letter we have in our Bibles called “1 Peter” was written by “Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ” (1 Pet 1:1a, NASB).[1] There’s only one person in the New Testament with the name Peter. It’s the Peter that was personally called (Matt 10:1-4) and commissioned by Christ (Jn 20:19-23). He spent three years with Jesus Christ and another thirty years as an apostle leading the church. As an apostle, the church was built on his teaching (Acts 2:42; Eph 2:20).

The letter we have in our Bibles called “1 Peter” was written to “those who reside as aliens” (1 Pet 1:1b). The people are described as “aliens” which means they were spiritual sojourners, exiles, and foreign residents. They are spiritual aliens on earth because their citizenship is heavenly.  

The letter we have in our Bibles called “1 Peter” was written to the people who lived in “Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia” (1 Pet 1:1c). These were provinces of Asia Minor located north of the Taurus Mountains. This is in modern Turkey. These people were experiencing unofficial, unjust suffering because of their Christian faith.

First Peter 3:15–16 is part of an extended teaching on the life of suffering that Christians face (1 Peter 3:13—4:19). With that backdrop of suffering, I want us to look at 1 Peter 3:15–16 and what it teaches us about sharing our faith with others.

            “But sanctify Christ as Lord in your hearts, always being ready to make a defense to everyone who asks you to give an account for the hope that is in you, yet with gentleness and reverence; and keep a good conscience so that in the thing in which you are slandered, those who revile your good behavior in Christ will be put to shame” (1 Pet 3:15–16). Peter teaches us that believers who experience unjust and unofficial suffering dedicate Jesus in their hearts, defend Jesus with their words, and describe Jesus with their behavior. This means that every believer is called to be an apologist. We’ll explore more about what that looks like in the coming weeks.


[1] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

Filed Under: Portraits of an Authentic Disciple

17. Assembly Required (Heb 10:23-25)

May 13, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

If you told a non-Christian that attending church was good for him, do you think he would do it? Research recently conducted shows that regularly attending church is good for mental and physical health in both adults and children.

            The past few weeks I’ve shown you what the Bible says about the importance of gathering together with other Christian believers for worship. I’ve shared lots of quotes from Bible teachers which supports that Bible teaching. Now let me share one more piece of evidence.

            Research was recently conducted about the health risks of “regular church attenders” compared with “never-attenders.” Tyler Vanderweele and Brendan Case both work at The Human Flourishing Program at Harvard’s Institute for Qualitative Research. These men have found through their research that there’s a vast difference in both physical and mental health when comparing people who regularly attend a church with people who never attend church.

            The research shows similar results for both adults and children. According to the research, if you are an adult who regularly attends church, then you have an 80 percent reduced risk of suicide, 29 percent reduced risk of depression, and 50 percent reduced risk of divorce. Regularly attending church also results in a 68 percent reduced risk of “deaths of despair” for women and 33 percent reduced risk of “deaths of despair” for men. If an adolescent regularly attends church there is a 33 percent reduced risk of adolescent illegal drug use and a 12 percent reduced risk of adolescent depression.[1]

            I know that’s a lot to take in. Feel free to read it again. Here’s the conclusion we should make about those statistics: attending church is good for both adults and children. To say it another way, attending church positively affects the physical and mental health of both adults and children.[2]

            Reading statistics about the benefits of regularly attending church should not surprise us. Hebrews 10:23–25 teaches us about the local church assembly, “Let us hold fast the confession of our hope without wavering, for He who promised is faithful; and let us consider how to stimulate one another to love and good deeds, not forsaking our own assembling together, as is the habit of some, but encouraging one another; and all the more as you see the day drawing near” (Heb 10:23–25, NASB).[3]

            According to these often known yet frequently ignored verses, the proper response to Christ for a Christian is to hold fast to the confession of faith, stimulate one another to love and good deeds, and encourage one another as we wait for the Lord’s return. The author of Hebrews teaches us that while you don’t have to attend church to be a Christian, one of the signs that you are a Christian is that you attend church.[4]

            Pastor Mark Hitchcock says, “One of the marks of discipleship—of being a follower of Christ—is that you cherish the church. When Sunday rolls around you ought to be excited to come to church and to be here with God’s people. You ought to look forward to it.”[5] While you don’t have to attend church to be a Christian, one of the signs that you are a Christian is that you attend church.

            Hebrews 10:23–25, alongside the testimony of good Bible teachers and research, shows that it’s good to be involved in a local church. We as Christians attend church regularly because it’s what God says in his word that we must do, but it’s also good to be involved in a local church because it’s good for us. Maybe that’s why he says to do it.

—

Christopher L. Scott is a pastor and author of the book, Walking Straight When Life Goes Sideways: Essential Christian Truths for Enduring Life’s Trials (Wipf and Stock). He provides hundreds of free articles, videos, and Bible study resources at his website ChristopherLynnScott.com.


[1] Tyler J. Vanderwheele and Brenden Case, “The Public Health Crisis No One Is Talking About: Americans are rapidly giving up on the church. Our minds and bodies are paying the price” (Christianity Today, November 2021, pp. 37-42)

[2] Church attendance is not a guarantee of health, wealth, and happiness. That research suggests a reduction of bad experiences, but it does not completely remove them from life. This research does not show that there is a positive connection between church attendance and a reduction in mental and physical health problems. I realize that correlation does not show causation. There might be a third variable at play that causes reduced risks of those who attend church. With that said, I want to support people, and according to that research, the church helps people.

[3] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[4] As we’ve examined Hebrews 10:23–25 we’ve learned that there was a failure to gather that was occurring among the Christians in Rome (Heb 10:25a). The author of Hebrews teaches us that there are three aspects of fidelity to the gathering of Christians for worship (Heb 10:23–24, 25b). The first fidelity to the gathering relates to our doctrine, specifically, holding fast to our confession of faith. The second fidelity to the gathering relates to our deeds, specifically, how we stimulate others to loving actions. The third fidelity to the gathering relates to our duty, specifically, the need for us to encourage one other.The author of Hebrews tells us that we worship on the Lord’s day to prepare for the day of the Lord when Christ returns.

              Hebrews 10:23 shows us that the confession of hope is based on Christ (not us), the hope consists of doctrine (not feelings), and the hope directs believers (not unbelievers). Hebrews 10:24 tells us that stimulating others to loving actions should be community focused and should be continually directed. Hebrews 10:25b teaches us that encouragement is something we all are called to do, we all can do, and we all need to do.

[5] “Assembly Required” (Hebrews 10:23-25), Faith Bible Church,  Edmond, OK on April 11, 2021.  https://faithbibleok.subspla.sh/8mk725z Accessed January 18, 2024.

Filed Under: Portraits of an Authentic Disciple

16. What the Church Needs (Heb 10:25b)

May 7, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

Several years ago when going on vacation, I took Warren Wiersbe’s memoir, Be Myself, with me on the trip. As you may know Warren Wiersbe was a popular twentieth-century preacher, pastor, and writer. He pastored the Moody Memorial Church, was the teacher for the Back to the Bible radio program, and published more than one hundred and sixty books before he passed in 2019. (I find it fitting that less than one year before he passed away he had, yet another, book published!)[1]

            In that memoir I remember him sharing about his first experiences preaching in local churches. Many years after his first sermons were preached, he received a note that someone had made in her diary after hearing him preach those first sermons. The woman had written in her diary: “November 30th, Sunday. Feeling a little better today. I rested and went to church in evening. Warren Wiersbe preached; God’s Spirit was felt. I know Warren is being and will be used of God mightily. I feel it.”[2] Warren Wiersbe held onto that note for many decades and always used it as a source of encouragement for him. He wrote, “With people like that encouraging you, how can you lose?”[3] That note reminds us that encouragement costs little, and everyone is capable of it.

            As we’ve examined Hebrews 10:23–25 we’ve learned that the Christians in Rome were failing to gather (Heb 10:25a). The author of Hebrews teaches us that there are three aspects of fidelity to the gathering of Christians for worship (Heb 10:23–24, 25b). I like to use the word “fidelity” as it relates to our worship of God with other believers because the word fidelity means “the quality or state of being faithful.”[4]

            The first fidelity (quality or state of being faithful) to the gathering relates to our doctrine, specifically, holding fast to our confession of faith (Heb 10:23). The second fidelity to the gathering relates to our deeds, specifically, how we stimulate others to loving actions (Heb 10:24). The third fidelity to the gathering relates to our duty, specifically, the need for us to encourage one another. We read, “encouraging one another; and all the more as you see the day drawing near” (Heb 10:25b).[5] The author of Hebrews tells us that we worship on the Lord’s day to prepare for the day of the Lord when Christ returns.

            I believe this verse teaches us that encouragement is something we all are called to do. Hebrews 10:25b was addressed to the church in Rome and was intended for all believers. It was not written to only pastors, mature saints, or only new converts. The entire body is responsible for providing encouragement to others. We need to take seriously our responsibility to each other within the body. When we join the body of Christ we don’t slack off as Christians, instead we are responsible to spur on one another. Encouragement for our faith only happens when we are together, not when we are separate. We are better Christians when we are around other Christians.

            I believe this verse also teaches us that encouragement is something we all can do. Every person can offer encouragement to others. Giving encouragement requires no money or technical abilities. It’s saying, “God cares for you, and I’m here for you.” It’s asking, “Last week we prayed for your doctor appointment, so how did it go? It’s telling a young parent, “Your child is often well behaved at church. You seem like an engaged parent.”

            I believe this verse also teaches us that encouragement is something we all need to do. Most people need encouragement in their lives, and the church body should be where that happens. Many times I’ve heard about our church members feeling encouraged when they see other church members and hear the stories shared by those church members.

            One lady told me about coming to church but not going inside. She would sit in the parking lot and watch the people to “see what church people were like.” Eventually someone invited her inside and she became a believer and follower of Christ. Another person used to drop a parent off at church, then go back home. It wasn’t until the parent passed away that this person realized he needed to get in touch with God. That person now has a steady and close relationship with God and is a committed member of our church. When those people share their stories, they encourage other people in our church. Here’s the point: their presence at church provides encouragement to others, and that encouragement is something we all need to do for others.

            I’d like to close this article with this thought from pastor Ray Stedman, “Corporate worship is not an option for a Christian; it is a necessity. It certainly includes regular attendance at church meetings, but means more than that. It means a willingness to help struggling faith whenever Christians meet.”[6] You might feel like you do not need the church, but the truth is that the church needs you. People need to hear your story. Kids and grandkids need to see your commitment to God by how you gather with others in worship each week. Friends need to find out how you are doing when they see you at church. The church needs you. Let me say it again: the church needs you.

—

Christopher L. Scott is a pastor and author of the book, Walking Straight When Life Goes Sideways: Essential Christian Truths for Enduring Life’s Trials (Wipf and Stock). He provides hundreds of free articles, videos, and Bible study resources at his website ChristopherLynnScott.com.


[1] Warren W. Wiersbe, Delights and Disciplines of Bible Study (Colorado Springs, CO: David C. Cook, 2018).

[2] Warren W. Wiersbe, Be Myself (Wheaton, IL: Victor Books, 1994),62.

[3] Warren W. Wiersbe, Be Myself (Wheaton, IL: Victor Books, 1994),62.

[4] Marriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, s.v. “fidelity.”

[5] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[6] Ray C. Stedman, Hebrews, The IVP New Testament Commentary Series 15 (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1992), 109.

Filed Under: Portraits of an Authentic Disciple

An Introduction to Joel

May 4, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

While Joel is famous for its eschatological reference to “locusts” and the “Day of the Lord,” it is perhaps most relevant to our lives as it teaches us about God’s character, the holy lives he calls us to live, and how God is forgiving and patient with us when we repent and return to him. The one-word description I would give for Joel would be “judging.”

BIG IDEA. Joel preached about impending doom that would come upon Judah, however because of God’s loving and forgiving character, God would relent if Judah repented of their wrong, and as a result would punish Judah’s enemies.

KEY VERSES. These are the two verses I believe are the key to this book: “’Yet even now,’ declares the Lord, ‘Return to Me with all your heart, And with fasting, weeping and mourning; And rend your heart and not your garments.’ Now return to the Lord your God, For He is gracious and compassionate, Slow to anger, abounding in lovingkindness And relenting of evil” (Joel 2:12-13, NASB).[1]  I also like Joel 3:20–21 as potential key verses of the book. However, some people see Joel 2:18 as a “hinge” verse or “pivot” verse in the book. Ken Hanna says Joel 1:15 and 2:28-29 are key verses of the book.[2]

AUTHOR. We learn about Joel in the opening verse of the book: “The word of the LORD that came to Joel, the son of Pethuel” (Joel 1:1, NASB). There are twelve other men named “Joel” in the Bible, however none of those men have the same father’s name that Joel has in Joel 1:1.[3] The name joel in Hebrew means “Yahweh is God.” We have no other biographical information about him. “The fact that no other information is included in the superscription may imply that Joel was well known to his contemporaries and that further identification was unnecessary.”[4]

There is no reason (as others have stated) that we should question that Joel was a real prophet responsible for this book. We have no information about which king was in charge when Joel spoke, but we can make a good guess about where he was when he wrote down these words. Joel likely was a native of Jerusalem from where he prophesied (Joel 1:9; 2:15–17, 23, 32; 3:1). Joel likely was in Jerusalem when he recorded this book for two reasons. One, he calls for the trumpet to sound in Zion (Joel 2:1, 15). Two, he speaks of reviving Jerusalem and Judah (Joel 3:1, 16). He was obviously from Judah based on regular references to Zion, Jerusalem, and Judah. Furthermore, some believe that Joel was a priest as well as a prophet based on his mention of both the temple and the priests (Joel 1:13–14; 2:17). However, he at times suggests that he is distinct from the priests (Joel 1:13; 2:17).  

AUDIENCE. Joel’s message is delivered to the people and priests of the temple in Jerusalem (Joel 1:2, 13). Israel is not mentioned except in a generic manner to describe the people of God (Joel 2:27; 3:2, 16). Following are mentions in the book: “Zion”[5] (seven times in Joel 2:1, 15, 23, 32; 3:16, 17, 21), “Jerusalem” (six times in Joel 2:32; 3:1, 6, 16, 17, 20), “Judah” (six times in Joel 3:1, 6, 8, 18, 19, 20), “inhabitants” of the land (three times in Joel 1:2, 14; 2:1), God’s “people” (six times in 2:16, 18, 19, 26; 3:2, 16), and “elders” (1:2, 14). It has been said, and I would agree, that a present crisis among the nation appears to be the occasion for prophesying about a future catastrophe.

DATE. Joel, along with Obadiah, are prophets we cannot date with certainty. Various dates have been proposed from the ninth century until second centuries. “Probably no book of the Bible has had a wider range of dates assigned to it.”[6] We cannot establish the date with dogmatism, however three dates have commonly been proposed.

            In Joel several nations are mentioned as enemies of Israel (Phoenicians, Philistines, Egypt, Edom, the Greeks, Sabateans). It’s tempting to use the names of these enemies to date the book. However, these are traditional enemies of Israel, so to date the book based on when these nations were prominent or simply active is cautious. Greek trade in the Levant is known from sources of Assyria in as early as the eighth century (Joel 3:6).[7] The Sabeans dominated trade routes to the east in the fifth century (Joel 3:8), but they were also active in the period of Solomon (1 Kings 10; 2 Chron 9).[8]

            Another puzzling aspect to Joel’s work is that it is similar to several other prophets. Did Joel prophesy first and others quote him? Did Joel prophesy later and quote those other prophets? Did Joel use common language, images, and metaphors that all prophets used?[9] To be transparent, we are not always sure. With that said, let’s look at the three common dates proposed for Joel.

Early Pre-Exilic (835–796 BC or 835–830 BC). This would be early in the reign of Joash before the Assyrian period. This date coincides with King Joash (835–795 BC) who was under the regency of priests when he ascended to the throne as king (2 Kings 11:12, 17, 21; 12:2; 2 Chron 22:16–17; 24:15).

Strengths.

  1. Location in the Canon between Hosea (8th century) and Amos (8th century)[10] favors an early date.
  2. Presumes the existence and routine operation of the temple (Joel 1:9, 13–16; 2:15–17).
  3. The wall around Jerusalem was still standing (Joel 2:9). This likely points to a time before the destruction of Jerusalem by Babylon in 586 BC.
  4. Reference to pre-exilic enemies such as Tyre, Sidon, Philistia (Joel 3:4), Egypt, and Edom (Joel 3:19) support an early pre-exilic date. If the book was written in post-exilic time, we would expect to see the enemies as Syria, Assyria, and Babylon. “If the Book of Joel was written in the ninth century b.c., the reference to Egypt in Joel 3:19 may allude to her acts of violence committed during the invasion of the Egyptian Pharaoh Shishak (ca 926 b.c.; cf. 1 Kings 14:25–26).”[11]
  5. No mention of kings or monarchy might suggest the monarchy has a limited role when Joash was under the regency of priests when he ascended to the throne at the age of seven (see 2 Kings 11–2; 2 Chron 23–24).
  6. Absence of allusions to Syria, Assyria, and Babylonians suggests an early pre-exilic date before these nations became prominent enemies of Israel.
  7. Conversely, the references to Egypt and Edom do support an early pre-exilic date as these were prominent enemies of Judah during the ninth century.
  8. It appears that the book of Amos, which was written later, borrows from Joel as Joel was written first. For example, it appears Amos 1:2 is a quote of Joel 3:16 and Amos 9:13 is a quote of Joel 3:18.
  9. Assyrian inscriptions made in the eighth century mention the Greeks in a similar way to Joel 3:6.
  10. The style and structure of the Hebrew text in Joel suggests a pre-exilic date. In the book of Joel there does not appear any influence of the Persian language or Greek language into Joel’s wording. We often see this influence in post-exilic books such as Daniel, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi, etc.

Weaknesses

  1. The LXX does not place Joel between Hosea and Joel, but instead after Micah.
  2. There’s no condemnation of worship of foreign deities or gods in Joel, which was often a pre-exilic staple for prophets of that time.
  3. There’s no mention of a king in Judah. However, Joel (if it’s pre-exilic) is not the only early prophet that does not mention a king. Obadiah, Jonah, Nahum, and Habakkuk do not directly mention a king in Judah even though they were pre-exilic prophets.
  4. Most Old Testament prophets in the Babylonian period delivered oracles against the nations of Tyre, Sidon, Philistia, Egypt, and Edom (Jer 46—47; Ezek 27—30; Zeph 2:4–7).
  5. Joel referenced a dispersion of Jews from Judah into surrounding nations (Joel 3:1–2), which is something Assyria and Babylon both did, but not in the ninth century. “Population relocation was a routine policy of the Assyrians; the annals of Sennacherib report that he had already subjected Judah to a major deportation, so that references to a Diaspora need not refer to the Babylonian captivity alone.”[12]
  6. Joel regularly mentions Judah and Jerusalem, but not Israel or Samaria, thus suggesting a date after 722 BC when the Assyrians destroyed Samaria and took Israel into captivity. However, Joel is a smaller book with only three chapters. If we looked at Amos 1—4 (without a superscription) or Micah 5—7, we might make the same conclusion, but we know from the expanded portions of those books that there was a king at that time.
  7. While a reference to Tyre, Sidon, Philistia, Egypt, and Edom (Joel 3:4, 19) might suggest a ninth century date, Old Testament Babylonian period prophets also delivered oracles against those same nations mentioned (see Jer 46—47; 49:7–22; Ezek 27—30; Zeph 2:4–7).

Post-Exilic. This would be after the exile of 586 BC. This is perhaps the most common view today among Old Testament scholars.

Strengths

  1. There’s no mention of kings or royal officials in Joel. In Joel the leadership of the community appears to be done by elders and priests (Joel 1:2, 13; 2:16).
  2. Joel mentions a dispersion of Jews into the surrounding lands (Joel 3:1–2), which would match the exile.
  3. There is no mention or condemnation of worshipping foreign gods or incorporating them into Yahweh worship. This usually was typical of post-exilic prophets and life in Judah after the exile.
  4. Joel 3:1–2, 17 refers to the destruction of Jerusalem and Babylonian exile. This is an interpretation referencing the temple in Joel 1:9, 13; 2:17 and applies to the second temple rebuilt in 515 BC.
  5. Joel 1:2; 2:16 references elders rather than a king as leaders of the community, which is more consistent with a post exilic period (see Ezra 10:14).
  6. Joel appears to quote other prophets which were written before him. Joel 2:3 quotes Ezekiel 36:35. Joel 2:10 quotes Ezek 32:7. Joel 2:27–28 quotes Ezek 39:28–29. Ezekiel was a post-exilic prophet thus Joel was written after him.

Weaknesses

  1. We would expect the enemies, if Joel was post-exilic, to be identified as Arameans, Assyrians, or Babylonians, but this is not the case (Joel 3:4, 19).
  2. While there is no reference to kings or a monarchy, scripture tells us that elders were prominent in Judean society before the exile (2 Kings 23:1; Jer 26:17; Lam 5:12, 14).
  3. While it might appear Joel quotes earlier prophets, it is not always clear who is quoting who.

Late Pre-Exilic. Some believe the book of Joel was written in 597–587 BC. This we call the “late pre-exilic” period. This view slides in between the two views I’ve shared above.

Strengths

  1. There’s no mention of the northern kingdom. The repeated designation of Judah as “Israel” (Joel 2:27; 3:2, 16) assumes a time when the 10 northern tribes had been taken off to exile in 722 BC.
  2. Joel 3:2b references a scattering of God’s people and dividing the land. This could refer to the Babylonian invasion of 597 BC when 10,000 of Judah’s finest men were deported to Babylon (see 2 Kings 24:10–16).
  3. Joel’s reference to the temple would make sense if he wrote from 597 to 587 BC because the temple (Joel 1:9, 13; 2:17) was not destroyed until 586 BC (2 Kings 25:9).
  4. Joel 1:15 and 2:11 would anticipate the final destruction of Jerusalem (in 586 BC as recorded in 2 Kings 25:1–21) and this would also connect “the day of the Lord” to that event.
  5. The references in Joel 3:6 to the slave trade between the Phoenecians and Greeks (or Ionians) harmonizes well with a late pre-exilic date. See Ezek 27:13 which also references this same type of economic arrangement.
  6. Zephaniah is a late pre-exilic minor prophet and the book of Joel shares many things in common with that book.

Weaknesses

  1. Joel 2:18–19 Appears to reveal God’s mercy to Joel’s generation. This implies that they truly repented. This event is hard to harmonize with Judah’s final days because 2 Kings 23:26–27 indicates that Josiah’s revival was good, but not severe enough to cause God to relent.  

Current Scholars on the Date of Joel. “Joel is a unified work composed under the circumstances of an invasion against the city of Jerusalem (and thus, of course, Judah) by Mesopotamian enemy forces, either Assyria or Babylonia. If this admittedly speculative assessment is correct, the words of the book would likely have been spoken on one of these occasions: the Assyrian invasion of 701 B.C., the Babylonian invasion of 598, or the Babylonian invasion of 588. There is no reason to think, therefore, that the book’s content and perspective are preexilic rather than postexilic.”[13]

            “In conclusion, it is impossible to be dogmatic about the date of the writing of Joel. The language of Joel 3:2b seems to favor a postexilic date. This verse suggests that nations in the future will be judged for having continued the policies of ancient Babylon in scattering the Israelites and dividing their land. Such a view is consistent with (but not proved by) several other observations (such as the reference to Phoenician-Ionian slave trade, the form of government implied in the book, and the literary parallels with other prophets). If one accepts a postexilic date, the references to the temple necessitate a date some time after 516 B.C. However, all this must remain tentative. Understandably, conservative scholars differ on the date of Joel.”[14]

            “The dating of Joel has had as much latitude as Obadiah, ranging from the ninth to the forth centuries BC. Fortunately there are no cardinal points of orthodoxy at stake in the matter. With no indication of date in the superscription and no clear corroborative evidence in other prophetic and historical books (as with Jonah), the matter must rest in the uncertain hands of internal evidence.”[15]

Conclusion on the Date of Joel. With that said, no one can be dogmatic on the date of the book of Joel. Just like Obadiah, we might make an educated guess, but we do not know for sure when Joel recorded his words. However, most of the book can be read, studied, and preached with a goal of application without specific requirements on a date. In this way, if we keep our exposition general without a specific date and the sins general without specific sins identified in the book, then the book is applicable to today’s audiences.

THEMES

Yahweh’s Sovereignty over the Nations. God makes it clear that he controls the nations. He states that if his people are not obedient to him (over whom he has given promises) then he will use other nations to punish his nation. “Joel’s depiction of the absolute authority of Yahweh over all the peoples of the earth is among the strongest in the Old Testament.”[16] Duane Garrett reminds us that, “God is merciful, and when his people call on him, he quickly desists from punishing and heals those whom he has wounded.”[17]

Zion. In Joel we learn about both God’s love for his people and his land. (See notes on audience above for references to Zion, Jerusalem, Judah, etc.) In addition to those place names, there are also various addresses to the inhabitants of the land, the elders, and the people of the land. I’ve chosen “Zion” as the theme here instead of “Israel” or “Jerusalem” or “Judah” because “Zion” represents both the geographical location as well as God’s chosen people. As one scholar has suggested, “Zion is connected with Jerusalem but actually transcends the geographical city. It represents the conviction that Israel is the chosen nation; that Yahweh, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, is the one true God; and that the Davidic monarch is destined to rule all the nations of the world.”[18] Specifically, Zion is mentioned seven times (Joel 2:1, 15; 23; 32; 3:16, 17; 21). Jerusalem is mentioned six times (Joel 2:32; 3:1, 6, 16, 17, 20). and Judah is mentioned six times (Joel 3:1, 6, 8, 18, 19, 20). I believe that these three words are various addresses to the inhabitants, elders, and people of the land.  

The Day of the LORD.[19] While there are various interpretations of “the day of the Lord” regarding its time (whether past or future) as well as its effect (limited or universal), the day of the Lord is a topic woven throughout this book. While the day of the Lord is referred to many times in the book (and one might even say that the entire book is about the day of the Lord) it is specifically discussed in Joel 1:15; 2:1, 11, 31; 3:14. As a general rule, the day of the Lord is a future time of accountability. The book of Joel provides a more graphic detail of the day of the Lord than any other prophetic book. I like how Charles Ryrie summarizes this theme, “The Day of the Lord, the major theme of this prophecy, involves God’s special intervention in the affairs of human history.”[20]

Locusts. The book of Joel is perhaps best known for the locusts described in it. One of my earliest memories at seminary was in our Bible study methods class where Dr. Mark Bailey said some people believe the locusts described in the book of Joel are modern day helicopters. (I do not hold that interpretation, but I have always remembered it as an option!) Locusts are introduced in chapter one, used in chapter two, and their effect is seen in chapter three. In the NASB we learn about “gnawing locusts” (Joel 1:4; 2:25), “swarming locusts” (Joel 1:4 [2t]; 2:25), “creeping locusts” (Joel 1:4 [2t]; 2:25), and “stripping locusts” (Joel 1:4; 2:25). It’s important to note that locusts are a warning curse. Not the final curse by God.

MISCELANEOUS QUOTES ON JOEL. “Written in Hebrew poetry, the language of the book manifests a poet’s eyes and a scribe’s skilled pen. His imagery is artful, the product of a mind that thinks in similes and poetic images”[21]

“At present, then, virtually no consensus can be claimed for scholarship on Joel, whether as to date, or unity, or theological perspective, or even the literalness of the imagery. Noticeably missing from recent scholarship on Joel has been attention to his dependence on covenantal ideas and structures, particularly those of the Mosaic covenant sanctions.”[22]

“The Book of Joel never views disaster as only a natural event or as an accident. All things are under God’s control and, more specifically, relate to God’s larger purposes for the world and Israel. As such, Joel contributes to our understanding of the problem of theodicy. In particular, Joel enables us to see that while disasters can be very painful and are a legitimate reason for mourning, they are always within the plan of God. There is ample reason to seek for grace here. By grace we remain in a state of repentance, and by grace we discern the larger plans for good behind our temporary setbacks and hardships.”[23]

“The success of the incorporation of the book of Joel into the overall program of the Twelve (Hos. 3:4–5) is attested by the citation of the book to explain the Pentecost event and to look forward to times of refreshing when Christ returns in the Day of the LORD (Acts 2–3). Here is the ongoing significance of the book as Christian Scripture for the church. It is indispensable for our understanding of the eschatological Day of the LORD in the Twelve, the Hebrew Bible, and in Christian theology. Without such hope, it is difficult for the individual believer to make sense of his or her daily life and struggles.”[24]

“A man of implicit faith in God, Joel imparts that reliance on the sufficiency of God and his prior claim on the believer’s life in every section of the book.”[25]

OUTLINE OF THE BOOK OF JOEL

“From Ruin to Renewal: Sermons from Joel”

“From God’s Destruction to Demonstration of Love”

I. LAMENT (Joel 1:1—2:17). One might say that Joel 1:1—2:17 describes judgement against Judah while Joel 2:18—3:21 describes judgment against the nations.

A. Destruction (1:1–20). In this first chapter we see a devastation by locusts in the past (vv. 2–14), a dreadful day of the Lord in the future (v. 15), and a drought following the locusts (vv. 16–20).[26] Another way to view this first chapter is to see the coming of locusts (vv. 2–4), call for personal penitence (vv. 5–12), communal lament (vv. 13–18), and crisis (vv. 19–20).

1. Calamity Comes (vv. 1–7). This provides awareness because of what the locusts destroyed.

2. Call to Cry Out (vv. 8–20). This shows the need for application of what the Lord demanded.

B. Day of the Lord (2:1–17). After a devastating locust plague we would expect a call to lament. Instead, Joel announces a new threat is coming that’s worse than the one they just experienced. My exposition shows, I hope, that from Joel’s standpoint chapter one is past and chapter two is future.

1. Invasion of the Land (2:1–11). In this section the theme of Joel 1:15 is more fully developed.

2. Invitation of the Lord to His People (2:12–17). In this section we see two formal appeals for repentance (vv. 12–14 and vv. 15–17). Joel 2:12–14 is an invitation to repent and Joel 2:15–17 is a summons to assemble.  While the invasion of the land (vv. 1–11) was an imminent event the invitation of the Lord (vv. 12–17) is timeless. Starting in Joel 2:18 we read about God’s predictions of benefit for God’s people and subjugation of God’s people’s enemies.

As we approach Joel 2:12 it’s important to note a chiastic structure that some scholars see in the book of Joel. Here’s one I’ve adapted from Duane Garrett that I think is true to the text:

A–Punishment by Locusts (Joel 1:2-20)

            B–Punishment by Northern Army (Joel 2:1-11)

                        C–Transition because of Repentance (Joel 2:12-19)

            B’–Grace in Northern Army Destroyed (Joel 2:20)

A’–Grace in Rain Poured out to Heal the Land (Joel 2:21-27)[27]

Another chiastic structure of this section could be:

A–Restoration of Crops and Cessation of Shame (Joel 2:19)

            B–Reference to Elimination of Enemies (Joel 2:20a)

                        C– Praise and Exhortation (Joel 2:20b–24). This section has two cycles (vv.                                              20b–21b; 21c–24). The second cycle expands and repeats the three elements of the first cycle (v. 20b with v. 21c; v. 21a with v. 22; v. 21b with vv. 23–24).

            B’– Reference to Elimination of Enemies (Joel 2:25)

A’– Restoration of Crops and Cessation of Shame (Joel 2:26–27)[28]

II. LORD’S RESPONSE (2:18—3:21). The first section of Joel was about Judah’s repentance and lament (1:1—2:17), now we learn about God’s response to that lament (2:18—3:21). The tone of the book of Joel dramatically changes in Joel 2:18. Thus far a lament on the locust plague, its affects, and a more severe judgment have been described. Now the Jews enjoy a “return to prosperity, receive the Holy Spirit, and see their enemies’ armies face the full fury of God.”[29] In this way, a new section begins in Joel 2:18 that focuses on the blessings God gives to his repentant people. Perhaps there is an interval between Joel 2:17 and Joel 2:18 in which the people have repented. Because of that repentance the problems of Joel 1:1—2:17 are fixed by the Lord: physical restoration (Joel 2:18–27), spiritual restoration (Joel 2: 28–32), and national restoration (Joel 3:1–21).

A. Intervention (2:18–32). Joel 1:1–20 has shown us the current crisis of Joel’s day, Joel 2:1–27 has shown us the potential conflict, and Joel 2:28—3:21 will reveal the continuing circumstances Israel will enjoy in the end-times.

1. Forgiveness from God (2:18–27). An interesting observation is while there is an occasional shift to the third person, all of Joel 2:19—3:21 is an oracle of salvation in which God is the speaker. An oracle of salvation “focuses on a change of fortune, situation, or relationship to God.[30]

2. Future for Israel (2:28–32). In the book of Joel we’ve seen the present reality of the locust plague (1:1—2:27), now we see future realities of the eschatological age (2:28—3:21). Joel 2:28–32 is quoted by Peter at Pentecost in Acts 2:16–21.[31] (However, Peter’s quotation contains a few variations from the Hebrew text and Greek text.) These five verses tell us about the Lord’s renewal of his people. Specifically, a promise of spiritual renewal (vv. 28–29), and a promise of deliverance from their enemies (vv. 30–32).

We might, perhaps, see another chiasm here in Joel with the focus of the chiasm being Joel 2:28–32:

A – Northern Army Destroyed (Joel 2:20)

            B – Rain Poured Out to Heal the Land (Joel 2:21–27)

            B’ – Spirit Poured Out to Heal the People (Joel 2:28–32)

A’ – Judgment on Gentile Armies (Joel 3:1–21)[32]

B. Implementation (3:1–21). We could summarize the three chapters of Joel this way: universal lamentation (ch. 1), uncompromising repentance (ch. 2), and unconditional love (ch. 3). In Joel 3:1–21 God reveals his plan for national restoration of Israel. In this national restoration, the people of Israel are regathered to Jerusalem and Israel (see Isa 11:15; Matt 24:31). I once heard the metaphor of a photographer used to describe what Joel does in Joel 2:30–32 and Joel 3:1–21. Joel uses the wide angle for the “big picture” scene in Joel 2:30–32. Then, Joel zooms in for a close look at the Day of the Lord in the future in Joel 3. We could summarize these final two sections as a judgement of the nations (vv. 1–16) and restoration for Israel (vv. 17–21). In Joel 3 we see that the nations are judged (Joel 3:1–16) and God’s people are blessed (Joel 3:17–21).

1. Penalty for the Nations (3:1–16). In this section judgment is announced (vv. 1–8) and described (vv. 9–16).[33] I like Warren Wiersbe’s organization of this section: “Nations, prepare for judgment” (vv. 1–8), “Nations, prepare for war!” (vv. 9–15), and “Nations, prepare for defeat” (v. 16).[34]

2. Peace for Israel (3:17–21). While the focus of Joel 3:1–16 was judgment of the nations, the focus now shifts in Joel 3:17–21 to a just restoration of Israel. In Joel 3:17–21 Joel looks beyond the battle. Again, I like Warren Wierbse’s summary of these five verses: A Holy City (v. 17), a restored land (vv. 18–19), a cleansed people (vv. 20–21a), and a glorious king (v. 21b).[35]

APPLICATION. The imperative mood is used forty-five times in the book of Joel, suggesting an urgency in his message. However, arriving at applications for Joel is difficult because no specific sins are mentioned (with one exception possibly being “drunkenness” in Joel 1:4). I agree with Douglas Stuart who writes, “Joel does not identify any covenant violations on the part of his nation. Nowhere does he specify exactly what Judah and Jerusalem have done to deserve the distress they now face.”[36] With that said, we need to keep our applications “general” because the text describes sin in general. Joel applies to any group of people because all people are sinful, and we don’t know what the specific sins were in the book of Joel. Here are some good applications from the book of Joel.

  1. Develop a distaste for sin.
  2. Discover our sin and find ways to stop it.
  3. Deploy a plan to prevent that sin from happening in the future.
  4. Determine to be sensitive to judgment God sends into our lives and repent of our sins.
  5. Discern how God is getting your attention.

“From Ruin to Renewal: Sermons from Joel”

  1. When Calamity Comes (Joel 1:1–7)
  2. When We Let God Down (Joel 1:8–20)
  3. An Alarm No One Can Ignore (Joel 2:1–11)
  4. When Sorry Isn’t Enough (Joel 2:12–17)
  5. Time to Call God (Joel 2:18–27)
  6. The View from Zion (Joel 2:28–32)
  7. Verdict in the Valley (Joel 3:1–16)
  8. Mind on the Millennium (Joel 3:17–21)

– – – – – – – – – – – –

Christopher L. Scott is a pastor and author of the book, Walking Straight When Life Goes Sideways: Essential Christian Truths for Enduring Life’s Trials (Wipf and Stock). He provides hundreds of free articles, videos, and Bible study resources at his website ChristopherLynnScott.com.


[1] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[2] Ken Hanna, From Moses to Malachi (Nashville, TN: WestBow Press, 2015), 434.

[3] An interesting fact that both Joel and Obadiah have names which twelve other men have in the Bible. Yet both Joel and Obadiah do not appear to be connected with those twelve men.

[4] Tremper Longman III and Raymond Dillard, An Introduction to the Old Testament, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Academic, 2006), 409.

[5] Zion is the same location as “Jerusalem.” However, Zion is often the word used in poetic sections of Scripture.

[6] Duane Garret, Hosea, Joel, New American Commentary vol. 19a (Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers, 1997), 286.

[7] Dillard and Longman, Old Testament Introduction, 411–12.

[8] Dillard and Longman, Old Testament Introduction, 412.

[9] This appears to be the case on several occasions. For example, Joel 3:5 is very similar to Obadiah 17. Joel 2:27 is also very similar to Isaiah 44:8; 45:14. Joel 3:10 is the reversed language of both Isaiah 2:4 and Micah 4:3. Most likely, these prophets were using common phrases popular among Israel’s prophets.

[10] An explanation for why Joel is placed between Hosea and Amos might be because of content, not date. Longman and Dillard point out, “The position of Joel in the Hebrew Canon between the eighth-century prophecies of Hosea and Amos has been taken by many as indicative of date; however, in the LXX Joel was found after Micah. Its position between Hosea and Amos is probably the result of the similarities between Amos 1:2; 9:19 and Joel 3:16, 18 [MT 4:16, 18] and the fact that both Amos and Joel mention Tyre, the Philistines, and Edom” (Dillard and Longman, Old Testament Introduction, 413). For example, Michael Shepherd sees Joel 1:2–3 providing a “compositional seam” with Hosea 14:10. Thus, the two works are placed together based on content not date. See A Commentary on the Book of the Twelve (Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Academic, 2018), 116.

[11] Robert B. Chisholm Jr., “Joel,” in The Bible Knowledge Commentary: An Exposition of the Scriptures, ed. J. F. Walvoord and R. B. Zuck, vol. 1 (Wheaton, IL: Victor Books, 1985), 1423.

[12] Longman and Dillard, Old Testament Introduction, 413.

[13] Douglas Stuart, Hosea–Jonah, Word Biblical Commentary 31 (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Academic, 1988), 226.

[14] Robert B. Chisholm Jr., “Joel,” in The Bible Knowledge Commentary: An Exposition of the Scriptures, ed. J. F. Walvoord and R. B. Zuck, vol. 1 (Wheaton, IL: Victor Books, 1985), 1410.

[15] Bullock, An Introduction to the Old Testament Prophetic Books (Chicago, IL: Moody, 2007),395.

[16] Stuart, Hosea-Jonah, 229.

[17] Garret, Hosea, Joel, 305.

[18] Garret, Hosea, Joel, 306.

[19] “the actual topic of the Book of Joel is not locusts, soldiers, the Holy Spirit, or the last judgment. It is the day of the Lord. This is the real focus of Joel and the theme to which the book repeatedly returns. Everything that happens in Joel is a fulfillment of the day of the Lord, a term that includes both judgment and salvation.” (Garrett, Hosea, Joel, 389.

[20] Charles Caldwell Ryrie, Ryrie Study Bible: New American Standard Bible, 1995 Update, Expanded ed. (Chicago: Moody Press, 1995), 1392.

[21] Bullock, Old Testament Prophetic Books, 391.

[22] Stuart, Hosea–Jonah, 235.

[23] Garret, Hosea, Joel, 308.

[24] Michael Shepherd, A Commentary on the Book of the Twelve (Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Academic, 2018), 147.

[25] Richard D. Patterson, “Joel,” in The Expositor’s Bible Commentary: Daniel–Malachi (Revised Edition), ed. Tremper Longman III and David E. Garland, vol. 8 (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2008), 314.

[26] Adapted from Hanna, From Gospels to Glory, 433.

[27] D. A. Garrett, “Joel, Book of,” in Dictionary of the Old Testament: Prophets, ed. Mark J. Boda and Gordon J. McConville (Downers Grove, IL; Nottingham, England: IVP Academic; Inter-Varsity Press, 2012), 452.

[28] Chisholm, “Joel,” in Bible Knowledge Commentary, 1418.

[29] Garrett, Hosea, Joel, 344.

[30] Leland Ryken, Symbols and Reality (Wooster, OH: Weaver Book Company, 2016), 38. Also see pp. 38–42.

[31] Joel 2:28–32 is quoted to some extent in nine places in the New Testament (Matt 24:29; Mark 13:24–25; Luke 21:25; Acts 2:17–21, 39; 21:29; 22:16; Rom 10:13; Tit 3:6; Rev 6:12).

[32] Garrett, “Joel, Book of,” in Dictionary of Old Testament: Prophets, 452.

[33] Chisholm, “Joel,” in Bible Knowledge Commentary, 1421–22.

[34] Warren Wiersbe, Be Amazed (Colorado Springs, CO: David C. Cook, 2010), 78–79.

[35] Wiersbe, Be Amazed, 80–83.

[36] Stuart, Hosea-Jonah, 231.

Filed Under: Bible Book Introductions

An Introduction to Galatians

April 30, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

The book of Galatians was a cornerstone in the Protestant Reformation. It’s known as a “short Romans” and has been called the “Magna Carta” of Christian liberty or the “Emancipation Proclamation of Christianity.” It is a “declaration of liberty and Christ.” As perhaps the first New Testament book written, it provides a glimpse into the doctrine and ministry not just of the apostle Paul, but the early church. If I was to assign a one-word description to the book of Galatians it would be “freeing” or “liberating.”

BIG IDEA. God’s grace is seen in the doctrine of justification by faith and liberty against legalism.[1]

KEY VERSES. I believe Galatians 2:16 is the key verse of this letter: “nevertheless knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the Law but through faith in Christ Jesus, even we have believed in Christ Jesus, so that we may be justified by faith in Christ and not by the works of the Law; since by the works of the Law no flesh will be justified” (NASB).[2] However, Galatians 3:16–7 and Galatians 5:1 could also be seen as key verses too.

AUTHOR. Galatians tells us that Paul was the author (Gal 1:1; 5:2; 6:11). Paul tells his original readers that they should know that he wrote this letter because the “large letters” he uses matches what they know about him (Gal 6:11).  

            Galatians is the least challenged among Paul’s letters for him being the author. Galatians is part of what’s called the hauptbriefe, which is a list of letters in the New Testament that almost all scholars accept as written by Paul. The book of Romans, 1 Thessalonians, Galatians, 1 Corinthians, 2 Corinthians, Philippians, and Philemon are all seen as authentic letters written by Paul (even liberal scholars admit this). Galatians has been accepted as a letter of Paul by virtually everyone. FC Baur, who was the father of the famous Tubingen School, regarded Galatians as a letter Paul wrote. Louis Berkof writes, “The authorship of the Epistle need not be subject to doubt, since both the external and the internal evidence are very strong.”[3]

            With that said, there are various elements of both “internal” and “external” evidence that supports Paul as the author. Let’s look at both.

Internal Evidence. Galatians 1 and Galatians 2 are highly biographical and harmonize well with Acts. The theology of the book of Galatians is also consistent with Paul’s sermons recorded in the book of Acts. Here’s some other internal evidence that leads us to believe Paul was the author of this letter:

-The author of Galatians is the founder of the churches and is their spiritual father (Gal 4:19–20)

-The author of Galatians has experienced illness (Gal 4:13)

-The author of Galatians has impaired eyesight that required him to write in large letters (Gal 4:15; 6:11)

-The author of Galatians has outstanding credentials that were well known (Gal 1:13–14)

-The author of Galatians has a special calling to minister to the Gentiles (Gal 1:1; 2:7)

-The author of Galatians was violent against Christianity early in his career (Gal 1:23)

-The author of Galatians has physical scars of persecution because of his belief in Christ (Gal 6:17)

External Evidence. The Bible Knowledge Commentary states, “No doubt existed in the early church that this letter was written by Paul, and no doubt should exist today.”[4]

            In the second and third centuries Irenaeus (AD 140–202), Clement of Alexandria (AD 150–215), and Origen (AD 185–253) all said that Paul wrote Galatians.

            Galatians is quoted or alluded to in 1 Peter, Epistle of Barnabas (likely dated to AD 70–132), 1 Clement (AD 70–96), Polycarp’s letter to the Philippians (Polycarp lived AD 69–155), Justin Martyr (AD 100–165), Irenaeus (AD 140–202), Clement of Alexandria (AD 150–215), and Origin (AD 185–253).[5]

            I love this quote from Timothy George, “Jerome once said that when he read the letters of the apostle Paul he could hear thunder. Nowhere in the Pauline corpus is such stormy dissonance more evident than in the Epistle to the Galatians.”[6]

AUDIENCE. Paul was writing to believers in “South Galatia” within Asia Minor. It was a “region” of people. Paul had planted the church there in Acts 13—14, then wrote this letter back to them between his first and second missionary journeys. Paul addresses his audience in Galatians 1:2, “and all the brethren who are with me, to the churches of Galatia.” With that said, the audience of this letter likely were Gentile readers.

            When reading the book of Galatians it’s clear that there has been a disruption in the church because of the teaching of the Judaizers. These Judaizers were enslaving the people in legalism to the Law of Moses. However, the audience of the letter might change slightly depending on the “destination” of this letter. We encounter a problem because the word “Galatia” had two distinct meanings in the New Testament era.

            As we look at the “north” and “south” audiences, it’s important to note that Paul’s ministry took him to both regions at different times which resulted in different outcomes. The two different locations does not necessarily affect the topic of Paul’s writing, but they do change the time of his writing and the place of the Jew-Gentile controversy as described in Acts 15.

“North” Ethnic (People) Geographical Region. If Paul uses “Galatia” for the northern region then he used the word to refer to the “people” that lived there. This is called the “ethnic geographical region” label. If this destination is correct, Paul would have written the letter from Corinth during his third missionary journey in approximately AD 55 or AD 56. This is commonly called the “North Galatian Theory.” If this is true, then the visit described in Galatians 2 corresponds to Acts 15.

            The “Celtic” people lived in the “north” region. These Celtic tribes moved there from ancient Gaul. They attacked and nearly destroyed Rome in 390 BC. They called it the region of “Galatia” from the word “Gaul.” (Makes sense, right?) These people were located in the mountains in the north. It had no major cities and no Jewish population (if any, it was very small). According to Acts, Paul did not visit this region until the beginning of his second missionary journey (Acts 16). On this visit, they only traveled through Phrygia and Galatia (Acts 16:5).  

            This “north” view was the traditional view of the church for many centuries, but is less popular today.

“South” Political Region. In 189 BC the Gauls were conquered and the area became a province of Rome. This process of conquest and assimilation was completed in 25 BC because Augustus declared the region an official Roman province and called it “Galatia.” Thus, it was the “province” of Galatia, not just the people. This “province” extended to the south and incorporated parts of Lycaonia, Phrygia, and Pisidia. This was the location of Paul’s first missionary trip to the Gentiles that’s described in Acts 13—14 which occurred in AD 47–49. It’s important to note that Paul’s first and second missionary journeys were separated by three years as one was before the Jerusalem council (Acts 15) and the other was after the Jerusalem council.

            If we were to focus on the “political” meaning of the word “Galatia” we could also include the cities of Lystra, Derbe, and Iconium. Paul had visited these cities on his first missionary journey. If this view is correct, then the Jerusalem visit recorded in Galatians 2 is not the same Jerusalem visit recorded in Acts 15. Instead, Galatians 2 records an earlier visit Paul made to Jerusalem (either Acts 9:26 or Acts 11:30) before we read what occurred in Acts 15.

            Sir William Ramsey did extensive archaeological work that led to this view. This “south” view is the predominant view today among evangelical protestant scholars.

DATE. Galatians was likely written during the three years between Paul’s first and second missionary journeys. Paul likely wrote Galatians from the city of Antioch (see Acts 14:28) before the Jerusalem council (Acts 15), but after Paul’s visit to Jerusalem in AD 46–48 (Acts 11:30). The date of Galatians is a complex topic. Let’s examine the different views below.

An Introduction to the Proposed Dates of Galatians. Three possible dates for the writing of Galatians are proposed by G. W. Hansen, “The dating of Galatians is a notorious and for some a fascinating historical puzzle. But the outcome of the protracted debate about the date has little if any effect on the interpretation of the major themes of the letter” One date is A.D. 53-57 (if letter was written after the second missionary journey of Acts 18:22). A second option is A.D. 49 (if letter was written immediately after the first missionary journey but before Jerusalem Conference). A third option is A.D. 50-57 (if Gal 2:1-10 = Acts 15:1-20, after the Jerusalem conference).”[7]

            I have several pages of hand-written notes on the date of Paul’s letter to the Galatians. Here’s my best attempt to summarize the different views on the date of this letter. Earlier in this work I’ve listed the “north” and “south” views briefly based on the audience intended for the letter. Here I will attempt to list the support for and weaknesses of each view. I hope this is helpful for you.

South Galatia “Political Province” View: AD 49.[8]

Support

  1. A trip traveling to and establishing churches in south Galatia matches Paul’s practice of strategically traveling to influential and well populated cities that had significant Jewish populations. The north Galatia area was smaller, more obscure, and had less Jews.
  2. The book of Galatians contains descriptive details that match details of Paul’s first missionary journey recorded in Acts 13—14 throughout Galatia. First, reception of Paul as an “angel of God” might match the attempted worship of Paul and Barnabas at Lyionian cities of Lystra and Derbe (Acts 14:6–18). Second, the physical mark of suffering (Gal 6:17) might reference the scars Paul received by being stoned (Acts 14:19–20).
  3. Galatians 2:1–10 addresses an issue which the council of Jerusalem in Acts 15 would have solved. The logical conclusion is that Acts 15 was after Galatians 2. Additionally, Galatians 2 indicates a private conversation, while Acts 15 was a public assembly.
  4. Galatians 2:1 says Paul went “again” to Jerusalem, which suggests this was at least Paul’s second visit. That second (or third) visit could be after the first (or second) visit as described in Acts 11:30. Acts also records a visit in Acts 9:26 which could have been the first.
  5. Barnabas is mentioned three times in Galatians (Gal 2:1, 9, 13) in a way that suggests the audience was familiar with him. This could only be true if Paul had went to the Galatians on his first missionary journey because Paul and Barnabas had split up before the second missionary journey began.
  6. If Paul was suffering from an illness in Galatia (Gal 4:13) and was there to recover, then the “North Galatia” theory is unlikely. North Galatia was far north, it was off the beaten path, and it was a difficult place to travel.
  7. It is possible, that Paul never went to the northern Galatian region. If Acts 16:6 and Acts 18:23 are referring to a political region instead of a geographical region, then Paul (according to Acts) never went to North Galatia.
  8. The word “Galatians” was the only word that would describe the people in Antioch, Lystra, Iconium, and Derbe.

Weaknesses

  1. The main weakness of this view is that it does not have church history behind it. For most of church history, the “north Galatia” view was prominent. This is a personal struggle for me and must not be overlooked. According to Donald Guthrie, “Since the nineteenth century many scholars have advocated this view, but it was Sir William Ramsay who popularized it and gave it its most cogent expression.”[9]

North Galatia “Ethnic Geographical Region” View: AD 55–56.[10]

Support and Strengths

  1. This is perhaps the most natural meaning of “Galatia” or “Galatians” as used in Galatians 1:2 and Galatians 3:1. This was the geographical region in north Asia Minor. The people that lived there used those terms.
  2. Luke tends to describe places in Acts according to geographical region instead of political province. Examples of this are Pamphylia (Acts 13:13), Pisidia (Acts 13:14), and Lycaonia (Acts 14:6) which are geographical terms. Thus, it’s likely that Paul used “Phrygian and Galatian region” in Acts 16:16 as a geographical region too.
  3. If Paul visited the geographical districts of “north” Galatia in Acts 16:6 and Acts 18:23, then he went there twice and possibly established churches there, which he could write letters to.
  4. The natural reading of Galatians 2:1–10 is to refer to Acts 15.
  5. No other view existed until Sir William Ramsay introduced his “south” Galatia view in the nineteenth century.

Weaknesses

  1. While no other view was held in the church until the nineteenth century under Sir William Ramsay, it is not surprising that patristic, medieval, and reformation commentaries assumed Paul wrote his letter to the Northern region because southern Galatia was reduced in size and significance by the Roman government in AD 74, 137, and 197.

ACCEPTANCE INTO THE CANON. The book of Galatians was accepted into the Canon very early in the history of the Christian church. There are references to it (as I’ve shown above) in Barnabas, 1 Clement, Polycarp, and Justin Martyr. There was no dispute about the book of Galatians’ genuineness in early times.

            The theologian Louis Berkof writes, “There has never been any serious doubt respecting the canonicity of this Epistle. It was received as authoritative in all sections of the Church from the very earliest times. There are allusions to its language in the apostolic fathers, Clement of Rome, Polycarp and Ignatius. Justin Martyr, Melito and Athanagoras seem to have known it; and some of the heretics, especially the Ophites, used it extensively. It is found in Marcions canon, is named in the Muratorian Fragment, and the Syriac and old Latin versions contain it. From the end of the second century the quotations multiply and increase in directness and definiteness.”[11]

THE “JUDAIZERS” IN GALATIANS. The people whom Paul identifies as his opponents and enemies in this letter probably came from Jerusalem. They likely were Jews who claimed to be Christians and wanted Christians to submit to the authority of the Mosaic Law.

            Often I called these “Judaizers” as the “Legalizers” when preaching to a congregation. In Galatians 6:12–13 Paul gives a good commentary on these people. He says that what the Legalizers (Judaizers) were doing describes the human effort of worldly people. The Legalizers believed they were saved through their merit instead of through God’s mercy.

According to Paul, the Legalizers were only interested in pleasing men. Paul writes that they wanted “to make a good showing in the flesh” (Gal 6:12a). That good impression came from getting the Galatians circumcised (Gal 6:12b).

According to Paul, the Legalizers were afraid of persecution. The passage continues, “so that they will not be persecuted for the cross of Christ” (Gal 6:12c). To avoid persecution seems a little odd. But if we think in their time, requiring people to be circumcised prevented persecution from two groups of people: Jews and Romans. Having everyone get circumcised pleased the Jews because it meant that the people weren’t joining a competing faith or a new faith. Instead they were submitting to the old established religion of the times. Faith in Christ for salvation that included circumcision appeased the rules, regulations, and restrictions of the rabbis of the established Jewish system of that time.[12] The Romans had accepted Judaism as a legal religion in the Empire. Any Gentile that was circumcised would fall under the category of Judaism and wouldn’t experience persecution. To reject circumcision and take the name of a “Christian”  would mean you weren’t protected under the legal umbrella of Judaism in Roman law. So the Legalizers did have a valid point: to get circumcised greatly reduced the chance of persecution.[13]

According to Paul, the Legalizers wanted to boast because of the number of converts they had. Paul writes, “they desire to have you circumcised so that they may boast in your flesh” (Gal 6:13c). The Legalizers wanted to claim the Galatians as their own. “They only want you to be circumcised so they can boast of their success in recruiting you to their side” (The Message). The Legalizers wanted to point to the Galatians as their “catch” much like a bass angler or big game hunter that wants to display the big fish or the big elk. For the Legalizers their big catch was this group of Galatian believers that Paul had evangelized, but now they were getting “caught” up in their teaching about the Law and how they needed to follow the Law.

According to Paul, the Legalizers had built their teachings around four key beliefs. Paul was surprised to learn that the Galatians had deserted his teachings for a false gospel (Gal 1:6). Based on what we read in Galatians (not cultural speculation), I think we can identify four key teachings of the Judaizers. One, that righteousness comes through obedience to the Law (Gal 2:15-21), two that the Holy Spirit came through works of the Law (Gal 3:1-3), three that righteousness comes through following the Jewish calendar’s festivals and events (Gal 4:8-11) such as Passover, Pentecost, Purim, etc., four that favor comes from God through circumcision (Gal 5:2-6; 6:12-13).

Conclusion about Judaizers. This is a long but important quote from FF Bruce,“Galatians was plainly written to converts of Paul’s who were in imminent danger of adulterating the gospel of Christian freedom which he had taught them with elements of Jewish legalism. Among these elements circumcision took a chief place; they also included the observance of the Jewish calendar (Gal. 4:10) and possibly Jewish food-laws. The ‘churches of Galatia’ had evidently been visited by Judaizers who cast doubt on Paul’s apostolic status and insisted that, in addition to the faith in Christ which he inculcated, it was necessary to be circumcised and to conform in other respects to the Jewish law in order to attain salvation. When news of this reached Paul he wrote this letter in white-hot urgency, denouncing this teaching which mingled grace and law as a different gospel from that which he had preached to them in Christ’s name—in fact, no gospel at all—and entreating his readers to stand fast in their new-found liberty and not place their necks again under a yoke of bondage.”[14]

THEMES. I believe there are four themes woven throughout this letter. Each of the themes relates to a “correction” Paul is trying to make with this audience.

Correcting the Misunderstanding of Paul’s Life. Paul wanted the Galatians to know about his past life as a Jew but also how he prepared for ministry. Based on my study I believe there are ten different “biographical sections” in Galatians that often begin with the first-person personal pronoun “I” (Gal 1:1, 10, 13–14, 16–19, 21–24; 2:1–2, 7; 4:12–14; 5:11; 6:17).[15] Timothy George comments, “Galatians contains one of the most important autobiographical reflections anywhere in the writings of Paul.”[16]

Correcting the False Gospel. Paul had taught the Galatians the correct gospel, but they had been led astray by Judaizers. The word “gospel” is used ten times in Galatians (Gal 1:6, 7, 8, 9, 11; 2:2, 5, 7, 14; 4:13).

Correcting the False Interpretation of the Law. Paul validates the purpose of the Law and how it has been fulfilled through Christ. The word “Law” is used twenty-nine times in Galatians (Gal 2:16 [2t], 19 [2t], 21; 3:2, 5, 10 [2t], 11, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 21 [3t], 23. 24; 4:4, 5, 21 [2t]; 5:3, 4, 14, 18; 6:13).

Correcting the Significance of Jesus’s Death. If the Law had been fulfilled, it was because of Jesus’s perfect substitution. In Paul’s letter he tells us that Jesus Christ gave himself for our sins (Gal 1:4a), Jesus Christ has rescued us from this world (Gal 1:4b), and that was a gift from God (Gal 1:4c).

OUTLINES OF GALATIANS

I. FOLLOWING GOD’S LAW (Gal 1—3)

A. Paul’s Past in Religion (Gal 1).

1. Substance of the Gospel (vv. 1-10). These ten verses are Paul’s groundwork for this letter and most of what he will write in the New Testament. In this section we learn about how the gospel is described and defended (vv. 4, 6) and we learn about the gospel defectors (vv. 6–9).

Greetings (vv. 1-5)

Good News (vv. 6-9)

Goal (v. 10)

2. Source of the Gospel (vv. 11-24). The Gospel message, according to Paul, was not according to man (v. 11), was not received from man (v. 12a), was not taught to him (v. 12b), but it was revealed to him by Jesus Christ (v. 12c).

From Jesus (vv. 11-12)

From Judaism (vv. 13-14)

From Jehovah God (vv. 15-17)

From Jerusalem (vv. 18-20)

From Judah (vv. 21-24)

B. Paul’s Preparation for Ministry (Gal 2)

1. Meeting with Church Leaders (vv 1-10)

Agreement from Leaders (vv. 1-3)

Disagreement from False Brothers (vv. 4-5)

Encouragement from Leaders (vv. 6-10)

2. Meeting with the Church Leader (vv.  11-21)

Peter’s Conforming (vv. 11-13)

Peter’s Confrontation (vv. 14-16)

Peter’s Correction (vv. 17-21)

C. Paul’s Preaching on Religion and Faith (Gal 3).[17] While Galatians 1—2 describes the ministry of Paul, Galatians 3—4 describes the ministry of the Law. Galatians 1—2 have focused on Paul and the Law, now we will read about Christ and the Holy Spirit in Galatians 3—4.

1. Abraham’s Faith: Saved Because of Faith (vv. 1-9). Notice the various questions Paul asks after he assesses the situation (v. 1): The Spirit Question (v. 2) – “How did you receive the Holy Spirit?” The Sanctification Question (v. 3) – “How are you growing in your Christian walk?” The Suffering Question (v. 4) – “Did you suffer in vain?” The Supernatural Question (v. 5) – “How did God perform miracles in and among you?”

2. Abraham’s Seed: Saved Because of One Man/Father (vv. 10-18)

3. Abraham’s Descendants: Saved Because of One Son (vv. 19-29)

II. FOLLOWING GOD’S SON AND SPIRIT (Gal 4—6)

A. Christ’s Children (Gal 4).

1. At One Time (4:1-11)

Slaves to this World (vv. 1-3)

Slaves Freed by the Son (vv. 4-7)

Slaves to Other gods (vv. 8-11)

2. At Paul’s Time with Them (4:12-20)

Free from the Law (vv. 12-13)

Free to Do What is Right (vv. 14-16)

Free from False Teachers (vv. 17-20)

3. At Abraham’s Time (4:21-31)

Abraham’s Two Sons (vv. 21-23)

Abraham’s Two Women (vv. 24-27)

Abraham’s Two Descendants (vv. 28-31)

B. Christ’s Freedom and the Holy Spirit’s Power (Gal 5). We could also call this chapter “Christ’s Fruit.” While Galatians 1—2 describes the ministry of Paul and Galatians 3—4 describes the ministry of the Law, now in Galatians 5—6 we read about the ministry of Christ. Galatians 1—2 have focused on Paul and the Law, Galatians 3—4 have focused on Christ and the Holy Spirit, now Galatians 5—6 focuses on Christians and the church. I like the one-word descriptions by Warren Wiersbe for Galatians as “Personal” (grace and the gospel in chapters 1—2), “Doctrinal” (grace and the Law in chapters 3—4), and “Practical” (grace and the Christian life in chapters 5—6).

1. Old vs. New (5:1-6)

Through Christ (v. 1)

Through Circumcision (vv. 2-4)

Through the Spirit (vv. 5-6)

2. Past vs. Present (5:7-15)

Their Struggle (vv. 7-10)

Paul’s Striving (vv. 11-12)

Our Goal/Target (vv. 13-15)

3. Flesh vs. Spirit (5:16-26)

The Goal (vv. 16-18)

The Deeds of the Flesh (vv. 19-21)

The Duty of the Spirit (vv. 22-24)

The Way We Live (vv. 25-26)

C. Christ’s Harvest (Gal 6)

1. Giving Help to Fallen Brothers (6:1-5)

Be Gentle (v. 1)

Be Realistic (vv. 2-3)

Be Focused (vv. 4-5)

2. Giving Help to Believers (6:6-10)

Giving to Teachers of the Word (v. 6)

Sowing Good (vv. 7-9)

Giving to Those in the Household (v. 10)

3. Giving Help to the Gospel (6:11-18)

Personal Appeal (v. 11)

Position of the Gospel (vv. 12-16)

Passion for Christ (vv. 17-18)

A couple other simple ways to outline the book would be:

I. THE MINISTRY OF PAUL (Gal 1—2)

II. THE MINISTRY OF THE LAW (Gal 3—4)

III. THE MINISTRY OF CHRIST (Gal 5—6)

I. PAUL AND THE LAW (Gal 1—2)

II. CHRIST AND THE HOLY SPIRIT (Gal 3—4)

III. CHRISTIANS AND THE CHURCH (Gal 5—6)

I. PERSONAL (Gal 1—2). In these two chapters we see lots of the word “I”, “me”, and “my”. Those words described Paul’s transition from following the Law to following the Liberty provided in Christ.

II. DOCTRINAL (Gal 3—4). In these two chapters we see lots of Old Testament quotations, references, and allusions that described how saints used to live under the Law, but now were saved by their faith in Christ.

III. APPLICATIONAL (Gal 5—6). In these two chapters we see lots of verbs, commands, and words like “you” that describe what we’re supposed to do with that freedom.

APPLICATIONS

  1. Let go of legalism. It’s human nature to want to “work for things.” And that’s what the Galatians were starting to think. Paul’s message to them was to let go of legalism and accept God’s grace. We as Christians need to be cautious of false teachers that overly emphasize the Law and festivals of the Old Testament more than the free gift of grace and salvation of the New Testament. It should not surprise us, that even in our evangelical churches, that legalistic people sneak in and try to impose their will on us (see Gal 2:3–5 where false brethren were brought in to spy out the true liberty that Christians have [v. 4b] and to put the true Christians in bondage under the Law [v. 4c]). Pastor Charles Swindoll writes, “The Christian life is not about working as hard as we can to live right; it’s about allowing Christ Himself to live out His life through us.”[18] And that’s based on faith. One commentary asserts, “The church of Jesus Christ needs the message of Galatians now as much as perhaps any time in its history. Alternative gospels abound within the realm of Christendom. Western Christianity in particular is at times shallow and individualistic, cast in terms that are more anthropocentric, existential, and serendipitous than being explained biblically in terms of self-denial and taking up one’s cross.”[19]
  2. Let God’s Holy Spirit guide your life. The Law no longer guides our lives. Now we follow God’s Son and the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit is mentioned fifteen times in this short six-chapter book. We bear fruit for God because the Holy Spirit lives in us and because the Holy Spirit leads us. Robert Rapa writes, “The simplicity of the truth of the person, word, and work of Jesus Christ is today under siege in various places and in diverse ways. The premise of Galatians—salvation by the grace of God through faith in Jesus Christ—must be reclaimed as the church’s indispensable bedrock on which to stand and to build.”[20]

SOME OF MY FAVORITE QUOTES ON GALATIANS

Max Lucado, “The reason the letter of Galatians is in your Bible is because Paul couldn’t stomach diluted grace.”[21]

            Donald Campbell, “Galatians, though one of Paul’s shorter epistles, is highly esteemed as one of his greatest and most influential.”[22]

            Robert Rapa, “The book of Galatians stands out in Christian history—and thus in the history of the Western world—as of major importance. This little book (149 verses) helped to launch the Protestant Reformation, as in it was rediscovered by Martin Luther and others the doctrine of justification by grace alone through faith alone. As a result of its message and its influence, it has been called “the Magna Carta of Christian Liberty,” and this expression sums up well the theme of the book.”[23]

            Timothy George, “During the Protestant Reformation, Galatians and Romans became the bedrock of a Pauline renaissance as Luther, Calvin, and other Reformers rallied around the doctrine of justification by faith over against a compromised theology of grace in the prevailing Roman Catholic systems of the day.”[24]

            Louis Berkof, “The purpose of the author in writing this Epistle was, of course, twofold. In order that his words might be effective, it was necessary, first of all, that he should defend his apostolic authority by proving that God had called him and had imparted the truth of the gospel to him by means of a direct revelation. And in the second place it was incumbent on him that he should expose the Judaeistic error by which they were led astray, and should defend the doctrine of justification by faith.”[25]

Sermon Series from Galatians: “Gospel Groundwork”

  1. A Hill Worth Dying On (Gal 1:1–10)
  2. One Source for Many Stories (Gal 1:11–24)
  3. A Gospel Get Together (Gal 2:1–10)
  4. When a Leader Loses His Way (Gal 2:11–24)
  5. Faithful Faith (Gal 3:1–14)
  6. When God Follows Through (Gal 3:15–29)
  7. Kingdom Inheritors (Gal 4:1–10)
  8. Freedom Fighters (Gal 4:12–20)
  9. The Bible Tells Me So (Gal 4:21–31)
  10. Love and Liberty for All (Gal 5:1–15)
  11. Your Walking Companion (Gal 5:16–26)
  12. We That Are Spiritual (Gal 6:1–10)
  13. Living It and Loving It (Gal 6:11–18)

Articles from Galatians

  • The Source of Paul’s Story (Gal 1:11-12)
  • Showing the Source of Your Story (Gal 1:13-24)
  • Eager to Help the Poor (Gal 2:1-2, 7-10)
  • Treating Everyone the Same (Gal 2:11-13)
  • Faithful Faith (Gal 3:6, 9)
  • God Keeps His Promises (Gal 3:23-25; cf. Gen 3:15; 12:1-3)
  • Refusing to Drift (Gal 4:16-20)
  • God Keeps His Promises (Gal 4:24-31)
  • Freedom Through Service (Gal 5:13-15)
  • We That Are Spiritual (Gal 6:1-2, 10)
  • Love for the Liberated Life (Gal 6:15-17)

Christopher L. Scott is a pastor and author of the book, Walking Straight When Life Goes Sideways: Essential Christian Truths for Enduring Life’s Trials (Wipf and Stock). He provides hundreds of free articles, videos, and Bible study resources at his website ChristopherLynnScott.com.


[1] Another big idea might be: Salvation is available to every person only by faith in Jesus Christ without obedience to the Law.

[2] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[3] L Berkhof, New Testament Introduction (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans-Sevensma Co., 1915), 178.

[4] Donald K. Campbell, “Galatians” in The Bible Knowledge Commentary: An Exposition of the Scriptures, ed. by J. F. Walvoord and R. B. Zuck (Wheaton, IL: Victor Books, 1985), 187.

[5] This list is adapted from Daniel Wallace, “9. Galatians: Introduction, Argument, and Outline,” Bible.org, June 27, 2004, https://bible.org/seriespage/galatians-introduction-argument-and-outline.

[6] Timothy George, Galatians, vol. 30, The New American Commentary (Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers, 1994), 21.

[7] G. W. Hansen, “Letter to the Galatians,” in Dictionary of Paul and His Letters, edited by Gerald Hawthrorne, Ralph Martin, Daniel Reid (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1993), 328-29.

[8] Much of the material in this section is adapted from Daniel Wallace, “9. Galatians: Introduction, Argument, and Outline,” Bible.org, June 27, 2004, https://bible.org/seriespage/galatians-introduction-argument-and-outline. Also see Donald Guthrie, New Testament Introduction, rev. ed. (Downers Grove, IL: Inter-Varsity, 1996), 466-72; D. A. Carson and Douglas Moo, An Introduction to the New Testament, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Academic, 2005), 458–61.

[9] Donald Guthrie, New Testament Introduction, 4th rev. ed., The Master Reference Collection (Downers Grove, IL: Inter-Varsity Press, 1996), 468.

[10] Much of the material in this section is adapted from Wallace, “Galatians: Introduction, Argument, and Outline,”; Guthrie, New Testament Introduction, 466-72; Carson and Moo, New Testament Introduction, 458–61.

[11] Berkhof, New Testament Introduction, 187.

[12] Charles Swindoll Insights on Galatians, Ephesians, Swindoll’s Living Insights New Testament Commentary, vol. 8 (Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House, 2015), 144.

[13] Swindoll Insights on Galatians, Ephesians, 144.

[14] F. F. Bruce, “Galatians, Epistle to” in New Bible Dictionary (Leicester, England; Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1996), 392–393.

[15] Galatians 1 and 2 are largely biographical. Galatians 1:1 tells us that Paul was a true apostle appointed by God, not man. “Paul, an apostle (not sent from men nor through the agency of man, but through Jesus Christ and God the Father, who raised Him from the dead),” (Gal 1:1). Apparently there were people in Galatia teaching that Paul was not a true apostle/messenger of the Gospel because his authority was appointed by men. And because he was getting that information from men, it was not correct. Paul makes it clear he says what he says and does what he does not to earn the approval of men, but to please God (Gal 1:10).

[16] George, Galatians, NAC, 23.

[17] Perhaps another way to outline this section: 1. The Law and Faith in Christ (3:1-14): a) Belief Brings the Holy Spirit (1-5), b) Belief Gives Righteousness (6-9), c) Belief Removes the Curse (10-14). 2. The Law and God’s Promise to Abraham (3:15-29): a) What Promise Was Given to Abraham (15-18), b)          Why the Law Was Given (19-23), c)  Who God’s People Are (24-29).

[18] Swindoll Insights on Galatians, Ephesians, 54.

[19] Robert K. Rapa, “Galatians,” in The Expositor’s Bible Commentary: Romans–Galatians (Revised Edition), ed. Tremper Longman III & Garland, David E., vol. 11 (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2008), 550.

[20] Rapa, “Galatians,” in The Expositor’s Bible Commentary: Romans–Galatians, 550.

[21] Max Lucado, In the Grip of Grace (Dallas, TX: Word Publishing, 1996), 136.  

[22] Campbell, “Galatians,” in The Bible Knowledge Commentary, 587.

[23] Rapa, “Galatians,” in The Expositor’s Bible Commentary: Romans–Galatians, 549.

[24] George, Galatians, NAC, 68.

[25] Berkhof, New Testament Introduction, 185–186.

Filed Under: Bible Book Introductions

15. When We Gather We Are Better (Heb 10:24)

April 29, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

I love the old joke of a light-hearted man that walked into the personnel office of a potential employer. The HR manager conducting the interview asked him, “Why are you looking for work?” The interviewee replied, “I left my last job over creative differences.” The HR manager replied, “Tell me more about that.” The interviewee then revealed, “My boss didn’t know what to make of me!”[1]

            We sometimes don’t know what to make of each other, but we are supposed to make the best of it. That’s true in life and in a local church.

            Two weeks ago we looked at a failure to gather that was occurring among the people (Heb 10:25a), and last week we looked at the first of three aspects of fidelity to the gathering of a local church (Heb 10:23–24, 25b). The first fidelity to the gathering of a local church relates to our doctrine, specifically, holding fast to our confession of faith. The second fidelity to the gathering relates to our deeds, specifically, how we stimulate others to loving actions. The author of Hebrews tells us, “and let us consider how to stimulate one another to love and good deeds” (Heb 10:24, NASB). [2]

            This verse tells us that stimulating others to loving actions should be community focused.  Did you notice the words, “let us” and “one another”? The two words “one another” are what’s called a reciprocal pronoun[3] which is used to indicate an interchange between two or more groups.[4] (There are only two reciprocal pronouns in English: “each other” and “one another.”) The author is addressing multiple people in this letter. He does this to emphasize that when we gather as a group we are supposed to love the members of that group, even if it might be difficult.

            I find Charles Swindoll’s words to be helpful here, “Ministry is not limited to theological matters—most ministry has to do with translating those profound theological concepts into people’s everyday lives and experiences. It’s in that realm where ministry gets complicated. A better word is messy. Yes, ministry has its miraculous and joyous moments. But, as I’ve said for years, God is much easier to get along with than His people. And the most difficult are those who can be characterized as unrepentant troublemakers.”[5]

            The author of Hebrews tells us that our job is to encourage each other in doing good deeds. Hebrews 10:24 is not God speaking to one person about being more loving. Hebrews 10:24 is written to a group of people to encourage them to love other members of their group. In other words, this verse tells us that stimulating others to loving actions should be community focused. 

            This verse also tells us that stimulating others to loving actions should be continually directed. Notice in the text the word, “consider.” That word is translated from the Greek word, katagomen, which can be translated as, “notice,” “look,” “consider,” or “contemplate.”[6] The word here is in the present tense indicating that the people “keep on doing so.” It denotes an attentive and continuous care.[7]

            Notice in the verse that the word, “stimulate,” is the direct object of the verb, “consider.” This Greek word, paroxusmon, is used here to mean “rousing to activity” and can be translated as “stirring up” or “provoking.”[8] The verb form of that word, paroxuno means “to cause a state of inward arousal” and can be translated as “urge on” and “stimulate.”[9]

            As we read Hebrews 10:24 it is clear that operating in love is only possible when there are opportunities for love. As Warren Wiersbe has said, “ministry is built on basic principles, not clever methods.”[10] The basic principle of loving others requires us gathering with others. I agree with the Scottish theologian William Barclay who writes, “There is no man that can live the Christian life and neglect the fellowship of the church.”[11]

            Cooking for my son requires serving food that’s not hot. He’s always been sensitive to food that is warm. So I’ve learned a simple strategy: separate the food from itself to cool it off. For example, after I steam broccoli I spread it out across a plate. To keep my food warm while his cools off, I keep my food grouped together on a plate.

            Like my food that stays warm when grouped together, the author of Hebrews tells us that when we gather together we keep each other “hot” in our passion and fervor for God. We encourage each other and stimulate each other in our walk with God and our work for God. We gather together as Christians not just because it’s what we’re told to do, but we gather regularly with other Christians because it’s what we need. It encourages us and stimulates us to perform loving deeds for others.

—

Christopher L. Scott is a pastor and author of the book, Walking Straight When Life Goes Sideways: Essential Christian Truths for Enduring Life’s Trials (Wipf and Stock). He provides hundreds of free articles, videos, and Bible study resources at his website ChristopherLynnScott.com.


[1] Inspired by and adapted from Frank & Earnest, January 10, 2022. Bob Thaves.

[2] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[3] “A pronoun (as each other) used when its referents are predicated to bear the same relationship to one another.” MW Collegiate Dict., 1039.

[4] Daniel Wallace, Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1996), 351.

[5] Charles Swindoll, What If God Has Other Plans (Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale, 2019), 161.

[6] BDAG, s.v. “katanoeo.”

[7] Marvin Richardson Vincent, Word Studies in the New Testament, vol. 4 (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1887), 502.

[8] BDAG, s.v. “paroxusmos.”

[9] BDAG, s.v. “paroxuno.”

[10] Warren Wiersbe, On Being a Servant of God (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 2007), 12.

[11] William Barclay, The Letter to the Hebrews, rev. ed., The Daily Bible Study Series (Philadelphia, PA: Westminister Press, 1976), 122.

Filed Under: Portraits of an Authentic Disciple

14. The Christ Confession (Heb 10:23)

April 22, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

The phrase “confession of faith” has been a staple of the Christian church for centuries. A confession of faith is a formal statement of Christian faith that describes doctrine.[1] Most of our modern confessions of faith began during the Protestant Reformation under the guidance of publications produced by Ulrich Swingli (1484–1531) in Switzerland, Martin Luther (1483–1546) in Germany, and John Calvin (1509–64) in Switzerland. However, the idea of a confession of faith that unites a local group of Christ followers goes back to the first-century book of Hebrews.

            Last week we looked at a failure to gather that was occurring among the people (Heb 10:25a). Today we will begin looking at the three aspects of fidelity to the gathering (Heb 10:23–24, 25b). The first fidelity to the gathering relates to our doctrine, specifically, holding fast to our confession of faith.

            The author of Hebrews writes, “Let us hold fast the confession of our hope without wavering, for He who promised is faithful” (Heb 10:23, NASB).[2] These verses teach us that as a local body of believers there is a specific doctrine that unites us and binds us together. This is why the author of Hebrews encourages us to hold fast to our confession in Christ, which is the doctrine we hold as believers. Let’s examine this short verse together and note three important things it teaches us about our hope and confession of faith.

            Let’s note that the confession of hope is based on Christ, not us. Hebrews tells us, “He who promised is faithful.”[3] The “hope” is based on Christ, and the hope is “without wavering.” Those two words are translated from the Greek word, akline. This word is only used one time in the New Testament. The literal translation could be “not leaning.”[4] The word is based on the idea of an upright object not inclining from perpendicular.[5] That word is used here to show that our confession of hope is steady and solid because it’s based on Christ.

            Let’s also note that the hope consists of doctrine, not feelings. The word “confession” here is probably both an expression of words and actions. One resource I use for Greek word studies lists two entries for this word. One use of this word means “expression of allegiance as an action” and can be translated as “professing” or “confessing.” Another use of this word means “statement of allegiance, as content of an action” and can be translated as “confession” or “acknowledgment that one makes.”[6] The focus here probably is on the person and work of Christ as the entire book of Hebrews focuses on how Christ is better than anything else. In other words, it’s who Christ was and what Christ did that we base our hope, not our feelings.

            Let’s also note that the hope directs believers, not unbelievers. When we gather as a local body of believers we sharpen each other in the confession of faith. It’s in this way and with this purpose that we read God’s word, we examine it, and we discuss it. This is why we all need to be in a church that teaches and preaches Scripture. You and I both know people that like to go to church to hear silly dad jokes, to affirm their beliefs about politics, or to talk about the Bible but not preach the Bible. The author of Hebrews tells us that if the church doesn’t preach Christ and God’s word, then it’s not a “church.”[7]            

            I find J. Scott Horrell’s words to be relevant here, “The blueprint for a dynamic Christian community is the Word of God. While cultural, traditional, and denominational interpretations of the church are to be appreciated, all forms of Christ’s church must be finally subject to Scripture, lest in their drift they increasingly cease to be Christian at all.”[8]

            As Christians we hold fast to our confession of faith in Christ. The doctrine we adhere to as a local body of believers is what defines us. That doctrine unites us together and separates us from other religions (Muslims, Buddhists, etc.) and cults (Mormons, Jehovah’s Witnesses, etc.). While there are different elements of a worship gathering, this doctrine and confession of faith is something that unites who we are and what we do as a local body of believers.

—

Christopher L. Scott is a pastor and author of the book, Walking Straight When Life Goes Sideways: Essential Christian Truths for Enduring Life’s Trials (Wipf and Stock). He provides hundreds of free articles, videos, and Bible study resources at his website ChristopherLynnScott.com.


[1] These formal statements we call “confessions of faith” are similar to, but different than “creeds” and “catechisms.” A “creed” refers to statements made by the early church that Christians in all places and at all times have recognized. Most popular are the Apostles’ Creed, the Nicene Creed, the Athanasian Creed, and the Definition of Chalcedon. A “catechism” is a structured statement of faith written in the form of questions and answers. These fulfill the same purpose of confessions while also giving instruction for the ordinances and spiritual practices of both the church and individuals.  

[2] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[3] Chapter eleven of Hebrews becomes the example of this as the author lists the numerous heroes of the faith that were able to endure a life of faithfully following God because of their reliance on God, not on their own will and volition.

[4] A. T. Robertson, Word Pictures in the New Testament (Nashville, TN: Broadman Press, 1933), “Hebrews 10:23.”

[5] Donald Guthrie, Hebrews, Tyndale New Testament Commentary, vol. 15 (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1983), 217.

[6] BDAG, s.v. “homogia.”

[7] This emphasis on Scripture reminds Christians about the unfailing promises of God. Why should we not cherish it confidently and confess it boldly? We are more likely to confess our hope courageously and continuously if we regularly meet together and spur each other on. Christ faith and witness flourishes in an atmosphere of fellowship.

[8] J. Scott Horrell, From the Ground Up (Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel, 2004), 61.

Filed Under: Portraits of an Authentic Disciple

An Introduction to Habakkuk

April 18, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

“Questioning”

While most Old Testament prophets declared God’s message to the people, in the book of Habakkuk the people—through Habakkuk—declare their message to God. While most Old Testament prophets preached about divine judgment, Habakkuk pleaded for divine judgment. While most Old Testament prophets shared God’s concerns with Israel or Judah, Habakkuk shared Judah’s concerns with God. In this way the book of Habakkuk contains some of the most foundational questions in life. The book of Habakkuk represents the godly voice of those in Judah that had questions of God. The book of Habakkuk is not an oracle to Judah, but instead is a dialogue between the prophet and God.

BIG IDEA. A mature faith trusts and submits to the Lord’s plans even when you can’t see or understand the Lord’s plans.

KEY VERSE. “Your eyes are too pure to approve evil, and You can not look on wickedness with favor. Why do You look with favor on those who deal treacherously? Why are You silent when the wicked swallow up those more righteous than they?” (Hab 1:13, NASB)[1]

AUTHOR. The name Habakkuk only shows up two times in the entire Bible (Hab 1:1; 3:1).[2] We know nothing about Habakkuk’s family or his heritage. We don’t get his father’s name, his hometown, nor are we told about the kings in power when he spoke. (Those details are often part of what’s called a superscription that is common in the Old Testament prophetic books.)

            Habakkuk likely was an ordained priest. He appears well educated, deeply sensitive to Scripture, and his literary style suggests Habakkuk was as much of a poet as a prophet.[3] Musical notes in Habakkuk 3:19 suggests he was part of the temple’s liturgical singing. His aptitude for music is clear.

            In the apocryphal section of Daniel (vv. 33-39) called “Bel and the Dragon,” Jewish tradition says Habakkuk was delivering food to workers in the field when an angel took him back to Babylon and Habakkuk offered food to Daniel in the lions den.[4] That story is probably more legendary than historical.

            Habakkuk likely lived in Judah in 607–604 BC under king Jehoiakim (Jer 22:15–17; 2 Kings 23:34—24:5) in the final dark days of the southern nation of Judah.

DATE. The heading of the book of Habakkuk—unlike other prophets—provides no chronological or historical information that would reveal to us the date of the book.

Pre-exilic Date. I take the date of 607 BC. At that time sin was ruling in the land of Judah, rulers were not administering justice to those who needed it, corruption and lawlessness were descriptive of their era, and it was bad.

            But how bad was it? Habakkuk lived under King Jehoiakim of Judah. Jehoiakim ruled in Judah 609-605 BC under Egypt’s oversight and 605-601 BC under Babylon’s oversight. During his rule Jehoiakim killed innocent people who opposed him, refused to pay poor laborers (2 Kings 23:35-37; Jer 22:13-19), he killed Uriah the prophet for prophesying that Jerusalem would fall (Jer 26:20-23), and he burned the prophet Jeremiah’s hand-written prophecy (Jer 36). Furthermore, prophets and priests were known to commit adultery and abuse their authority under his rulership (Jer 23:1-2, 9-11).[5]

            Here’s a brief timeline. In 607 BC Habakkuk writes. In 605 BC Babylon comes to Judah and Daniel is taken into exile in Babylon. In 597 BC Babylon comes again and Ezekiel is taken into exile in Babylon. In 586 BC Babylon finishes what they started by completely destroying the city of Jerusalem.

Post-exilic Date. C. Hassell Bullock writes, “One of the most radical proposals was put forth by Bernard Duhm, who amended the term Kasdim (Chaldeans) to Kittim (Greeks) and dated the book about 322 BC.”[6] Bullock continues, “C. C. Torrey followed that line of reasoning and advocated that the book was a meditation on the conquests of Alexander the Great. He dated it between 334 and 331.”[7]

THEMES. Two themes appear to be prominent in this book.

The Lord. Both of Habakkuk’s questions begin with, “O Lord” (Hab 1:2, 12), the “Lord” answers (Hab 2:2, 13, 14, 16, 20), then Habakkuk praises the “Lord” (Hab 3:2 [two times], 8, 18, 19). The name of God, “Lord,”is mentioned eleven times in the book of Habakkuk. The NASB translation uses “Lord” in small caps and is translation of YHWH[8] (transliterated as Yahweh).[9] Some people believe it comes from the verb, “to be” in Hebrew. YHWHis called the “Tetragrammaton” (which means four letters) and was the covenant name of God from Exodus 3:14 where God reveals to Moses, “I AM WHO I AM.” This indicated God’s covenant faithfulness and should evoke confidence.[10]

The Chaldeans. The answer to Habakkuk’s questions is that God will use the Babylonians to execute God’s plan (Hab 1:5–11, 15–17). In Habakkuk 1:6a we read, “For behold, I am raising up the Chaldeans” (Hab 1:6a). The Hebrew word, kasdim, is translated as “Chaldeans” in the NASB but this group of people is better known by another name: Babylonians. The Babylonians were a tribe within the Assyrian Empire that rose up and overtook the Assyrian Empire. Nabopolassar rose to power in 625 BC and Nebuchadnezzar inherited the powerful kingdom in 605 BC.[11] This was surprising for two reasons. One, that a small group within the nation of Assyria could rise up and overtake Assyria. Two, that God would allow a foreign nation which was wicked and evil to punish the nation of Judah. The prophets Isaiah (39:5–7) and Micah (4:10) could see the transition from Assyrian to Babylonian dominance. Many people could see the Babylonian rise to power and significance in the ancient Near East.

LITERARY DESIGN AND GENRE.

Oracle. Habakkuk 1:1 reveals this is an “oracle.” The word, “oracle” (מַשָּׂא)[12] literally means “burden” and is “a pronouncement or message from God to people.”[13] In the Old Testament there are three types of oracles:Judgement, blessing, and salvation.[14] The book of Habakkuk is an oracle of judgement against the evil of the nation of Judah, its kings, its people, and its rulers.

Woe. In Habakkuk 2 we see the Hebrew word, hoy used as “woe” in Habakkuk 2:6, 9, 12, 15, 19. These are woe oracles which announce the failure and future doom of a nation. Amos 6:1–7 is a good example of a woe oracle against Israel. Technically, Habakkuk 2:6–19 is an oracle of judgement, but it goes a little farther. We would classify this as “taunt.” A taunt “is an utterance that mocks or jeers the opponent.”[15] It’s a put down. It’s trash talk. There’s an element of not just “what bad will happen” but also a personal attack on the nation and its leaders. God “rubs it in” in a certain way to make it hurt, to make it sting, and to make it personal.[16]

Theodicy. The book of Habakkuk is often called a “theodicy.” A theodicy is an “attempt to defend God’s omnipotence and goodness in the face of the problem of evil in the world.”[17] The book of Habakkuk tells the story of a man, Habakkuk, asking God about the evil he sees occurring in his country and in the neighboring nations. It also reveals the struggles that Habakkuk has with what he sees and what he believes God should be doing.

Unique. The book of Habakkuk is unique among the prophets in the Old Testament. Most Old Testament prophets brought God’s messages to the people, Habakkuk brings the people’s questions to God. While most prophets in the Old Testament preached about divine judgment, Habakkuk pleaded for divine judgment. While most prophets of the Old Testament shared God’s concerns with Judah, Habakkuk shares Judah’s concerns with God. Thomas Constable writes, “Habakkuk is unusual among the prophetical books in that it tells a story. In this it is similar to Jonah, which is also the record of a prophet’s experience. Jonah gives the account of a prophet’s failure to sympathize with God. Habakkuk gives the account of a prophet’s failure to understand God. Jonah deals with a problem posed by Nineva, and Habakkuk deals with a problem posed by Babylon. Habakkuk, like Jonah, also records one major event in the life of the prophet. Most of the other prophetic books record the messages and activities of a prophet over an extended period of years. Habakkuk does contain prophecies, so it does like the other prophetic books in this respect.”[18]

UNITY OF THE BOOK. Some liberal scholars over the years have challenged the unity of the book of Habakkuk. Specifically, they’ve viewed chapter three as a post-exilic addition because of the different literary features and because a commentary on Habakkuk found in the Dead Sea Schools does not contain Habakkuk 3 (1QpHab is the scroll).[19] However, the early textual witnesses from many different languages and text-types all have Habakkuk 3 in them. It seems odd to me that the Qumran commentary on Habakkuk does not have a commentary on Habakkuk 3. “Some argue that Habakkuk 3 was added much later, as it is missing from DSS commentary (1QpHab). The majority think that it is part of the original mt tradition (Andersen, 259–60), confirmed in the second-century Minor Prophet scroll found at Wadi Murabbaʿat and present in the early lxx versions and in the Naḥal Ḥeber first-century Greek manuscript. The more archaic language of the chapter is in keeping with the liturgy of theophanic visions (Sweeney, 1:479; Roberts, 148–58). It is also a fitting response after the prophet’s questions and God’s revelation in the first two chapters (Hiebert 1986, 129–49).”[20]

OUTLINE

I. HABAKKUK’S PROBLEMS (Hab 1:1—2:1).

A. Introduction (Hab 1:1). We could label this verse as Habakkuk’s call.

B. Habakkuk’s First Question (Hab 1:2–4). In these verses we read about God’s perceived inactivity. Habakkuk essentially asks God, “How long will evil continue and when will you stop it?” Habakkuk shares his cry (vv. 2–3) and his concern (v. 4).

C. God’s First Answer (Hab 1:5–11). God essentially responds: “I’m going to stop it, I know what’s going on, and you’ll be surprised how.” God tells Habakkuk that he will use the ungodly people of Babylon to purify his people (Judah) who are acting ungodly. In this section we see God’s intention of discipline (v. 5), God’s instrument of discipline (vv. 6–10), and God’s implementation of discipline (v. 11).

1. Pay Attention to This (v. 5)

2. The Description of the Chaldeans (vv. 6–7)

3. The Destruction of the Chaldeans (vv. 8–11)

D. Habakkuk’s Second Question (Hab 1:12—2:1). In these verses we read about God’s perceivedinconsistency. Habakkuk essentially asks God: “Why use greater sinners against less sinners?” Habakkuk asks why God would use the more serious sinners (Babylonians) to punish the less serious sinners (Judah). In this section we read a declaration about God (1:12–13), a description of the Babylonians (1:14–17), and a determination to wait (2:1).

1. Holiness of God (vv. 12–13)

2. Haughtiness of the Chaldeans (vv. 14–17)

3. Habakkuk Waiting (Hab 2:1)

II. HABAKKUK’S PATIENCE (Hab 2:2–20). This is God’s second answer. In these verses God essentially says: “I have a plan for the future, a message for the faithful, and punishment planned for the Babylonians.” In this section we read about God’s plans for the future (vv. 2–3), God’s plans for the righteous (vv. 4–5), and God’s plans for the wicked (vv. 6–20).

A. God’s Answer (vv. 2–3)

B. Righteous Living by Faith (vv. 4–5). The Talmud (Makkot 23b) records a Rabbi that said, “Moses gave Israel 613 commandments, David reduced them to 10, Isaiah to 2, but Habakkuk to one: the righteous shall live by faith.”

C. Enemies of Babylon and Response to Those Enemies (vv. 6–11)

D. Anger Building Against the Babylonians (vv. 12–14)

E. Punishment Against the Babylonians (vv. 15–17)

F. True God in Heaven Will Contrast Fake Gods in Babylon (vv. 18–20)

III. HABAKKUK’S PRAISE (Hab 3). “Habakkuk does not end with a wail, but with a song. It does not end with inquiry, but with affirmation. It does not end with frustration, but with faith.”[21] Habakkuk 3 records Habakkuk praying (vv. 1–2), pondering (vv. 3–15), and praising (vv. 16–19). When writing about Habakkuk 3 Warren Wiersbe says, “His circumstances hadn’t changed, but he had changed, and now he was walking by faith instead of sight. He was living by promises, not explanations.”[22]

A. The Message of God (vv. 1-2). After God’s second answer to Habakkuk we read what Habakkuk says in reply to God. In this section we see Habakkuk’s reply (v. 1), response (v. 2a), and request (v. 2b).

1. A Prayer (v. 1)

2. A Praise (v. 2)

B. The Majesty of God (vv. 3-15). Habakkuk 3:3–15 is a theophany.[23] A theophany is a manifestation of God on earth and “an appearance of God in great power and glory.”[24] In this section there is an awesome appearance of God (vv. 3–7), and there are amazing acts of God (vv. 18–19).

1. Where He Comes From (v. 3)

2. What He Looks Like (v. 4)

3. What He Does (vv. 5–15)

To the Nations (vv. 5–7)

To His Creation (vv. 8–12)

To His Enemies (vv. 13–15)

4. How God Affects Us (v. 16)

C. The Meaning of God (vv. 17-19). Notice the strong contrast to how this book started. We started with Habakkuk asking, “God, why don’t you do something?” (Hab 1:1–4) and “God, why would you do that?” (Hab 1:12—2:1). Now Habakkuk essentially says, “God, when you do what you said you will do, I exult you, rejoice in you, and look to you for strength.” In this section we see Habakkuk’s position (v. 16), problem (v. 17), and praise (vv. 18–19)

1. The Circumstance (v. 17)

2. The Calling to Praise (v. 18).

3. The Capacity of God for Strength (v. 19)

APPLICATION. Many of us probably have the same questions that Habakkuk asked. Questions such as, “God do you know what’s going on? God when will you intervene? God why don’t you do something? God if you are good why do you allow evil, pain, and suffering?”

            In the book of Habakkuk we don’t get all of those answers at once. Just as each of the four gospels give us a portrait of Jesus from a different side and with a different emphasis, the book of Habakkuk answers our questions in a series of steps building upon each other. Each step gets us closer to understanding who God is and why he chooses to do what he does in the way he does it.

            The Old Testament book of Habakkuk was written 2600 years ago (in 607 BC), yet it deals with a modern problem and common questions we all experience. The book of Habakkuk answers our questions because Habakkuk was asking the same questions then that we ask now. Thankfully, we don’t just read about Habakkuk’s questions, we read about God’s answers. In this process we are seeing Habakkuk go from a wonderer, to a watcher, and now to a worshipper. Habakkuk started in gloom, now he ends in glory. Habakkuk went from why to worship. Habakkuk’s faith has been tested (chapter 1), taught (chapter 2), and is triumphant (chapter 3).

            In her book, Trembling Faith, Taylor Turkington writes, “Habakkuk does something different–he invites us into his conversation with God, like we’re sitting in on his prayer meeting. We have a front-row seat to Habakkuk’s wrestling, listening, bravery, and gritty faith.”[25]

SERMONS FROM HABAKKUK: “REVERENT WRESTLINGS”

  1. Wondering and Waiting (Hab 1:1–4)
  2. God’s Got This (Hab 1:5–11)
  3. God, Do You Have This? (Hab 1:12—2:1)
  4. Living by Faith (Hab 2:2–20)
  5. The Prayer of a Prophet (Hab 3:1–2)
  6. Standing Ovation (Hab 3:3–15)
  7. Direction in the Midst of Disaster (Hab 3:16–19)

ARTICLES FROM HABAKKUK

  1. Meet Habakkuk
  2. What do we know about Habakkuk? (Hab 1:1)
  3. Habakkuk’s Cry (Hab 1:2-3)
  4. What We Do When We See Suffering (Hab 1:4)
  5. Our Limited View of God (Hab 1:1-4)
  6. Our Reminder That God Is God (Hab 1:5-11)
  7. He Who Is Sovereign (Hab 1:5)
  8. How America Is Different Than Israel (Hab 1:6-10)
  9. Grace Time (Hab 1:11)
  10. Gospel News (Hab 1:5-11)
  11. God Questions (Hab 1:12-2:1)
  12. Confidence in God (Hab 1:12-13)
  13. Nothing Without God (Hab 1:14-17)
  14. Waiting for God (Hab 2:1)
  15. Waiting on God (Hab 1:12-2:1)
  16. Living by Faith (Hab 2:2-20)
  17. While We Wait for God (Hab 2:2-3)
  18. God’s Plans for the Righteous (Hab 2:4-5)
  19. God’s Plans for the Wicked (Hab 2:6-20)
  20. Just Live by Faith (Hab 2:2-20)
  21. How Revelation Leads to Trust (Hab 3:1-2)
  22. God Knows Your Name (Hab 3:1)
  23. A Healthy Fear of God (Hab 3:2a)
  24. Peace in God’s Plans (Hab 3:2b)
  25. When Faith Matures (Hab 3:1-2)
  26. An Answer to Prayer (Hab 3:3-15)
  27. An Awesome Appearance of God (Hab 3:3-7)
  28. The Amazing Acts of God (Hab 3:8-15)
  29. What a Big God (Hab 3:3-15)
  30. Direction in the Midst of Disaster (Hab 3:16-19)
  31. Embracing the Wait (Hab 3:16)
  32. Consequences of Disobedience (Hab 3:17)
  33. Rejoicing While God Works (Hab 3:18)
  34. Raising Above Life’s Troubles (Hab 3:19)
  35. Looking Up When We Are Down (Hab 3:16-19)

Christopher L. Scott is a pastor and author of the book, Walking Straight When Life Goes Sideways: Essential Christian Truths for Enduring Life’s Trials (Wipf and Stock). He provides hundreds of free articles, videos, and Bible study resources at his website ChristopherLynnScott.com.


[1] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[2] Habakkuk 2:4 is quoted in Romans 1:17, Galatians 3:11, and Heb 10:38.

[3] J. Ron Blue, “Habakkuk” in The Bible Knowledge Commentary: Old Testament, edited by John Walvoord and Roy Zuck (Colorado Springs, CO: David C. Cook, 1985), 1508.

[4] C. Hassell Bullock, An Introduction to the Old Testament Prophetic Books (Chicago, IL: Moody, 2007),221.

[5]This material on the kings during Habakkuk is adapted from J.K. Bruckner, “Habakkuk, Book of” in Dictionary of the Old Testament: Prophets, edited by Mark Boda and J. Gordon McConville (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2012), 294-301, specifically p. 296.

[6] Bullock, Introduction to the Old Testament: Prophets, 219.

[7] Bullock, Introduction to the Old Testament: Prophets, 219.

[8] YHWH occurs 6,823 times in Old Testament. See Francis Brown, Samuel Rolles Driver, and Charles Augustus Briggs. Enhanced Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew and English Lexicon (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1977), 217–19.

[9] Other names for God based on Hebrew are “God” from Elohim (which is the more universal name for God) and “Lord” from Adonai (which was a divine title for God). The word “Jehovah” in some Bibles consists of the Hebrew consonants from Yahweh combined with the Hebrew vowels from Adonai.

[10] One commentary on Habakkuk 2:2 tells us, “The choice of ‘LORD’ here rather than the more general term for God probably emphasizes the fact that Habakkuk addressed his words to Israel’s covenant God” (Richard D. Patterson, Habakkuk, Cornerstone Biblical Commentary vol. 10[Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House, 2008],427).

[11] B. T. Arnold, “Babylon” (pp. 53-60) edited by Mark J. Boda and Gordon J. McConville, Dictionary of the Old Testament: Prophets (Downers Grove, IL; Inter-Varsity Press, 2012), 59.

[12] The NLT translates it as “message” and the NIV as “prophecy.”

[13] Leland Ryken, Symbols and Reality (Wooster, OH: Weaver Book Company, 2016), 31.

[14] Ryken, Symbols and Reality, 32-43.

[15] Ryken, Symbols and Reality, 50.

[16] Ryken, Symbols and Reality, 49-52.

[17] Page Brooks and D. A. Neal, “Theodicy,” ed. John D. Barry et al., The Lexham Bible Dictionary (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2016).

[18] Thomas Constable, Notes on Habakkuk, 2013 edition, p. 8.

[19] See O. Palmer Robertson, The Books of Nahum, Habakkuk, and Zephaniah, New International Commentary on the Old Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1990), 212–14; Richard D. Patterson, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, Wycliffe Exegetical Commentary (Chicago, IL: Moody, 1991), 127–29, for further discussion of the book’s unity.

[20] Bruckner, “Habakkuk, Book of,” in Dictionary of the Old Testament: Prophets, 295.

[21] Constable, Notes on Habakkuk, 11.

[22] Warren Wiersbe, Be Amazed (Colorado Springs, CO: David C Cook, 2010), 157.

[23] The clearest theophany in Scripture, besides Habakkuk 3:3–15, is Exodus 19:9, 18.

[24] Waylon Bailey, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, vol. 20, The New American Commentary (Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers, 1999), 358.

[25] Taylor Turkington, Trembling Faith: How a Distressed Prophet Helps Us Trust God in a Chaotic World (Brentwood, TN: B&H, 2023), 15–16.

Filed Under: Bible Book Introductions

13. Failing at Gathering (Heb 10:25a)

April 14, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

If one of the marks of an authentic disciple of Jesus Christ is encouraging other disciples, then it makes sense that disciples gather regularly with one another. That topic is addressed by the author of the book of Hebrews in Hebrews 10:23–25.

            Apparently, there was a failure to gather. The author writes, “not forsaking our own assembling together, as is the habit of some” (Heb 10:25a).[1]It appears some people deliberately decided not to gather[2] and had been absent from the church. These people were capable of attending the worship gatherings but had decided not to attend them.

            It appears this deliberate decision not to gather was habitual. The word “forsaking” is translated from the Greek word, egkataleipontes. This word means “to separate connection with someone or something”[3] and is often translated as “forsake,” “abandon,” or “desert.”[4] The verb is used here in what’s called a “customary present participle,” which describes a regular action that is iterative or repeated.[5]

            The decision not to gather was deliberate, habitual, and it appears this decision to not gather was also communal.This is not one person but a group. Perhaps there was a community of believers that left the Christian faith and returned back to a form of Judaism.[6]

            Choosing not to gather with other Christians was a dangerous choice for first-century Christians. Thus far we have seen the problem addressed in Hebrews 10:25a, but was this also a problem in that first-century culture? The religious culture of the Greeks and Romans believed in many gods. People sought to please and appease those gods for health, prosperity, protection, and victory in wars. This attempt to make the gods happy was done as a community, not as individuals. Thus, when people became Christians and departed from the Greek and Roman community effort to appease the many gods, those Christians were often blamed when bad things happened. An example of this was when a massive fire broke out in the city of Rome in AD 64 and the Roman Emperor at that time, Nero, quickly blamed the Christians for the fire.[7]

            In the first century, Christians were seen as having drawn away from society and had neglected their obligation to appease the various Greek and Roman gods. This meant Christians relied on one another for protection and survival against the persecutions they received from non-Christians. The idea of a private decision and private life following Jesus Christ was almost impossible in the first century. In his commentary on Hebrews, Donald Guthrie writes, “The New Testament lends no support to the idea of lone Christians. Close and regular fellowship with other believers is not just a nice idea, but an absolute necessity for the encouragement of Christian values.”[8]

            Now that we’ve seen the problem addressed in that culture and in Hebrews 10:25a, let’s look at the same problem in our times. In the last several decades we have seen a massive departure from the American Protestant church.  

            In his article, “The Church Is Losing Its Gray Heads: Why Are Boomers and Gen X Dropping Out of Church at Higher Rates than Younger Christians,”[9] Adam Macinnis cites Barna’s research that found the biggest decline in church attendance over the past three  decades has been among adults 55 and older.[10]

            What are the reasons for this departure? I believe there are two reasons people are not actively involved in a local church assembly.

            One reason is people’s priorities. Often so called Christians allow other priorities to override their time for church involvement. A few years ago I was talking with the pastor of a church in another state. He told me about various members of his church that he hadn’t seen gather for worship for months or even a year. Often when he talked to them during their impromptu meetings at restaurants, the mall, or coffeeshops, they would tell him, “We want to be a church, but we’re so busy.” This pastor shared with me that he struggled to listen to the “we’re so busy” excuse because he knew these families weren’t too busy to go on a two-week vacation to another country. They weren’t too busy to have their kids in multiple sports at the same time. They weren’t too busy to have their hair done at a salon and their nails professionally painted and manicured. They weren’t too busy to play golf every week. The pastor told me that it wasn’t that those people were “too busy for church,” but instead the problem was that they had prioritized other items over church.

            Another reason people are not involved in the local church is pride. We could call this the “John Wayne” mentality: ““I can get what I want by myself.”  Perhaps our American individuality mindset tells us we don’t need people and that we can go life alone. Therefore we don’t need to be involved in a local church.

            With all that in perspective, we must recognize that the author of Hebrews says that a Christian’s ability to persevere in the faith is dependent on meeting with other Christians for worship and encouragement. Essentially, Hebrews 10:25a says that it’s impossible to be a Christian in isolation.


[1] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[2] There is a problem in the book of Hebrews. When reading Hebrews, it’s clear the assembly was in crisis. Some people defected from the assembly, as described here. Some stopped listening to God’s Word preached in an attentive way (Heb 2:1; 3:7b—4:13; 5:11; 12:25). Some of the believers became lethargic and discouraged in their faith in a hostile culture (Heb 12:3–4). Some were in danger of turning away from Jesus and returning back to the safe haven of Judaism (Heb 3:12).

[3] BDAG, s.v. “egkataleipo”.

[4] Ibid.

[5] Daniel Wallace, Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1996), 521–22.

[6] This is the reason we see several “warning passages” in the book of Hebrews. Here’s a list of those famous warning passages: “The Danger of Drifting“ (Heb 2:1–4); “The Danger of Disobedience“ (Heb 3:7—4:13); “The Danger of Degeneration“ (Heb 5:11—6:20); “The Danger of Despising“ (Heb 10:26-39 or Heb 10:19–39); and “The Danger of Denying“ (Heb 12:25–29).

[7] The Roman historian, Tacitus, records this in his work, Annals 15:44.

[8] Donald Guthrie, Hebrews, Tyndale New Testament Commentary, vol. 15 (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1983), 218.

[9] Adam Macinnis, “The Church Is Losing Its Gray Heads: Why Are Boomers and Gen X Dropping Out of Church at Higher Rates than Younger Christians,” Christianity Today (March 2022),  47–52.

[10] This is contrary to the popular belief that the church is shrinking because young people are abandoning their faith. In fact, The Barna Group has conducted research that shows that weekly worship attendance is highest among Millennials According to Barna, in 2022 approximately 39 percent of Millennials attended church regularly. See “The Turn of the Millennial” in Christianity Today (October 2022), 19.

Filed Under: Portraits of an Authentic Disciple

12. The Significance of Showing Up (Heb 10:23-25)

April 7, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

It is important to gather with a body of other believers in worship each week. If you’re reading this I’m guessing that you know that already. This past Sunday you likely woke up early, got dressed, entered your car, and drove to church where you worshipped God with other believers.

            But if a non-Christian asked you, “Why do you go to a worship service each week;” what would you tell him? You would have to ask yourself some questions. Do you attend church because of what you get out of it? Do you attend church as a way to earn righteousness before God? Do you attend church because it’s your spiritual family and you want to spend time with your family? Do you attend church because it is what you have always done?

            Let me pose another scenario to you. What if someone said, “I don’t have to go to church to be a Christian.” What if someone said, “I don’t have to go to church to show that I love Jesus.” How would you respond to those declarative statements?

            Starting today we’re going to examine Hebrews 10:23–25 and explore this passage in the next several articles. Perhaps these are familiar verses for you. They are definitely relevant verses for the local church to study.

            We look at Hebrews 10:23–25 as part of our series of articles about discipleship we’ve been exploring together this year. Thus far we’ve learned that authentic disciples of Jesus embrace God’s word (2 Tim 3:16–17) and embody God’s kingdom (Phil 3:17–21). Today we’ll begin to learn how disciples encourage one another from Hebrews 10:23–25.    

            Hebrews is a unique book. Not a lot of pastors like to preach from Hebrews because it’s long (thirteen chapters), it’s difficult to preach (it contains twenty-nine Old Testament quotations  and fifty-three Old Testament allusions), and it’s difficult to interpret (Hebrews is famous for its “warning passages”[1]).

            Hebrews was probably composed around AD 62[2] and addressed to a local community of Jewish believers[3] located in the city of Rome. Hebrews 10:23–25 is part of Hebrews 10:19–25 which is one single, skillfully composed sentence in Greek.[4] Hebrews was written to encourage Jewish believers to mature in their faith by focusing on the superiority of Christ and his work.

            With that background work done let’s look at the verses briefly together. “Let us hold fast the confession of our hope without wavering, for He who promised is faithful; and let us consider how to stimulate one another to love and good deeds, not forsaking our own assembling together, as is the habit of some, but encouraging one another; and all the more as you see the day drawing near” (Heb 10:23–25, NASB).[5]

            Based on what we read we learn that the proper response to Christ for a Christian is to hold fast to the confession of faith, stimulate one another to love and good deeds, and to encourage one another as they wait for the Lord’s return. This means that while you don’t have to attend church to be a Christian, one of the signs that you are a Christian is that you attend church.

            I realize those are strong statements that need explanations, and we’ll do that in the coming weeks.


[1] Here’s a list of those famous warning passages: “The Danger of Drifting“(Heb 2:1-4); “The Danger of Disobedience“ (Heb 3:7-4:13); “The Danger of Degeneration“ (Heb 5:11-6:20); “The Danger of Despising“ (Heb 10:26-39 or Heb 10:19-39); and “The Danger of Denying“ (Heb 12:25-29).

[2] I believe Hebrews was written around AD 62 for the following reasons. The readers appear to be second generation believers (Heb 2:3-4), so the date cannot be earlier than AD 60. Clement of Rome utilized this letter, so it must have been written before AD 96. The temple rituals are described as still going on (Heb 9:6-9; 10:1-4), so the letter must have been written before AD 64.

[3] Throughout the letter there are no references to Gentile society, no description of a Jewish-Gentile controversy, and the entire background of the epistle is placed in a Jewish history and religion.

[4] Some scholars have called this section a “sustained exhortation.”

[5] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

Filed Under: Portraits of an Authentic Disciple

Surprised by the Tomb (Luke 24:1-12)

April 2, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

A woman in Sioux Falls, South Dakota that ordered Arby’s through DoorDash was surprised when the food arrived at her door. She did not open her door to a DoorDash driver, but instead to a police officer. With his squad car parked in front of her house, wearing his full uniform, the police officer handed the woman her two bags of Arby’s food and a soda. As he handed her the food he smiled and said, “I know I’m not who you are expecting, but your driver got arrested, so I figured I’d complete the DoorDash for you.”[1]

            As you could imagine the woman was very surprised! That same type of feeling of surprise was experienced by some friends of Jesus on Easter Sunday 2,000 years ago.

            The first testimony of the resurrection of Jesus is revealed by Luke in Luke 24:1–12. We could summarize Luke 24:1–12 this way: The empty tomb is discovered by women, interpreted by angels, and revealed to the disciples by women. Just as that woman in Sioux Falls did not expect to see a police officer holding two bags of Arby’s food, these women did not expect to see what they saw nor did they expect to hear what they were told. The disciples that later learned about what occurred did not expect (or believe) what they were told.

            Luke tells us about the messengers[2] in Luke 24:1–7. The women traveled to the tomb, “But on the first day of the week, at early dawn, they came to the tomb bringing the spices which they had prepared. And they found the stone rolled away from the tomb, but when they entered, they did not find the body of the Lord Jesus” (Luke 24:1–3, NASB).[3] The women were Mary Magdalene, Joanna, Mary the mother of James, and other women (Luke 23:55; 24:10). These ladies are the first to find out about the resurrection.

            The women were planning to honor Jesus’s body with spices and perfume (v. 1), but when they arrived they notice the stone was moved (v. 2). This was the first unexpected thing they noticed. This was the first hint that Jesus has been resurrected. A tomb’s entrance was normally closed to keep animals and vandals from disturbing the body.[4] Usually it was a circular stone rolled in front of a square entrance.

            However, when the women arrived they also notice the body was gone (v. 3). This was the second unexpected thing they noticed. Luke makes it clear by contrast what they found, “stone rolled away” (v. 2), and what they did not find, “the body of the Lord Jesus” (v. 3).

            At this point angels revealed the resurrection to the women, “While they were perplexed about this, behold, two men suddenly stood near them in dazzling clothing; and as the women were terrified and bowed their faces to the ground, the men said to them, ‘Why do you seek the living One among the dead? He is not here, but He has risen. Remember how He spoke to you while He was still in Galilee, saying that the Son of Man must be delivered into the hands of sinful men, and be crucified, and the third day rise again’” (Luke 24:4–7).

            The angels were a third unexpected thing the women noticed. The angels not only appeared (v. 4), but they asked a question (v. 5), and then made two declarations (vv. 6–7): That Jesus Christ was risen (v. 6a) and that the women should remember that they were told this would happen (vv. 6b–7).[5]

            Luke reveals the messengers in Luke 24:1–7 and then tells us more about the message they brought in Luke 24:8–10, “And they remembered His words, and returned from the tomb and reported all these things to the eleven and to all the rest. Now they were Mary Magdalene and Joanna and Mary the mother of James; also the other women with them were telling these things to the apostles” (Luke 24:8–10).

            In these verses the women remembered Jesus’s words about his resurrection (v. 8), they

responded by returning to the disciples to reveal what they saw (v. 9), and they are recognized by name by Luke (v. 10).[6] In other words, they were messengers with a message.

            Luke has told us about the messengers and message thus far. He then reveals to us the meaning of all of this. “But these words appeared to them as nonsense, and they would not believe them. But Peter got up and ran to the tomb; stooping and looking in, he saw the linen wrappings only; and he went away to his home, marveling at what had happened” (Luke 24:11–12). In these two verses we see both the reaction of the group in verse eleven (which was unbelief), and we see the response of Peter in verse twelve (which was investigation).

            In Luke 24:1–12 we learn the tomb is empty and discovered by women, interpreted by angels, and revealed to the disciples by women. The former bishop of Canterbury, NT Wright has written about Luke 24:1–12, “The opening mood of Easter morning, then, is one of surprise, astonishment, fear, and confusion.”[7] All of those emotions are mixed together in this one event.

            The resurrection can be like a ball of rubber bands mixed and entangled for many of us. We are astonished it happened yet grateful at the same time. We find it almost unbelievable that a man could come back to life after being dead for three days, but when we remember it was God we can believe it. We feel unworthy that God would give us eternal life but understand why he would do it when we learn about his loving character.

            Just as the women and the disciples felt surprise, wonder, and astonishment at the resurrection of Jesus Christ, may we too feel surprise and wonder as we reflect on the resurrection of Jesus Christ.

—

Christopher L. Scott is a pastor and author of the book, Walking Straight When Life Goes Sideways: Essential Christian Truths for Enduring Life’s Trials (Wipf and Stock). He provides hundreds of free articles, videos, and Bible study resources at his website ChristopherLynnScott.com.


[1] “Police Officer Delivers DoorDash Order After Delivery Driver Arrested,” The Today Show, January 27, 2022,

[2] In the context of the gospel of Luke these are the events that have occurred just before Luke 24:1–12. On Friday Jesus died on a cross (Luke 23:26–49) and was buried in a tomb by Joseph of Arimathea (Luke 23:50–54). A group of women stood at a distance watching Jesus die on the Cross (Luke 23:49) and those same women also saw where Jesus was buried (Luke 23:55). On Saturday those women prepared spices and perfumes for Jesus’s body (Luke 23:56).

[3] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[4] In Jesus’s situation there were guards posted to keep it closed.

[5] Jesus had told his followers, “The Son of Man must suffer many things and be rejected by the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed and be raised up on the third day” (Luke 9:22). And again later, “Then He took the twelve aside and said to them, ‘Behold, we are going up to Jerusalem, and all things which are written through the prophets about the Son of Man will be accomplished. For He will be handed over to the Gentiles, and will be mocked and mistreated and spit upon, and after they have scourged Him, they will kill Him; and the third day He will rise again.’ But the disciples understood none of these things, and the meaning of this statement was hidden from them, and they did not comprehend the things that were said” (Luke 18:31–34).

[6] Among this group of women was “Mary Magdalene” who had seven demons cast out of her by Jesus (Lk 8:2). Luke points out “Joanna” who was the wife of Chuza, (who was Herod’s steward), and she was one of Jesus’s companions in Galilee (Lk 8:3). Luke points out “Mary the mother of James” whom we don’t know much about. And Luke points out “also the other women with them” which was a group of women with these named prominent women.

[7] NT Wright, Luke for Everyone (Louisville, KY: Westminister John Knox, 2004), 291.

Filed Under: Easter Articles

Things I Wish I’d Learned in Seminary

April 1, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

What a privilege it has been for me to receive an education. In addition to graduating from a public high school, I also received a bachelor’s degree from a Christian college and a master’s degree from a Christian seminary. I am extremely grateful for the Seminary that I attended and graduated from. If I could go back and choose again which seminary I attended, I would still make the same decision and attend the same Seminary.

            With that said, there are a few things that I didn’t learn in Seminary which I wish I had. Maybe these things were taught and I just didn’t learn them. Here’s my list of things that I wish I had learned at seminary, or at least wish I had taken notes about and would have been able to apply to ministry as soon as I needed them.

Benedictions

I was not taught about the purpose or method for giving a benediction to the congregation. Do I have the people look at me while I give the benediction or do I ask them to close their eyes? Do I use Scripture as a benediction or write something of my own? Is it okay to use someone else’s benediction? After ten years of ministry I will sometimes write my own benediction adapted to the message I just preached, sometimes I will read Scripture as a benediction, and occasionally I read a benediction that someone else has written.

Baptisms

I did not baptize anyone at the first church I worked at because I was an associate pastor. It wasn’t until six years after Seminary that I was tasked to baptize my first person. In Seminary I certainly learned a lot about the doctrine of baptism, biblical support of it, and the history of its practice in the early church. But I did not learn how to conduct a baptism. Furthermore, the church I now serve at does not have a baptismal built into the facilities, so I had to come up with a way to conduct baptisms in a desert! Our solution is that we use a horse trough in our front lawn and we have baptism on a potluck Sunday.

Working with Boards, Elders, and Deacons

Based on my Seminary education I could give you the biblical support for having elders and deacons within a church and I could tell you about the history of their deployment within the church throughout the centuries. But I don’t think I was taught how to effectively and cooperatively work with a group of elders, deacons, or a church board. Every pastor will tell you that these are delicate relationships that need to be handled carefully. Our jobs literally depend on this skill. With that said, I am still learning this.

Baby Dedications

I do not remember talking about baby dedications in Seminary. As the pastor of a local church I have had to answer my own questions. Do I, as a protestant evangelical Christian in an anabaptist denomination, allow for baby dedications? What if people want to have their baby dedicated, but the parents are nominal or carnal Christians? What if grandparents want their grandchildren baptized in our church, but the parents are members of a different church? As a result of these questions, I’ve developed a brief speech about baby dedications that I give to describe what it is, what it’s not, and why we do it.

Being a Hallmark Calendar Preacher

The list of American holidays and other important Christian days adds up quickly. Of course we have New Year’s Day, Presidents Day, Sanctity of Life Sunday, Disability Awareness Sunday, Memorial Day, Veteran’s Day, Reformation Sunday, Mother’s Day, Father’s Day, Thanksgiving weekend, Palm Sunday, Pastor Appreciation Sunday, Easter Sunday, Martin Luther King Jr. Day, etc. Any pastor that is expected to preach fifty Sundays a year like me is faced with the dilemma: Do I continue preaching verse-by-verse through books of the Bible even on these special days? Do I take a break from my sermon series in order to touch on the topics of these special Sundays? How do I minister to the people who feel these days are important to their spiritual lives, but at the same time still meet the needs of people that would rather ignore those days or have no connections to them? Similar to working with boards as I discussed earlier, I am still figuring this out.

Preaching Palm Sunday, Good Friday, and Easter Sunday

These are three worship gatherings that have a different feel to the service. The celebration is different and the preaching should also be different too. The people expect something different from the preacher. Our job on these Sundays is to deliver a special message in which our regular audience is in attendance with their loved ones that might not often hear the Gospel.

Things I’m Learning After Seminary

            Recently I was at a neighborhood coffee shop. The young man working was attending college and asked me, “Do you think going to college is a good idea?” He began to share with me that he was going to college, but was not sure if it was worth the time and money. He was afraid he might not use what he learned in college for work.

            I told him that I was not sure if I was the best person to ask that question. The reason is that I use what I learned in Seminary every single day as a pastor. My Seminary experience prepared me for pastoral ministry and equipped me with the tools to continue learning and growing as I have developed as a professional minister.

            With that said, there are a few things I didn’t learn in Seminary that I wish I had. My hope is that an awareness of these things that I’ve shared with you helps you learn them in ministry, just as I am learning them too.

—

Christopher L. Scott serves as senior pastor at Lakeview Missionary Church in Moses Lake, Washington and is the author of the book, Walking Straight When Life Goes Sideways: Essential Christian Truths for Enduring Life’s Trials (Wipf and Stock). He provides hundreds of free articles, videos, and Bible study resources at his website ChristopherLynnScott.com.

Filed Under: Church Pastor and Leader Advice

When One Dies So Others May Live (Matt 20:28; 2 Cor 5:21; 1 Pet 3:18)

April 1, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

For the past year the city of Seattle has hosted, “Titanic: The Exhibition.” It’s a traveling museum about the ship and its occupants.[1] Part of this museum includes a wall that lists the names of people that died when the boat sank. The list categorizes people under groups of men, women, and children. If we attended that museum and looked at the list we would notice something surprisingly absent: the names of children and women. The list of the deceased says 1,352 men died while only 109 women and 52 children died.[2]

            As you probably know, there were not enough lifeboats to save all the passengers from the sinking Titanic. As a result, women and children were given first priority to get in lifeboats. When the Titanic was sinking into the deep icy Atlantic waters, husbands and fathers gave their lives to save women and children. What an amazing example of sacrificial love.

            The Titanic is an example of how some died so that others may live. This week we remember the same act not by men on a boat but by a man on earth in the first century. Jesus Christ gave his life so that we may live. We call this the substitutionary atonement of Christ. In other words, Christ died for sinners.

            The doctrine of the substitutionary atonement is based on the Greek word, anti, which is a preposition that often means “in the place of” or “for.” This preposition is used in Matthew 20:28 when Jesus says, “just as the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life a ransom for [anti] many.”[3] Christ’s sacrifice was a substitution for sinners. His death would take the place of many deaths because only Christ could atone for our sins (Jn 1:29; Rom 5:8; 1 Pet 2:24; 3:18). Christ was the perfect sacrifice.

            The doctrine of substitutionary atonement is also based on another Greek word, huper, which is also a preposition. It often means “for the benefit of” or “in the place of.” This word is used by Paul in 2 Corinthians 5:21, “He [God] made Him [Jesus] who knew no sin to be sin on [huper] our behalf [huper], so that we might become the righteousness of God in Him.” This verse describes the heart of the gospel: The sinless Savior took our sins so that we may have God’s righteousness. The preposition huper is also used in 1 Peter 3:18, “For Christ also died for sins once for all, the just for [huper] the unjust, so that He might bring us to God, having been put to death in the flesh, but made alive in the spirit.” This verse from 1 Peter is often seen as one of the shortest, simplest, and richest summaries of the meaning of Jesus’s death on the cross.

            One of the most basic ways to explain what Jesus did during Easter week is that he gave his life for us so that we may live. Christ took our sins and died in our place. Jesus was the supreme example of love. His life was given as a substitute.

            Mrs. Marvin was on the Titanic enjoying her honeymoon with Daniel Marvin. She retells the last memories of her husband, “I was put in the boat, he [Mr. Daniel Marvin] cried to me, ‘It’s all right, little girl. You go. I will stay.’ As our boat shoved off he threw me a kiss, and that was the last I saw of him.”[4] Like those husbands and fathers on the Titanic that died so that women and children could live, Jesus died for us so that we may live.

—–

Christopher L. Scott is a pastor and author of the book, Walking Straight When Life Goes Sideways: Essential Christian Truths for Enduring Life’s Trials (Wipf and Stock). He provides hundreds of free articles, videos, and Bible study resources at his website ChristopherLynnScott.com.


[1] The traveling museum was in Seattle from July 2024 through April 2025.

[2] “Titanic Disaster: Official Casualty Figures and Commentary,” Church Anesi, accessed April 7, 2025, https://anesi.com/titanic.htm.

[3] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[4] Simon Adams, Eyewitness Titanic (New York, NY: DK Publishing, 2014), 34.

Filed Under: Easter Articles

He Died and Then Lived

April 1, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

If there is one event that Christianity relies on more than others, it is the resurrection of Jesus Christ. John Stott once said, “We live and die; Christ died and lived!” And that “died” and then “lived” is what our Christian faith is about.

            The apostle Paul provides the best summary of the resurrection of Jesus in his letter to the believers in Corinth. Paul writes, “Christ died for our sins, just as the Scriptures said. He was buried, and he was raised from the dead on the third day, just as the Scriptures said. He was seen by Peter and then by the Twelve. After that, he was seen by more than 500 of his followers at one time, most of whom are still alive, though some have died. Then he was seen by James and later by all the apostles. Last of all, as though I had been born at the wrong time, I also saw him” (1 Corinthians 15:3-8, NLT).

            Paul tells us that Jesus rose from the dead and appeared to Peter and the twelve disciples, 500 people at one time, James and all the apostles, and the apostle Paul. While some people try to say that Christ’s resurrection was a wishful hallucination of his broken-hearted followers after this death, it is difficult for me to believe that more than 525 people had a hallucination of Jesus Christ.

            But what does Christ’s resurrection mean? If he died and came back to life, what was the point? The point is that Christians also get to experience a resurrection both spiritually and physically. Paul wrote in his letter to the Romans, “Have you forgotten that when we were joined with Christ Jesus in baptism, we joined him in his dead? For we died and were buried with Christ by baptism. And just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glorious power of the Father, now we also may life new lives (Romans 6:3-4, NLT). There is a spiritual death to sin and resurrection back to life in Christ when we believe in him. There will be a resurrection physically for the Christians who have died. Paul wrote to the believers in the city of Thessalonica that when Christ returns “the Christians who have died will raise from their graves” (1 Thessalonians 4:16). Because of Christ’s death and resurrection there are two resurrections for Christians. A spiritual resurrection of Christians at their moment of saving faith.  And a physical resurrection when Christ returns to the earth.  

            Christ’s death is important, but so is his resurrection. Christians often focus on Christ’s death, yet, his resurrection deserves as much attention because it is through his resurrection that we have life. Christ’s death would have been meaningless if he had not also been raised from the dead three days later.

Filed Under: Easter Articles

11. Present on Earth, Oriented Toward Heaven (Phil 3:20–21)

March 19, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

Physicists from Stanford and the University of California Santa Barbara are trying to put one object in two places at the same time. This is called “quantum entanglement” and consists of heating and cooling a tiny piece of matter to extreme levels and measuring it to see if it can be detected in multiple locations. Einstein theorized it might be possible, and these researchers believe they can do it.[1]

            While this might sound like the stuff of science fiction, Christians have been in two places at once for more than two thousand years. How is this possible?

            Christians alive on earth are citizens of heaven (spiritually) and are living on earth (physically). Paul tells us that even though our bodies are on earth, “we are citizens of heaven” (Phil 3:20, NLT).[2] We are in two places at once.

            Philippians 3:17–21 describes how we embrace God’s kingdom as citizens of heaven while on earth. In other words, we live as residents of God’s heavenly kingdom even though we live on the earth. It’s like we are in two places at once.

            Paul writes to the believers in the city of Philippi, “Brethren, join in following my example, and observe those who walk according to the pattern you have in us. For many walk, of whom I often told you, and now tell you even weeping, that they are enemies of the cross of Christ, whose end is destruction, whose god is their appetite, and whose glory is in their shame, who set their minds on earthly things. For our citizenship is in heaven, from which also we eagerly wait for a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ; who will transform the body of our humble state into conformity with the body of His glory, by the exertion of the power that He has even to subject all things to Himself” (Phil 3:17–21, NASB).[3]

            In these five verses we learn we should follow the example of a mature believer that is less imperfect than us, reject the example of those that reject Christ, and live according to heaven’s agenda. In this way, being a member of God’s kingdom requires that we live like a member of the kingdom.

            Some parts of Scripture are hard to read, not because the text is hard to understand, but because the text is hard to apply. I would put Philippians 3:17–21 in the category of hard to read because it’s hard to apply.

            Philippians 3:17–21 is a challenging set of verses because they address behavior. This passage reminds us that discussing our creed we have as Christians is easier than figuring out our proper conduct. This passage shows us that discerning our doctrine we have as Christians is easier than following our correct duty. 

            Let’s remind ourselves what Paul says a citizen of heaven who lives on earth looks like. Based on Philippians 3:17 we learned about the model we should follow. We were taught to designate a mentor for ourselves. Based on Philippians 3:18–19 we learned about mortals we avoid. We were taught to discern what we read or hear. Based on Philippians 3:20–21 we learned about the manner we live. We were taught to distinguish our lifestyles as Christians from the lifestyle of the world. 

            Being a Christian is difficult because people look at our entire life (personal, professional, family, friends) to evaluate our claim that we are Christians. Being Christians is a challenge because all of our behavior is tied to who we are as Christians. If we worked as an accountant, as a nurse, or as a mechanic, most people would not look at our personal life to examine if we are effective at our jobs. We normally do not pay attention to someone’s personal life as a reflection of how well he can do his professional work.

            However, the opposite is true for us as Christians. How we act at church is important, but how we behave when we are at Wal-Mart, with our friends in a restaurant, or at work are all evaluated in light of the fact that we are Christians. In other words, it’s even more important that we live as Christians when not at church. And that’s because we are on earth living as citizens of heaven.

Questions for Reflection and Discussion:

  1. What areas of your life do you feel like you’re living as a citizen of heaven best?
  2. What areas of your life do you feel you’re not living as a citizen of heaven?
  3. How can you improve?
  4. Are there teachings of Scripture you know contradict your life? How can you change that?

—

Christopher L. Scott is a pastor and author of the book, Walking Straight When Life Goes Sideways: Essential Christian Truths for Enduring Life’s Trials (Wipf and Stock). He provides hundreds of free articles, videos, and Bible study resources at his website ChristopherLynnScott.com.


[1] See Jay Bennet, “The Same Atoms Exist in Two Places Nearly 2 Feet Apart Simultaneously,” Popular Mechanics, December 28, 2015, https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a18756/atoms-exist-two-places-simultaneously/; Andrea Estrada, “Physicists Show Theory of Quantum Mechanics Applies to the Motion of Large Objects,” The Current, March 17, 2010, https://news.ucsb.edu/2010/012788/physicists-show-theory-quantum-mechanics-applies-motion-large-objects;

[2] Tyndale House Publishers, Holy Bible: New Living Translation (Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House Publishers, 2015).

[3] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

Filed Under: Portraits of an Authentic Disciple

10. The Manner We Live (Phil 3:20-21)

March 12, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

Christians should look different. That’s the essence of Paul’s message to the Christians in the city of Philippi in Philippians 3:17–21. Paul has told them about the model they follow (v. 17), about the mortals they avoid (vv. 18–19), and now he’s going to tell them about the manner they live (vv. 20–21). In previous weeks we’ve learned that an authentic disciple of Jesus Christ embraces God’s word (2 Tim 3:16–17), Now we are learning that an authentic disciple embodies God’s kingdom (Phil 3:17–21).

            Paul writes, “For our citizenship is in heaven, from which also we eagerly wait for a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ; who will transform the body of our humble state into conformity with the body of His glory, by the exertion of the power that He has even to subject all things to Himself” (Phil 3:20–21, NASB).[1]

            Let’s look at the expression, “For our citizenship is in heaven” (Phil 3:20a).Paul says we are in the world, yet not of the world. It’s like saying you’re in the boat, but not touching the water.[2] This word for “citizenship” is the Greek word, politeuma.[3] It’s only used one time in the New Testament and can be translated as “commonwealth,” “government,” or “state.”[4] This noun is similar to the word used as a verb in Philippians 1:27a, “Above all, you must live as citizens of heaven, conducting yourselves in a manner worthy of the Good News about Christ” (NLT, emphasis mine).

            The idea of citizenship is a metaphor that the Philippians[5] would have understood.[6] Many residents of Philippi were patriotic veterans of the army.[7] 

            After having been destroyed by wars it was rebuilt by Emperor Octavian who established it as a military outpost, populated the city with veterans of his wars, made it a Roman colony, and gave it what was called, ius italicum, which was one of the highest privileges attainable by provincial municipality.[8] The people living in Philippi were Roman citizens living in a foreign land 800 miles away from Rome.[9]

            Thus far we’ve looked at the expression Paul uses about citizenship. Next let’s look at the expectations his followers have. Paul writes, “from which also we eagerly wait for a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ” (Phil 3:20b). This eager expectation is a common theme in other parts of the New Testament. Several writers tell us about the second coming of Christ and how we are to eagerly await him (Rom 8:23; 1 Thess 1:9–10; 4:16–18; 2 Pet 3:11). We’re taught to wait patiently yet expectantly.[10]

            Now that we’ve read Paul’s expression and expectation, we next see his explanation, “who will transform the body of our humble state into conformity with the body of His glory, by the exertion of the power that He has even to subject all things to Himself” (Phil 3:21).

            Paul explains our situation,“the body of our humble state.” That phrase could literally be translated as “body of our humiliation.” That phrase refers to how our bodies are subjected to disease, decay, and death due to sin. But this will be changed at the resurrection of believers (Rom 8:11; 1 Cor 6:14; 15:50-53).

            Paul explains our transformation, “who will transform . . . into conformity with the body of His glory.” All believers will have to undergo a change in order to inherit God’s eternal kingdom. Those alive at Christ’s second coming as well as those who have died will experience this transformation. The late Greek scholar A.T.  Robertson has written, “The body of our state of humiliation will be made suitable to associate with the body of Christ’s glory.”[11] As Pastor Mark Hitchcock says, “We’ll get an airlift and a facelift.”[12] We will have a body like Jesus Christ’s resurrected body.

            Philippians 3:20–21 teaches us that as Christians we distinguish our lifestyle from the lifestyle of the world. Did you notice the contrast between those who are worldly in Philippians 3:18–19 with those who are heavenly in Philippians 3:20–21?

            This is one of the most important articles I’ve written in our series on discipleship. If there is one thing that hurts the church it’s this: when Christians don’t live like Christians. Paul’s message tells us that if we are followers of Christ then we should act like Christ acted. And Christ acted very different than the culture of his day. We too, are called to act different than the world we live in today.

            So let’s review.[13] Paul has given us descriptions of the worldly person in Philippians 3:18–19. These people are enemies of the cross, they are on a path to destruction, their appetite is their god, their glory is their shame, and they set their minds on worldly things.

            Conversely, Paul has also given us directions for the heavenly person in Philippians 3:20–21. In these verses we learn several things.

            First, heavenly people are embracers of the cross. We accept the gift of salvation of what Christ did for us, and we live in a way that honors his sacrifice.

            Second, heavenly people are on a path to salvation. We walk with the Holy Spirit growing in Christlikeness all the time. We live in a sacrificial way in order to honor his sacrifice.

            Third, heavenly people have God as our appetite. We desire what God desires. We desire what honors him. What pleases him pleases us.

            Fourth, heavenly people mourn over our shame. When we do shameful things we feel the shame that rightly comes into our lives not just because of what sin does to us, but because of what sin does to others and to God.

            Fifth, heavenly people set our minds on heavenly things. We don’t live for today, but we look for Christ coming. He’ll return and change us.

            These are just a small sample of the things the New Testament teaches us to do as citizens of heaven on earth. Being a member of the kingdom requires that we live like a member of the kingdom.

Questions for Reflection and Discussion:

  1. Was there a time in your life when you lived as an enemy of the cross?
  2. What was it that changed you?
  3. Which of these “heavenly people” descriptions does not describe you? How can you change that?
  4. Which of these “heavenly people” descriptions does describe you? How did you achieve this?

—

Christopher L. Scott is a pastor and author of the book, Walking Straight When Life Goes Sideways: Essential Christian Truths for Enduring Life’s Trials (Wipf and Stock). He provides hundreds of free articles, videos, and Bible study resources at his website ChristopherLynnScott.com.


[1] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[2] John 17:14-16; 1 Cor 7:29-34; 1 Peter 2:11.

[3] The word used in this manner “is not so much a reference to their citizenship, nor even their status as a ‘colony’; it should be understood in terms of their metropolis or capital city, which lists its members among its citizens. It is a community of foreign nationals (foreigners to paganism) with a threefold meaning: (a) local (the politēs has ties to a place, a city)—our politeuma is in heaven; (b) political—like every analagous civitas, conferring liberty and equality on all its members, full rights; (c) constitutional and legal—exclusive dependency on the supreme authority of the Kyrios, Jesus,” Ceslas Spicq and James D. Ernest, Theological Lexicon of the New Testament (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 1994), 131.

[4] A word-study resource I regularly use states that in the “strict sense of the word, a politeuma is an organization of citizens from the same place, with the same rights (isonomoi) in the midst of a foreign state,” Spicq and Ernest, Theological Lexicon of the New Testament, 130.

[5] The city of Philippi was old and historic when Paul was addressing them. The city had been built by Philip of Macedon in 358-357 BC. It was one of the main stations along the main overland route that connected Rome and the East.

[6] The Philippians were “proud of their city, proud of their ties with Rome, and proud to observe Roman customs and obey Roman laws, proud to be Roman citizens,” Hawthorne, “Philippians, Letter to the” in Dictionary of Paul and His Letters (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1993),707.

[7] A.A. Rupprecht, “Legal System, Roman” in Dictionary of Paul and His Letters, 548.

[8] Hawthorne, “Philippians, Letter to the” in Dictionary of Paul and His Letters, 707.

[9] With that historical background in mind, I think we can read the same phrase in a fresh way, “For our citizenship is in heaven.” One commentary says that this word, “citizenship” describes “one’s behavior as a citizen of a nation. Paul is encouraging us to have the spiritual mind, and he does this by pointing out the characteristics of the Christian whose citizenship is in heaven. Just as Philippi was a colony of Rome on foreign soil, so the church is a ‘colony of heaven’ on earth,” Warren Wiersbe, Bible Exposition Commentary, vol. 2(Wheaton, IL: Victor Books, 1996), 92.

[10] The Greek word used here, apekdechomai, is also used in Romans 8:23. While different words are used, the idea is the same in 2 Peter 3:11, 12; 1 Thess 1:9–10; 4:16–18.

[11] A. T. Robertson, Word Pictures in the New Testament (Nashville, TN: Broadman Press, 1933), Philippians 3:21. Also see 1 Corinthians 15:54.

[12] Mark Hitchcock, “Walk This Way” (Philippians 3:17-21), Faith Bible Church, Edmond, OK, November 19, 2017. https://faithbibleok.subspla.sh/g66f5x5. Accessed Jan 13, 2024.

[13] The following section is adapted from Charles Swindoll, Insights on Philippians, Colossians, Philemon, Swindoll’s Living Insights New Testament Commentary, vol. 9 (Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House, 2017), 78.

Filed Under: Portraits of an Authentic Disciple

9. The Mortals We Avoid (Phil 3:18-19)

March 5, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

There are many things in life we are taught that we should avoid. Don’t speed when driving a car. Don’t eat highly processed foods. Don’t spend more money than you make. Those are all good advice for life. Scripture teaches us that there are activities we should avoid, and that there are people we should avoid too. That’s the message Paul sends in Philippians 3:18–19.

In Philippians 3:17 Paul taught us (as Christians) that we need a model to follow. Now in Philippians 3:18–19 he gives us caution about mortals to avoid. We might say that Philippians 3:18–19 gives the reasons for the exhortation of Philippians 3:17. Paul tells us that there are people we need to avoid and that Christians always need to be cautious about what they read and hear.

Paul writes, “For many walk, of whom I often told you, and now tell you even weeping, that they are enemies of the cross of Christ” (Phil 3:18, NASB).[1] Paul calls these people,“enemies of the cross of Christ,” and had previously warned the Philippians about these people, “I often told you.” When you read Paul’s letters and his activity in the book of Acts, you see that he often warned about false teachers.[2]

While there was a past warning given, now there is a present warning given, “now [I] tell you even weeping.”[3] The participle, “weeping,” is connected to the verb, “tell you.” This combination reveals to us the manner in which Paul spoke to the Philippians: sadness. Paul wept as he warned the Philippians because of the harm these people do.

            In addition to a past and present warning, there also was a problem. Perhaps the believers in Philippi that Paul had discipled were drifting from the truth. Perhaps these false teachers were strong leaders that were beginning to throw their weight around.

            These “enemies of the cross”[4]probably were not members of the church because Paul would not have included these people in his glowing thanksgiving of Philippians 1:4–8.[5]

Based on this information, I believe these likely were people that professed to be Christians since they are connected to Christ’s saving death, but did not possess Christ as Lord in their lives. The things they proclaimed about Christ showed that they did not possess Christ in their lives. In addition to that, Philippians 3:19 reveals the behavior of these people has made them enemies of the cross. These people demonstrate by the way they behave what they believe.

            Paul writes more about these people, “whose end is destruction, whose god is their appetite, and whose glory is in their shame, who set their minds on earthly things” (Phil 3:19). This verse reveals four short curt expressions of the character and destiny of Paul’s enemies.

            We first learn about their goal, “whose end is destruction.” They are headed for eternal damnation because they have rejected the cross of Christ.

            We next learn about their god, “whose god is their appetite.” This is the deep self-centeredness in which their desires come first. These enemies of the cross only think of their physical desires. In some way perhaps they have failed to put their old life to death. Maybe they claim to embrace the cross of Christ while also enjoying the sins of their life prior to Christ.

            Then we learn about the glory they desire, “whose glory is in their shame.”They prided themselves in the things they should have been ashamed of. The combination of words here describes a shameful conduct that has excess, especially sexually.[6]

            Lastly we learn about their guide, “who set their minds on earthly things.”They have set their minds on the things of this life. As they “set their minds”to earthly things it depicts their mental attitude, their basic aims, and their inward disposition to earthly things. In other words, they focus on the earthly sphere of sin (Rom 8:5-6).

            Philippians 3:18–19 teaches us that we need to discern what we read and hear. This, essentially, is what Paul is doing here in this letter. He’s discerning how these“enemies of the cross” conduct themselves.

            This is hard because enemies of the cross sometimes look like us. They might use some of the same language such as “salvation” or “faith” or “repentance.” Yet as we learn more, we learn they don’t mean the same things that we mean.

            For example, Mormons will talk about “Scripture” or the “Trinity.” Mormons will use words like “grace” and “faith.” But the more you talk with Mormons about those terms the more you realize those terms have vastly different meaning by Mormons than how we as Christians use them. We need discernment because they used the same terms we use, but they don’t mean the same thing.

            When we hear sermons in church, read Christian books, or listen to messages on podcasts we should always be discerning and be aware of false teaching that might lead us astray. There’s a quote I’ve had in my files for a while that seems fitting for this topic, “Every car with a Christian bumper sticker is not necessarily occupied by Christians. Every neck wearing a cross is not necessarily a redeemed neck.”[7] Because of that Christians need to discern what they read and hear. We do this by filtering what we hear and read through the Scriptures God has given us and the theology the church has preserved for us.

            Paul encouraged his audience to do that, and may we too heed that same advice as we interact with the people around us.

Questions for Reflection and Discussion

  1. What have you learned from identifying and avoiding enemies of the cross?
  2. Are there people in your life that might fit the description of “enemies of the cross?”
  3. How can you (or should you) try to avoid them?
  4. Have you ever been an “enemy” of the cross and how did you change?

—

Christopher L. Scott is a pastor and author of the book, Walking Straight When Life Goes Sideways: Essential Christian Truths for Enduring Life’s Trials (Wipf and Stock). He provides hundreds of free articles, videos, and Bible study resources at his website ChristopherLynnScott.com.


[1] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[2] Paul often warned about the dangers of false teachers (Phil 3:1). He possibly did this while he was there in Philippi ministering, through letters we don’t have, or through Epaphroditus’ unofficial comments not in print. This was similar to what he did for the believers in the city of Ephesus (Acts 20:19, 28-30, 31).

[3] In Acts 20:31 there he says he was weeping too.

[4] As we read about these people it’s important that we remember that Paul and his readers knew who these people were, but us reading 2,000 years later don’t know. One commentator, JJ Gunther, listed eighteen different scholarly suggestions about who these people might be. Peter O’Brien, Philippians (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm B. Eerdmans, 1991), 27.

[5] These enemies of the cross might be the same group Paul has labeled as having wrong motives in preaching (Phil 1:15-17), Paul’s opponents headed for destruction (Phil 1:27–28), those Paul calls dogs of evil work (Phil 3:2), or the people Paul calls libertines or antinomians (Phil 3:18–19).

[6] Peter O’Brien, Philippians (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm B. Eerdmans, 1991), 456–457.

[7] John MacArthur, “Traits of a True Believer, part 1” (John 13:31–38), https://www.gty.org/sermons/43-70/traits-of-a-true-believer-part-1.

Filed Under: Portraits of an Authentic Disciple

8. The Model We Follow (Phil 3:17)

February 26, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

Every Christian needs to follow a person that is passionately—and imperfectly—following Christ. Paul was that person for the Philippians. Paul wrote, “Brethren, join in following my example, and observe those who walk according to the pattern you have in us” (Phil 3:17, NASB).[1]

            Paul describes several good models to follow for Christian behavior in his letter to the Philippians.[2] He provides the example of Christ (Phil 2:5–11), Timothy who was concerned for them and worked hard to share the Gospel (Phil 2:19–24), and Epaphroditus who was a fellow worker with Paul in the Gospel even though it caused health problems (Phil 2:25–30). In addition to those, we need to also remember that Paul spent time in Philippi. In Acts 16 he established the church there, spent some time in prison, and then continued to minister to the church after he was released from prison.

            With this in mind, in Philippians 3:17 Paul tells his readers to follow him. He writes, “join in following my example.”[3]The idea of “mimic me as I mimic Christ” was something Paul often said (Phil 4:9; 1 Cor 4:6; 11:1; Tit 2:7-8). He told others to emulate him because he was following Christ, not because he was perfect.[4] Specifically, what would Paul say to imitate about himself? Perhaps his self-denying and self-giving acts (1 Cor 10:33-11:1), his willingness to suffer for others (1 Thess 1:6; 2:14; 2 Thess 3:7-9), or his ability to lose everything for Christ while also imitating Christ (Phil 3:5-9).

            Paul not only wants the Philippians to follow him, but also to follow Paul’s companions. He writes, “observe those who walk.” This is not Paul, but Paul’s companions: Timothy and Epaphroditus (see Phil 2:19, 25). They were contemporaries of Paul and other godly examples for the Philippians to imitate.

            Paul tells the Philippians to copy both Paul and his companions. He writes, “walk according to the pattern you have in us” That word for “pattern” is a different Greek word than for “example” above. The word for “pattern” in Greek is tupon. This word describes an impression left by a stroke, like “the print of the nails” (John 20:25). It often was used of a stamp on a coin or the impression of an engraving or work of art.[5] The idea Paul conveys here is that the Philippians are to follow the tangible examples of Paul and his coworkers.

            Philippians 3:17 teaches us that we need to designate a spiritual mentor for ourselves. Ideally, it’s best if this is a local person that we can talk to and be in proximity to physically. It’s best to have a flesh and blood person whom we can be with to disciple us. Often this is someone that we worship God with each week.

            All of us need a fellow fallen and frail person that is passionately (and imperfectly) following Christ that we can follow. So who do we follow if no one is perfect? We find a less imperfect person than we are and follow him or her. We do not look for someone who’s perfect but someone who relentlessly pursues Christ-likeness.

            In other words, we need imperfect mentors for imperfect disciples. For example, if you struggle with an alcohol addiction that you want to overcome, do you want someone that’s never touched alcohol or someone that had a severe addiction and overcame it with God’s grace? If you struggle in your marriage with arguments and are not sure how you can stay married, do you want a mentor that has never had a fight with his spouse or someone that’s been through many troubles but stayed married and is passionately loving his spouse?

            As we look for spiritual mentors we must remember that different Christians have different needs. Whatever our situation might be, we need to find someone who is following God that we can imitate and follow. Paul was that person for the Philippians, and I pray that we each find someone to be that “Paul” for us just as the Philippians experienced.

Questions for Reflection and Discussion:

  • Who has been a spiritual mentor in your life, and what did that relationship mean to you?
  • Is there someone in your life you’d like to offer to be a spiritual mentor to? Discuss your plan to offer to mentor that person.
  • Is there someone in your life you’d like to have a as a spiritual mentor to you? Discuss your plan to ask him or her to mentor you.
  • What would the format look like for you to mentor or be mentored by someone else?

—

Christopher L. Scott is a pastor and author of the book, Walking Straight When Life Goes Sideways: Essential Christian Truths for Enduring Life’s Trials (Wipf and Stock). He provides hundreds of free articles, videos, and Bible study resources at his website ChristopherLynnScott.com.


[1] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[2] As we read Philippians 3:17 we need to make sure we understand the context of it within the book of Philippians. Philippians is one of the four letters of Paul that we call “prison letters.” Paul wrote Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, and Philemon during his first imprisonment in Rome (see Acts 26—28). Second Timothy was another letter that Paul wrote from prison in Rome. However, 2 Timothy was written during a second and later imprisonment in Rome. Philippians, Ephesians, Colossians, and Philemon were written while Paul was under “house arrest” while Paul wrote 2 Timothy from the “Mamertine” prison in a later imprisonment after the first. Many prisoners awaited execution in the famous Rome Mamertine Prison. It was an abandoned cistern that was only accessible through a whole in the ceiling. See Charles Swindoll, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, Swindoll’s Living Insights New Testament Commentary, vol. 11 (Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House, 2014), 161.

[3] The word for “example” here is summimetai which is found nowhere else in Greek literature. But it comes from the Grk word, mimetes meaning “imitator.” William Arndt, Frederick W. Danker, Walter Bauer, and F. Wilbur Gingrich, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000). 652.

[4] How do I know Paul was not perfect? He wrote earlier in this chapter, “Not that I have already obtained it or have already become perfect, but I press on so that I may lay hold of that for which also I was laid hold of by Christ Jesus. Brethren, I do not regard myself as having laid hold of it yet; but one thing I do: forgetting what lies behind and reaching forward to what lies ahead, I press on toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus” (Phil 3:12–14).

[5]A. T. Robertson, Word Pictures in the New Testament (Nashville, TN: Broadman Press, 1933), Philippians 3:17.

Filed Under: Portraits of an Authentic Disciple

Authentic Christian Leadership

February 21, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

When people in Thessalonica met the apostle Paul they saw something they had never seen before. They saw a plain man with a basic message, who had honest motives, and gentle manners. He was a man seeking God’s honor, not man’s honor. He wanted God’s approval, not man’s approval.

            The Thessalonians had met traveling preachers, religious leaders, and philosophers, but never seen one like Paul. When they met Paul they met an authentic Christian leader.

            I know many of us as Christian leaders desire to be authentic Christians, but that sometimes can be difficult when we are leaders responsible for shepherding a church. First Thessalonians 2:9–10 tells us about how to be authentic Christian leaders.

            I think it’s good to remember that the New Testament letters we read are one side of a conversation. In 1 Thessalonians 2:1–8 Paul has been reminding his readers of his authority and past ministry experience. Paul seems to be defending himself possibly against an accusation that he lacked sincerity and concern for the Thessalonians. Perhaps someone had accused Paul of preaching for personal gain.It’s as if someone was saying he was preaching only for his own personal enrichment.

The Christian Leader’s Work

With that context in mind Paul writes, “For you recall, brethren, our labor and hardship, how working night and day so as not to be a burden to any of you, we proclaimed to you the gospel of God” (1 Thess 2:9, NASB).[1] When Paul writes, “For you recall, brethren” it is Paul’s request for the readers to remember his visit to them.

            In 1 Thessalonians 2:9 we learn about the type of work Paul did. When Paul says, “our labor,” that word “labor” he uses is the Greek word, kopos, which is derived from a verb meaning “to strike.” It means “a blow” that produces an effect. The idea is work that produces weariness.[2] The word “hardship” is translated from the Greek word, mochthos, and it’s a word for difficult labor. It describes labor which is overcoming difficulties.[3] These two words combined together convey burdensome and tiring work that Paul did. 

            In 1 Thessalonians 2:9 we learn about the context of work in the first-century.It was a Jewish custom that every boy should learn a trade. Even if he was being trained by a Rabbi to be a teacher of Old Testament law, each boy was given a trade of physical labor. This probably was because of economic necessity above any other reason. In Palestine there were no paid teachers. Thus a Rabbi would have another means of income in addition to gifts that were occasionally provided to him.[4]

            In 1 Thessalonians 2:9 we learn about the timing of the work. It was work done “night and day.”[5] Paul and his companions worked both during the day and at night. Or they worked before it got light, while the sun was up, and they worked after the sun had set.

            In 1 Thessalonians 2:9 we learn about the goal of work. Paul says they tried “not to be a burden to any of you.” In other words, they did not want to place a financial burden on any of the Thessalonians. We learn from other Scriptures that Paul was a tent-maker (Acts 18:2-3) and specifically that while in Thessalonica the church in Philippi gave him financial gifts to sustain him (Phil 4:10-15). Paul’s goal was to “proclaim to you the gospel of God.”That verb for “proclaim” is the Greek word, keryysso. It signifies the action of a herald. A herald passes on the words given to him. He does not give a message that he creates. He does not even elaborate on what he was given. He simply passes on what he has been told.

The Christian Leader’s Walk

Thus far we’ve learned about Paul’s work, now let’s learn about his walk. Paul writes, “You are witnesses, and so is God, how devoutly and uprightly and blamelessly we behaved toward you believers” (1 Thess 2:10).

            Again we see “you are witnesses” in which Paul is addressing the Thessalonians’ personal experiences that they had with Paul and his companions (Silas and Timothy). He brings in God too, “and so is God.”

            Notice the three adverbs that indicate the upright conduct of Paul’s preaching in that city: “devoutly” likely describes their inner convictions, “uprightly” likely describes their behavior in light of God’s objective standard, and “blamelessly” likely describes how their conduct was unapproachable and was able to endure the scrutiny of critics.[6]        Those three adverbs describe how Paul and his companions “behaved toward the believers.” There are a few other ways that phrase could be translated such as “in the sight of you believers” or “among you believers” or “in relation to.”[7]

            Authentic Christian leadership is something every Christian should have. The picture of an authentic Christian leader will look different for each person based on his or her personality, spiritual gifts, ministry context, and weaknesses. Hopefully Paul’s words in 1 Thessalonians 2:9–10 tell us about something we all should have in common.

CONGREGATIONAL STUDY GUIDE

  1. Who was an authentic leader you have known and what was that person like?
  2. What other Scriptures come to mind when we talk about “authentic leadership”?
  3. What are some steps you can take personally to be a more authentic leader?
  4. How can you act toward others in a way that shows you are an authentic leader?

[1] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[2] Leon Morris, The First and Second Epistles to the Thessalonians, New International Commentary on the New Testament (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1959), 81.

[3] Morris, 1 & 2 Thessalonians, NICNT, 81.

[4] Morris, 1 & 2 Thessalonians, NICNT, 80-81. F.F. Bruce, 1 & 2 Thessalonians, World Biblical Commentary vol. 45 (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2015), 34, cities Rabban Gamaliel III (3rd century priest) that said it was good for Rabbi’s to study the Law and have a worldly profession.

[5] Daniel B. Wallace, Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1996), 122-124, labels this as a “Genitive of Time (within which or during which).”

[6] A.T. Robertson, Word Pictures in the New Testament (Nashville: Broadman Press, 1933), 1 Thess 2:10.

[7] Differences in translation reflect how one should treat the force of the dative case in that phrase.

Filed Under: Church Pastor and Leader Advice

7. Citizens of Heaven on Earth (Phil 3:17-21)

February 20, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

I have a family member who was born in 1965 as an American citizen, but he was not born in America. He was born 4,8000 miles away in Germany, yet his birth certificate lists him as an American citizen.

That is possible because he was born on an American Army base in Germany. As Christians, we have a similar situation to my family member who lived in one country while being a citizen of another country. We are here on earth temporarily until we arrive at our permanent home in heaven.

            Because of this we face the challenge of living like citizens of heaven on earth in a culture that does not match our Christian values and priorities. While we want to honor God with our actions, we live in a culture where people get honor from culture because of the shameful things they do. Have you ever noticed that? The more shame someone brings on himself or herself, the more fame he or she gets through media coverage, book contracts, social media following, documentary series, etc.

            Conversely, the honorable way we live on earth should bring honor to our God in heaven. We do this in many ways such as through how we love our family, how we care for our community, the effort we put into our work, and the way we use our money. People in our culture should look at us as Christians and recognize that something is different. We should be so different that they might not even understand why we do what we do.

            Paul tells us to do this and how to do this in his letter to the Philippians. “Brethren, join in following my example, and observe those who walk according to the pattern you have in us. For many walk, of whom I often told you, and now tell you even weeping, that they are enemies of the cross of Christ, whose end is destruction, whose god is their appetite, and whose glory is in their shame, who set their minds on earthly things. For our citizenship is in heaven, from which also we eagerly wait for a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ; who will transform the body of our humble state into conformity with the body of His glory, by the exertion of the power that He has even to subject all things to Himself.” (Phil 3:17–21, NASB).[1] This text forces us to examine our behavior as Christians compared to the behavior of the world.

            In previous weeks we looked at 2 Timothy 3:16–17 about the belief we have that all Scripture is inspired by God and useful. In the coming weeks we will look at Philippians 3:17–21 which addresses behaviors we have because of those beliefs.

            Before we carefully examine the individual parts of Philippian 3:17–21 I think it’s healthy to summarize these few verses. Here’s my summary of what Paul is telling us: Follow the example of a mature believer that is less imperfect than you, reject the example of those that reject Christ, and live according to heaven’s agenda. In other words, being a member of God’s kingdom requires that we live on earth like a member of that kingdom.

Questions for Reflection and Discussion

  • What are some areas where people get attention and accolades because of the shameful things they do?
  • What pressure do you regularly feel living as a Christian in a culture that does not match your values and priorities?
  • How can you gain more confidence to live as a citizen of heaven while on earth?

[1] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

Filed Under: Portraits of an Authentic Disciple

6. Our Ministry and Growth from Scripture (2 Tim 3:16–17)

February 12, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

Years ago I heard of a poet who left a note on his door when he would go to lunch with his friends: “Publishing poetry is fun, but my morning’s work is done, so I went out to brunch with others as a bunch, and I’ll be back at one.”[1] Now that’s a man who practiced what he preached. He applied his job (as a poet) to a task (of writing a sign on his door telling people he’d gone out for food).

            As Christians we need to be people that apply God’s word to our lives. If we say we believe in God, that we love God, and that we want to follow God, then the only logical step is to apply to our lives what he has given us.

            In Paul’s second letter to Timothy he tells us about what God has given us. “All Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness; so that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work” (2 Tim 3:16–17, NASB).[2] In those two verses Paul tells us that if we are Christ followers we should be doers of what Christ says.

            From these two verses we learn that Scripture is supernaturally given by God for the sanctification of God’s people and preparation for ministry and life. We can conclude an authentic disciple embraces God’s word into his or her life.

            So, how do we embrace God’s word into our lives? There are three ways we do this.           

First, we read it devotionally. We might read a couple of verses, a paragraph, or a chapter a day. The amount is less important than the regular practice. For many years I read through the entire Bible each year by reading four chapters a day. Recently I spent five years reading through the Psalms by reading the same Psalm every day for a week before moving on to the next Psalm (an exception was Psalm 119, of course!).

            Second, we study it methodically. There are different ways to study God’s word, but I prefer the Inductive Bible Study method. The Inductive Bible Study method starts with “observation” and answers the question, “What’s the text say?” Then moves on to “interpretation” which asks, “What’s the text mean?” It finishes with “application” which asks, “How do I apply the text?”[3]

            Third, we listen to it regularly. Find some good podcasts or radio broadcasts that you listen to each week. Here are a few. I’ve provided the Bible teacher’s name as well as the name of the ministry in parenthesis: David Jeremiah (Turning Point), Charles Swindoll (Insight for Living), J. Vernon McGee (Thru the Bible), Chip Ingram (Living on the Edge), John MacArthur (Grace to You), or Charles Stanley (In Touch Ministries).

            I believe we learn from 2 Timothy 3:16–17, as well as the rest of the New Testament, that an authentic disciple embraces God’s word into his or her life.

Questions for Reflection and Discussion:

  • What is your current process for reading God’s word?
  • How can you learn more from what God has provided?
  • How can you apply more of what God has provided?
  • Is there someone you can discuss what you are reading and learning with regularly?

[1] Adapted from the text of Frank & Earnest, June 20, 2023.

[2] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[3] You can learn more about inductive Bible studies in the following books: Robert Traina, Methodical Bible Study (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1980); Howard Hendricks and William Hendricks, Living by the Book (Chicago, IL: Moody, 2007); Charles Swindoll, Searching the Scriptures (Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale, 2013).

Filed Under: Portraits of an Authentic Disciple

5. The Manual God Gives Us for Life (2 Tim 3:17)

February 7, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

Those of us who have spent time working on vehicles remember the trusty Chilton repair manuals. Back before there was NASA level technology in our vehicles, when someone bought a vehicle he or she often also bought the Chilton manual to go with the vehicle. The Chilton manual provided descriptions and pictures for how to maintain and fix different parts of the vehicle.

            The Scriptures that God has given us are like those Chilton manuals. God has provided Scripture to make us competent in the Christian life. Paul writes about this in 2 Timothy 3:17, “so that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work.”[1]

            In 2 Timothy 3:16 Paul has described the divine origin of scripture (where it comes from) and the divine purpose of Scripture (what Scripture is for). Now in 2 Timothy 3:17 we learn about the divine result of Scripture. The two words at the beginning of 2 Timothy 3:17, “so that,” reveal what the result should be of Scripture being given to us.

            These words are directed to Timothy yet are for all people. When Paul writes, “the man of God,” it refers to Timothy as the man responsible to shepherd and pastor this church in Ephesus. It also is directed to an official preacher of divine truth. But in a sense it applies to all of us who commit ourselves to God, rely on Scripture for Godly living, and have positions of spiritual oversight.

            These are the words directed to the preparation of all people, “may be adequate, equipped for every good work.” The word “adequate” is translated from the Greek adjective, artios. This word is defined as “being well fitted for some function” and is used “in the sense of able to meet all demands.”[2] It could be translated as “complete” or “capable” or “proficient.” [3] This word comes from an old word meaning “to fit.”[4] In Greek you can move words around in a sentence in order to show emphasis. Often a writer would move a word to the front of the sentence to emphasize it. Here, this word, “adequate,” is placed second in the sentence in Greek to show emphasis on it. The idea is this: the person of God is capable of doing what God calls him or her to do because of God’s word.

            Let’s take a moment to examine the phrase, “equipped for every good work.”[5] Paul tells us here that Scripture makes us able to meet the demands of a godly ministry. In this way Scripture makes us able to live righteously. All who follow God experience the direction Scripture gives us for the life we live as Christians. Paul explained this same idea in his letter to the Ephesians (see Eph 4:11-13).

            What we learn from 2 Timothy 3:17 is that Scripture makes us competent. I like The Message’s rendering of 2 Timothy 3:17, “Through the word we are put together and shaped up for the tasks God has for us.”[6] When chaos comes, Scripture makes us competent to weather the storms in the sea of life.

            Just as we might use the Chilton manual to be competent and adequate for any work on our vehicle, Scripture does that for us as Christians. Tony Evans has declared, “Everything that you need in order to be what God wants you to be is already in Scripture.”[7]

Scripture prepares us for what is ahead. An example of this is when I preached through 1 Peter on suffering in 2023. I had prayed about the needs of our church and sensed I needed to preach about suffering to help our church members who were going through some hard situations. So in the fall of 2023, I preached fourteen sermons from 1 Peter on suffering. Then, two weeks after I completed the sermon series, I found myself in a seven-day unexpected stay in our local hospital. I didn’t know God was preparing me for suffering, but I was ready! God was using his word to prepare me for the suffering that awaited me.

            Scripture gets us ready for what God has planned ahead of us. It might be a new challenging job we never thought we’d have to take, a set of kids that we weren’t sure we’d ever have, health problems we never imagined could be so bad, or aging parents that we never thought we’d have to care for. Whatever it might be, God’s word makes us competent for what God has planned ahead for us.

Questions for Reflection and Discussion:

  • What are some things you have done to study God’s word in order to become more competent?
  • What are some ways Scripture has made you competent in life?
  • Who are people in your life you’ve seen grow and become competent because of God’s word?
  • What are some areas of your life you are struggling with and might look to Scripture to help you handle?

[1] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[2] William Arndt, Frederick W. Danker, Walter Bauer, and F. Wilbur Gingrich, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000), 136.

[3] Ibid.

[4] A. T. Robertson, Word Pictures in the New Testament (Nashville, TN: Broadman Press, 1933), 2 Timothy 3:17.

[5] The Greek word for “equipped” is the verbal form of the Grek noun used for “adequate” earlier. This verb, exertismenos ἐξηρτισμένος (ἐξαρτίζω) is the verb of that adjective. (Much like “build” is the verb and “building” is the noun.) Thus you might notice the audible play on words: artios and exertismenos as they sound similar.

[6] Eugene H. Peterson, The Message: The Bible in Contemporary Language (Colorado Springs, CO: NavPress, 2005).

[7] The Tony Evans Bible Commentary (Nashville, TN: Holman Bible, 2019), 1297.

Filed Under: Portraits of an Authentic Disciple

4. Scripture in Action (2 Tim 3:16b)

January 29, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

I love clean jokes. Here’s one: How many “traditionalists” does it take to change a light bulb? The answer is four. One to change the light bulb and three to tell you how great the old bulb was.

            We all know that change is hard. Second Timothy 3:16 teaches us about the change that occurs in us as we read Scripture. This verse reveals the divine origin of Scripture, “All Scripture is inspired by God” (2 Tim 3:16a),[1] as well as the purpose of Scripture, “profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness” (2 Tim 3:16b). It’s in 2 Timothy 3:16b that we learn that one of the reasons God gave us Scripture is to change us.

            In 2 Timothy 3:16b we learn that Scripture provides education. Paul writes that Scripture is “profitable” and provides “teaching.”Scripture has an educational aspect as the Word gives us teaching in a positive way. This helps us to understand God’s truth. This is divine instruction and foundational doctrinal content of both Old Testament and New Testament. God’s Word also provides practical real life instruction. If we compare this with the process that most of us followed to get a driver’s license, this would have been the classroom time where we were taught the laws of driving by a teacher and instructional book.  

            But that’s not all Scripture does. Scripture is profitable for “teaching” but also for “reproof” and “correction” and “training in righteousness.” Scripture reveals to us both our creed and our conduct, our belief and our behavior, as well as our doctrine and our duty.

            In 2 Timothy 3:16b we learn that Scripture provides exhortation. Paul writes about “reproof” which is negative. This addresses someone in sin and exposes his sin to himself. It means bringing correction of error where there has been deviation from that truth. It implies exposing someone’s sin in order to bring correction.[2] If we compare this with the process that most of us followed to get a driver’s license, this would have been us driving with our learner’s permit and passing a stop sign. The adult observing us would say, “You’re supposed to stop at that sign.”

            In 2 Timothy 3:16b we learn that Scripture provides exhortation with “reproof” but also  “correction.” While “reproof” is negative, “correction” is positive. Correction addresses those in error and brings restoration to the truth when there has been an error. This is the process of restoring that person after reproof. The Greek word here, epanorthosis, is only used one time in the New Testament. However, it is used in extra-biblical literature for “righting a fallen object, or helping back to their feet those who had stumbled.”[3] In this way, Scripture points people back to Godly living in addition to pointing out sin (Pss 119:9-11; Jn 16:1, 2). If we compare this with the process that most of us followed to get a driver’s license, this would be us approaching another stop sign and stopping like we are supposed to stop, at the direction of the adult observing us.

            In 2 Timothy 3:16b we learn that Scripture provides enablement. Paul writes about “training in righteousness.” This too, like “correction” and “teaching,” is positive. That phrase, “training in righteousness” could literally be translated as “child-training.” It’s the sameword used in Ephesians 6:4 for parents to bring up their children “in the instruction of the Lord.” This is positive training in Godly behavior. It’s a system of discipline that leads to Godly behavior and a holy lifestyle. If we compare this with the process that most of us followed to get a driver’s license, it is the continual learning we experience as we drive and get better at it.

            I love this summary of what Paul teaches in 2 Timothy 3:16 from Warren Wiersbe. He writes that the Scriptures “are profitable for doctrine (what is right), for reproof (what is not right), for correction (how to get right), and for instruction in righteousness (how to stay right).”[4] He then adds, “A Christian who studies the Bible and applies what he learns will grow in holiness and avoid many pitfalls in this world.”[5]

            What we learn from 2 Timothy 3:16b is that Scripture changes us. While change is hard, Scripture is what changes us. You and I can read other books, but the Bible is a book that reads us. If we read the Bible, the Bible will read us and change us.

            As the late J. Vernon McGee has said, “Studying the Bible should bring conviction to us.”[6] Every page should be read and marked in our Bible. Pastor Charles Swindoll says “Scripture trains us to align our behavior so that it matches our new, righteous identity.”[7]

            When we read God’s Word and follow what it says, we are changed. It will mold us. And what we find is that it changes us.

            For several years I was a member of a Toastmasters Club where I was taught to give speeches. Being in a Toastmasters Club is a unique experience because you stand up each week and give speeches, but when you sit down other members of the club take turns giving you feedback on what you could do better. One week I would be told that I said the word “um” too much. The next week I would be told that I didn’t use my hands when I spoke like I should. The next week I was told I spoke too fast and needed to slow down. The next week I was told that I talked in a monotone voice and I need to vary my pitch. I think you get the point: each week I would improve but then the group found new things I could still improve upon.

            It’s like that when we study God’s Word. We read it, we grow and change, only to learn later there’s something new we can improve. We work through things. Then we start to get those handled, and we have more things we work through. It’s in that way that Scriptures changes us.

Questions for Reflection and Discussion:

  • What’s your process for reading God’s word daily?
  • How has reading God’s word changed you?
  • How can you find ways to read and discuss what you reading in Scripture with others?
  • What are some ways you feel God’s word is changing you right now?
  • Are there some areas of your life you need God to change you? How can reading God’s Word help you to make that change?

[1] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[2] NET Bible, Full Notes Edition (Biblical Studies Press, 2019), 2279.

[3] MacArthur Study Bible, 2nd ed. (Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 2020), 1625.

[4] Warren Wiersbe, Be Faithful (Colorado Springs, CO: David C. Cook, 2009), 174.

[5] Wiersbe, Be Faithful, 174.

[6] J. Vernon McGee, First and Second Timothy, Titus, Philemon, Thru the Bible vol. 50 (Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 1991), 124.

[7] Charles Swindoll, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, Swindoll’s Living Insights New Testament Commentary, vol. 11 (Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House, 2014), 241.

Filed Under: Portraits of an Authentic Disciple

14. Learning to Trust God’s Promise (Phil 4:19)

January 26, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

During World War II the Allied soldiers often gathered many hungry, homeless children and placed them in large camps. The children were abundantly fed and cared for. However, at night they did not sleep well; they seemed restless and afraid. After months of trying to help the children sleep, a psychologist offered a solution. After the children were put to bed, they each received a slice of bread. If they wanted more to eat, they could have it, but this particular slice was not to be eaten—it was just to hold.

            Surprisingly, the slice of bread produced marvelous results. The child would go to sleep, subconsciously feeling there was something to eat tomorrow. That calmed the child.[1]

            In a desire to calm the hearts and comfort the uneasiness of his readers, Paul tells them about the abundant riches of their God. As Paul begins to conclude his letter to the believers in Philippi, he knows that the people of Philippi likely have struggles and will encounter difficulties like he did, so he gives them encouragement and direction. “And my God will supply all your needs according to His riches in glory in Christ Jesus” (Phil 4:19, NASB).[2]

Notice the emphatic “my” at the beginning of the verse. We must remember the personal God helps us. Paul says, “my God” (emphasis added). He could have said, “God got me through” or “God will take care of you.” But instead he says “my God is the one who helped me and he will help you.” The God that allowed him to be put in prison—where he was writing this letter—is the same God that would sustain him through it.

            Notice a full promise is described. He writes that God “will supply all your needs.” That’s the promise that they need to hold on to in their lives. This is a declaration of what God will do for us. When the food pantry is bare or the bank account is empty, God will provide.

            Notice the basis for the promise. It says “according to” which is the reason or the basis for why God can supply every need that we have. It tells us why he can supply every need. And this is why Paul says he can be content and get through every circumstance: God does it. As Warren Wiersbe once said, “Contentment comes from adequate resources.”[3] And as Christians our adequate resource is God.

            God is sufficient to get us through the various trials of life. God won’t fix every problem, but he will help us through every issue. God won’t heal every sickness, but he will strengthen us to endure it. God won’t restore every broken relationship, but he will help us forgive others and live in peace. God will supply all our needs.


[1] Charles L. Allen, God’s Psychiatry (Revell, 1988). Quoted in Craig Brian Larson and Phyllis Ten Elshof, 1001 Illustrations That Connect (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 2008), 463.

[2] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[3] Warren Wiersbe, Be Joyful (Colorado Springs, CO: David C. Cook, 2008), p. 147.

Filed Under: Articles from Philippians

13. Learning to Rely on Christ (Phil 4:13)

January 24, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

Perhaps one of the most quoted yet least understood verses of the Bible is Philippians 4:13. In Philippians 4:11–12 (which we looked at last week) Paul tells his readers he has learned to be content in every circumstance. Now in Philippians 4:13 Paul tells us he learned to rely on Christ in every circumstance.

            Paul wrote, “I can do all things through Him who strengthens me” (Phil 4:13, NASB).[1] Here Paul describes what is possible. The word “things” refers to what Paul has talked about in Philippians 4:12 which were humble means, prosperity, being filled, being hungry, having abundance, and suffering need.

Paul says that what is possible is based on the secret (which is Christ). Paul’s words contrast with the Stoic philosophers of his time who said that you can be content by being sufficient and reliant on yourself. Paul learned to be content in poverty not because of his self-sufficiency, but because of his God-sufficiency. Paul was not content because he was self-sufficient in his situation. He was content because of Christ who strengthened him to get through every circumstance. His circumstances changed, but his contentment did not because his contentment was based on Christ, not his circumstances. The joy Paul mentioned sixteen times in this letter did not come from poverty or prosperity, his joy came from Christ.

Paul says that his joy was possible based on the filling power of Christ. When he said that Christ “strengthens me,” it meant Christ “infuses strength into me”[2] or that Christ “pours strength into me.” The same phrase is used in 1 Timothy 1:12, “I thank Christ Jesus our Lord, who has strengthened me, because He considered me faithful, putting me into service” (emphasis added). Paul’s source of strength was Christ, and that was his secret in getting by with a lot or little.

The focus here is not on Paul and how Paul improved his circumstances. There is nothing here about Paul getting what he needed. He did not learn “how to escape” or “how to improve” but instead, “how to make do with where he was.” Paul was not writing for us a self-help manual. “If you don’t like your life, change it.” I remember once talking to a non-Christian and asked him what he thought about the Bible. He told me he thought the Bible contained good principles for achieving success in life. But the Bible is not primarily about us; it’s about God and how he interacts with us.

Paul reveals to us how to get through and survive the circumstances we endure. The self-help version of Philippians 4:13 goes like this, “I can do all things through myself because I try hard.” But Paul’s version is, “I can do all things through another person and his name is Jesus Christ.”

If there’s one lesson we learn from Philippians 4:13, it is that we can endure any circumstance, event, hardship, or trial. We can do this not because of who we are, but because of who strengthens us when we need it.


[1] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[2] Vincent, Marvin Richardson Vincent, Word Studies in the New Testament (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1887), p. 460.

Filed Under: Articles from Philippians

12. Learning To Be Content (Phil 4:11-12)

January 23, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

Most of us struggle with contentment in our lives. Perhaps some of it comes from the sin nature we all have. Maybe it’s taught to us since we are often told about things we should have and taught to be upset when we don’t have them.

            In Philippians 4:11–13, 19, the apostle Paul reveals the power he was given to be content with his circumstances. Let’s look at Philippians 4:11–12, “Not that I speak from want, for I have learned to be content in whatever circumstances I am. I know how to get along with humble means, and I also know how to live in prosperity; in any and every circumstance I have learned the secret of being filled and going hungry, both of having abundance and suffering need” (NASB).[1]

            The Greek word Paul uses here for “content” (v. 11) is autarkes,[2] which means “self-sufficient.” Stoic philosophers (who were common and prominent in Paul’s time) used this word to describe human self-reliance. One commentary reveals that this word “described the cultivated attitude of the wise person who had become independent of all things and all people.”[3] It was a calm acceptance of life’s pressures. To the Stoic philosophers of Paul’s day, contentment was the essence of all virtues. But Paul takes this word and uses it to describe how we are not sufficient on our own but sufficient based on someone else.

            In Paul’s thirty years of ministry and thousands of miles of travel he has learned to be content. Paul didn’t have contentment early in his life (see Philippians 3 where he declared his zeal was above his fellow Pharisees), but he had to learn it through tough times. He describes his practical real-life experience saying “I have learned” and “I know how” twice in these verses. He knows how to survive, get along in life, and how to make it through tough times. It reminds me of how my dad used to teach our dogs to swim. We’d take the boat out onto the lake. Then he would toss the dog into the water to teach it to swim. Some things you can learn in a classroom; some things can only be learned in the real world. 

            But what was the “every circumstance” (v. 12) that Paul describes? According to Philippians 4:14 it was affliction but also likely a state of financial poverty.

            Paul calls what he has learned a secret. He writes, “I have learned the secret of being filled and going hungry, both of having abundance and suffering need” (v. 12). That “secret,” as we’ll learn next week in Philippians 4:13, is that Christ provides us what we need. Paul again uses the cultural background of the times in which he was living. When he writes “I have learned” it is the Greek word, myeo,[4] which literally means “I have been initiated.” This term was commonly used of the mystery religions to describe the initiation practices of a devotee who wanted to enter their secrets and privileges. The word in Greek is in the perfect tense which describes something that has happened in the past with present effects now.[5] Paul has learned this from past experiences, but it effects how he lives his life now.  

            With Paul as an example, maybe you have certain ways you have learned to be content. I think what we learn from Paul here is that God is the source of our contentment. And it’s helpful for us to realize that Paul learned to be content even in his difficult circumstances. This gives us hope that we too can learn to be content in whatever circumstances we find ourselves experiencing.


[1] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[2] This is the only occurrence of this word in the New Testament.

[3] Peter O’Brien, Philippians (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm B. Eerdmans, 1991), 521.

[4] The lexical form is μυέω but it appears here in verse twelve as μεμύημαι.

[5] “The force of the perfect tense is simply that it describes an event that, completed in the past . . . has results existing in the present time” (Dan Wallace, Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics [Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1996], p. 573).

Filed Under: Articles from Philippians

3. How Belief Affects Behavior (2 Tim 3:16-17)

January 22, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

What we believe influences the decisions we make. For example, if we believe vaccinations are good then we will receive them. But if we believe vaccinations are harmful then we won’t receive them. If we believe it is important to vote as an American citizen, then we will register to vote and we will vote when allowed to do so.

            We could summarize this principle this way: what we believe influences our behavior. And because of this, what we as Christians believe about Scripture affects our behavior regarding what Scripture teaches. Two verses from Paul’s second letter to Timothy often inform our beliefs about Scripture.

            Second Timothy was written by the apostle Paul while he was in prison in Rome. However, this was different than the “prison letters” known as Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, and Philemon which were written while Paul was under “house-arrest” in Rome. In 2 Timothy we learn from Paul that he is in prison once more (2 Tim 1:16-18), has been subjected to one trial (2 Tim 4:16), and the hour of his death was about to come (2 Tim 4:6).[1] Paul wrote 2 Timothy from the maritime prison, which was a wet, cold, and dark dungeon. While there is no biblical testimony about the death of Paul, the source closest to Paul’s death—Clement of Rome—wrote that Paul (and Peter) was persecuted and killed under Nero.[2]

            It is with this context that Paul wrote, “All Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness; so that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work” (2 Tim 3:16–17, NASB).[3]

            In this context Paul was emphasizing the importance of Scripture in Timothy’s past (v. 15) as well as Timothy’s present and future ministries (vv. 16-17).

            Pastor Charles Swindoll wrote about this verse, “It is the single most significant sentence in all the New Testament regarding the Scriptures, because it touches on the watershed issue of faith in our times. What you believe about the Bible influences everything you believe and affects every decision you make.”[4]

            I think we could summarize these two verses like this: Scripture is supernaturally given by God for the sanctification of God’s people and preparation for ministry and life. It is my belief, based on these two verses, that an authentic disciple embraces God’s Word in his or her life.

            In the coming weeks we’re going to study these two verses to see what we should believe about the Bible and how that belief influences every decision we make.

Questions for Reflection and Discussion:

  • What have you heard other people say—whether good or bad—about Scripture?
  • What do you believe about Scripture?
  • What are some of your earliest memories of seeing or reading the Bible?
  • Do you have any significant or important memories of God speaking to you through his Word?
  • How has your life changed as a result of reading Scripture?

[1] Paul Barnett, Jesus and the Rise of Early Christianity (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1999), 342-343.

[2] 1 Clement 5:1-4:5 cited in Barnett, Jesus and Early Christianity, 343.

[3] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[4] Charles Swindoll, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, Swindoll’s Living Insights New Testament Commentary, vol. 11 (Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House, 2014), 239–240.

Filed Under: Portraits of an Authentic Disciple

11. Concentration Determination (Phil 4:8-9)

January 21, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

Distraction is something that we all face and I believe that’s the reason why the apostle Paul concluded his letter to the Philippians with a list of things for us to ponder and deeds for us to practice. He writes, “Finally, brethren, whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is of good repute, if there is any excellence and if anything worthy of praise, dwell on these things” (Phil 4:8, NASB).[1] These things are opposite of many things our culture tries to get us to focus on today.

            Here Paul lists six adjectives that paint the picture of what Christians should focus on daily. Greek scholar A.T. Robertson said, “They are pertinent now when so much filth is  flaunted before the world in books, magazines and moving-pictures under the name of realism (the slime of the gutter and the cess-pool [sic]).”[2] He made that statement in 1933, and it’s even more true now! Thankfully Paul gives us a list of things to focus on that is opposite of the slime and cesspool of the twenty-first century.

            The task we have as Christians is to, as Paul writes, “dwell on these things.” The Greek term used here logizomai[3] was primarily a mathematical and accounting term describing a cognitive process. Here it means to give careful attention to a matter or let one’s mind dwell on something. In this way we must direct our thoughts to the correct things.

            As I have worked with various people at different churches I’ve seen them do this in different ways. People have put Scripture on 3×5 cards, phone backgrounds, or post-it notes on mirrors. Chip Ingram, teacher on the radio program, “Living on the Edge” has a series of “truth cards” that list Scriptures and Bible truths from God’s Word for people to keep with them and memorize. The method we use to focus on the correct things is simply preference. The important thing is that we do it.

Paul moves on from our thoughts to our actions in verse nine. He tells them to practice right deeds, “The things you have learned and received and heard and seen in me, practice these things, and the God of peace will be with you” (Phil 4:9, NASB). Have you ever known someone that says, “Do as I say, not as I do?” Most of us don’t like that. People can smell hypocrisy like a dog can smell a BBQ in someone’s backyard a mile away. Paul had spent a lot of time with Christians in Philippi. He was in their city, he walked out to the river to talk with them, he was arrested, and spent time in their jail (see Acts 16). He knew what they were going through. The Philippians had seen his faith in action. And through the previous three chapters they read about joy and rejoicing in spite of many of the difficult circumstance Paul was facing. He mentions “rejoice” and “joy” sixteen times in the letter. Now, he’s telling them to act like he acts and to do what he does. Paul was the model for them, and he is a model for us Christians living today.

Paul uses a particular word here in verse nine, prasso,[4] which is translated as “practice.” It means to bring about or accomplish something through activity. It’s often translated in the New Testament as “do” or “accomplish.”[5] I like this picture of practice because it implies that we don’t always do it perfectly every time. But the point is that we are doing it and striving for it.

As we are pondering the right things as described in verse eight, and we practice the right deeds in verse nine, then “the God of peace will be with you.” And we all know that we need more peace.


[1] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[2] AT Robertson, Word Pictures in the New Testament (Nashville, TN: Broadman Press, 1933).

[3] Lexical form is λογίζομαι but it appears here in Phil 4:8 as λογίζεσθε.

[4] The lexical form is πράσσω but it shows up in Phil 4:9 as πράσσετε.

[5] William Arndt, Frederick W. Danker, Walter Bauer, and F. Wilbur Gingrich, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000), p. 860.

Filed Under: Articles from Philippians

10. Our Anxiety Prescription (Phil 4:8-9)

January 20, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

One of the most quoted passages of our Bibles comes from the pen of Paul as he wrote to the Philippians, “Rejoice in the Lord always; again I will say, rejoice! Let your gentle spirit be known to all men. The Lord is near. Be anxious for nothing, but in everything by prayer and supplication with thanksgiving let your requests be made known to God. And the peace of God, which surpasses all comprehension, will guard your hearts and your minds in Christ Jesus.” (Phil 4:4–7, NASB).[1]

            Paul tells these believers (and us too) that we receive peace from how we talk with God and interact with Him. I didn’t write we achieve peace or we attain peace. I was careful to write we receive peace. Peace is something that God gives us based on what we do and how we interact with God.

            Paul tells us to “rejoice” twice in this passage. Did I mention that he was in prison when he was writing this letter?[2] Nine times in just four chapters Paul talks about rejoicing even though he was in prison in Rome when writing this letter. Bible teacher Ken Hanna says, “The rattle of the chains is drowned out by the sounds of joy that mark this short letter.”[3]

            As we talk about rejoicing we need to make a distinction between happiness and rejoicing. Happiness is a personal feeling we have based on our circumstances. Rejoicing is the activity we can do regardless of our circumstances or our feelings. One commentary describes it like this, “Sometimes the trials and pressures of life make it almost impossible to be happy. But Paul did not tell his readers to be happy. He encouraged them to rejoice in the Lord.”[4] We might not feel happiness, but we can rejoice!

            If we are honest, anxiety naturally comes to most of us. But the challenge is what we do with that anxiety. Three things from Philippians 4:4-7 direct us about how cope with our anxiety. First, we have requests. “Let your requests.” We need to simply acknowledge those. Paul doesn’t say to ignore the problems or to pretend that they are not there. We need to accept reality. Second, we share them. Paul tells us those requests should “be made known.” We must make those request known to God either by talking aloud, writing them out, or sharing them with others. Third, we direct them to a person. And that person, according to Paul here, is “to God.” This is an important point because if we are not careful we can start to direct our requests and problems to areas they should not be sent. We might reach for a bottle of alcohol or open a container of prescription drugs that doesn’t belong to us. Instead, we need to direct those requests to God. Here’s the amazing thing: he’s always available, and he wants to listen. Do you have someone in your life that you can go to at any time and know that he or she will want to listen to you? That is God!

            Hebrews 4:14-16 says that regardless of what we have done or experienced we can always approach God’s throne of grace with confidence. When we arrive he accepts us! And when we meet Jesus on his throne we find mercy and grace to help us in our time of need! You don’t need an appointment to enter his office. Every time you call him he answers.

            Philippians 4:4-7 is one of the most quoted passages in the Bible because it helps us with a problem almost all of us have: anxiety. But God has given us a prescription to help with that anxiety.


[1] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[2] See Phil 1:7, 13, 17.

[3] Ken Hanna, From Gospels to Glory (Bloomington, IN: WestBow Press, 2015),276.

[4] Robert Lightner, “Philippians” in Bible Knowledge Commentary (Colorado Springs, CO: David C Cook, 1983), 663.

Filed Under: Articles from Philippians

9. Family Feud in Philippi (Phil 4:2-3)

January 19, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

Feuds sometimes occur in our Christian churches. There was a feud in the city of Philippi that the apostle Paul addressed in his letter to the Philippians.

            “I urge Euodia and I urge Syntyche to live in harmony in the Lord. Indeed, true companion, I ask you also to help these women who have shared my struggle in the cause of the gospel, together with Clement also and the rest of my fellow workers, whose names are in the book of life” (Philippians 4:2–3, NASB).[1]

            Euodia and Syntyche were Christian women that actively did ministry in the church. But we don’t know what the issue was between these two ladies. In other places in the New Testament the apostle Paul was not afraid to tell people they were wrong. Paul publicly confronted and corrected Peter in Galatians and Paul condemned a man for sleeping with his mother-in-law in Corinthians. Thus Paul probably knew what the issue was between these two women, but it was not important enough for him to mention it or correct a wrong position.

            Sometimes our personalities cause conflict with other Christians. These people in Philippi lived in an important city. The people living there were Roman citizens, had voting privileges, and they were governed by their own senate and legislature. They were proud of their city, their ties to Rome, to follow Roman law and customs. I wonder if that same pride for the city had seeped into the church and caused quarrels between these two women.

            So Paul tells them “live in harmony in the Lord” (v. 2).  He’s telling them not to let their pride get in the way of the harmony they should have as believers. 

            This is a strong prompting. There is no “suggestion” here or “if you can, please do this.” This is a command from Paul to these two women to resolve their disagreements. In the Greek text Paul puts their name first for emphasis. Literally, “Euodia I urge and Syntyche I urge.” Sometimes writers in Greek do this to emphasize certain parts of the sentence. Here Paul is emphasizing their names as the ones responsible to solve the problem.

            There are two options for seeking harmony in a Christian family feud: Release it or resolve it. In church sometimes we need to release it, meaning we concede our want or need and allow the other person to get his or her way. Another option is to resolve it. We and the other person come to a mutual agreement on the issue. This one takes more time and effort but is necessary on important matters.

            Sometimes there are issues that we cannot resolve without outside help. And that is what Paul addresses next. Paul calls in help for these two women in this passage asking for help from a “true companion” (v. 3). Paul asks for him to help these two women resolve their conflict.

            This true companion might be Epaphroditus who carried this letter from Paul back to Philippi. It might be the bishop overseeing all the churches in Philippi. It might be a faithful, well-known leader that everyone would recognize when he is addressed this way. Whoever it is, Paul asks for his help.

            Sometimes we need help to achieve harmony. This person likely knows these two ladies and can help them. Sometimes we need help to resolve conflicts. Dads, moms, brothers, sisters, coworkers, and counselors can all be those third parties that help us resolve our conflicts.

            These verses remind us that feuds sometimes occur in God’s family. But when they occur we must learn to put our personalities aside and seek to solve the conflict either by releasing it or resolving it. If necessary, we might need to include someone else to help us. 


[1] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

Filed Under: Articles from Philippians

8. Divine Motivation (Phil 3:13)

January 18, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

All of us struggle with motivation from time to time. That’s why we allow God to work in us and give us the motivation we need to do and act how he wants us to act.

            Paul has just told the believers in the city of Philippi to work out their salvation in Philippians 2:12. Now he says that they can do this by allowing God to work in them. “For it is God who is at work in you, both to will and to work for His good pleasure” (Phil 2:13, NASB).[1]

            The phrase at the beginning of this verse, “for it is God” supplies the basis for how we act out our salvation. God does the work, but he puts us to work too.

            Pastor J. Vernon McGee wrote, “So God works out that which He had worked in. If God has saved you, He has saved you by faith—plus nothing. God is not accepting any kind of good works for salvation. But after you are saved, God talks to you about your works. The salvation He worked in by faith is a salvation He will work out also.”[2] The Swiss reformer John Calvin famously has said, “Faith alone saves, but the faith that saves is not alone.” James put it another way, “Even so faith, if it has no works, is dead, being by itself. But someone may well say, ‘You have faith and I have works; show me your faith without the works, and I will show you my faith by my works’” (James 2:17–18).

            God puts the will and the work in us. God is the one energizing us to do the work. Pastor Warren Wiersbe once wrote, “The Christian life is not a series of ups and downs. It is rather a process of ‘ins and outs.’ God works in, and we work out.”[3]

            Let’s let God work in us. As we yield our desires to him, let’s do God’s work that he wants us to do.


[1] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[2] J. Vernon McGee, Philippians and Colossians (Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 1991), 54.

[3] Warren Wiersbe, Be Joyful  (Colorado Springs, CO: David C. Cook, 2008), 74.

Filed Under: Articles from Philippians

7. The Joy of a Christian (Phil 2:17-18)

January 17, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

Joy is part of the Christian life. Paul wrote from prison in Rome to the believers in the city of Philippi, “But even if I am being poured out as a drink offering upon the sacrifice and service of your faith, I rejoice and share my joy with you all” (Phil 2:17, NASB, emphasis added).[1] Here we see the spiritual leader, Paul, sharing his joy with his spiritual children, the believers in Philippi. When I was doing some research on this letter one person said that Philippians is “the most spontaneous and intimate of Paul’s letters.”[2] And we see that here when Paul wants to share his joy with his readers.

            Joy is supposed to be shared amongst believers. That’s Paul’s focus in the next verse. “You too, I urge you, rejoice in the same way and share your joy with me” (Phil 2:18). Here we see the words “rejoice” and “joy” used again. That’s four times in these two short verses. “Joy” and “rejoice” are used sixteen times in just four chapters in Paul’s letter to the believers in Philippi.

            In these two verses Paul uses two different words to talk about joy. The first is chairo which means “be glad, rejoice.” And the other one is synchairo which means “rejoice” as well, but it has a slight change. It has the preposition added to the front of the verb that often translates as “with.” So literally, “rejoice with someone.”

            Let’s observe the context in which Paul uses “joy” and “rejoice.” Philippians 1:18 describes about how Paul was in prison—but he still shared the Gospel—so he rejoiced about that! Paul told the Philippians in 2:28-29 to rejoice when Epaphroditus shows up because Epaphroditus “came close to death for the work of Christ, risking his life.”

            Paul tells his readers repeatedly to share in the joy that he has. No matter what is going on we can rejoice with God. We should always have something to rejoice about.

            If you struggle with joy, here are a few things you can do to be more joyful:

  • Write in a journal a list of things you are grateful about in your life.
  • Read from the book of Psalms.
  • Go outside for a walk in the sunshine.
  • Spend time with others and have at least one close friend you talk to each week.

[1] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[2] Kenneth Hanna, From Gospels to Glory (Bloomington, IN: WestBow Press, 2015), 276.

Filed Under: Articles from Philippians

6. The Job of a Christian (Phil 2:14-16)

January 16, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

Headlines from a local newspaper reveal the dark world in which we live. Take a quick glance at these: “Golden State killer returns to valley,” “Riverbank homeless population a rising concern for city,” “Residents want gym to pump down the volume.”[1] Two weeks later these appeared in the same newspaper, “Freight train derails near Goshen” and “Police arrest 13 men for human trafficking.”[2] These are all examples of the corrupt, dark, evil, and fallen world in which we live.

            Christians have found themselves surrounded by these types of things for 2,000 years. In Paul’s letter to the believers in Philippi we learn about our job as Christians in this dark world.

            First, Christians have a good attitude. “Do all things without grumbling or disputing” (Phil 2:14, NASB).[3] The word “grumbling” describes an utterance made in a low tone of voice. The word “disputing” describes a verbal exchange when conflicting ideas are expressed. As Christians we must have a good attitude and not grumble or dispute.  

            Second, Christians live upright among a crooked culture. “so that you will prove yourselves to be blameless and innocent, children of God above reproach in the midst of a crooked and perverse generation” (Phil 2:15a). The Greek word for “crooked” is skolios which sounds familiar to scoliosis. Skolios is used here to describe the immoral behavior of someone who is crooked, unscrupulous, and dishonest. It means bent, curved, or crooked as opposed to the Christian that is straight and morally upright.

            We as Christians are to be, “Blameless and innocent, children of God above reproach.” The word “blameless” relates to a solid and righteous conduct. The word “innocent” here means unmixed and pure. When it says “above reproach” it means being without fault and therefore morally blameless. The New Testament uses this word to describe the Christian community (Eph 1:4; 5:27; Col 1:22). The Greek scholar AT Robertson says this means “without a spot.”[4] Another Greek grammarian says it means “unblemished in reputation and in reality.”[5]

            Third, Christians shine among the darkness. “appear as lights in the world,” (Phil 2:15b). Among that crooked and perverse generation, we should “appear as lights in the world.” We don’t need a Ph.D. to figure out how to look different as a Christian in our culture. The idea Paul is explaining here is to shine or produce light as luminaries or stars.

            There are many ways we can shine bright in the darkness. We can quietly pray over our lunch in the breakroom at work. When some classmates or friends gossip, we politely excuse ourselves. When someone is struggling we stop what we are doing and pray with him or her. We can write an encouraging note in a card to a non-Christian friend that we know has been having a hard time.

            The potential to shine is easy, but it is hard work because it doesn’t come naturally, it is the opposite of everyone else, and because it often has a cost (either financially, emotionally, socially, or with time).  

            Fourth, Christians hold on to the word of life. “holding fast the word of life, so that in the day of Christ I will have reason to glory because I did not run in vain nor toil in vain” (Phil 2:16). When it says “holding fast the word of life” that could be translated as “holding forth.” It likely means that we hold on to the word of life as it helps us live righteously. Pastor J. Vernon McGee describes the important point for us, “Life and light are related. When we hold forth the Word of Life, we are lights in the world.”[6]

            Our job as Christians is not to wave our “white flag” and retreat from our culture and community (even though that’s tempting to do). Yes, there are certain things we should abstain from, but we are supposed to be engaged in our culture so that we can stand out and look different. Our job as Christians—according to the apostle Paul in Philippians 2:14-16—is to have a good attitude, live upright in a crooked culture, shine among the darkness, and hold onto the word of life.


[1] The Sun-Gazette Newspaper, Exeter, CA. November 11, 2020.

[2] The Sun-Gazette Newspaper, Exeter, CA. November 25, 2020.

[3] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[4] A.T. Robertson, Word Pictures in the New Testament (Nashville, TN: Broadman Press, 1933).

[5] Marvin Richardson Vincent, Word Studies in the New Testament, vol. 3 (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1887),  439.

[6] J. Vernon McGee, Philippians and Colossians (Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 1991), 55.

Filed Under: Articles from Philippians

2. Just the Essentials (2 Tim 3:16-17; Phil 3:17-20; Heb 10:23-25; 1 Pet 3:15-16)

January 15, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

In 2008 I was working at a nonprofit doing fundraising. My boss’s name was Steve and he worked in an office adjacent to my cubicle. This was convenient as I could walk about fifteen feet from my desk into his office when I had accumulated a list of questions for him. I had only been working in this new position for a few weeks so I was still learning what my job was and how to do that job.

            One day I walked into his office with a few questions I had compiled to ask him. “Do you have a few minutes to talk about some questions I have, Steve?” He said, “Sure go ahead.” As I began to ask him questions I noticed he was packing items from his desk into boxes.

            My questions transitioned from my work to, “What are you doing, Steve?” He replied, “I’ve been let go. It’s not being handled well so I’m packing up and leaving.” He then admitted, “Hattie is going to be your new boss. Maybe you should ask her your questions. I’m glad to answer your questions and try to be helpful, but I think it would be best if you begin talking to her about these things since she will be your new boss.”

            I went to Hattie’s office and told her I heard she would be my new boss. She bluntly told me, “I don’t want to be your boss, I don’t want to do performance evaluations, and I don’t want to manage anyone.  So, let me tell you the basics of your job.” She then laid out the basic things she wanted me to do, and told me about things I could do that she didn’t want me to waste my time on. For the next five years I worked for Hattie always “sticking to the list” of things she told me she wanted me to do while ignoring all the other things that I “could do” but was told “not to do.”

            I want this series of articles on discipleship to be like that direction that Hattie gave to me. Whether you have just become a Christian or have been a Christian for sixty years, I want us to explore what the New Testament says we should be doing as Christians. This will then lead us to logical conclusions about what we should not be doing as Christians.

            Every Christian and every local church wonders about what things they should stay focused on as disciples of Jesus Christ. Sometimes we are overwhelmed as Christians. Do we sell all our things and give everything to the church like the believers did in the book of Acts? Do we go to Africa as missionaries or stay here and evangelize our families and friends? Do we still go and enjoy the same activities or watch the same movies we used to watch before we were Christians? As a local church, what is our purpose and what things do we do and not do?

            In our articles in the coming weeks we’ll look at four passages of Scripture from three different writers. Here’s a basic summary of what we’ll examine together.

            Paul teaches us that as disciples of Jesus Christ we embrace God’s Word: “All Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness; so that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work” (2 Tim 3:16–17, NASB).[1]

            Paul also teaches us that as disciples of Jesus Christ we embody God’s kingdom: “Brethren, join in following my example, and observe those who walk according to the pattern you have in us. For many walk, of whom I often told you, and now tell you even weeping, that they are enemies of the cross of Christ, whose end is destruction, whose god is their appetite, and whose glory is in their shame, who set their minds on earthly things. For our citizenship is in heaven, from which also we eagerly wait for a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ; who will transform the body of our humble state into conformity with the body of His glory, by the exertion of the power that He has even to subject all things to Himself” (Phil 3:17–21).

            The author of Hebrews teaches us that as disciples of Jesus Christ we encourage one another: “Let us hold fast the confession of our hope without wavering, for He who promised is faithful; and let us consider how to stimulate one another to love and good deeds, not forsaking our own assembling together, as is the habit of some, but encouraging one another; and all the more as you see the day drawing near” (Heb 10:23–25).

            The apostle Peter teaches us that as disciples of Jesus Christ we evangelize others: “but sanctify Christ as Lord in your hearts, always being ready to make a defense to everyone who asks you to give an account for the hope that is in you, yet with gentleness and reverence; and keep a good conscience so that in the thing in which you are slandered, those who revile your good behavior in Christ will be put to shame” (1 Pet 3:15-16).

            While this is one of many ways that we could define discipleship, I pray it is helpful for us to orient us to what we should and should not be doing as Christians. In the coming weeks we’ll explore each of these passages in detail. I look forward to the journey with you!


[1] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

Filed Under: Portraits of an Authentic Disciple

5. Ministry When the Minister Is Absent (Phil 2:12)

January 14, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

Most of us admit that the quality of our work is better when our boss is watching. We pay closer attention to details, make less mistakes, check our cell phone less often, work longer, and take fewer breaks when our boss is watching.

            Paul mentions to the Philippian believers that he wants them to live obediently to God even though Paul was no longer with them physically in person. These believers in the city of Philippi had been obedient to their spiritual leader, Paul, and he was grateful for it, writing, “my beloved, just as you have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence” (Phil 2:12a, NASB).[1] This is a gentle reminder for all of us to act the way we should when our spiritual mentor or spiritual leader is not around. 

            Paul founded the church in Philippi on his second of three missionary journeys. It was the first church established in Europe. In Acts 16 Paul meets a lady named Lydia and other women who were meeting outside the city of Philippi. He shared the gospel with them, they accepted, and he helped them start a church.

            But when Paul writes this letter—Philippians—he is under house-arrest in Rome awaiting trial before Nero. He’s chained to a soldier day and night. While under house-arrest he writes the letters Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, and Philemon. Philippians is one of what we call the “prison letters” that Paul writes to instruct and encourage believers that were in locations he could not visit.

            As the Philippians learn to obey the teachings of Paul even though he was not around, we too need to obey our spiritual mentors even if they are not present with us. Spiritual mentors might have been a small group leader that shared wisdom we needed, someone that discipled us one-to-one for a period of time giving us guidance, a pastor that gave us instruction in a sermon, or a Bible study facilitator that helped us understand God’s Word on a deeper level.    

            Even though those people might not be with us now, we still should abide obediently to their teachings just as the Philippians were encouraged to do.


[1] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

Filed Under: Articles from Philippians

4. Working Out Salvation (Phil 2:12)

January 13, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

One of my favorite scenes in the movie, Fireproof,[1] is when two firemen are eating lunch and talking about marriage. One fireman takes a saltshaker, puts some super glue on the side of it, then adheres it to the peppershaker. The purpose of that scene was to describe God’s view of marriage—two people joined inseparably together—but it describes our relationship between salvation and works as Christians too!

            Paul writes to the believers in the city of Philippi, “work out your salvation with fear and trembling” (Phil 2:12, NASB).[2] That statement “work out your salvation” can be perplexing for us protestant evangelical Christians because we’re taught we’re saved by faith, not by works. And that is true! Salvation is by faith alone, in Christ alone, by grace alone.

            However, that salvation leads to work. The study Bible that I use has a note that explains that the Philippians were told, “Not work for it [salvation], but work it out in the personal and church problems at Philippi.”[3] Those problems in the church are described throughout the letter. They were struggling with rivalries and personal ambition (Phil 2:3–4; 4:2), the doctrine of the legalistic teachers (Phil 3:1–3), perfectionism (Phil 3:12–14), and the influence of people that said sinning was okay (Phil 3:18–19). They were working out the issues in the church.

            The phrase, “work out” means to do something as a result of what was done. We do our work from a state of possession. In other words, “we have it, so this is what we do because of it.” That’s what “work out” means here in this context because we know these people Paul writes to are saved. Paul addresses his readers this way, “Paul and Timothy, bond-servants of Christ Jesus, To all the saints in Christ Jesus who are in Philippi, including the overseers and deacons” (Phil 1:1, emphasis added). In Philippians 2:12 Paul says salvation and good works go together.

            We need to address this “fear and trembling” phrase too. These words are not meant to scare us. They are meant to remind us how awesome God is and that we are privileged to be called his sons and daughters. Another way to translate it would be to work out our salvation with “awe and reverence.”[4] In light of that, we are to work out our salvation. The fear and trembling are because of how awesome he is.

            God doesn’t want us to do things with fear in order to get saved. Instead, we work because he has saved us.


[1] “Fireman Lunchroom,” Fireproof, directed by Alex Kendrick (Albany, GA: Samuel Goldwyn Films, 2008), DVD.

[2] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[3] Charles Ryrie, Ryrie Study Bible: New American Standard Bible, 1995 Update, expanded ed. (Chicago, IL: Moody Press, 1995), 1470.

[4] Biblical Studies Press. The NET Bible First Edition (Biblical Studies Press, 2005).

Filed Under: Articles from Philippians

3. Humility in Action (Phil 2:3-4)

January 12, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

Harry Ironside was a well-known preacher and author in the twentieth century who struggled with pride. He asked a friend what he could to become less prideful and humbler. His friend suggested he make a sandwich board with the plan of salvation in Scripture on it and to wear it as he walked throughout downtown Chicago. Ironside followed through and wore the sandwich board for an entire day. As he was taking the sandwich board off, however, he caught himself thinking: “There’s not another person in Chicago who would be willing to do a thing like that!”[1] Humility is a character trait that once we think we have it, we probably have lost it.

            Paul writes about humility in his letter to the Philippians, “Do nothing from selfishness or empty conceit, but with humility of mind regard one another as more important than yourselves; do not merely look out for your own personal interests, but also for the interests of others” (Phil 2:3–4, NASB).[2]

            In Philippians 2:3 Paul says to think about others with our minds. Why this emphasis on humility to the Philippians?

            The city of Philippi was old and historic when Paul wrote to the people living there. The Roman Emperor Augustus had established Philippi as a military outpost, populated the city with veterans of his wars, made it a Roman colony, and gave it what was called, ius italicum, which was one of the highest privileges for a city.[3] The Philippians were “proud of their city, proud of their ties with Rome, and proud to observe Roman customs and obey Roman laws, proud to be a Roman citizens.”[4]

            Pride was not just a problem for the Philippians, it’s something everyone struggles against. I think that’s why Paul places such a strong emphasis on humility this in his letter.[5]

            Paul uses a rare Greek word[6] to describe “humility” here. It’s the word, tateinophrosune, that means “humility” or “modesty.”[7]This word uses “humility” in contrast to “pride” or “arrogance.”[8] The term signifies the grace of “lowliness” or “humility.”[9] In Philippians 2:3 humility is used as the manner in which the Philippians were to live and look at others.

            While in Philippians 2:3 Paul says to think about others with our minds, in Philippians 2:4 Paul says to focus on others with our actions.[10] Does this mean that we only focus on others and ignore ourselves? Of course not. I think Paul wants us to think about ourselves less and to think about others more.

            Pay careful attention to the different translations, the emphasis I’ve added, and how we learn it’s okay to attend to our basic needs while also focusing on the needs of others. “Do not merely look out for your own personal interests, but also for the interests of others” (NASB).[11] “Don’t look out only for your own interests, but take an interest in others too” (NLT).  “Be concerned not only about your own interests, but about the interests of others as well” (NET).  “Let each of you look not only to his own interests, but also to the interests of others” (ESV).

            It is okay to have a slight concern for ourselves. The issue Paul was hoping to combat is when we become infatuated with ourselves. Paul knew humans have a sinful nature that tries to satisfy ourselves first, and others later.

            While we might not need to wear a sandwich board to make us humble, I am sure we all could do something to humble ourselves. We can (and should) look out for our own interests, but to follow Paul’s admonitions as Christians means we look out for the needs and interests of others above our own.


[1] Max Anders, “Galatians-Colossians,” vol. 8, Holman New Testament Commentary (Nashville, TN: Broadman & Holman, 1999), 223.

[2] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[3] Gerald F. Hawthorne, “Philippians, Letter to the” in Dictionary of Paul and His Letters, ed. by Gerald Hawthrone, Ralph Martin, and Daniel Reid(Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1993),707

[4] Ibid.

[5] I agree with Warren Wiersbe who has said, “There can be no joy in the life of the Christian who puts himself above others” (Warren Wiersbe, Be Joyful [Colorado Springs, CO: David C. Cook, 2008], 62).

[6] While this term is rare (as has been shown already) the word ταπεινος (“lowly”, “humble”) and its cognates occur more than 270 times in Greek version of the Old Testament. Often this word was used when describing the Lord’s acting in history to bring down the proud and arrogant while bringing up the lowly. This can be seen in four ways: 1) the process expressed in warning judgements in the prophets (Amos 2:6, 7, 13; 8:6, 7; Isa 2:9, 11, 17; 5:15; Zeph 2:3; 3:12), 2) the historical books describe the bringing down of proud and exalting of lowly with reference to events (Judg 4:23; 6:15; 1 Sam 1:11, 16; 7:13; 2 Sam 22:28), 3) the psalmists express it in their prayers (Pss 10:17, 18; 25:18; 31:7), 4) humility is spoken as the rule for life in proverbs and wisdom literature (Job 5:11; Prov 3:34; 11:2; 15:33) (See O’Brien, Philippians, 180-181).

[7] In the Greek and Hellenistic world, the word seemed to imply some type of “weakness.” The word is found only once outside of the Bible used by a man named Epictetus, a Phrygian slave of Hierapolis in the days of Nero (50-130 AD). Epictetus was freed of the imperial palace and was a Stoic of the younger school and preacher of ethics tinged with religion. His lectures were collected into eight books. In his Disserationes, he said, “He also is not tied by things man cannot control but despises them, and judges aright, and keeps his impulses and desires in reign, is incapable of flatteries and a mean and petty disposition ταπεινοφροσυνη” (Walter Grundmann, “ταπεινοφροσυνη” in Theological Dictionary of the New Testament [Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdman’s Publishing, 1962], 8:5).

[8] “Humility” in Douglas Mangum, Derek Brown, Rachel Klippenstein, et al., eds. Lexham Theological Wordbook (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2014).

[9] Peter O’Brien, The Epistle to the Philippians, New International Greek Testament Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1991), 180.

[10] The idea of Paul telling his readers to look out for the interests of others was not a new idea for the Philippians. He provided similar commands in 1 Cor 10:24, 33; 11:1; 13:5 (cf. Phil 2:21).

[11] O’Brien notes that Paul’s inclusion of the Greek “and” or “also” “does not prohibit any interest in one’s own affairs. It is the selfish preoccupation with them that he condemns (Peter O’Brien, The Epistle to the Philippians, New International Greek Testament Commentary [Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1991], 185).

Filed Under: Articles from Philippians

2. The Christian Call to Suffer (Phil 1:29-30)

January 11, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

As Christians we should not be surprised that we suffer. The late Warren Weirsbe has written, “For some reason, many new believers have the idea that trusting Christ means the end of their battles. In reality, it means the beginning of new battles.”[1] The apostle Paul was in the middle of one of those battles while in prison in Rome writing a letter to the believers in the city of Philippi.

Paul wrote to the believers in Philippi, “For to you it has been granted for Christ’s sake, not only to believe in Him, but also to suffer for His sake, experiencing the same conflict which you saw in me, and now hear to be in me” (Phil 1:29–30, NASB).[2] Paul tells us that we shouldn’t be surprised that we experience suffering.[3]

            David Garland, who serves as professor of Christian Scriptures at Truett Seminary says, “In the biblical world, to be chosen by God does not protect one from suffering for God. It is a call to suffer.”[4] Max Anders, who has dedicated his life to creating discipleship tools for Christians writes, “Adversity is a part of the Christian life and should come as no surprise. Those that follow Christ should expect opposition. Believers have two privileges: to believe in him and to suffer for him. Both are integral part of Christian living.”[5]

            I think Paul addresses the topic of suffering to the Philippians because suffering for religious belief was foreign to the Philippians. They were converted out of a pagan background in which the deities promised happiness and blessings, not suffering.

            That worldview of the Philippians is not much different than the American one. Some people think—even within the Christian church in American—that the Bible is something you read to help you live a happy, healthy, and successful life. Some people think that when you have problems you need to give your life to Christ so that he will make your problems go away.  

            Yet that is not taught in Scripture. The word for “conflict” in Philippians 1:30 is the Greek word, agona, that generally means a struggle against opposition.[6] Peter O’Brien, who taught the New Testament for thirty years at Moore College in Austria, believes that this word[7] “involves untiring toil and labor, an intense wrestling and struggle for the spread, growth, and strengthening of the faith as the goal of his [Paul] mission.”[8]

            Now, what type of suffering is Paul talking about? He’s describing specific suffering someone receives as a result of living a godly life as a Christian. Here’s an example from “M.”

            Athens in Greece has traditionally been one of the refugee highways. Millions of desperate people travel through Athens after being forced from their homelands by violence, terror, and persecution. These refugees seek a safe place to end their journey and begin new lives in freedom.

            In 2003 an earthquake destroyed everything M knew. He constantly asked why something like this would happen. With no place to go, he went to live with relatives in Afghanistan. M eventually traveled to Athens and stayed with other relatives.

            While M and all his family were Muslims, M became interested in Christianity as he saw the crosses decorating the Orthodox churches in the city. A Christian gave M a Bible and he started reading. Since M’s relatives were Muslim they forbade such a thing. As a result, M used a small flashlight to read his Bible at night after his uncles were asleep. He studied the Bible this way for two years.

            M believed God was calling him to be born again so he contacted the refugee ministry center, declared his faith in Jesus Christ, and asked for more information. He eventually scheduled a day to be baptized with other believers, but M’s cousin had discovered the plan.

            On the morning M was supposed to be baptized his cousin boiled water in a pan and poured it on M while he slept. This scalded both thighs and one arm. M went to the baptism anyway. He stood before those gathered—the burn on his arm clearly visible—and declared, “No matter what they do to me, I will love Jesus.”[9]

            That obviously is an extreme form of suffering. We might not experience that in America, but we still need to be prepared for suffering because of our Christian faith.


[1] Warren Wiersbe, The Bible Exposition Commentary (Wheaton, IL: Victor Books, 1996), 72

[2] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[3] The Greek here is very precise and exact. Daniel Wallace gives a literal translation, “the on-behalf-of-Christ thing has been given to you, namely, not only the believing in his name, but also the suffering for him” (Wallace, Greek Grammar, 236).

[4] David E. Garland, “Philippians.” The Expositor’s Bible Commentary: Ephesians–Philemon (Revised Edition), ed. by Tremper Longman III, vol. 12 (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2006) 211

[5] Max Anders, Galatians-Colossians, vol. 8, Holman New Testament Commentary (Nashville, TN: Broadman & Holman, 1999), 211

[6] William Arndt, Frederick W. Danker, Walter Bauer, and F. Wilbur Gingrich. in A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000), 17.

[7] Its cognate, ἀγωνιζομαι, is used in Luke 13:24; John 18:36; 1 Cor 9:5; Col 1:29; 4:12; 1 Tim 4:10; 6:12; 2 Tim 4:7.

[8] Peter O’Brien, The Epistle to the Philippians, New International Greek Testament Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1991), 161.

[9] Story adapted from Kallie Skaife, International Teams, personal email. See Craig Brian Larson and Phyllis Ten Elshof, 1001 Illustrations That Connect (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 2008), 444.

Filed Under: Articles from Philippians

1. A Blessed Assurance (Phil 1:6)

January 10, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

While in seminary I worked at a golf course where my coworkers and boss knew I was a Christian. As a result, they sometimes would ask questions about the Christian faith or make comments about Christianity.

One day my boss said to me in front of others, “I’ve stopped smoking. I want to make it into heaven like Christopher!” I took that opportunity to teach my boss and coworkers about eternal security and assurance. I told him, “Whether or not you smoke does not determine if you go to heaven. Your belief in Jesus Christ and commitment to follow him is what decides whether or not you go to heaven. And when we place our faith in Jesus Christ, we receive eternal security and assurance.”

            The apostle Paul teaches about this truth when writing to the Philippians, “For I am confident of this very thing, that He who began a good work in you will perfect it until the day of Christ Jesus” (Phil 1:6, NASB).[1] Paul had planted the church in Philippi on his second missionary journey (Acts 16) and wrote this letter to them about ten years later assuring them of their salvation.

            A question people often ask is, can someone lose his salvation? That question is connected to what Christians call “eternal security” and “assurance.” Eternal security means the work of God guarantees the gift of salvation forever, and salvation cannot be lost once it is received.[2] “Assurance” is a believer’s personal feeling that he is eternally secure because he realizes he possesses eternal life.[3]

            I believe Scripture teaches both eternal security and assurance. Here are a few passages along with my added emphasis. From the apostle John we learn that Jesus taught, “My sheep hear My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me; and I give eternal life to them, and they will never perish; and no one will snatch them out of My hand. My Father, who has given them to Me, is greater than all; and no one is able to snatch them out of the Father’s hand” (John 10:27–29). From the apostle Paul we learn, “for the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable” (Rom 11:29). The apostle Peter teaches us “to obtain an inheritance which is imperishable and undefiled and will not fade away, reserved in heaven for you” (1 Peter 1:4). And from Jude we learn, “Now to Him who is able to keep you from stumbling, and to make you stand in the presence of His glory blameless with great joy” (Jude 24).[4]

One of the best things about assurance and eternal security is that they help us realize we do not have to be perfect. I struggle with always feeling like everything must be organized and prepared. However, when it comes to our salvation we do not have to be perfect. The blessing of the doctrines of assurance and eternal security is that we do not have to be perfect. Regardless of our performance, God has accepted us and saved us if we place our faith in him.

            My former boss, perhaps half-jokingly, said he was quitting smoking to get to heaven, but whether or not he smoked did not matter. What mattered was whether or not he had placed his faith in Jesus Christ. (I knew that he had based on our private conversations.) And once that faith in Jesus Christ has been placed, God will continue the work that God began.


[1] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[2] Charles C. Ryrie, Basic Theology: A Popular Systematic Guide to Understanding Biblical Truth (Chicago, IL: Moody, 1999), 57.

[3] Charles C. Ryrie, Basic Theology: A Popular Systematic Guide to Understanding Biblical Truth (Chicago, IL: Moody, 1999), 57

[4] Here are some additional verses along with my emphasis added to show the doctrine of eternal security taught in Scripture.

-“For this is how God loved the world: He gave his one and only Son, so that everyone who believes in him will not perish but have eternal life.” (John 3:16, NLT)

-“However, those the Father has given me will come to me, and I will never reject them. . .  For it is my Father’s will that all who see his Son and believe in him should have eternal life. I will raise them up at the last day.” (John 6:37–40, NLT)

-“And I am convinced that nothing can ever separate us from God’s love. . .indeed, nothing in all creation will ever be able to separate us from the love of God that is revealed in Christ Jesus our Lord.” (Romans 8:38–39, NLT)      

-“Because of God’s grace to me, I have laid the foundation like an expert builder. Now others are building on it. But whoever is building on this foundation must be very careful. For no one can lay any foundation other than the one we already have—Jesus Christ. Anyone who builds on that foundation may use a variety of materials—gold, silver, jewels, wood, hay, or straw. But on the judgment day, fire will reveal what kind of work each builder has done. The fire will show if a person’s work has any value. If the work survives, that builder will receive a reward. But if the work is burned up, the builder will suffer great loss. The builder will be saved, but like someone barely escaping through a wall of flames.” (1 Corinthians 3:10–15, NLT)

-“And do not bring sorrow to God’s Holy Spirit by the way you live. Remember, he has identified you as his own, guaranteeing that you will be saved on the day of redemption.” (Ephesians 4:30, NLT)

-“If we are unfaithful, he remains faithful, for he cannot deny who he is.” (2 Timothy 2:13, NLT)

These ten passages by four different New Testament authors explain the doctrine of eternal security and assurance. Here, and in most of Paul’s writings, Paul seems to indicate that salvation is an event that occurs and cannot be taken back.

Other Scripture that supports eternal security and assurance: John 1:12; 3:15; 17:2-4, 6; Col 2:9-14; 2 Tim 1:12; 1 Peter 1:1-9; James 2:14-17; 1 John 2:18-19; 5:11-13

Filed Under: Articles from Philippians

35. Looking Up When We Are Down (Hab 3:16-19)

January 8, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

The book of Habakkuk teaches us that a mature faith trusts and submits to the Lord’s plans even when we can’t see or understand the Lord’s plans.We see that clearly in Habakkuk 3:16–19 as Habakkuk responds to the news that the Babylonians are coming to conquer and punish Judah for their sins.

            “I heard and my inward parts trembled, at the sound my lips quivered. Decay enters my bones, and in my place I tremble. Because I must wait quietly for the day of distress, for the people to arise who will invade us. Though the fig tree should not blossom and there be no fruit on the vines, though the yield of the olive should fail and the fields produce no food, though the flock should be cut off from the fold and there be no cattle in the stalls, yet I will exult in the Lord, I will rejoice in the God of my salvation. The Lord God is my strength, and He has made my feet like hinds’ feet, and makes me walk on my high places. For the choir director, on my stringed instruments” (Hab 3:16–19, NASB).[1]

            From these verses we learn we rest while we wait for God to work (v. 16), we recognize God will judge and do what he says (v. 17), we rejoice in God while he works (v. 18), and we rely on God to get us through difficult circumstances (v. 19).

            In her book, Trembling Faith, Dr. Taylor Turkington reflects on Habakkuk 3:16–19 writing, “Someone has said that how you respond when you don’t get the answer you want is the true test of character. If that’s true, Habakkuk was training in spiritual formation with his song. He taught how to respond when you don’t get what you want.”[2] I think that when God gives us what we don’t want it reveals the level of faith and trust we have in God.

            In the case of Habakkuk, he praises God even though he knows that judgment is coming and he trusts God to protect him through it. In spite of the chaos of Babylon coming to conquer Judah and the seventy-year exile Judah is going to experience, Habakkuk has a mature faith that trusts and submits to the Lord’s plans even when he can’t see or understand the Lord’s plans.

            Habakkuk trusts God to get Habakkuk through the troubles that are coming. Habakkuk has learned what I hope we can learn: We can endure the trials we see in front of us if we look to the God above us.


[1] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[2] Taylor Turkington, Trembling Faith: How a Distressed Prophet Helps Us Trust God in a Chaotic World (Brentwood, TN: B&H Publishing, 2023), 201.

Filed Under: Articles from Habakkuk

1. The Most Quoted Yet Least Obeyed Bible Verses (Matt 28:19-20)

January 8, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

Several years ago the editor of a magazine contacted me and asked for an article on discipleship. I had not written much on discipleship at that time, but I thought his request would be a good opportunity for me to clarify what I believed the New Testament taught on discipleship.

            I began my work on the article by reading from Matthew 1 to Revelation 22. Anytime I saw a description or action of a disciple I wrote it down on a piece of scratch paper. After reading through Matthew 1 to Revelation 22, I had compiled a list of more than sixty identifications of what a disciple looks like based on the New Testament.

            While I compiled a list of sixty descriptions of a disciple from the New Testament, you probably are familiar with Jesus’s teaching about discipleship. We are told about discipleship from Matthew when he records Jesus saying, “Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age” (Matt 28:19–20, NASB).[1] I’m guessing this is a verse you’ve read and heard discussed before.

            Steve Elliott was one of the first people to disciple me and walk with me as a new Christian. He often said Matthew 28:19–20 was the most quoted yet least obeyed passage in the entire Bible. He originally taught that to me almost twenty years ago. I believe his words are truer now than ever.

            Because of that, I’m going to dedicate the coming months to us examining what the New Testament says about discipleship. I am excited to go on this journey with you this year as we explore different passages of scripture that teach us what being a disciple looks like.

QUESTIONS FOR REFLECTION AND DISCUSSION:

  • Have you been discipled by someone? If so, who was that person and what was the experience like for you?
  • Have you ever discipled someone? If so, who was that person (or persons) and what was that experience like for you?
  • What have you heard people teach related to Matthew 28:19–20?
  • How has your church fulfilled or failed to fulfill the command of these verses?
  • In what ways do believe you and/or your church can better follow Jesus’s command to make disciples?

[1] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

Filed Under: Portraits of an Authentic Disciple

34. Raising Above Life’s Troubles (Hab 3:19)

January 7, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

In a popular book released several years ago the author advocated that relying on small, simple tasks helps us get through worry, anxiety, and stress.[1] While I think having a hobby can help ease our uneasiness, there are many things in life that knitting won’t help us endure. The loss of a spouse, financial problems, rebellious children, or an unplanned job change, all require more than a hobby that distracts us. Instead, those life events require faith in God. That’s a lesson we learn from reading the book of Habakkuk.

            The last verse of the book of Habakkuk reads, “The Lord God is my strength, and He has made my feet like hinds’ feet, and makes me walk on my high places. For the choir director, on my stringed instruments” (Hab 3:19).[2]

            Notice the strong contrast to how this book started. We started with Habakkuk asking, “God, why don’t you do something?” (Hab 1:1–4) and “God, why would you do that?” (Hab 1:12—2:1). Now Habakkuk essentially says, “God, when you do what you said you will do, I exult you, rejoice in you, and look to you for strength.”

            Here in verse nineteen we see the source of Habakkuk’s strength, Hekd“The Lord God is my strength.”God had told Habakkuk about his divine wrath he planned to unleash, but God also provided Habakkuk assurance of divine favor and hope. Pastor Tony Evans writes, “When you know God’s character (who he is) and his works (what he has done), you’ll know that you can trust him—even in the dark.”[3] Habakkuk’s security and hope were based on what he knows about God.

            Here in verse nineteen we see the symbol of Habakkuk’s strength,“And He has made my feet like hinds’ feet and makes me walk on my high places.” Another way to translate “feet like hinds feet” would be “feet of a goat.” The Nubian ibex goat is the image he’s using here. They are light tan with long thin horns that extend up, back, and down. They live in rough, dry, mountainous terrain and eat grasses and leaves. Their feet are flexible and spread under a load. They stay close to steep cliffs where they can escape their predators. Learning to navigate cliffs are essential to their survival.[4]

            Like a sure-footed goat on the highest of heights, God has equipped Habakkuk for whatever lies ahead. Just as a sure-footed Nubian ibex goat can scale up a mountain to escape danger and continue to live, Habakkuk’s faith in God will place him above his circumstances and give him the ability to withstand the troubles that loom below. A Nubian ibex goat can travel through difficult rocky steep terrain without stumbling or suffering injury, likewise because of Habakkuk’s trust in the Lord Habakkuk will survive the troubles and struggles in Judah as Babylon invades.[5]

            The lesson we learn from Habakkuk 3:19 is that we rely on God to get us through difficult circumstances. Christians are not exempt from difficulties and troubles. Being a Christian does not prevent heartache, disappointment, and sadness.

            If we follow the imagery of the Nubian ibex goat, when we encounter difficult paths or predators we turn to God who can help us walk without stumbling. Just as a Nubian ibex goat can move swiftly through steep rocky terrain, we too can make it through difficult circumstances. Not only will we get through the trials, but we will rise above them as a symbol of victor. Like the Nubian ibex goat that rises above problems, we get a new perspective on our problems when we have faith in God. We eventually realize, “God, that’s why you closed that door,” or “God, that’s why you made me walk through those trials.”

            When nothing makes sense and when everything falls apart, that’s when we trust God and look to God to get us through it all. As pastor Mark Hitchcock has said, “The bigger God is to us, the smaller our troubles will seem. And the smaller God is, the larger our troubles will seem.”[6] At some point we need to take our eyes off our difficulties and look to God because God is the only one that can help us get through tough experiences.

            With God we can endure difficulties and trials because he sustains us. He’ll walk with us through our troubles, help us endure temptation, make a way for us to live with a disability, and show us how to endure poor times. He did that for Habakkuk, and I know he will do that for you and me too.


[1] Michelle Obama, The Light We Carry: Overcoming in Uncertain Times (New York: Penguin Random House, 2022), 36–38, 44, 47.

[2] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[3] Tony Evans, Evans Bible Commentary (Nashville, TN: B&H Publishing, 2019), 830.

[4] “Nubian ibex,” Wikipedia, accessed August 24, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nubian_ibex.

[5] Here in verse nineteen we also see thesinging of strength, “For the choir director, on my stringed instruments.”This is not just a cerebral joy in a head, but an emotional joy aloud. The intent was for this to be something that the community sang together.

[6] Sermon titled, “How Big Is Your God?” (Hab 3:1-19) Aug 28, 2016. https://faithbibleok.subspla.sh/rnz6q2q Accessed May 24, 2023

Filed Under: Articles from Habakkuk

33. Rejoicing While God Works (Hab 3:18)

January 6, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

The book of Habakkuk is unique among the prophets because it contains interactions between the prophet and God. We learned about Habakkuk’s problems in chapter one where he questions God’s inactivity. Habakkuk essentially asks God in Habakkuk 1:2–4 “How long will evil continue and when will you stop it?” God answers Habakkuk in Habakkuk 1:5–11 saying, “I’m going to stop it, I know what’s going on, and you’ll be surprised how.”

            Habakkuk asks a second question in Habakkuk 1:12—2:1. He questions God’s inconsistency and basically asks, “Why use greater sinners against less sinners?” In chapter two we see Habakkuk’s patience as he accepts God’s response. God provided his second answer to Habakkuk in Habakkuk 2:2–20 in which God basically says, “I have a plan for the future, a message for the faithful, and punishment planned for the Babylonians.” Now in chapter three Habakkuk praises God.

            In this process we are seeing Habakkuk go from a wonderer, to a watcher, and now to a worshipper. Habakkuk started in gloom, now he ends in glory. Habakkuk went from why to worship. Habakkuk’s faith has been tested (chapter 1), taught (chapter 2), and is triumphant (chapter 3).

            While Habakkuk 3:16–17 has focused on what Habakkuk feels based on what Habakkuk knows will happen, Habakkuk 3:18–19 focuses on what Habakkuk does: praise God because God saves. “Yet I will exult in the Lord, I will rejoice in the God of my salvation” (Hab 3:18, NASB).[1]

            In Habakkuk 3:18 we read the most important word of this section. There are one hundred and thirty-six words in Habakkuk 3:16–19, but the word “Yet” is most important. In spite of all the things going to happen, Habakkuk still has confidence in God.

            In Habakkuk 3:18 we also read the most important response. Habakkuk has confidence in God to deliver him. This salvation is not just spiritual salvation, but also material blessings in the future too.

            The word “exult” is not a word we use much. It means “to be extremely joyful: rejoice.” The word “exult” comes “from Latin saltare (‘to leap’), also the source of saltation, a word for leaping as well as dancing. Another etymological cousin of exult is sally, meaning ‘to leap out’ or ‘to set out,’ as in ‘After the storm passed, the hikers sallied forth.’”[2] Here we see Habakkuk does not just endure God’s plans, he exults God in those plans. Habakkuk does not just receive God’s plans, he rejoices God in those plans.

            The lesson we learn from Habakkuk 3:18 is that we rejoice in God while he works. We rejoice in God who will rescue us even when we know things will get worse before they get better. This is contrary to how we are taught in America. For Americans we are taught inner peace only occurs when outward prosperity occurs. In other words, life is only good after you’ve graduated, get a nicer car, or experience a better vacation.

            For Habakkuk inner peace did not depend on outward prosperity. For Habakkuk inner peace started with who God was and what God said would happen. Habakkuk’s feelings were not controlled by the events around him; Habakkuk’s feelings were controlled by the God above him.[3]

            Pastor Mark Hitchcock teaches about this verse, “When you and I face difficult times God often doesn’t change our circumstances. Now sometimes he does. Sometimes God comes and in his grace and in his mercy he changes the circumstances. But I would say more often than not God leaves the circumstances the way they are. But what he does is he changes us to enable us to meet the circumstances.”[4]

            Notice how the circumstances of Habakkuk have not changed, but God has changed Habakkuk. Let’s allow that to be true of ourselves as well so that we rejoice in God while he works.


[1] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[2] “Exult Definition and Meaning” Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/exult Accessed May 27, 2023

[3] We might not rejoice in our circumstances, but we can rejoice in our God. One commentary puts it like this: “Far too many people keep trying to buy joy, but happiness is not found in circumstances. Joy is available to everyone, even to those stripped of every material possession, for joy is to be found in a Person. It comes through an intimate and personal relationship with the Lord, so that even those in the worst circumstances can smile.” J. Ronald Blue, “Habakkuk,” in The Bible Knowledge Commentary: An Exposition of the Scriptures, ed. J. F. Walvoord and R. B. Zuck, vol. 1 (Wheaton, IL: Victor Books, 1985), 1521.

[4] Mark Hitchcock, “How Big Is Your God?” (Hab 3:1-19) Aug 28, 2016. https://faithbibleok.subspla.sh/rnz6q2q Accessed May 24, 2023

Filed Under: Articles from Habakkuk

32. Consequences of Disobedience (Hab 3:17)

January 4, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

At some point in our lives we learn about the consequences of behavior. I remember seeing a kid get spanked at daycare and thinking, “I don’t want to misbehave like him.” In high school I was late to class several times, received after-school detention, and realized, “I need to get to class on time.” After my first (and only) speeding ticket I attended an eight-hour traffic school class and thought, “Speeding is not worth this.”

            Consequences for behavior is something the nation of Judah and the man Habakkuk had become acquainted with. When learning about future punishment for past sins of Judah Habakkuk writes, “Though the fig tree should not blossom and there be no fruit on the vines, though the yield of the olive should fail and the fields produce no food, though the flock should be cut off from the fold and there be no cattle in the stalls” (Hab 3:17, NASB).[1]

            Here Habakkuk describes the luxuries people enjoy as well as the necessities they needed to survive. When Habakkuk tells us that “though the fig tree should not blossom and there be no fruit on the vines, though the yield of the olive should fail,”he describes the noblest fruit trees in the area. The fig tree, fruit, and olive represent choicest products of the land.[2]

            When Habakkuk tells us “the fields produce no food, though the flock should be cut off from the fold and there be no cattle in the stalls,”he describes necessary items. The grain of the fields, the flock, and the cattle are the necessary items that produce bread, milk, and meat.

            Without these items there will be no wine, no anointing oil, no vegetables, no milk, and no wool. This is a basic list of the produce and livestock that form the basis of an ancient economy. If these things go away the people cannot survive. Most importantly, this is not because of a plague or lack of rain, it will be directly from the hands of their enemies (Hab 1:6, 15). When Babylon comes to Judah they will destroy buildings, decimate crops, and ruin fields (Hab 2:2–20).

            Imagine what life would be like if our country’s stock market closed, the banks did not  open, the grocery stores were not able to get produce, and water was not flowing. Devastation would occur.

            The lesson we learn from Habakkuk 3:17 is we recognize God will judge and do what he says. Let’s survey a little bit of Scripture to dive deeper.

            God had told Judah that judgment would occur if they disobeyed him. As Israel was about to enter the Promised Land God gave Israel one last message. In Deuteronomy 28 we read about two predictions from God. One prediction was a promise of blessings (Deut 28:1–14) and the other prediction was a promise of curses (Deut 28:15–68).[3] Deuteronomy 28:49–51 provides a good example of God’s prediction of curses for Judah that he would send if Israel disobeyed him. “The Lord will bring a nation against you from afar, from the end of the earth, as the eagle swoops down, a nation whose language you shall not understand, a nation of fierce countenance who will have no respect for the old, nor show favor to the young. Moreover, it shall eat the offspring of your herd and the produce of your ground until you are destroyed, who also leaves you no grain, new wine, or oil, nor the increase of your herd or the young of your flock until they have caused you to perish.”

            God told his people what would happen if they disobeyed him. Later God does what he said he would do. The prophet Jeremiah records the destruction of Jerusalem by the Babylonians in Lamentations 2:11–12, 20; 4:4, 9–10; 5:17–18. That destruction by the Babylonians is the one predicted in the book of Habakkuk.

            It might be easy for us living under the promises of the New Testament to believe we are exempt from God’s judgment. However, the church shouldn’t be surprised either by God’s judgment. Galatians 5:19–21 provides strong warnings for people living today and so does Galatians 6:7–8, “for whatever a man sows, this he will also reap. For the one who sows to his own flesh will from the flesh reap corruption, but the one who sows to the Spirit will from the Spirit reap eternal life.”

            I enjoy reading the Frank & Earnest comic in our local newspaper each day. In one comic Frank is reading the newspaper that has the following headline, “Wonderland News: Prince Charming in Big Trouble.” As Frank reads the newspaper he tells Earnest, “It was bound to happen eventually – Snow White, Sleeping Beauty and Cinderella met, and realized there is only one prince charming.”[4] The lesson is that our wrong deeds eventually catch up to us.

            Scripture teaches us that there are penalties for sin in a Christian’s life. There’s a loss of fellowship (1 John 1:6), church excommunication (1 Cor 5:4–5), chastisement (Hebrews 12:6), and sometimes even physical death (1 Cor 11:30). When we do wrong, sin, and violate God’s commands, then we should recognize that God will judge us and do what he says.


[1] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[2] As seen in Joel 1:7; Hosea 2:12; Mic 4:4; 6:15; Deut 6:11; 8:8.

[3] There are four times as many curses as there are blessings, either to follow ANE treaties or to foreshadow the future failure of Israel to keep the covenant.

[4] Bob Thaves and Thom Thaves, image #193356. Published March 18, 2022.

Filed Under: Articles from Habakkuk

31. Embracing the Wait (Hab 3:16)

January 4, 2026 by Christopher L. Scott

No one likes to wait for things. We pay extra money so we don’t have to wait in long security lines at the airport, we order food on our phone so that it’s ready when we arrive, and we pay for memberships to Amazon so that our online orders can be delivered to our homes the same day. But in our spiritual lives sometimes the only thing we can do is wait. Habakkuk is learning to wait on God in Habakkuk 3:16.

            It’s important to remember that Habakkuk 3:16 comes right after the theophany of Habakkuk 3:3–15. In Habakkuk 3:3–7 we saw an awesome appearance of God. In Habakkuk 3:8–15 we saw the amazing acts of God. Thus, we now read about Habakkuk’s position as he responds to that theophany in Habakkuk 3:16: “I heard and my inward parts trembled, at the sound my lips quivered. Decay enters my bones, and in my place I tremble. Because I must wait quietly for the day of distress, for the people to arise who will invade us” (NASB).[1]

            In this verse we read aboutwho Habakkuk talks about,“For the people to arise who will invade us.” This refers to the nation of Babylon that will come punish Judah for their sins (Hab 1:6, 15). 

            In this verse we also read about what Habakkuk feels. “I heard and my inward parts trembled, at the sound my lips quivered. Decay enters my bones, and in my place I tremble.” Habakkuk is about to collapse. Habakkuk is paralyzed. This reminds us of Exodus 15:14 when the nations were trembling before God as God led Israel out of Egypt.

            In this verse we also read about why Habakkuk feels fear, “Because I must wait quietly for the day of distress, for the people to arise who will invade us.”The word “Because” is from the Hebrew word, ’esher which reveals the terrible devastations that God’s own people must undergo. This tells us why Habakkuk trembles. Habakkuk feels something is going to happen and he can’t do anything about it. Habakkuk is upset and distressed because nothing will stop the Lord’s punishment of Judah by the Babylonians.This is the reason the prophet trembles from head to toe. Habakkuk is upset because he must wait quietly for those plans to be fulfilled.

            The lesson we learn from Habakkuk 3:16 is we rest while we wait for God to work. Habakkuk had been told these things will happen, and now Habakkuk waits for them to happen.Sometimes we have to wait while God does his work. That’s what Habakkuk has to do here. There’s nothing he can do but rest and wait for God to work. Habakkuk has learned how great God is, and now Habakkuk waits for the great God to do what he said he would.

            I appreciate Dr. Taylor Turkington’s perspective on this verse in Habakkuk. She writes, “Habakkuk is afraid, yet there’s hope: he believes what God said. Even in his fear, even in panic, he believes God will do what he promised, which means he knows his powerful God will ultimately bring justice on the bloodthirsty and greedy coming their way.”[2]

            Part of following God means learning to surrender and trust God. We need to learn to trust his character. That’s hard for some of us. We don’t like to trust others. We don’t like to surrender to others. But sometimes the only thing we can do is wait, just as Habakkuk did.


[1] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[2] Taylor Turkington, Trembling Faith: How a Distressed Prophet Helps Us Trust God in a Chaotic World (Brentwood, TN: B&H, 2023), 183.

Filed Under: Articles from Habakkuk

30. Direction in the Midst of Disaster (Hab 3:16-19)

December 26, 2025 by Christopher L. Scott

Sometimes things don’t work out the way we thought they should or would. Patti experienced that in 2021. After spending years getting her doctorate degree she was working at a Christian college in Portland in administration. She was doing what she loved in a city she loved. She thought she would do that job until her retirement. But after the COVID pandemic, riots in Portland, and a recession that later occurred, the school decided to close. Patti went from doing what she thought she’d do until retirement to looking for a job. Everything in her world changed in just a few months.

            Patti had a plan but God’s plan was different than her plan. Some things we go through don’t work out like we thought they would. You might have pondered one or more of the following: I thought I would have children by now. I thought I would be a manager by now. I thought my college education would be more meaningful. I thought I would be retired and be enjoying my golden years. I thought my children would have left the home by now.

            When God’s plan doesn’t follow our plan we need to recognize the dissonance. What do we do when God changes our plan? What do we do when God gives us an answer we didn’t expect? What do we do when God gives an answer we didn’t want?

            Habakkuk was in that place. He saw injustice and wickedness in Judah, so he asked God when God would intervene and stop evil in Judah (Hab 1:2–4; 1:12—2:1). God replied that he would send the Babylonians to punish Judah for their sins (Hab 1:5–11; 2:2–20).

            We read part of Habakkuk’s response to hearing God’s plans in Habakkuk 3:16–19. “I heard and my inward parts trembled, at the sound my lips quivered. Decay enters my bones, and in my place I tremble. Because I must wait quietly for the day of distress, for the people to arise who will invade us. Though the fig tree should not blossom and there be no fruit on the vines, though the yield of the olive should fail and the fields produce no food, though the flock should be cut off from the fold and there be no cattle in the stalls, yet I will exult in the Lord, I will rejoice in the God of my salvation. The Lord God is my strength, and He has made my feet like hinds’ feet, and makes me walk on my high places” (Hab 3:16–19, NASB).[1]

            Habakkuk praises God even though he knows judgment is coming. Habakkuk trusts God to protect him through the coming troubles. Dr. Taylor Turkington writes, “Habakkuk lands us where the scriptures do over and over again, at God’s feet, recognizing the great value of knowing him over everything else.”[2] From Habakkuk 3:16–19 we learn that God will enable us to endure the trials God sets before us. We also learn that we can endure the trials we see in front of us if we look to the God above us.


[1] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[2] Taylor Turkington, Trembling Faith: How a Distressed Prophet Helps Us Trust God in a Chaotic World (Brentwood, TN: B&H, 2023), 191.

Filed Under: Articles from Habakkuk

29. What a Big God (Hab 3:3-15)

December 26, 2025 by Christopher L. Scott

In the early twentieth-century Donald Grey Barnhouse was recognized as an amazing preacher in America. Barnhouse had graduated from Princeton Seminary and was asked to return there to preach to the students. His mentor, Robert Dick Wilson, a scholar and highly respected Hebrew professor at Princeton Seminary sat in the front of the room while Barnhouse preached.

            Barnhouse was surprised to see Dr. Wilson approaching him after the service. “When my boys come back, I come to see if they are big-godders or little-godders, and then I know what their ministry will be,”[1] Dr. Wilson said.

            Barnhouse then asked Dr. Wilson to explain what he meant. “Well, some men have a little god and they are always in trouble with him. He can’t do any miracles. He can’t take care of the inspiration and transmission of the Scriptures to us. He doesn’t intervene on behalf of his people. They have a little god and I call them little-godders. Then there are those who have a great God. He speaks and it is done. He commands and it stands fast. He knows how to show himself strong on behalf of them that fear him.”[2]

            According to Dr. Wilson, Donald Grey Barnhouse was a “big-godder.” He worshipped a big God that was in control of the world and could do mighty works.

            In Habakkuk 3:3–15 we see Habakkuk showing the size of God to Judah as they prepare to go through the purging judgment of Babylon in the next couple of years. Habakkuk 3:3b describes one of the awesome appearances of God, “His splendor covers the heavens, and the earth is full of his praise.”[3] Habakkuk 3:13 describes one of the amazing acts of God, “You went forth for the salvation of Your people, for the salvation of Your anointed. You struck the head of the house of the evil to lay him open from thigh to neck. Selah.”          

            Habakkuk 3:3–15 contains a visual revelation. These verses are a positive response to Habakkuk’s prayer for divine mercy in Habakkuk 3:1–2. In response to Habakkuk’s prayer (recorded in Hab 3:1–2) God gives Habakkuk a reminder of God’s past mighty acts. Those reminders of God’s past mighty acts are designed to stimulate faith in God for the future.

            Habakkuk 3:3–15 is a theophany.[4] A theophany is a manifestation of God on earth and “an appearance of God in great power and glory.”[5] We must remember that we worship a big God that overcomes any situation we are in, that produces good even in troubled times, and that shines light in only darkness.

            I love this quote from Warren Wiersbe, “There is no substitute for good theology, whether in our sermons or in our songs. The shallowness of some contemporary sermons, books, and songs may be the major contributing factor to the weakness of the church and the increase in ‘religious entertainment’ in meetings where we ought to be praising God. The thing that lifted Habakkuk to the mountaintop was his understanding of the greatness of God. We need a return to the kind of worship that focuses on the glory of God and seeks to honor Him alone.”[6]

            Like Donald Grey Barnhouse, we need to be “big-godders.” Let’s worship a big God, focus on his glory, and seek to honor him alone.


[1] Donald Grey Barnhouse, Let Me Illustrate (Revell, 1967), 132–33.

[2] Ibid.

[3] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

[4] The clearest theophany in Scripture, besides Habakkuk 3:3–15, is Exodus 19:9, 18.

[5] Waylon Bailey, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, vol. 20,  The New American Commentary (Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers, 1999), 358.

[6] Warren Wiersbe, Be Amazed: Restoring an Attitude of Wonder and Worship (Colorado Springs: David C. Cook, 2010), 163.

Filed Under: Articles from Habakkuk

The Miracle of Christmas (Luke 1:26-35; Phil 2:6-7)

December 24, 2025 by Christopher L. Scott

In his book, The Case for Miracles, Lee Strobeldefines miracles this way: “miracles are outside the normal course of events. They’re a supernatural exception to the way the world usually works.”[1]

            Richard Purtill, who was professor emeritus of philosophy at Western Washington University, taught that a “miracle is an event (1) brought about by the power of God that is (2) a temporary (3) exception (4) to the ordinary course of nature (5) for the purpose of showing that God has acted in history.”[2]

            I think we can apply both of those definitions to the birth of Jesus. He was born by God’s power, the Holy Spirit. Mary was the only one who had a baby without having relations with a man. It showed God had acted in history.

            While we all agree it was a miracle that Mary became pregnant while a virgin and that the baby was the son of God, I think we often forget that it was a miracle that there was even a nation of Israel for Jesus to be born into. Let’s trace Israel’s history.

            About 2100 years before Christ was born, God spoke to a man named Abram who was seventy-five years old. God told Abram to move his family 1000 miles from Ur to the land we know as Israel (Gen 12:1–3). He was told by God to establish his family there, even though Abram did not know anyone there and had no idea of what to expect. He traveled those 1000 miles by foot, and twenty-five years later God finally gave Abram and Sara a son whom God said would grow into the nation of Israel (Gen 21:1–7).

            About 2000 years before Christ was born, a severe famine (Gen 47:13) came across all of the land in the ancient Near East (the region around the Mediterranean Sea). People were dying (Gen 47:15) and families were selling their kids into slavery to get money for food. But God, through his providence, had placed Abraham’s great grandson Joseph in a prominent job in Egypt with resources, and Abraham’s family continued to live because of God’s placement of Joseph in Egypt (Gen 47:11–12).

            About 1400 years before Christ was born, the Jews were in slavery in Egypt (Exod 1:8–14). Life was hard and difficult for them, but God still wanted them to be a unique people in the land of Israel (Exod 19:5–6). So God dramatically led them out of Egypt and to the land God had originally promised to Abraham (Ezek 12:37—15:21).

            About 600 years before Christ was born, the Jews were taken into exile by Babylon (2 Kings 24:1—25:30). Even though the Babylonians worked hard to indoctrinate their captives and make their subjugated people “Babylonian”, God preserved the Jews while in exile and helped them remain unique and distinct (Dan 1:8–16).

            About 500 years before Christ was born when the Jews were in Babylon, the Babylonians were conquered by the Persians. The Persian king allowed the Jews to return to their land (under king Cyrus, Ezra 1:1–11), rebuild their temple (under king Darius, Ezra 6:1–22), and eventually rebuild the walls around their city (under king Artaxerxes, Neh 1:1—7:3).

            About 475 years before Christ was born, a group of Jews still lived in Persia. But a man named Haman in Persia hated the Jews and convinced the king of Persia to write a decree that would kill all of the Jews living in Persia (Esth 3:8–15). However, God provided an alternative decree to allow the Jews to defend themselves (Esth 8:5–14). In a dramatic way, the Jews continued to exist in Persia even after a decree was made allowing the Persian people to kill the Jews (Esth 9:1–9).[3]

            About 300 years before Christ was born, a man named Alexander the Great conquered the known world. Alexander the Great conquered territory from northern Africa into southern Russia, as far as what we know is India today. Along with Alexander the Great came the most enlightened and most sophisticated culture there was in the world, Greeks. The Jews faced a decision. Do they maintain their separateness and remain Jews, or do they become Greeks like Alexander the Great wanted them to? With God’s help, the Jews continued to be unique and distinct in spite of the pressure to assimilate into Greek culture.

            Alexander the Great died in 331 BC, and his kingdom was divided up into four parts (called the Diadochi). Two of those parts became important for Israel: Syria, ruled by the Seleucids (“the kingdom of the north”) and Egypt, ruled by the Ptolemies (“the kingdom of the south”). From 274–168 BC there were six wars between Syria and Egypt. Israel was literally caught in the middle between them and became a pawn in their wars because Israel was a strategic piece of land that had direct access to the Mediterranean Sea. Eventually, the Seleucids of the north of Syria took control of Israel.[4] And later the Romans grew in power and influence and gained control of Israel.

            That’s the history of the Jewish people whom God miraculously preserved because God promised to Abraham and to King David (2 Sam 7:11–16) that there would be a people to whom the Messiah would be born.

            It’s a miracle that the Holy Spirit conceived Jesus inside Mary, that she became pregnant without ever being with a man, and that God became human among us. But it is also a miracle that there was even a nation for Jesus to be born into.

            As if that’s not enough, we see those past miracles still existing today. There is a people of Israel in the land of Israel. While some people debate whether or not Israel should be there or has a right to be there, most of us cannot debate the unlikeliness that Israel would be there. Most of us have to admit that it’s a modern miracle that Israel is back in the land.[5] The Jews were conquered by Babylon in 605 BC and ceased to be a people without a land for more than 2,500 years until their return to the land in 1948.[6]

            The miracle of Christmas is this: The Son of God left his throne in heaven, and he came to earth. Paul describes this in his letter to the believers in the city of Philippi, “who, although He existed in the form of God, did not regard equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied Himself, taking the form of a bond-servant, and being made in the likeness of men” (Phil 2:6–7, NASB).[7]

            The miracle of Christmas is that God came to us. He did not tell us a list of rules or sacrifices by which we are supposed to approach him. Instead, he took initiative. He came to us as one of us, and we celebrate that on Christmas when Christ the Savior was born as a baby.

            What a miracle it was that God became a human, but it is also a miracle that the nation of Israel still existed for him to be born into.

            When we praise God this Christmas, we praise him for the whole picture—not just the baby—but all the miracles that led up to that baby, the miracles we see today, and the miracles yet to come. That’s the miracle of Christmas.


[1] Lee Strobel, The Case for Miracles (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2018), 252.

[2] Richard L. Purtill, “Defining Miracles,” in In Defense of Miracles: A Comprehensive Case for God’s Action in History, ed. R. Douglas Geivett and Gary R. Habermas (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1997), 71. Quoted in Lee Strobel, The Case for Miracles (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2018), 27.

[3] Next we find the silent years, that period of time between Malachi and Matthew. We have 400 years where no Scripture is spoken to the nation of Israel. But God was still active in preserving Israel.

[4] In 175 Antiochus IV (Epiphanes) came to power.

[5] Their temple was destroyed in AD 70 and for the next 1900 years Jews live in scattered locations all around the world.

[6] There was a short period of time when Israel reclaimed their temple in 164 BC. This we call the Maccabean revolt. The conflict between the Seleucids rose drastically when Antiochus (IV) Epiphanies erected an altar in the Jewish temple and sacrificed pigs to the pagan god, Zeus. This act was predicted by Daniel (Dan 11:31) and became a model for what the New Testament mentions as the Abomination of Desolation (Dan 9:27; Matt 24:15). With that act, Antiochus commanded Jews to offer similar sacrifices at other locations. The pious Jews had reached their limit of the Pagan attacks on their faith. The Maccabean revolt was the result. The Maccabean revolt began when a priest, Mattathiah, and his five sons killed an Israelite about to offer one of those pagan sacrifices. What followed was a three-year guerrilla war campaign. Mattathiah died, but his son Judas Maccabeus became a fierce leader, and they claimed victory in 164 BC. This victory began a period of rule by the Jews known as the Hasmoneans, the family name of Matthias’s ancestry. This was the only time since the Babylonian exile that Israel had political control of her temple and her land. The Hasmonean dynasty, while producing extreme hope in the Jews, only lasted until 37 BC. (Bock, Studying the Historical Jesus, p. 90).

[7] Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

Filed Under: Articles for Advent

  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 5
  • Go to Next Page »

Copyright © 2026 · Christopher L. Scott · 810 S. Evergreen Dr., Moses Lake, WA 98837